Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply puritysourcelabs US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ Raptor Labs UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAKUS-PHARMACIESRaptor Labs

North Korea is on deck!!!!!!!!!!

Hitler

New member
The North Koreans are again thumbing their nose at the UN and US by removing UN survalence cameras from NK nuke plants. When will they be getting their asses kicked? Hopefully before they shell and bomb the shit out of Seoul.
 
were they acting up before or after they got named as one of the 'axis of evil' members......

im not being sarcastic/rhetorical, its a real question....ios this because they feel threatened?

whats more funny is the S.koreans are beginning to dislike the US presence there.....i wonder what will happen if there is a war?
 
well if there is war, S. Korea won't have much time to think about it. Correct me if im wrong but the capitol of SK is well within NK artilery and missle range. Plus we have a shitload of troops over there and there would be HELL to pay if NK made a preemptive strike against SK and US forces.
 
yes....but have we stirred the pot? before they were named an 'axis' member, they were gonna send diplomats over to saouth korea and things between the nationed had calmed down. i didnt hear much after that, only that the sent a bunch of US ambassadors back over. were they named an axis memebr because they were doing this stuff covertly or did they only start after....its something i wondered
 
If they want an ass Woopin then can bring it. I got something for them. Too bad I can't reclass to a 97B and go out and do something good instead of bs-ing where I am at
 
Hitler said:
well if there is war, S. Korea won't have much time to think about it. Correct me if im wrong but the capitol of SK is well within NK artilery and missle range. Plus we have a shitload of troops over there and there would be HELL to pay if NK made a preemptive strike against SK and US forces.

and they have China on their side. That's the difference between NK and Iraq. Go ask R.I.P. Gen. MacArthur, things were going perfectly till China joined the war.
 
The Nature Boy said:
what harm has north korea done to anyone? someone please enlighten me.

they didn't the US the permission to have Nuke plants/weapons. Nukes in the world are basically like a car, in order to use one you need a license........lol
 
We are creating a threat to our military power so we can spend trillions of dollars on star war missile shields and stuff.

If I was a foreign country, I may very well really dislike America. Our foreign policy comes across like we have apppointed ourselves as everybodies boss. Frankly, other countries have a right to defend themselves.
 
manny78 said:


they didn't the US the permission to have Nuke plants/weapons. Nukes in the world are basically like a car, in order to use one you need a license........lol

well then we need to go after everyone else with nuclear weapons then too. north korea is a soverign nation, they should be allowed to go about their business.
 
Testosterone boy said:
If I was a foreign country, I may very well really dislike America. Our foreign policy comes across like we have apppointed ourselves as everybodies boss. Frankly, other countries have a right to defend themselves.

you're right. people get upset about the UN trying to dictate to the US, yet the US is allowed to dictate to everone else in the world what happens.
 
NK makes brash decesions that affect not just the U.S. but everyone else in the world. China is not doing anything to help feed the NK people and doing nothing else other then to give moral support. Give NK a Nuke and see how long it takes them to invade the south
 
manny78 said:


and they have China on their side. That's the difference between NK and Iraq. Go ask R.I.P. Gen. MacArthur, things were going perfectly till China joined the war.

I can't remember who was over there during the korean war (Patton or MacArthur), but he wanted to keep rolling right through china and russia. He had a window of opportunity to conquer almost all of the Asain continent (the parts that matter anyway), but the president at the time wouldnt allow it. The general actually lobbied for it so much, and was so gun hoe, that he was taken out of control of the region and we never bothered. Makes you wonder what the world would have looked like had we conquered Russia and China.

But as far as N. Korea removing the video survelience.... Whoever thinks that isnt a problem is delusional. If you are using a reactor for what it is supposed to be used for (creating energy) , then there should be no problem with a camera watching people go about there normal business. Its not like they are gonna get in trouble for smoking on the job, or the employees donrt want them cause they feel a lack of privacy. It isnt a business office thatthese cameras are in. So why would they remove the cameras? Hmmm... Could it be so no one sees them enriching plutonium to weapon grade material, or removing material from the site to bring to another location to build a bomb? Duh.

TTlPkg, ytou really think we couldnt take both of them at the same time? If we got an ok from China, it wouldnt be a problem. I dont think China would have a problem if we made our point like this...
N. Korea is not a stable nation. They deal weapons of mass destruction to whoever wants to buy them so they can fund further development. some of these nations are not friendly with china anyway. Look at china's location. Chances are unless these weapons and chemicals and nukes are shipped by boats, they are gonna have to be smuggled through China. Does china want things like that moving through their country without their Knowledge? I doubt it. They dont allow citizens to own handguns, i doubt they would like people smuggling nukes through tthere country. N. Korea also has a piss poor economy. A war in N. Korea would barely (if at all) effect the chinese economy.
And if we promised to come in, do our business, and then leave without leaving an occupying force, i dont think it would be much of an issue.

