Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

test/eq cycle advice

zrock

New member
I was wanting to run test cyp 400mg/week and Eq 250mg/week for 12 weeks.

The only other cycle I have done was test cyp 350mg/week.

Is 250mg/week EQ enough or should I bump it up to 400.
 
4 or 500 for sure, I did low dose EQ and it was a waste, went up to 400 and it showed, very similar to the wait with deca, but when it comes you know it, strength and hardness about week 6, very noticable week 8
 
250mg of EQ is a waste.... bump it up to 400 and run it w/your proposed test dosage for 12 weeks.
 
Hey bro,

I'm actually looking to run a very similar cycle. I had a bunch of responses and it answered some specific questions for me:

http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=442999

Everything I've read leads me to believe that EQ would be the most effective if run at 400mg+/wk for atleast 12 weeks. I was planning 500mg of test-e but that's just because the Test-E is 250mg/ml rather than cyp's 200mg/ml.

I'll be keeping an eye on this thread. Have you figured out how and where you're going to inject?

Goodluck.
 
do 400mg+

I'm running the same cycle. I threw in 250mg of test e for libido and a couple other reasons.

www.spotinjections.com - Rejection


If your using 500mg/ml EQ I've found that 23g are the best. 22g leaves me too sore, 25g I had the needle in me for over a min.(Wasn't very smart choice I know). It's only one injection a week in alternating glutes.
 
rejection_juice said:
Everything I've read leads me to believe that EQ would be the most effective if run at 400mg+/wk for atleast 12 weeks. I was planning 500mg of test-e but that's just because the Test-E is 250mg/ml rather than cyp's 200mg/ml.

The EQ needs to be more that the Test.

And the dosing of Test E, Test Cyp., or any other compound depends on the lab.
 
wirednutz said:
The EQ needs to be more that the Test.

And the dosing of Test E, Test Cyp., or any other compound depends on the lab.

is there a specific reason why eq should be run higher than test or is it just because if you need that much test you would also need more eq.
 
donsj said:
4 or 500 for sure, I did low dose EQ and it was a waste, went up to 400 and it showed, very similar to the wait with deca, but when it comes you know it, strength and hardness about week 6, very noticable week 8

Right on Donsj
my buddy just ran same cycle. Exact figures as donsj just stated. Fully use the EQ use @ 500mg wk and for atleast 12 weeks. anything less or run shorter is just a waste of money.
BTW my buddy ran test @ 750mg with the 500mg EQ. Tremendous results. GL bro.
 
wirednutz said:
The EQ needs to be more that the Test.

QUOTE]

I disagree. I ran test e @ 250 and EQ @ 400 for 14 weeks and LOVED IT. Great slow burn, great pumps, solid LMM, kept most of my gains, low sides, throw in some liquidex for the bloat and you are golden. (nolva if gyno is an issue which it is not for me) This was a very good cycle and it you lift hard you will be happy with the gains. it may just be me as we do all respond different, but more test would of just equaled more sides/bloat.
 
Last edited:
Rapter said:
I plan on doing a Prop 75mg ed/Eq 600mg wk cycle in the summer.

I actually just plan on doing this cycle for my first every..

250mg/ew Test E
400mg/ew EQ
PCT

I'm pretty excited!!
 
what kind of gains would one expect with:

12 weeker of 600mg/wk of Test Eth. and 400mg/wk of EQ

strength?
size?
hardness?
 
actually its 600mg/wk of test and 600mg/wk of eq

i looked at the dosage on the eq wrong

how much better is this compared to just Test Eth. alone?
this will be my 2nd cycle
 
Rapter said:
I plan on doing a Prop 75mg ed/Eq 600mg wk cycle in the summer.

I'm going to do 75mg Test Prop ED / 500mg EQ a week for 12 weeks and throw 75mg of Tren ED for the last 6 weeks. Looks like Spring fever is starting to set in for most of us!
 
Test does not need to be lower than EQ. Everyone needs to keep in mind that test is the king of AAS. The only reason others were created was to minimize sides. With that in mind it's obvious that one should run the highest dose of test possible vs. the sides. I always run test as the highest AAS in my cycle or it's at least equal to anything else. I don't know where this 250 mgs/wk of test theory came up, but I can guarantee you'll feel better and have much better gains by using at least 400 mgs/wk.
 
Makavelli said:
Test does not need to be lower than EQ. Everyone needs to keep in mind that test is the king of AAS. The only reason others were created was to minimize sides. With that in mind it's obvious that one should run the highest dose of test possible vs. the sides. I always run test as the highest AAS in my cycle or it's at least equal to anything else. I don't know where this 250 mgs/wk of test theory came up, but I can guarantee you'll feel better and have much better gains by using at least 400 mgs/wk.

I don't think I have ever done this but I am going to disagree with mak here...sort of. You are right that the test doesn't HAVE to be lower than the EQ but that is an option. I ran it for the low test sides and not only had low sides but felt quite good. You CAN run more test if you prefer but there isn't generally any harm done by having the EQ higher than the test. Test is the king, but it depends on your goals I think. It is obvious to run the most test vs. the sides and I did that for me; it is a personal choice I think. You can feel better while running a higher dose of test vs a lower does, but you can also win 50 million versus 25 million in the lotto, both are going to make you happy and I'll take either over niether. :D
 
I'm acne prone, so I have considered a cycle of only 150mg test e, and 600mg eq for 12 weeks.

I'm hoping I won't get acne from this - thats the main reason I'd run low T, to minimize acne.
 
Top Bottom