SleepingFist
New member
oh god Peaches not you as well
I did not think you would go that way aswell.
I have said my piece and I will say it again but this time in baby talk.
The mere suggestion that any one is trying to be "smart" is derisory. Your question concerning illusion and chemistry is a phylisophical one and includes many different factors, views and slants.
My previous post, stated that ther state of a humans conscious developement affected their 'love' experience. It stated that as we progress, if our progression is inward, love becomes a state of mind and not a chosen extreme for a single person. It stated that the lust or 'chemical' experiencesin the short term can be far stronger than the 'love' thang. It stated that in my opinion, true 'spritual' progression affords an appreciation for the long term emotional states and transitory lust is seen for what it is; 'transitory'. 'Letting go' as you say is not about clinging to romantic notions and spielbergesque sentimentality, it is about exactly what Bekinimum stated earlier, something that is a treasure is in the wrinkled old hand and not in the silken hips.
I love my girlfreind, I do not ask myself why, I do not analise this fact nor do I disect it. I know that it has never been chemical; I saw her and in that moment of experiencing her movement, her grace and something else, I experienced something quite different to sexual stimulation, I felt a rush of somehting close to happiness or joy, something like a lightening of the world around me amd it had nothing to do with blood rushing to my nether regions. If it is illusion it is a wonderful illusion.
Love to men is as important to them as it is to women. To say otherwise is ingrascious. We, or some of us, may speak strongly on the subject and be 'phylisophical' about this but that is because the subject is not about Mills and Boon or Ally Mcbeal. The post may have been started with a light hearted idea in mind, the same as Testboy might answer it, but to criticise men because they see things differently is to say I wish men thought like women...and how many sex changes would there be.
The difference must be celibrated between you and I. Love is a tool in some circles for a kind of consious ascension and anyone who would deride a person for looking deaply into something of such importance to them has simply asked that everyone approached love like Macdonalds approaches food, fast, cheap and unsatisfying.
If you girls find that men nead to lighten up on the subject of love it will not be long before we are asked to take the damn subject seriously, which is half your normal, most common criticisms anyway.
Accept or don't but don't be stupid in the process.
I did not think you would go that way aswell.
I have said my piece and I will say it again but this time in baby talk.
The mere suggestion that any one is trying to be "smart" is derisory. Your question concerning illusion and chemistry is a phylisophical one and includes many different factors, views and slants.
My previous post, stated that ther state of a humans conscious developement affected their 'love' experience. It stated that as we progress, if our progression is inward, love becomes a state of mind and not a chosen extreme for a single person. It stated that the lust or 'chemical' experiencesin the short term can be far stronger than the 'love' thang. It stated that in my opinion, true 'spritual' progression affords an appreciation for the long term emotional states and transitory lust is seen for what it is; 'transitory'. 'Letting go' as you say is not about clinging to romantic notions and spielbergesque sentimentality, it is about exactly what Bekinimum stated earlier, something that is a treasure is in the wrinkled old hand and not in the silken hips.
I love my girlfreind, I do not ask myself why, I do not analise this fact nor do I disect it. I know that it has never been chemical; I saw her and in that moment of experiencing her movement, her grace and something else, I experienced something quite different to sexual stimulation, I felt a rush of somehting close to happiness or joy, something like a lightening of the world around me amd it had nothing to do with blood rushing to my nether regions. If it is illusion it is a wonderful illusion.
Love to men is as important to them as it is to women. To say otherwise is ingrascious. We, or some of us, may speak strongly on the subject and be 'phylisophical' about this but that is because the subject is not about Mills and Boon or Ally Mcbeal. The post may have been started with a light hearted idea in mind, the same as Testboy might answer it, but to criticise men because they see things differently is to say I wish men thought like women...and how many sex changes would there be.
The difference must be celibrated between you and I. Love is a tool in some circles for a kind of consious ascension and anyone who would deride a person for looking deaply into something of such importance to them has simply asked that everyone approached love like Macdonalds approaches food, fast, cheap and unsatisfying.
If you girls find that men nead to lighten up on the subject of love it will not be long before we are asked to take the damn subject seriously, which is half your normal, most common criticisms anyway.
Accept or don't but don't be stupid in the process.