Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries

samoth said:
I've been studying the Weyl curvature hypothesis applied to initial spacetime singularities necessitating a time-asymmetric quantum theory of gravity. I wish everyone would use the same damn notation with tensor analysis. It's hard to find a geometrical approach to QG, it seems that everyone tries the QM approach.

Hmm... I could use a missle or two. We'd make this summer a blast!



:cow:
what?
 
samoth said:
lol

www.wikipedia.org

They actually are pretty thorough with respect to math and physics. I always use them for looking up encyclopedia stuff and the like.



:cow:
maybe tomorrow, im headed to bed
 
probably this little piece of trash should be added to the mix: the Female Eunuch from that fucking cuntrag, Germaine Greer.

I have met her a few times in person, and she is as obnoxious in person as she her books are.
 
Last edited:
AAP said:
Nothing by Anne Cuntler?

you can't make the list if no one reads your books.
 
Last edited:
MattTheSkywalker said:
you can't maje the list if no one reads your books.


It's funny, I've checked out Fox News website, and they have a list of "What They Are Reading"

Nowhere on that list does Ann Coulter appear.

I would have thought they would have at least one of her books listed.
 
FreeballinDC said:
It's funny, I've checked out Fox News website, and they have a list of "What They Are Reading"

Nowhere on that list does Ann Coulter appear.

I would have thought they would have at least one of her books listed.

She's been out of the news for a while now, thankfully. People like her only profit from ignorance and demagoguery...which...is never a good thing. Not hearing from her again would be nice.

Glad to hear that her books are not even being read by the Fox crowd.
 
samoth said:
lol

www.wikipedia.org

They actually are pretty thorough with respect to math and physics. I always use them for looking up encyclopedia stuff and the like.



:cow:

I think wikipedia is so thorough with respect to science and math is because scientists, mathematicians, and yes, us ENGINEERS, actually care about what is defined there.
 
curling said:
How can the Bible be on the list it was written before the 19th century. Why don't read the thread before making lame comments.

It's still on sale isn't it?
 
Top Bottom