Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Operation Ignore
- Thread starter WODIN
- Start date
nordstrom said:
Too funny... you made me laugh... You get the short version.
Clinton had a terrorism plan.
Sandy Berger briefed condi on it but she later lied saying "Uhn uh white man!"
Richard Clarke (a clinton hold over) formulated the plan of action to prevent stuff but the bushies were too busy sucking ken lay cock.
Then 9/11 happened.
Then the bushies stopped ignoring Richard Clarke's plan that was formulated under Clinton and Said "Those damn liberals left the door open."
Boulder257
New member
Becoming said:
I like how you said "funny" stuff...it's meant to be a serious scathing article...but when matched against reality it is kinda funny!
Boulder257
New member
what exactly was clinton's plan? He was a military hating, and draft dodging sex fiend. How did he come up with a plan when he spent his time chopping our forces...by the way, those are the forces that are protecting you and I!
Boulder257 said:
As has been said. The next president fights a war with the military of the previous president. Thank you President Clinton for building a modern efficient military for Bush to use in a war that had no justifiable basis in the first place.
Boulder257
New member
Wait...in your very first post you are arguing that Bush did not give enough priority to Al Qaeda, but then you argue that the war is unjustified? Guess like other liberals, you will just use whichever argument is convenient...I suggest picking one and sticking with it.
During one of his rare press conferences, President Bush admitted something which completely contradicts what we've been hearing from him, most other politicians, and the mainstream media. Not surprisingly, the media have completely ignored this; I couldn't find a single article that mentions it in any news source, domestic or foreign.
The occasion was a press conference with UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, which took place in the White House on 31 January 2003. Here's the key portion:
[Adam Boulton, Sky News (London):] One question for you both. Do you believe that there is a link between Saddam Hussein, a direct link, and the men who attacked on September the 11th?
THE PRESIDENT: I can't make that claim.
THE PRIME MINISTER: That answers your question.
Under any circumstances, these answers are remarkable for their brevity and directness. No politician answers clearly and in just one sentence. Yet on this crucial matter, Bush and Blair did just that. (True, Blair then launched into his standard speech about how we need to attack Iraq anyway, but his direct answer is brief and to the point.)
What they unambiguously admitted is that there is no connection between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden/al Qaeda. You may recall that bin Laden and al Qaeda are officially blamed for hatching, plotting, and carrying out the 9/11 attacks. That's who the British reporter was referring to. Now the President and Prime Minister have said there is no link between them and the government of Iraq. Could it be any simpler?
the entire transcript on the White House Website
Blair again says there is no Iraq regime/al Qaeda link
propaganda from 26 Sept 2002: "Making the Case: White House Says it Has Evidence of Iraq-Al Qaeda Ties"
The occasion was a press conference with UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, which took place in the White House on 31 January 2003. Here's the key portion:
[Adam Boulton, Sky News (London):] One question for you both. Do you believe that there is a link between Saddam Hussein, a direct link, and the men who attacked on September the 11th?
THE PRESIDENT: I can't make that claim.
THE PRIME MINISTER: That answers your question.
Under any circumstances, these answers are remarkable for their brevity and directness. No politician answers clearly and in just one sentence. Yet on this crucial matter, Bush and Blair did just that. (True, Blair then launched into his standard speech about how we need to attack Iraq anyway, but his direct answer is brief and to the point.)
What they unambiguously admitted is that there is no connection between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden/al Qaeda. You may recall that bin Laden and al Qaeda are officially blamed for hatching, plotting, and carrying out the 9/11 attacks. That's who the British reporter was referring to. Now the President and Prime Minister have said there is no link between them and the government of Iraq. Could it be any simpler?
the entire transcript on the White House Website
Blair again says there is no Iraq regime/al Qaeda link
propaganda from 26 Sept 2002: "Making the Case: White House Says it Has Evidence of Iraq-Al Qaeda Ties"
Boulder257
New member
hmmm...couldn't find it in the news? That surprised me with all of the liberal rags out there (e.g. CNN, MSNBC, NY Times, etc). maybe that's beacause your story takes the entire cicrumstance out of context.
Also, they just captured a high ranking Al Qaeda member in Iraq yesterday! Interesting isn't it?
Also, they just captured a high ranking Al Qaeda member in Iraq yesterday! Interesting isn't it?
Boulder257 said:
Straight from the White house website.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030131-23.html
Similar threads