Besides, the U.S. basically keeps china moving forward economically witht the amount of trade we do. What does N. Korea do for them, besides be fellow communists and occupy the same continent.
 
The Nature Boy said:


well then we need to go after everyone else with nuclear weapons then too. north korea is a soverign nation, they should be allowed to go about their business.

they should but Bush thinks he's the "exclusive supplier of Nuke licenses".

Iraq is neither a big ass country (China, Russia, India) or a "friend" (UK, France, Israel...... and even Pakistan). I seriously doubt they'll invade North Korea, I think Bush will rather find an "asian" version of the Rosenbergs to fry......
 
TxArmyGuy said:
NK makes brash decesions that affect not just the U.S. but everyone else in the world. China is not doing anything to help feed the NK people and doing nothing else other then to give moral support. Give NK a Nuke and see how long it takes them to invade the south

starvation is the best tool to keep your people obedient. Every Dictator know that. As far as China not giving any support, well cause they don't give a shit about koreans life on a daily basis. It's all about their influence in the region. Same thing in 1951.
 
TxArmyGuy said:
NK makes brash decesions that affect not just the U.S. but everyone else in the world. China is not doing anything to help feed the NK people and doing nothing else other then to give moral support. Give NK a Nuke and see how long it takes them to invade the south

can you please elaborate 'brash decisions" with some specific examples?
 
JohnyJuice said:


I can't remember who was over there during the korean war (Patton or MacArthur), but he wanted to keep rolling right through china and russia. He had a window of opportunity to conquer almost all of the Asain continent (the parts that matter anyway), but the president at the time wouldnt allow it. The general actually lobbied for it so much, and was so gun hoe, that he was taken out of control of the region and we never bothered. Makes you wonder what the world would have looked like had we conquered Russia and China.

But as far as N. Korea removing the video survelience.... Whoever thinks that isnt a problem is delusional. If you are using a reactor for what it is supposed to be used for (creating energy) , then there should be no problem with a camera watching people go about there normal business. Its not like they are gonna get in trouble for smoking on the job, or the employees donrt want them cause they feel a lack of privacy. It isnt a business office thatthese cameras are in. So why would they remove the cameras? Hmmm... Could it be so no one sees them enriching plutonium to weapon grade material, or removing material from the site to bring to another location to build a bomb? Duh.


MacArtheur was the general back the. He requested somewhere in 1952 I think President Trumman to use nukes against Chinese troops in Mandchuria. The idea was not that bad and it would have probably solved many problems later. But Trumman got scared at the idea of seeing Russia taking the opportunity to blow West Germany and maybe Japan.

As for the camera, I would understand if this was in Iraq since they technically a "defeated country", but NK is a sovereign country. Why don't the US place some cameras in Pakistanis or Indian facilities ?
 
The Nature Boy said:


you're right. people get upset about the UN trying to dictate to the US, yet the US is allowed to dictate to everone else in the world what happens.

Boy, you U.N. supporters are like a bunch of mindless gimps. Why is it that you think the U.N. is the benevolent force in the world? What makes you think they are always right?
The reason America can dictate countries around the world on things like weapons of mass destruction is this...LOOK AT WHO WE ARE BITCHING AT ABOUT HAVING\ DEVELOPING THEM!!!
We are not mad that England has them, or France, etc. Cause these countries are stable and not looking to get them to win the upper hand and use them on someone.
We dont want coutries like Iraq (and the rest of the middle east for that matter) and N.Korea to have them because.. well look at them. The are aggressive unstable countries. The sell lesser weapons of mass destruction (chemical and bio) to obtain bigger shit (nuclear). Middle eastern countries are always blowing shit up, and attacking each other. Saddam gassed his own fucking people for Christ sakes. you want a guy like that to have Nukes??
And worse yet, these countries are economically in the shitter. And guess what, nukes are worth money, so most likely they would sell them to people around the world (including terrorriss) to raise funds. Its not hard to figure out why we dont want that shit going on.

And why Americans dont want to listen to the U.N. is simple...look who makes up the U.N. There are some countries that are on the level, i will give you that. Then there are the countries that are a step down the rung like France, who wanted us to leave Iraq alone. They are willing to trade nukes in the hands of this guy for some oil deals? What the F? And then look at the rest of the U.N..... it is made up of the same countries who i mentioned before, who are a bunch of fuck ups. But collectively, they are the almighty, all knowing U.N.

How can an organization with such conflicting interests in everything, and a political agenda that is different on every issue (because of who is being affected) be expected to even work, let alone do what's right?

