I just read an olympic vs powerlifting(close stance vs wide stance) squatting article on an OL website so the bias was towards close stance high bar squats being superior for strength gains. the article talked about OL squats being superior for strength and explosive strength. it also said it had better carryover to the PL squat. he also argues that because of the 'pathetic depth and lack of ROM' and the slow speed of the squats, OL squats are superior.
i have also read from other sources(louie simmons) that the wide stance squat will recruit all the muscles that the OL squat will recruit and will also work the posterior chain for an overall superior squat. the PL squat is usually done with max effort day and dynamic effort day so absolute and explosive strength are both trained. louie said that the PL squat will carryover to the OL squat but not the other way around.
i want to get some more opinions on which style of squatting is better for strength development.
i have also read from other sources(louie simmons) that the wide stance squat will recruit all the muscles that the OL squat will recruit and will also work the posterior chain for an overall superior squat. the PL squat is usually done with max effort day and dynamic effort day so absolute and explosive strength are both trained. louie said that the PL squat will carryover to the OL squat but not the other way around.
i want to get some more opinions on which style of squatting is better for strength development.