Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
S
satchboogie
Guest
both DUTCH and WRONGUN seem to back up HBOMB.
i'm inclined to stick with the heavyweights.
i'm inclined to stick with the heavyweights.
RSOC creates a fake lab report, lots of questions to answer
- Thread starter William_WaLLace
- Start date
jasonstrong
New member
History of GAC Redstar all the same people....from many years of experience on the boards seeing scans and posts about this crap:
After selling humatren and establishing a customer base...sold thousands of vials of underdosed humatren and then admitted to a "Formulation Problem"
Claimed to have and made real Parabolan which tested out to be regular ol Tren Acetate.
Masteron tested out to be trenbelone acetate-blamed supplier of powder.
Initial lab test of Primo Tests out inert...and on and on it goes.....
After selling humatren and establishing a customer base...sold thousands of vials of underdosed humatren and then admitted to a "Formulation Problem"
Claimed to have and made real Parabolan which tested out to be regular ol Tren Acetate.
Masteron tested out to be trenbelone acetate-blamed supplier of powder.
Initial lab test of Primo Tests out inert...and on and on it goes.....
The_Eviscerator
New member
UPDATE
In the unending saga of the Primomax 200
Subject: CHECK IT OUT
I got this e-mail from a good bro who could not run our product for testing but tested his own piss to see if any primo or primo by products were found in it. This may not be the best way to test the purity of my product(s) but it does prove that there was methenolone (no duh!) in PRIMOMAX200!!! Fuckin' eh!!
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Your Primobolan From: "[email protected]" Date: Thu, July 17, 2003 4:13 pm To: --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Phil and Butters, I'm not lucky enough to be one of your customers but I do like your products. Anyhow I happened to get my hands on 2 of the bottles of primo 200 you're selling and had been running a cycle with just that and nothing else. Been doing 3cc a week for 4 weeks and let me tell you people notice the difference, there is gear in the bottles no doubt. Saw on the boards this big thing about your primo being bunk and having no steroids in it and I can vouch for sure that there is something in it. I didn't pay for something though, I paid for primo. I work at one of the labs the IOC uses for drug testing athletes for performance enhancing substances so I decided to run a little of my urine to see if any primo showed up in it. Just to let you know, I tested positive for 3a-hydroxy-1-methylen-5a-androstan-17-one which is the major metabolite of primo. So there is no doubt that what I am injecting into my arse is real primo. I can't tell you if it is properly dosed but I tell you it is some type of methenolone. I can't tell if it is methenolone acetate or enanthate. Or some other ester. But there is methenolone in it. For anyone doubting this, tell them to have there urine tested for AA's in a lab and see if they test positive for primo. If they do, they'll find 3a-hydroxy-1-methylen-5a-androstan-17-one. This is easier and cheaper then sending some sample of your gear to a lab for analysis. Also, no legality issues with doing it this way. This is what we did here at our lab - My urine was prepared in a liquid-liquid (pentane) extraction. The residue was derivatized by adding 50 microl MSTFA-NH4I-2-mercaptoethanol (1000:2:5, v/v/v), then incubated for 20 ml at 60 degrees C. A 1.5-microl aliquot of the derivatized extract was injected into the column (HP5-MS capillary column, 5% phenyl-95% methylsiloxane, 30 m x 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 microm film thickness) of a Hewlett-Packard gas chromatograph (6890 Series). 3a-hydroxy-1-methylen-5a-androstan-17-one was detected by its parent ion at m/z 406 through a Finnigan TSQ 700 MS-MS system. So can I get a list now?
Stud Lee
In the unending saga of the Primomax 200
Subject: CHECK IT OUT
I got this e-mail from a good bro who could not run our product for testing but tested his own piss to see if any primo or primo by products were found in it. This may not be the best way to test the purity of my product(s) but it does prove that there was methenolone (no duh!) in PRIMOMAX200!!! Fuckin' eh!!
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Your Primobolan From: "[email protected]" Date: Thu, July 17, 2003 4:13 pm To: --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Phil and Butters, I'm not lucky enough to be one of your customers but I do like your products. Anyhow I happened to get my hands on 2 of the bottles of primo 200 you're selling and had been running a cycle with just that and nothing else. Been doing 3cc a week for 4 weeks and let me tell you people notice the difference, there is gear in the bottles no doubt. Saw on the boards this big thing about your primo being bunk and having no steroids in it and I can vouch for sure that there is something in it. I didn't pay for something though, I paid for primo. I work at one of the labs the IOC uses for drug testing athletes for performance enhancing substances so I decided to run a little of my urine to see if any primo showed up in it. Just to let you know, I tested positive for 3a-hydroxy-1-methylen-5a-androstan-17-one which is the major metabolite of primo. So there is no doubt that what I am injecting into my arse is real primo. I can't tell you if it is properly dosed but I tell you it is some type of methenolone. I can't tell if it is methenolone acetate or enanthate. Or some other ester. But there is methenolone in it. For anyone doubting this, tell them to have there urine tested for AA's in a lab and see if they test positive for primo. If they do, they'll find 3a-hydroxy-1-methylen-5a-androstan-17-one. This is easier and cheaper then sending some sample of your gear to a lab for analysis. Also, no legality issues with doing it this way. This is what we did here at our lab - My urine was prepared in a liquid-liquid (pentane) extraction. The residue was derivatized by adding 50 microl MSTFA-NH4I-2-mercaptoethanol (1000:2:5, v/v/v), then incubated for 20 ml at 60 degrees C. A 1.5-microl aliquot of the derivatized extract was injected into the column (HP5-MS capillary column, 5% phenyl-95% methylsiloxane, 30 m x 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 microm film thickness) of a Hewlett-Packard gas chromatograph (6890 Series). 3a-hydroxy-1-methylen-5a-androstan-17-one was detected by its parent ion at m/z 406 through a Finnigan TSQ 700 MS-MS system. So can I get a list now?
Stud Lee
S
satchboogie
Guest
damn!!
thats some serious chemist lingo at the end there.
thats some serious chemist lingo at the end there.
Similar threads