Face it, America is keeping the world as you know it in one piece. If we had some fucking help from the rest of the world, things wouldnt be like they are now. Instead, the countries of the world choose to do jack shit abou things until their are loads of problems, and then they say "look what you have done America. That is why everyone hates you"

I like that philosophy taken by th rest of the world... Do nothing, let America bend over backwards by bailing out countries, forgiving debts, helping some to defensd themselves, eliminating threats to world piece, getting the rerst of the world out of jams (WWII), etc.. and then bitch because everthing isnt perfect, and blame it on us intruding.

I would like to see the U.S. completely close itself off from the rest of the world for 5 years, and watch the rest of the world fall apart. First economically, then by all the wars that would break out everywhere. Maybe then you ingrates would step to the U.S> and suck our dick like you all should be doing, instead of bitching.
 
Ah yes. i see that my tactical brilliance and gift to percieve how things would unfold shut you U.N. loving butt slammers up.

WEST SIDE!!!!! (as in western hemisphere, bitches)
 
JohnyJuice said:

I like that philosophy taken by th rest of the world... Do nothing, let America bend over backwards by bailing out countries, forgiving debts, helping some to defensd themselves, eliminating threats to world piece, getting the rerst of the world out of jams (WWII), etc.. and then bitch because everthing isnt perfect, and blame it on us intruding.


ok einstein. fill me in on the forgiving debts issue, when the US is one of the in debt countries in the world. Please list our acts of debt benovolence, besides forgiving WWII debts.

As for WWII, we had to do it for our own interest... not because we felt like helping everone else out, not only that the japanese bomed pearl harbor and that's what brought us in.

Now fill me in on who we've helped defend themselves.

Enlighten me.
 
The Nature Boy said:


ok einstein. fill me in on the forgiving debts issue, when the US is one of the in debt countries in the world. Please list our acts of debt benovolence, besides forgiving WWII debts.

As for WWII, we had to do it for our own interest... not because we felt like helping everone else out, not only that the japanese bomed pearl harbor and that's what brought us in.

Now fill me in on who we've helped defend themselves.

Enlighten me.


To whom is the US in debt? Are you talking about our "National Debt"?

Anyway, here's one for you:

At the commencement of Desert Storm, we forgave all debts of Arab or Muslim nations in the Middle East. Recently we forgave approx $300 million in debt to Pakistan.
 
i think i remember a BBC report about the US and chinese meeting fairly recently to discuss amongst other things, N.korea....i dont think china likes em too much and see;s them as a mutual enemy


pakistan is a DAMN unstable givernment....its still ruled by a military dictator who overthrew the elected government, who in the past supported the taliban, who's borders still harbour taliban, who;s government probably has the odd nutjob in there and is currently in a stalemate with india, who can;t seem to decide what to do about kashmir, only that it should put 1milloon men on its border.

why are we not going after them?
why are we cancelling there debt? its just gonna go on military spending...
 
danielson said:
i think i remember a BBC report about the US and chinese meeting fairly recently to discuss amongst other things, N.korea....i dont think china likes em too much and see;s them as a mutual enemy


pakistan is a DAMN unstable givernment....its still ruled by a military dictator who overthrew the elected government, who in the past supported the taliban, who's borders still harbour taliban, who;s government probably has the odd nutjob in there and is currently in a stalemate with india, who can;t seem to decide what to do about kashmir, only that it should put 1milloon men on its border.

why are we not going after them?
why are we cancelling there debt? its just gonna go on military spending...

North Korea is a country ruled by a dictator who cares little for the people of the country, has isolated them from just about everything. The world is a better place if he is removed, period. it matters not who does it.

Pakistan - we forgave their debt to enlist their support of our operations in Afghanistan. The US, for better or worse, uses its welath and economic leverage like a blunt instrument to get things done on the world stage. You know that.
 
Who cares...get out of Korea. Fuck em.

I've lived in South Korea for more than a few years...South Koreans, despite owing their freedom to the USA (North korea has a much bigger army and lots more equipment), whose soldiers died for them in the Korean War and liberated them from the Japs in WW2, are thankless...they wont admit to owing the usa one damn bit of thanks. instead...because of an ACCIDENT where a US armoured vehicle ran over two teenage girls (what are amoured vehicles and pedestrians doing using the same road anyway? whose fault is that?), are crying foul and in some cases attacking anyone who is white as long as there are 10 of them and one white guy. These are people who think it is ok to slaughter dogs for food in the following manner: they take a stick and beat the dog to death, as they think it makes the meat more tender. I am not kidding. And I have fournd that they find that acceptable. Cruel bastards, I have no respect for them or their backward, racist culture. Wanna beat up your girlfriend in public- mgo to korea. No one there will care. Seen it happen. I intervened, and nobody else would. Just walked on by. Why does America and Canada let them immigrate? They wont allow a foreigner to become korean. South Korea has accepted ONE refugee- despite the thousands that arrive there.

