Texas Ranger
New member
These are staples of Flex Wheeler and Chris Cormier in their back routines. Needless to say, their backs are AWESOME!! Has anyone else tried them? If so, have they made a big improvement in your back development???
Citruscide said:They most likely do them because of the injury that can take place due to high weight lifting and deadlifts. With full range of motion, deadlifts are quite possibly the greatest cause of injury in bodybuilders.
Using the Smith machine will most likely stablize the workout and reduce the chance of injury.
For us amatures... I'd say stick to the free bar, unless you are thinking of doing super heavy weight or are prone to back injury.
C-ditty
Hannibal said:
The deadlift itself is not the cause of injury....poor form is. The heavier weights used do increase the "risk", but if you pull properly it will not be an issue. Having a "pretty"(not strong) lower back and abs is the real issue. And not strengthening those stabilizer muscles, by taking them out of the equation with the Smith, is a bad idea..IMO.
Why is it that a majority of bodybuilders are always looking for ways around exercises. They want to modify exercises so that they are safer. Why not just learn to lift correctly?
Hannibal said:
Why is it that a majority of bodybuilders are always looking for ways around exercises. They want to modify exercises so that they are safer. Why not just learn to lift correctly?
heavywear said:I can't think of a single good reason to do them on a smith. Lots of "published" routines aren't accurate.
spatts said:If the weight doesn't start on the floor, it's a modified deadlift. The deadlift, by definition, means picking up dead weight...off the floor. Hence the name.
Citruscide said:if it works, it works.
C-ditty
bignate73 said:ps...the smith machine for deadlifts....bad idea, thats taking a stable movement and making it even more stable. get strong with that one...and throw your back out picking up groceries.
my $0.02 anyways.
bignate73 said:of all the talk about lifting near maximal weight or being injured trying to rack said weight. how much stabilizer work is done? do any of you do work with loads in anything other than the saggital plane? throw some transverse work in there, some rotation, some core stability work and chances are you will safeguard against the odd injury due to being slightly out of groove. transverse work puts you all out of the groove. this type of training doesnt have to the staple of your workouts but can work just as well as a prehab movement. dbell cleans for rotators=prehab. single leg romanian deads with a dbell or twisting lunges= comparable for trunk and ham glute complex.
Citruscide said:Sumo deadlifts are supposed to have the same ROM as regular deads, at least from what I've read and learned in my training... the sole difference is hand placement in the bar... inner grip vs. outer.
Imnotdutch said:This wide stance means that your hips are closer tot he ground when you reach lockout.......so the ROM is less for a sumo lift.
spatts said:We really need to stifle the us vs. them BS. PLers and BBers have different goals. Many, like myself, cross compete. Alot of PLers could benefit from some PURTY eating habits. That's preventative medicine too.
No one should have to sacrifice safety for results, though. So if we can share a better way to meet our needs, great. We have alot to learn from eachother.
Imnotdutch said:
I do not know where you read this but it is wrong. The range of motion on a sumo deadlift can be much less in a conventional deadlift. The difference is not realy the hand placement. The largest difference is foot placement. In sumo you use a wide stance compared to that used in a conventional DL. For example, I (and spatts I think) have my toes touching the plates when I do a sumo lift.
This wide stance means that your hips are closer tot he ground when you reach lockout.......so the ROM is less for a sumo lift.
Citruscide said:
Actual Range of Motion yes... but the bar still has to go through the same pattern. Start at floor, come up, and back down. (BTW, i'm very familiar with HOW sumo's look).
When I say the ROM should be the same, I am meaning that one should go all the way down, and then come all the way back up... I'm aware that foot placement will decrease the range the bar travels... but it must travel none-the-less.
C-ditty
spatts said:
One should never have to go further down than the floor. That's where the deadlift starts.
You aren't talking about the same deadlifts we are.
Citruscide said:Deadlifts are deadlifts. I do mine on a platform so I can have a constant motion and not have my weights hit the floor all the time.
I never said they should go further down than the floor.
spatts said:IAs always, do what works for you. The only way to find out you could be doing it better, safer, more efficiently ANOTHER way, is to try it. Until you have, you don't know.
spatts said:I agree with you imnotdutch, of course, as I have stated this throughout the thread as well. I was under the impression that the topic centers around the safest method for building the erectors. When was the last time you saw a powerlifter with lagging erectors? How do you know that if you didn't do a traditional, by the book, deadlift you wouldn't get better, safer results? This isn't really BB vs PL...back in "the day" bodybuilders DID deadlift. There was no choosing between pretty and strong. They stuck to compound basics for density, and used accessory movements for hypertrophy...not TOO unlike WSB. The thread quickly turned to whether or not a deadlft is safe. How can one determine deadlifts to be unsafe if never performed?
As always, do what works for you. The only way to find out you could be doing it better, safer, more efficiently ANOTHER way, is to try it. Until you have, you don't know.
b fold the truth said:Ya know...there comes a time when you have to quit debating, quit arguing, quit complaining, quit comparing, and quit planning...and you have to actually step into the pit of death, wrap your hands around a piece of cold steel, and challenge gravity to a duel.
There is something very productive about something so simple...
B True
spatts said:Exactly. I just consider some forms more "dangerous" than others.
Often it's not the deadlift that's the problem, it's putting it down. Many people don't have the eccentric strength to accomodate what they can pull. Prescription for disaster. A PL competition deadlift has no eccentric, so the deadlift is just that...a lift.
*This doesn't include speed deads or deads for glute/ham hypertrophy, just the 1RM.
Texas Ranger said:Splatts, I seen Flex and Chris on tape do them while being trained by Charles Glass. I think they were doing 3-4 plates on each side, nothing major.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










