Here let me help you out because it appears you don't know the entire story or just choose not to know or you are holding some stereotype grudge that is blinding your judgement. He put here personal info out there first, then she retaliated by putting his personal info out there. They were both wrong and even at that time. He has been relentlessly stalking her lately, she asked him to stop, he would not stop. SQT warned him to stop, again, he would not stop.. Hence, your "tit for tat" theory is refuted.
According to your "rules" he should be banned, that is the bottom-line and the end-of-the-story. SQT asked me to cease fire with him. I lived up to my end of the bargain by not replying to any of his posts nor even mentioning his name on the forum and so did Cindy, which I find absurd because the "one" thread was about Cindy and I, and he felt so compelled to insult us because his fragile ego has been shattered. Therefore, that refutes your claim of him not being a crybaby. If he does not care about her, then why did he post in that thread, why would he start threads about her? Why is every other word that he types is "Cindy"? Why was he crying over her the other night like a little bitch? I asked SQT to junk that thread in order to prevent further conflict, that goes to show you how much I really give a fuck about him. I could have easily went to war with him but I opted to disregard him, and that is about all he is worth, to be "disregarded." All he did was find a different avenue to harass Cindy, and he did without regard to the rules and the warnings. We abided by the forum rules, he did not, he blatantly disobeyed a mod's directive after a stern warning. It appears, you arbitrarily decide who should be banned and who does not instead of going by the forum protocol. Insinuating Cindy is equally to blame at this juncture is ridiculous, anyone who has the reading comprehension of 1st grade kid would be able to instantly see he is the culprit, and a psychotic wack-job, and should be automatically banned without hesitation.
There is a difference between taking a potshot at someone here and there, and putting someone's name in "one inch bold letters" for the world to see, meaning he is deliberately and openly stalking her in case you can't discern that? She never started a thread about his criminal record nor did she use his real name, he constantly starts threads about her and uses her name. All he had to do was ignore her post about his "criminal record" because she did not produce actual "evidence." Consequently, his guilty conscious took over and made his own situation worse. If I was Him (and I am glad I am not) I would have told her to show proof about my criminal record in order to bait her to violate the rules, but he is too stupid and his whole identity depends on what people from a roid site think of him, he played himself, yeah, he totally played himself. As far as I knew Cindy could have been lying because she never posted any "primary documents" about him. However, he openly admitted he did the crime. So, do actually believe what people say about other people without them producing evidence? If you want to go by the rules, she never posted any "real documents" about him on an "open forum." I told Cindy she was wrong about a few things and to stop dealing with him, and leave him alone, and she has, yeah she has. You can speculate all you want about her indirectly taking potshots at him on open forum, you have no proof, your argument holds no water. SQT can say all she wants about Cindy telling his business outside of this site, that is irrelevant to the rules of this site. There is tons of proof he has been stalking her since SQT implemented that gag order, he is violating the rules. He is unequivocally the culprit since SQT handed down the warnings, and you are justifying his mischievous behavior by making a comparison to what happened in the wrong time frame.
Start from the time SQT got involved, you will come to the shocking conclusion he is on a mass stalking spree and Cindy is pretty much blameless. In all fairness, she has not always been blameless, but since SQT got involved she stopped, he has not. Therefore, you are failing to reconize the situation for what it really is at this point and time, and you are refusing to reprimand him for his flagrant violations of the forum rules. I have been insulted 1,000 times by different females on this board, 90% of the time I laughed about it. He has to retaliate against a defenseless female because he is nothing but a pussy, and this site is the only place in the world where his voice is heard, and all you are doing is enabling and re-enforcing him to be the sociopath that he really is by making absurd assertions without collecting all the facts.
As for getting banned, if JG gets banned he will slice his wrists, because this all he has in life. It don't matter to me if you ban me for writing this post, I am practically daring you to ban me, lol.. All I will do is scoff at you and walk away like I was never a member of this site. Ah! Ha!
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