SOBs. Why die for them? fuck south korea. they wont hire blacks to teach there...they want to learn english but are xenophobic...they suffer from a "helpless victim syndrome" and are always complaining about being treated poorly by other countries when they more or less have a slave market in chinese, phillipino and pakistanis whom they treat like SHIT.

Fuck them. The US ought to pull out of korea, period. so what if north attacks south One thing about Koreans..North Korea is bluffing. Call them on it, really threaten them, and watch them tremble.

North korea has sent hit squads to the south, blown up a passenger plane, blown up a handful of south korean govt ministers at a meeting in thailand, sells missle technology to unstable regimes, and is the most sickening dictatorship in a long time. The people are outright lied to- I am talking history is not so much portrayed differently, as a completely different version is taught to the north's people. I'd make it clear to the north: build nukes, and The US vaporizes Pyongyang with a hydrogen bomb (a nice 15 megatonner would obliterate everything within city limits and beyond) and a handful of other cities.
Because those weapons WILL be sold abroad and used against the US.
 
Last edited:
MattTheSkywalker said:


North Korea is a country ruled by a dictator who cares little for the people of the country, has isolated them from just about everything. The world is a better place if he is removed, period. it matters not who does it.

Pakistan - we forgave their debt to enlist their support of our operations in Afghanistan. The US, for better or worse, uses its welath and economic leverage like a blunt instrument to get things done on the world stage. You know that.

i agree on both points.

doesnt stop me disliking it though....:)
 
MattTheSkywalker said:



To whom is the US in debt? Are you talking about our "National Debt"?

Anyway, here's one for you:

At the commencement of Desert Storm, we forgave all debts of Arab or Muslim nations in the Middle East. Recently we forgave approx $300 million in debt to Pakistan.


I am thinking a more appropriate handle would be MattTheTightRopeWalker.
 
Re: Who cares...get out of Korea. Fuck em.

Victorian guy said:
I've lived in South Korea for more than a few years...South Koreans, despite owing their freedom to the USA (North korea has a much bigger army and lots more equipment), whose soldiers died for them in the Korean War and liberated them from the Japs in WW2, are thankless...they wont admit to owing the usa one damn bit of thanks. instead...because of an ACCIDENT where a US armoured vehicle ran over two teenage girls (what are amoured vehicles and pedestrians doing using the same road anyway? whose fault is that?), are crying foul and in some cases attacking anyone who is white as long as there are 10 of them and one white guy. These are people who think it is ok to slaughter dogs for food in the following manner: they take a stick and beat the dog to death, as they think it makes the meat more tender. I am not kidding. And I have fournd that they find that acceptable. Cruel bastards, I have no respect for them or their backward, racist culture. Wanna beat up your girlfriend in public- mgo to korea. No one there will care. Seen it happen. I intervened, and nobody else would. Just walked on by. Why does America and Canada let them immigrate? They wont allow a foreigner to become korean. South Korea has accepted ONE refugee- despite the thousands that arrive there.

SOBs. Why die for them? fuck south korea. they wont hire blacks to teach there...they want to learn english but are xenophobic...they suffer from a "helpless victim syndrome" and are always complaining about being treated poorly by other countries when they more or less have a slave market in chinese, phillipino and pakistanis whom they treat like SHIT.

Fuck them. The US ought to pull out of korea, period. so what if north attacks south One thing about Koreans..North Korea is bluffing. Call them on it, really threaten them, and watch them tremble.

North korea has sent hit squads to the south, blown up a passenger plane, blown up a handful of south korean govt ministers at a meeting in thailand, sells missle technology to unstable regimes, and is the most sickening dictatorship in a long time. The people are outright lied to- I am talking history is not so much portrayed differently, as a completely different version is taught to the north's people. I'd make it clear to the north: build nukes, and The US vaporizes Pyongyang with a hydrogen bomb (a nice 15 megatonner would obliterate everything within city limits and beyond) and a handful of other cities.
Because those weapons WILL be sold abroad and used against the US.

Awesome post. I, as a Korean-American, can wholeheartedly agree with many of your observations, VG.

Koreans seem to have very little regard for human life. Hospitals there will not treat you unless you can prove you can pay for the services. Also, I don't understand why they are bitching so much about the two girls when the same thing happens many times a day there. Cars have priority over pedestrians in the streets, and Korea has some of the most reckless drivers.

This also gives me a chance to bitch about my Korean roommate, who is the most worthless waste of oxygen I've ever met in my life. He moved to the US about ten years ago (he is eighteen) and still has the English skills of a fifth-grader, on his account of only having Korean friends, speaking as little English possible, and generally being a racist fuck. In my experience, this is quite typical; many Koreans are very close-minded people.
 
The Nature Boy said:


ok einstein. fill me in on the forgiving debts issue, when the US is one of the in debt countries in the world. Please list our acts of debt benovolence, besides forgiving WWII debts.

