mrplunkey
New member
Source: Blomberg
Effect of Bush Tax Cuts to Brackets:
39.6 -> 35%
31 -> 28%
28 -> 25%
15 split and dropped to 10%
2013 Financial Impact by Bracket:
cost of reducing 39.6% bracket = $52B
cost of reducing 31% and 28% brackets = $84B
cost of reducing 15% bracket = $54B
So total cost of bracket reduction = $190B
Current year's deficit = $1,010B
-------------------------
So to sustain our spending, here are the brackets we'd need:
39.6% -> 64%
31% and 28% brackets -> 47% and 44%
15% -> 41.5%
And if we only took the top bracket to 64% and left the others alone, we'd still run a $734B deficit.
If we took the top bracket to 100% and left the others alone, $386B deficit.
This math doesn't add up. Why are we even having a tax discussion over such useless tax increases?
Effect of Bush Tax Cuts to Brackets:
39.6 -> 35%
31 -> 28%
28 -> 25%
15 split and dropped to 10%
2013 Financial Impact by Bracket:
cost of reducing 39.6% bracket = $52B
cost of reducing 31% and 28% brackets = $84B
cost of reducing 15% bracket = $54B
So total cost of bracket reduction = $190B
Current year's deficit = $1,010B
-------------------------
So to sustain our spending, here are the brackets we'd need:
39.6% -> 64%
31% and 28% brackets -> 47% and 44%
15% -> 41.5%
And if we only took the top bracket to 64% and left the others alone, we'd still run a $734B deficit.
If we took the top bracket to 100% and left the others alone, $386B deficit.
This math doesn't add up. Why are we even having a tax discussion over such useless tax increases?