Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
ROFL @ Weiner showing his Weiner
- Thread starter mrplunkey
- Start date
mrplunkey
New member
So wind-down Fannie and Freddie? Back to a privatized mortgage market? Should we have let the banks and insurance companies that bought toxic assets go down?
What about the Fed? Good or bad thing?
Holy grasping at straws, Batman!
Why dont we do this in the interest of making things easier and wrapping up this faux-inquisition. Lets choose one of a few options:
1) Since it appears were moving on to social/religious issues, first explain to me what the fuck that has to do with your original assertion that I was a proponent of mass distribution of wealth. Last I checked, me not giving a shit about prayer in public school or wanting to keep "Christmas" as "Christmas" had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with your accusation that I am a socialist masquerading as a moderate who is looking to destroy the free market system and steal from the rich in order to give to the poor. Further proof that 95% of those who use the term "socialist" arent familiar with the definition.
Once you explain that, why dont you just compile all your questions into one single post? We dont need to use another 20 posts to go back and forth. That way I can respond to them all at once.
2) You can simply say "Hey 75th, it seems that while you and I may disagree on one or two economic issues, we seem to see eye-to-eye on the vast majority of others. I just googled the definition of a "political moderate" and it seems like you fit the criteria. I know it's not some club you were looking to join so you may not give a shit, but at least I know that going forward if you were to challenge me on an issue or two, I wouldnt be able to scream the word "SOCIALIST!" in an attempt to avoid intelligent discourse. I've taken about 9 shots in the dark so far and 8 of them have come back to blow up in my face (no homo) and have actually disproved my original thesis on my own."
Your call. Dont be afraid of option 2 - believe it or not it wouldnt be the first time you were wrong. Bonus points come along with that in the form of you not embarrassing yourself any further.
Option 1 is fine too, but again just compile all your questions into one post and give me until later tonight to reply to all of them. Im going to be busy campaigning for the return of ACORN all afternoon.
Why dont we do this in the interest of making things easier and wrapping up this faux-inquisition. Lets choose one of a few options:
1) Since it appears were moving on to social/religious issues, first explain to me what the fuck that has to do with your original assertion that I was a proponent of mass distribution of wealth. Last I checked, me not giving a shit about prayer in public school or wanting to keep "Christmas" as "Christmas" had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with your accusation that I am a socialist masquerading as a moderate who is looking to destroy the free market system and steal from the rich in order to give to the poor. Further proof that 95% of those who use the term "socialist" arent familiar with the definition.
Once you explain that, why dont you just compile all your questions into one single post? We dont need to use another 20 posts to go back and forth. That way I can respond to them all at once.
2) You can simply say "Hey 75th, it seems that while you and I may disagree on one or two economic issues, we seem to see eye-to-eye on the vast majority of others. I just googled the definition of a "political moderate" and it seems like you fit the criteria. I know it's not some club you were looking to join so you may not give a shit, but at least I know that going forward if you were to challenge me on an issue or two, I wouldnt be able to scream the word "SOCIALIST!" in an attempt to avoid intelligent discourse. I've taken about 9 shots in the dark so far and 8 of them have come back to blow up in my face (no homo) and have actually disproved my original thesis on my own."
Your call. Dont be afraid of option 2 - believe it or not it wouldnt be the first time you were wrong. Bonus points come along with that in the form of you not embarrassing yourself any further.
Option 1 is fine too, but again just compile all your questions into one post and give me until later tonight to reply to all of them. Im going to be busy campaigning for the return of ACORN all afternoon.
mrplunkey
New member
We're far from just doing social/religious issues. I'll ask you a question and you'll answer 1/3 of it. Should the banks have been bailed out? Wind-down Freddie and Fannie? Eliminate the Fed?
lol.
Ill ask you a question and you'll answer 0/3 of it.
you said:
Seems like were not far from them, right?
Should the banks have been bailed out? No.
Wind-down F&F? Yes. But we would need a private mechanism to replace them.
Eliminate the Fed? Unsure. Reduce their power/capacity? Yes.
The self-pwnage continues by Heir Plunk.
So, are we going with option 1 or option 2?
mrplunkey
New member
I'm encouraged by your answers, truth be told. We've just got to get that retarded view of nationalized HC insurance and higher taxes out of your head.
I'd like you to go with option stfu.
mrplunkey
New member
We're clearly not going with option two. You've still got that streak of libtard we'll have to deal with.
In pick3 terms, I think you like girls. But I think we'd both agree that you experiment at Cutter's at least a few times a month too.
