Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply puritysourcelabs US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ Raptor Labs UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAKUS-PHARMACIESRaptor Labs

Proposal for those in higher tax brackets

I think you should get a little extra something for actually paying into the tax system. Nothing crazy or anything that will cost money, but just a few conveniences.

Like, you get to go to the front of the line at the courthouse, DMV, etc.

Get your first speeding ticket of the year as a warning, no report to insurance companies...

What other added benefits might make it less painful to pay for the rest of the plebs?
 
A free 50 years block of time added to the death clock embedded in their forearms
 
Nope. No special privileges. The right thing to do is to not have tax brackets. A flat tax, whether 2% or 30% (the same rate for everybody from after-school McDonald's clerk to oil investor), is much more fair and would bring in a HUGELY increased amount of tax revenue. Why? Ask me why someone might leave rental houses and apartments sitting empty for 3 or 4 years in perfect condition and with tenants happy to move in any minute. Ask me why a factory might have plenty of money and work, to hire 10 more people NOW, but won't since it already has 49 employees... These things go on all day every day, and that's a lot of lost housing, lost jobs, lost tax revenue, and Obama and the Dems will never let the Press write about it. NOT ONLY do we have this goofy tax bracket schedule where people have to pay a bigger percentage for the more they earn (in other words, say you earn $100K, you take home about $70K. But if you earn $130K, you take home $68K. The numbers here are hypothetical, but the formula is FACT. There is a window of income, where if you make more, you keep less. How does that encourage anyone to work harder? It encourages me to pass up business opportunities, and pass up hiring people, and pass up lots of things that might be very nice on the economy. And it really pisses me off when people think "rich people don't pay enough tax". I don't blurt out private stuff on the Internet generally, but peoples' taxes are in fact public record, and there's no reason to hide anything because if someone wants to find out, they can look it up. So sit down... In the tax year 2006, we made a terrible mistake by operating a business which did fine that year, but guess what? It made just enough to knock us into "alt min" (alternative minimum tax), which caused me to have to go stand in line at the post office on April 15, 2006, with checks to the IRS totalling $1,145,000.00. That's right, 1.145 million dollars in taxes for one year, and I'm not even what most people would call "rich". Alt min does not let you deduct for ANYTHING, and as a result, the business venture could not work. And the result of that: A veterinarian, two vet techs, 7 ranch hands, and a book keeper had to go looking for jobs the next January.

Charles
 
Can we spot peasant virgins off the street and say: "Bathe her, and bring her to me."? I'd pay a couple extra points of taxes to be able to do that.
 
The wealthiest already benefit the most from the stability of an orderly society, since they have the most to lose if things go tits up.
 
The wealthiest already benefit the most from the stability of an orderly society, since they have the most to lose if things go tits up.

That's absurd. If things do go tits up, who do you think would have the resources to protect and feed themselves?
 
That's absurd. If things do go tits up, who do you think would have the resources to protect and feed themselves?

What if the banks or markets go tits up, and most of your assets are in stocks? Or a major catastrophe such as an earthquake or meteor strike? The only advantage you'll have then is better locks on your castle.
 
What if the banks or markets go tits up, and most of your assets are in stocks? Or a major catastrophe such as an earthquake or meteor strike? The only advantage you'll have then is better locks on your castle.

And land and guns and paper currency and precious metals and people working for you...
 
“A government with the policy to rob Peter to pay Paul can be assured of the support of Paul”

I notice how out of all my friends only the ones that advocate higher taxes are the ones that don't have to pay them. Yea, this pisses me off. I love telling them that I got a veterans disability settlement check monthly for $1300 which is just under what I pay a month in taxes... So the way I look at it is that I don't have to pay taxes anymore. This burns them up since I'm in better shape than all of them but considered a disabled vet
 
And land and guns and paper currency and precious metals and people working for you...

In the event of a breakdown of lawful society, none of those things except the guns will be of any value.
 
The wealthiest already benefit the most from the stability of an orderly society, since they have the most to lose if things go tits up.

There is always opportunity in chaos.

Do you think the current Russian billionaires got rich from the stable comunist regime, the stable whatever police state they are in now or something in between when all hell was breaking loose??
 
Would you chose chaos (which I depict to anarchy and terrorism) vs what you have today?

Would not, but that is not to say that people would not benefit from that taking place.

It depends on what you are looking for in life. I cherish safety, a nice jogging path, and a stream to fish in more than I do personal wealth.

Others have different motivators.
 
Would not, but that is not to say that people would not benefit from that taking place.

And my point is that those with wealth and status have the most to lose in that kind of situation, therefore they benefit the most from maintaining an orderly and lawful society.
 
And my point is that those with wealth and status have the most to lose in that kind of situation, therefore they benefit the most from maintaining an orderly and lawful society.

The people who stand to lose the most are the ones in the poorest, most volatile cities. Even if Armageddon comes, I don't see the hoards tearing 25 minutes into the Knoxville suburbs looking for loot.
 
The people who stand to lose the most are the ones in the poorest, most volatile cities. Even if Armageddon comes, I don't see the hoards tearing 25 minutes into the Knoxville suburbs looking for loot.

You and your neighbors will be among the hordes, it might just take a week or two longer for you to use up your resources.
 
You and your neighbors will be among the hordes, it might just take a week or two longer for you to use up your resources.

You'll know when I join the hoards. I'm going to kill all the tax assessors first.

;)
 
Its been proven, that lower taxes at the consumer level, grow the economy. The big reason things are "tough all over" is that big gigantic corporations have manipulated everything from the size of a candy bar, to the funding of donations to politicians. There needs to be a simplified tax code that prevents the manipulation. Until this happens, Big Corp Thugs inc. will always manipulate things.
The fed has continued to cut interest rates, hoping to increase the economy, you and I get a mortgage for less, little lower interest on a purchase, but the big boys then over inflate costs to increase the profit, thus nullifying the impact on the economy. All the while, they gain massive advantage of the reduced rates, since they are exponentially massive at that level.
Sort of like the "would you rather have $1 million, or get a penny a day, doubled for a month"

Sent from my SCH-I510 using EliteFitness
 
who the fuck do you think you are?
 
That's absurd. If things do go tits up, who do you think would have the resources to protect and feed themselves?
Anybody with a loaded gun.
 
Top Bottom