Test or primo

[spursmad]

Thanks for the replays there really helping me make my mind up

 

[bigorse]

your more likely to have issues with LOW test.. many in those studies are already unhealthy... test is needed for many functions in body, not just muscle.
using primo or other aas shut DOWN your natty production of test, this is bad. so the question is not primo or test. its test solo or test and primo...... I rec test only first go around.... with an AI during cycle and 4-5 week pct of clomid and tamoc ed

Good post

 

[ceo]

Test. Because primo is worthless for gains and mostly worthless at under 800mg. If you like to throw money away though...

 

[buttbeater]

Real primo is not garbage on its own. I ran 400 mgs a week ten years ago and put on 12lbs of rock muscle.

 

[RADAR]

Real primo is not garbage on its own. I ran 400 mgs a week ten years ago and put on 12lbs of rock muscle.

Yes, it is the most highly faked compound out there. Its not unusual to get EQ mixed as primo.

 

[buttbeater]

I've ran both a few times each and know the difference right away, real primo will make your muscles hard as steal with an increase in strength and a slight decrease in bodyfat. EQ always made me vascular, gave me an increase in muscular endurance/cardio but much in terms of size ( i don't use high doses of anything, maybe that's why)

 

[ceo]

It's only decent use if precontest. If you don't compete don't waste your money.

 

[ceo]

Then is about a million times better and cheaper too.