Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Planet could be "unrecognizable" in less than 40 years

hanselthecaretaker

High End Bro
Platinum
WASHINGTON (AFP) – A growing, more affluent population competing for ever scarcer resources could make for an "unrecognizable" world by 2050, researchers warned at a major US science conference Sunday.

The United Nations has predicted the global population will reach seven billion this year, and climb to nine billion by 2050, "with almost all of the growth occurring in poor countries, particularly Africa and South Asia," said John Bongaarts of the non-profit Population Council.

To feed all those mouths, "we will need to produce as much food in the next 40 years as we have in the last 8,000," said Jason Clay of the World Wildlife Fund at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
"By 2050 we will not have a planet left that is recognizable" if current trends continue, Clay said.

The swelling population will exacerbate problems, such as resource depletion, said John Casterline, director of the Initiative in Population Research at Ohio State University.
But incomes are also expected to rise over the next 40 years -- tripling globally and quintupling in developing nations -- and add more strain to global food supplies.

People tend to move up the food chain as their incomes rise, consuming more meat than they might have when they made less money, the experts said.

It takes around seven pounds (3.4 kilograms) of grain to produce a pound of meat, and around three to four pounds of grain to produce a pound of cheese or eggs, experts told AFP.

"More people, more money, more consumption, but the same planet," Clay told AFP, urging scientists and governments to start making changes now to how food is produced.

Population experts, meanwhile, called for more funding for family planning programs to help control the growth in the number of humans, especially in developing nations.

"For 20 years, there's been very little investment in family planning, but there's a return of interest now, partly because of the environmental factors like global warming and food prices," said Bongaarts.

"We want to minimize population growth, and the only viable way to do that is through more effective family planning," said Casterline.

Planet could be 'unrecognizable' by 2050, experts say - Yahoo! News

Apparently fucking up the planet is a side effect of being an "advanced" species. I guess this makes the decision to not have kids a little easier lol. Maybe we're about due for another WW too.
 
Apparently fucking up the planet is a side effect of being an "advanced" species. I guess this makes the decision to not have kids a little easier lol. Maybe we're about due for another WW too.

hahaha i was thinking the same thing. maybe another epidemic plague? next we should just colonize the moon
 
I'm not that worried about agricultural productivity. Over 100 years ago, over 50% of the US population was involved in agriculture yet we barely fed ourselves. Today, less than 2% of the US population is involved in agriculture and we are a net food exporter.

We are overdue for a pandemic. And considering our increased population density and freedom to travel, it could be a really bad one.

But my guess is that nuclear proliferation will eventually lead to some man-made disaster that screws-up the atmosphere and/or water.
 
I'm thinking ball lightening will take out a couple billion, just like the Ark of the Covenant's balls took out those Nazis.
 
One word: Water. If the current trends continue, in 50 years, the need for drinking water will far outstrip anything happening with petroleum. No water, no crops.

Check out these articles - there's pretty pictures if you don't feel like reading the words.

Balancing water supply and wildlife : Nature News

Daily Kos: Hell is coming: Drought in the age of global warming

These models only address the supply-side of water resources likely to be affected by climate change. Our demand for water has also been increasing thanks to overpopulation, poor conservation of surface water sources, and our extravagant use of water in agriculture, power generation, and industry. And then there is the depletion and toxic degradation of our water resources to extract fossil fuels through unconventional recovery methods such as shale gas drilling, oil sands refining, and mountaintop removal coal mining.

Between climate change-induced drought, excessive water consumption, and water pollution, we are loading at least five bullets into the chambers of a six-cylinder gun. Instead of pointing the gun at our head, we are taking aim at our children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren.

People like those fucking Duggar bastards should lined up and shot. Worldwide we should be aiming for 0 population growth, ideally, population decline. People should have one child, two at the most, preferably none.

Of course, a plague may take care of that, and since most of those "quiverful" goofballs who homeschool usually don't get their kids vaccinated, there might be part of that problem resolved. :whatever: Of course, idiot missionaries tell 3rd worlders that god wants them to "be fruitful and multiple" but since those children are malnourished, usually don't have access to potable water, and rarely get vaccinated, they only have about a 50% survival rate under the best of circumstances.
 
"We want to minimize population growth, and the only viable way to do that is through more effective family planning," said Casterline.
and tobacco and wars and no cures for disease/virus and creating new virus', and legalizing drugs, and creating more fast food restaurants
 
get rid of the Mo's first
Oh, sure, get rid of the fashion designers (that are really the only thing keeping the last remaining women thin) and the ONLY people guaranteed NOT to reproduce!!!
 
Told you, the article I quoted had pretty pictures:

but here are others (BTW, these come from Scientific American, is that sciency enough for you?)

water_2-1.jpg


From the main article here:

Confronting a World Freshwater Crisis: In-Depth Reports


Silly girl. You're forgetting that the Earth has unlimited resources.

Besides, there's enough oil/water/food/entertainment for us now, and who cares about the future?

*sells NASA to lowest bidder, throws in free shipping and first-born child to sweeten offer*



:cow:
 
actually, we're kinda overdue for a plague...it's only a matter of time...the germs all got smarter over the last 50 years too.

Your right Digimon. If you notice , we have a plague or naturally disaster every so often, as if to thin the masses.
 
Silly girl. You're forgetting that the Earth has unlimited resources.

Besides, there's enough oil/water/food/entertainment for us now, and who cares about the future?

*sells NASA to lowest bidder, throws in free shipping and first-born child to sweeten offer*

:cow:
*forehead smack* How stupid can I be!!!

My bad, I forgot :whatever:
 
There are more humans alive today than all the humans who lived and died from the birth of humanity to 1980, all added together.
 
I should be scoring waaaaaay more tail




just sayin'

You get a double-bump due to an expanding population AND a higher % of MO-dome. It's like you're getting DP'ed (like you do at Cutter's nightly).
 
We're overdue for a thinning of the herd...The last non-man made major thinning was the Spanish Flu at the turn of the 20th century.
 
I read somewhere that if you dumped all the people on Earth onto Texas, the population density would still be less than the city of Tokyo.

So how about this - we turn Texas into a massive city, and move everyone there, and turn all the rest of the planet into farm land, wildlife preserves, mining for natural resources, forests...
 
I read somewhere that if you dumped all the people on Earth onto Texas, the population density would still be less than the city of Tokyo.

So how about this - we turn Texas into a massive city, and move everyone there, and turn all the rest of the planet into farm land, wildlife preserves, mining for natural resources, forests...

But then my homestate would turn into the worlds biggest clusterfuck and I cant have that.
 
Top Bottom