He later returned the belt to Barneys because he says he "didn't want to have nothing to do with it."
I was with the kid right up to this part of the story.
If he wants Barney's to pay he better show that someone from the store made the call to the police. Right now Barney's is saying that none of their employees had anything to do with it. It's really the police that violated his civil rights.
He later returned the belt to Barneys because he says he "didn't want to have nothing to do with it."
I was with the kid right up to this part of the story.
If he wants Barney's to pay he better show that someone from the store made the call to the police. Right now Barney's is saying that none of their employees had anything to do with it. It's really the police that violated his civil rights.
he returned it cause the belt now has a certain racial stink to it. WHy should that preclude him from suing the store that "quite obviously" called him in?
he returned it cause the belt now has a certain racial stink to it. WHy should that preclude him from suing the store that "quite obviously" called him in?
It's possible another customer called him in. Like I said, Barney's claims they had nothing to do with it and Trayon will have to prove a Barney's employee called.
It's possible another customer called him in. Like I said, Barney's claims they had nothing to do with it and Trayon will have to prove a Barney's employee called.
shouldn't be terribly hard in court. Honestly Barneys is going to have to claim exactly what you said, that a customer called it in. The entire courtroom including the judge will go cough<bullshit>cough-cough