As for WWII, we had to do it for our own interest... not because we felt like helping everone else out, not only that the japanese bomed pearl harbor and that's what brought us in.

Now fill me in on who we've helped defend themselves.

Enlighten me.


Wow. Lets see. We could have just fucked up the Japenese and exitted stage left right out of WWII. Instea we were helping your English ass the whole time. Thne we rebuilt all of Europe for Christ's sakes. We Rebuilt Japan. Matt already mentioned us forgiving everyone's debt. We give poeple money, granted they spend it on our stuff. so essentially they get free shit. Fuck man, i am getting bored of this so i will go on to some other replies.

Manny78.... The UN put the cameras in, not us. Those countries dont need cameras in their nuke facilities becasue we know they have nukes. N. Korea isnt allowed to have them (cause they are fucked up), and the camera is there to make sure they dont make nuke material. Get it? They disabled the cameras, so what does that tell you? Oh yeah, they are also building and testing long range ballistic missles. COincedence?
 
JohnyJuice said:



Manny78.... The UN put the cameras in, not us. Those countries dont need cameras in their nuke facilities becasue we know they have nukes. N. Korea isnt allowed to have them (cause they are fucked up), and the camera is there to make sure they dont make nuke material. Get it? They disabled the cameras, so what does that tell you? Oh yeah, they are also building and testing long range ballistic missles. COincedence?

As usual, the UN as nothing better to do. Useless organization IMO. Pakis have nukes, nothing really care anymore. They're unstable as hell but anyway. Let's assume North Korea has nukes. What would they do ? What'S the worse that can happen ? They blow up Seoul or Tokyo. No more Hyundays or Hondas.

I say, nuke them, but don't go waste US lives in that piece of crappy land.....
 
there is no reason for a country like North Korea to have nukes! who threatons them? and if they were a democracy we would protect them and help their economy....what this all comes down to in these leaders having an ego trip....

they will never be the US, we are the super power and until the oil reserves run out in this world we will always be the dominant nation militarily
 
prophet said:
there is no reason for a country like North Korea to have nukes! who threatons them?

there's a reason: Japan. They still have the WWII fresh in memory...
 
manny78 said:


there's a reason: Japan. They still have the WWII fresh in memory...

japan is more concerned with their economy right now...i don't think a war with N korea will solve their current economic conditions such as liquidity shortage and deflation
 
manny78 said:


As usual, the UN as nothing better to do. Useless organization IMO. Pakis have nukes, nothing really care anymore. They're unstable as hell but anyway. Let's assume North Korea has nukes. What would they do ? What'S the worse that can happen ? They blow up Seoul or Tokyo. No more Hyundays or Hondas.


Thats the thing. we arent happy about those others having nukes, cause they are unstable. But it is tyo late to keep nukes form them, they got em already. The cameras are there to prevent yet another group of assholes from getting them. An ounce of prevention is worht a pound of cure. I will give you one guess as too why they are pulling th cameras out. If they keep it up, look for the japs to blow the place up. my 2 cents.
 
and besides.....would the US let Japan attack N. Korea?


my guess is no....we encourage stability in the world, except for israel and palestine...we let them kill one another
 
prophet said:


japan is more concerned with their economy right now...i don't think a war with N korea will solve their current economic conditions such as liquidity shortage and deflation

no no no, sorry if I haven't been clear. I meant North Korea (just like SOuth Koreans too) would probably be looking for vengeance cause of what happened during the WWII.
 
WizKid25 said:
Why can't we just nuke them both already?


Who will make our shoes and ball bearings and shit then??
Besides, most chicks who are half korean and half white are hot. just an observation.
 
Our leadership needs to communicate to the public a little bit more. Calling someone an "axis of evil" stirs nothing in me. That may work for the general public but people with brains want to know more.

I still have no real idea why we care about N. Korea being nuclear. We are left to postulating on a chat board. What does a sensible person expect us to think?

I don't buy this "We are Americans, we are right and you are wrong crapola."

While they are at it, how about some solid reasoning behind the invasion of Iraq. This "They may be developing nuclear capabilities" does not impress me.

There are numerous Governors, Senators, and Congressmen with similar sentiments. We are not the only ones in the dark.

If it is true that the media is run by the Jews, that would be a plausible explanation for a virtual blackout on public knowledge.
I do not feel like I am being informed.
 
they have a failing economy and need help. its there way of asking for help by making threats. this is different that Iraq as theya re starting shit like shutting off camara's on nukes and threatning us. China won't do shit we have to much trade its all about he dollar. If things ever got real bad guess who ahs the most weapons of mass destruction? yes it may not matter as we would all be dead but so would they and they know it. its a ploy for money
 
The United States believes North Korea already has as many as three nuclear warheads in addition to the plutonium that could be used to make two more.

