Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

The three main levels of sexual contact

RottenWillow

Plat Hero
Platinum
According to Annabelle Florez

1) making love- high on the emotionality, a bit lower on the hormones

2) having sex- much less emotion, likely to be friends though, much higher on the hormones

3)Fucking- I need you to fuck me hard . No emotion, may not even like the other person. Pure, unbridled lust.
 
hamstershaver said:
no emotion and pure umbridled lust in the same sentance is an oxymoron
Disagree. Unbridled lust would be the complete absence of inhibitions which is not the same thing as lack of affection.

BTW, people who are in love can fuck and/or have sex.
 
My testosterone is too high for number 1.

I will gladly take numbers 2 and 3 though.
 
anya said:
Disagree. Unbridled lust would be the complete absence of inhibitions which is not the same thing as lack of affection.

BTW, people who are in love can fuck and/or have sex.



thats not what im saying, im saying that is is impossible to have NO EMOTION in pure umbridled lust
 
TQpew said:
don't distinguish between 2 and 3. both fucking.

That's really the reason I posted my own definitions cause I do make this distinction and I think most people dont.

Everything else being equal, would it mean the same thing to you in both instances if in one case a girl asked you to "have sex with her" and in another she asked you to "fuck her". Same tone of voice, same facial expressions, no other differences apart from the word choice. Is your interpretation of what she wants to do with you exactly the same in both instances or different?
 
I think of a "fuck" as a wham-bam thank you ma'am kinda thing. Where having sex is more of a time duration thing, and making love is a different emotional plain.
 
#1 - I disagree on the hormonal issue: after all it is the abundance of hormones and neurotransmitters that is responsible for 'emotionality'

#2 - under this condition #1 and #3 fall - all stems from having sex, the direction you choose depends on the object of sex: lover vs fuckbuddy

#3 - when you have 30 mins to get to your lectur/class/job/etc on the one hand and a chick on the other hand the combination of the two will result in #3

:velvett:
 
hamstershaver said:
thats not what im saying, im saying that is is impossible to have NO EMOTION in pure umbridled lust

Oh gotcha. The statements are contadictory you're saying? sorry

Mmmmm.....still disagree. But I appreciate your comments.
 
I'll take all three in one session.
 
anya said:
That's really the reason I posted my own definitions cause I do make this distinction and I think most people dont.

Everything else being equal, would it mean the same thing to you in both instances if in one case a girl asked you to "have sex with her" and in another she asked you to "fuck her". Same tone of voice, same facial expressions, no other differences apart from the word choice. Is your interpretation of what she wants to do with you exactly the same in both instances or different?

i can see where some people would make the distinction. i just never did. more than one ex gf accused me of being an emotional robot. i guess it's the subtle distinctions like this that keep them from becomeing "ex" gf's.
 
Right now, Id take all of the above and for once, i agree with hamsterbutt...I guess some people can have sex with no feelings what so ever..but i couldnt, I would at least have to know their name.
 
Top Bottom