Repost-Stacking opposing classes of anabolics for maximum efficiency...

[manny78]

Good stuff bro

 

[jAcKiNDaBoX]

Goo post...great info.......thanks

 

[body72]

BUMP 4 a good post!!
Body

 

[Komo]

I AM CONFUSED

Hi Huck!

I am not questioning your knowledge, I just want to get some things straight!

If Dianabol works only by blocking the cortisol receptors, wouldn`t using arimidex in a dianabol only cycle eliminate negative feedback both from testosterone and estrogen.
Since dianabol doesn`t bind to progesterone receptors
this would in theory mean no testicular atrophy during cycle.
I understand that the cortisol levels will shoot through the roof, and that as soon as the dianabol is absent all this cortisol will bind to their newly free receptors leading to catabolism and negative feedback on testosterone production..... BUT STILL....

Am I right at all? Have anyone got any scientific articles on the binding affinities of different steroids, i would be very interested.....

/Komo

 

[HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex]

Dianabol does not work only by binding cortisol receptors.It causes acute up-regulation of potassium and calcium,as well as preventing calcium leaks from muscle tissue.It also hightens peripheral nervous system reaction,not to mention increasing biosynthesis of protein/decreasing protein degradation.If arimidex is used,it will keep suppression minimalized,but not stop it,as there will still be ANDROGENIC inhibition as well,not just ESTROGENIC.

 

[panerai]

I believe, Dianabol binds to AR, it's just its affinity to it is much weaker then Test's. Also, don't forget it's strong aromatic, so higher levels of converted estrogen will lead to greater strenthg, also increase in IGF-1 and GH levels.

 

[Bulldog_10]

What the fuck? I saw this thread when Huck first posted it, and I looked about an hour later and it was no where to be found! It dropped like the fuckin Berlin Wall.

This could quite possibly be the best info I've ever seen on the boards. Short and to the point, not one of those posts that goes on for 5 pages trying to prove what he's saying, because the proof is not necessary, it's common sense.

Now for all those people that say "help me come up with a good bulking/cutting cycle" here it is...Huck just gave you about 20 combinations to try.

Usually a post like this would get about 50 bumps in the first minute it was here and be a sticky, but I guess people would rather flame. I think bumpin and flamin has gotten outta hand, but I wouldn't argue if someone bumps a thread like this. Also, a flame is good once in a while (Like on that "s" thread) but only when it's humorous, not when you're making fun of someone. We're all here to learn, some of us know more then others, but we all started out with a clean slate.

I have an idea...How bout everytime Huck posts, it automatically becomes a sticky? He always seems to posts shit like this!

B-10

P.S. I think the kitty is under used!

 

[ahadpour28]

Excellent post- some of these facts have come to light based on anecdotal evidence but a rationale for it and some background makes it all make sense.

 

[Buffalo Joe]

great post!!! awesome for first time users through vets. i believe as others do short and to the point .

thanks

 

[Buffalo Joe]

bump it again just to keep it at top