The same article said that NK would lay "merciless punishment" upon us. That type of shit pisses me off. However, it makes me wonder. What do they have the capability of doing to us? As Americans we just think "oh, if they have three nukes, we have 3 dozen. If they can launch there's 3,000 miles, we can launch ours around the globe." Well, how much of that is true? With GW at the helm it seems we may be in for many more wars over the next few years. Do we really have the means to win them all? I think so, but I'm not too educated on our military.
 
There are people fighting around the world for us Everyday. Though you will never hear or read about 99% of the times
 
The North Korean response should be expected. North Korea is a sovereign nation and should not have to answer to pompous statments and ridicule of intruding countries. The North Korean response was warrented, considering the seriousness of our threats against them.

Our current foreign policy is intrusive and hypocritical. The Bush administration is pushing forward a war agenda that will surely leave us spread to thinly across many fronts. We should concentrate on those threats who pose a current and more immediate threat.

How can we call upon foreign soveriegn nations to disarm and disist from nuclear projects of any kind, when we violate all existing nuclear treaties?
 
TxArmyGuy said:
NK makes brash decesions that affect not just the U.S. but everyone else in the world. China is not doing anything to help feed the NK people and doing nothing else other then to give moral support. Give NK a Nuke and see how long it takes them to invade the south

Just give em a nuke huh????!!!!!!!!

People like you shouldn't even be allowed near sharp objects without supervision let alone a gun. Ever wonder about the knock on effectsthat just one nuke might have??
 
I applaud the fact that this country is finally attempting to quiet the problem children of the world.

Americans have been too nice and bleeding heart for too long. We must install enough fear in the world through force because that is the only language these backward nations understand.

We could have avoided the whole Cold War, Korean, Vietnam, if we just listen to the practical minds of Patton and McAuther.

Now, after all these lost American lives we can thank the policy of the Truman era and those who followed after him.
 
danielson said:
yes....but have we stirred the pot? before they were named an 'axis' member, they were gonna send diplomats over to saouth korea and things between the nationed had calmed down. i didnt hear much after that, only that the sent a bunch of US ambassadors back over. were they named an axis memebr because they were doing this stuff covertly or did they only start after....its something i wondered

I dunno, maybe he called them evil since they were?
 
Rogue Warrior said:
I applaud the fact that this country is finally attempting to quiet the problem children of the world.

Americans have been too nice and bleeding heart for too long. We must install enough fear in the world through force because that is the only language these backward nations understand.

We could have avoided the whole Cold War, Korean, Vietnam, if we just listen to the practical minds of Patton and McAuther.

Now, after all these lost American lives we can thank the policy of the Truman era and those who followed after him.

So Bush is really being a nice guy.........rather than a power crazy fuckwitt?
 
Imnotdutch said:


Just give em a nuke huh????!!!!!!!!

People like you shouldn't even be allowed near sharp objects without supervision let alone a gun. Ever wonder about the knock on effectsthat just one nuke might have??

I believe you missinterpretted what he said. I believe he meant when they get their nukes developed, watch how quickly they invade south Korea. And as far as your Statement to The Rogue Warrior.... stop being a pussy and think for a second. If we just up and decided one day to start handing out beat downs on nations that were peaceful and benevolent, then yes we would be a fucked up country with a fucked up leader. The fact of the matter is, we have ignored so many problems, and solved others so hlaf assed, that we now have literally a whole world of shit to deal with.

and MR?, perhaps you should change your name to Mr. IDon'tknowwhatiamtalkingabout. Like i said earlier, it was the U.N> who put the cameras in N. Korea's nuke plants, not the U.S. In fact, that was one of the only intelligent things that the U.N. has done that i can think of. They put them in there because the entire fucking world does not want Korea to have nukes. No one threatens them, they are merely an assbackwards aggressive country. But once they pull the cameras out of there (i wonder why) and America has the bals to speak up, we are intruding on their Sovreignty?Shut the fuck up. You dont see the U.N> installing cameras into america or england or etc. nuke plants, now do you?
 
JohnyJuice said:
I believe you missinterpretted what he said. I believe he meant when they get their nukes developed, watch how quickly they invade south Korea. And as far as your Statement to The Rogue Warrior.... stop being a pussy and think for a second. If we just up and decided one day to start handing out beat downs on nations that were peaceful and benevolent, then yes we would be a fucked up country with a fucked up leader. The fact of the matter is, we have ignored so many problems, and solved others so hlaf assed, that we now have literally a whole world of shit to deal with.

On point 1 you are right.........I stand corrected.

