Short Cycle - Primo and Masteron

[wadboram]

I ran before a short cycle of primo (2 weeks) of 300mg/wk and it made a reasonable 2 lbs gain. I'm fan of Bill Roberts's short cycles.

I'm 92 KG -174cm - 16-17% body fat - training for about 5 years.

I'm thinking of running another 2 weeks cycle with the objective of adding clean lean mass:

Week 1 : 400mg Primo & 200mg Masteron
Week 2 : 400mg Primo & 200mg Masteron

I'm thinking of adding a testosterone shot per each week.. Any suggestions? and should I increase my diet?

 

[Nelson Montana]

uh oh. Be prepared for the onslaught of people who will tell you Primo doesn't work unless you do it for at least 12 weeks. lol

Nevertheless , 2 weeks is simply too short. As for Bill Roberts, he stole that whole short cycle idea from me. Yes, I wrote about it in 1997 in an article for T nation called STEROIDS FOR HEALTH where I recomened 3 week cycles with a one week taper. He just made it a week shorter and suggested going back on sooner , which would be a very bad idea. Roberts is a bit of a tool.

Now I think 6 weeks might be more productive. Longer than that produces less gains and a harder recovery. But 2 weeks would be pretty much a waste of time, money and receptor site acceptance, beyond the fact that the Mast will give some temporary polish.

 

[stevesmi]

I agree with nelson, primo needs to be run longer. its an E ester.

if you want 2 week cycles run an oral or suspension

 

[wadboram]

Originally I was going to run 2 weeks on and 4 weeks off then repeat the cycle again.

Thanks for clarification but could you please elaborate more on how to use the two products in 3 week cycles (mg per week) with a one week taper (what's taper??)

Also, should I use testosterone with them ?

 

[stevesmi]

you don't know what you are doing!!

 

[banana monkey]

really!!!! another one.... good cycle is easy to understand... do some research please...

 

[littleb]

bro got to run it longer then two weeks, 10-12 min. if it were me it would be 16-20 primo is great, mild sides but not as fast acting or strong as test or deca.. 2 weeks is going to be counter productive..

 

[Nelson Montana]

bro got to run it longer then two weeks, 10-12 min. if it were me it would be 16-20 primo is great, mild sides but not as fast acting or strong as test or deca.. 2 weeks is going to be counter productive..

The OP's confusion aside, I must disagree that primo needs to be run at least 12 weeks and I don;t believe ANY cycle should be 20 weeks long if you want to fully recover.

I started my cycle of Primo and test just 6 weeks out from the pic in my avatar. The first one in years so my base was 100% natty. And believe me, those 6 weeks made a difference.

 

[RickRock13]

A 2 week cycle is way to short to get the benefit from Primo. It needs to be ran longer plain and simple. If you want a short cycle pick orals or a short/no ester injectible.

 

[Nelson Montana]

A 2 week cycle is way to short to get the benefit from Primo. It needs to be ran longer plain and simple. If you want a short cycle pick orals or a short/no ester injectible.

A 2 week cycle is too short for anything. Even orals.

 

[RickRock13]

A 2 week cycle is too short for anything. Even orals.

I agree completely

 

[dylangemelli]

its just an absolute waste of two of the best steroids out there... primo is not only extremely desirable but its also extremely expensive... its just such a waste to even consider doing what your doing... nelson found a method that worked for him and that's great because we all respond differently... i run primo longer and its always provided continuous gains throughout... regardless, your not even giving them a chance to start doing anything... even a prop ester would be ran longer... you really need to just take a step back and realize your not ready for this...

 

[broscience]

this guy is a retard or just trolling...there is no one out there who ever thought about doing steroids think that they could take 2 weeks of gear.
fuking getting sick of these idiots....i wanna just bash there fuking heads in.......

 

[Nelson Montana]

this guy is a retard or just trolling...there is no one out there who ever thought about doing steroids think that they could take 2 weeks of gear.
fuking getting sick of these idiots....i wanna just bash there fuking heads in.......

Like he said -- it's based on a Bill Roberts theory, which is based on my belief that shorter cycles provide better gains with less suppression over time. He simply exaggerated it for shock value. Though I'm an advocate of short cycles , cycling for j 2 weeks is just stupid.