Ive been training the PL squat up til now because i thought they were superior but after reading a couple articles by oly lifters they make it seem like oly squats are far superior. im going to be training both the oly and PL squats from now but i just want to differentiate which one would be better for overall strength development.
im training westside barbell style and ive been taking the dynamic effort workout for squats quite seriously and i can squat so fast the bar gets hard to hold on to so i have to attatch more bands or get more weights on the bar. not to say that all powerlifters are like this but just saying that explosiveness can be trained.
the PL squat recruits the quads, hamstrings, hips and glutes. the oly squat recruits the quads heavily, but recruits hamstrings and glutes less heavily. so from that i dont see how oly squats are better for leg development when the muscles it recruits are less. ive heard that the high bar placement places more stress on the back for oly squats.
PL squats may have less ROM but i am 100% sure that PL squats are stronger because it recruits the strongest muscles in the body.
im not trying to argue with you i just want to know what kind of squats are better.
If the goal is for explosive power and leg development its not even close. Ol is far more superior. I have been on both sides. I started with pl and transitioned to bb. U never see anyone outside of pl doing wide stance squats. for athletic performance or leg development or explosiveness its all ol squats. The only reason more weight can be lifted with a pl stance is because of a decreased rom and it requires much less flexibility. That is also why pl squat power doesn't really translate over to anything else. Ol style is much harder and recruits more muscle fibers if done correctly. They also require much more flexibility which many people do not want to work towards. U might not be able to lift much weight off the start with ol style squatting but the increased leg development and translatable strength and explosiveness will more than make up for it.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using EliteFitness
im training westside barbell style and ive been taking the dynamic effort workout for squats quite seriously and i can squat so fast the bar gets hard to hold on to so i have to attatch more bands or get more weights on the bar. not to say that all powerlifters are like this but just saying that explosiveness can be trained.
the PL squat recruits the quads, hamstrings, hips and glutes. the oly squat recruits the quads heavily, but recruits hamstrings and glutes less heavily. so from that i dont see how oly squats are better for leg development when the muscles it recruits are less. ive heard that the high bar placement places more stress on the back for oly squats.
PL squats may have less ROM but i am 100% sure that PL squats are stronger because it recruits the strongest muscles in the body.
im not trying to argue with you i just want to know what kind of squats are better.