On point two.........since when did the USA decide it was the worlds policeman? Bush is spoiling for a fight and he'll do anything to get it. Is that me being a pussy? No. Outside of the USA there are alot of people that suddenly got very concerned when Bush got into power..........its a shame Tony Blair is so out of touch with his people that he couldn't even see this. Tell me this, why is Bush picking on Iraq instead of say Egypt (a nest of terrorism if ever ther was one) or Saudi? Bush just wants an easy fight........with Iraq he has a better chance of getting that. He's just throwing his weight around ensuring that everybody notices him........pathetic really.
 
JohnyJuice said:


I believe you missinterpretted what he said. I believe he meant when they get their nukes developed, watch how quickly they invade south Korea. And as far as your Statement to The Rogue Warrior.... stop being a pussy and think for a second. If we just up and decided one day to start handing out beat downs on nations that were peaceful and benevolent, then yes we would be a fucked up country with a fucked up leader. The fact of the matter is, we have ignored so many problems, and solved others so hlaf assed, that we now have literally a whole world of shit to deal with.

BTW concerning the pussy comment........go fuck yourself. Bet you feel real tough bandying words like that around huh.......and just last night your mom was telling me that she was so proud of you.
 
Nice post Victorian Guy...sometimes it is good to be reminded of how good our country (US) really is
 
Imnotdutch said:


BTW concerning the pussy comment........go fuck yourself. Bet you feel real tough bandying words like that around huh.......and just last night your mom was telling me that she was so proud of you.

Fuck you, you little bitch. I was implying that you were taking a pussy's stance in this whole thing, not that you were a pussy (which you probably are).
And as far as your "world's policeman" bullshit arguement, i can already tell your mentality. You would rather the U.N. handle the world's problems, and make everyone hug and play nice. The world doesnt work like that, you idealistic shithead. When America does nothing, we get bitched and moaned at. When we act, we get bitched and moaned at. Maybe we should just sit around and let things develop at the rate they are going, without intercededing. We could play "Lets pretend we are like the pussy whipped bitch Europeans, who like to sit back and do nothing as they get demolished and cry for help". Lets see, here are some quick predictions....
1. N. Korea gets nukes. Invades south Korea. Depending on how China reacts to this, they could have a little nuke fest of their own. If N. korea and china get along, well then Korea can just sit back and sell misles and nukes to fund their economy.
2. Huge war in the middle east. It will go nuclear as well. It will also most likely roll over into India/Pakistan nuke fest.
3. Korea sells nukes to islamic extremists, and they detonate one somewhere, leading to a big war.

I really dont see a need to go on, because any of the above mentioned events would probably bring around another dark ages.
So while you are sitting there in your pathetic smugness combing your studly ponytail, why dont you think about the way things work back in a little place called reality. For all you know about international events and blah blah, you obviously have a problem realising that talking to people doesnt work most of the time.
So be content sitting around, sucking cock, wearing a skirt, and being an idealistic fag. Leave keeping the world in a somewhat ordered fashion up to America.
 
JohnyJuice said:

I believe he meant when they get their nukes developed, watch how quickly they invade south Korea.

For your information, they already got nukes.

They can not reach the USA however they can attack US military bases in South Korea and Japan if the Americans decide to cowardly attack them from the air.

War with North Korea wont happen. Putting it bluntly, the Americans will get their asses kicked badly if they decide to embark on an un-winnable war like North Korea. North Korea would be harder than Vietnam even without China's support. They are more than capable of defending them selves and rightly so, the US has no right to act righteous and decide who can have nukes or not.

Rumsflieds speech, that he can take on NK and Iraq at the same time was complete bullshit. A war with North Korea would destroy the US economy, Rumsfield and bush are the most cockiest fags I have ever seen.
 
Strong_Man20 said:


For your information, they already got nukes.

They can not reach the USA however they can attack US military bases in South Korea and Japan if the Americans decide to cowardly attack them from the air.

War with North Korea wont happen. Putting it bluntly, the Americans will get their asses kicked badly if they decide to embark on an un-winnable war like North Korea. North Korea would be harder than Vietnam even without China's support. They are more than capable of defending them selves and rightly so, the US has no right to act righteous and decide who can have nukes or not.

Rumsflieds speech, that he can take on NK and Iraq at the same time was complete bullshit. A war with North Korea would destroy the US economy, Rumsfield and bush are the most cockiest fags I have ever seen.


Don't quit your day job. Your debating skills are among the worst I have seen.
 
Strong Man I'm just wondering from what experience do you speak about us not being able to handle NK?

being worst then vietnam? doubtfull...the modern day battle field has shown no one has been able to keep up with us.
 
Our technological edge is so great that we could take aybody within weeks if we had to and there were no constraints. I'm not sure if I'm comfortable having that big of a military advantage with human nature being what it is. The wrong people could enforce a coup de tat or whatever it is called.
 
Strong_Man20 said:


For your information, they already got nukes.

They can not reach the USA however they can attack US military bases in South Korea and Japan if the Americans decide to cowardly attack them from the air.

War with North Korea wont happen. Putting it bluntly, the Americans will get their asses kicked badly if they decide to embark on an un-winnable war like North Korea. North Korea would be harder than Vietnam even without China's support. They are more than capable of defending them selves and rightly so, the US has no right to act righteous and decide who can have nukes or not.

Rumsflieds speech, that he can take on NK and Iraq at the same time was complete bullshit. A war with North Korea would destroy the US economy, Rumsfield and bush are the most cockiest fags I have ever seen.

GayMan5000, thank you for your input. i have now seen the light. I like how you threw in the "cowardly attack them from the air" comment. Shut your mouth. What would be manly, if we give out troops handguns and march thousands upon thousands of them in to fight hand to hand, because that would only be "fair" since the opposition doesnt have our technology, manpower, etc? You are a joke. Listen to your horseshit about us not being able to take on Korea and Iraq. I am sure if i go dig up some of your posts on the war in Afghanistan (before we went in), you were one of those assholes saying "Look what happened to the soviets when they went in there. They got themselves into a war which lasted years, cost countless lives, and then lost". But what happened?? We mopped the floor with them.
Keep hating on America, because i know it burns you up that not only are we a stronger nation, we arent a bunch of socialist dildoes like the rest of the world, i know it also pains you that we have bigger dicks.
I would even wager to say that we could also probably hand "your majesty's military" their ass while we simultaneously dealt with Iraq and Korea. We will just arm out troops with Tooth brushes, and tell them to engage in oral hygene warfare; something that is completely unknown to the English.
 
Those that say do nothing I only wish that would be enough. I find it ironic that the pacificist are appallingly misinformed or simply apathetic. If it is one of the two I suggest you get involved and research your opinions. Its my belief if you do you will find your stand illfounded.

This is one of "MY" personal favorites.
http://www.globalsecurity.org
 
You can already tell my mentality?? LMAO. Had a great time laughing at your post.......full of paranoia, macho images, loadsa choldish comments........funny as hell.

You must know everything huh. This wouldn't be out of character for you.........the minute somebody crosses you, you get all upset and get involved with pathetic name calling. Did you know that you exemplify the stereotypical american (as veiwed by the rest of the world)? Fortunately I know enough americans to know they aren't all like you. Bottom line is you like throwing your weight around and you can't handle it when people oppose you and your views. Most people get past that attitude once puberty hits.........mebbe you still have time??




JohnyJuice said:


Fuck you, you little bitch. I was implying that you were taking a pussy's stance in this whole thing, not that you were a pussy (which you probably are).
And as far as your "world's policeman" bullshit arguement, i can already tell your mentality. You would rather the U.N. handle the world's problems, and make everyone hug and play nice. The world doesnt work like that, you idealistic shithead. When America does nothing, we get bitched and moaned at. When we act, we get bitched and moaned at. Maybe we should just sit around and let things develop at the rate they are going, without intercededing. We could play "Lets pretend we are like the pussy whipped bitch Europeans, who like to sit back and do nothing as they get demolished and cry for help". Lets see, here are some quick predictions....
1. N. Korea gets nukes. Invades south Korea. Depending on how China reacts to this, they could have a little nuke fest of their own. If N. korea and china get along, well then Korea can just sit back and sell misles and nukes to fund their economy.
2. Huge war in the middle east. It will go nuclear as well. It will also most likely roll over into India/Pakistan nuke fest.
3. Korea sells nukes to islamic extremists, and they detonate one somewhere, leading to a big war.

I really dont see a need to go on, because any of the above mentioned events would probably bring around another dark ages.
So while you are sitting there in your pathetic smugness combing your studly ponytail, why dont you think about the way things work back in a little place called reality. For all you know about international events and blah blah, you obviously have a problem realising that talking to people doesnt work most of the time.
So be content sitting around, sucking cock, wearing a skirt, and being an idealistic fag. Leave keeping the world in a somewhat ordered fashion up to America.
 
This post proved one thing to me.........you are just a jackass.

I hope the other americans on the board wil ignore my next comments below because I feel the need to tell this fuckwitt what the rest of the world considers to be a stereotypical american:

1) Big mouth (you got that covered)
2) Inability to think prior to acting (you got this well and truly covered too)
3) Big headed (guess what- looks like you do this spectacularly well too)
4) Power crazy (hhmmmm what do you reckon)
5) Huge ego (yip)
6) Mental ability of a chimp (mebbe this is exaggerating a little- you are more like an amoeba)
7) Obese (dunno....)
8) Small penis- ok I made this one up just for you. But I'm guessing that you are less than well endowed hence you try to compensate with a shitty attitude.

Disclaimer: These views are STEREOTYPICAL views. They are unlikely to be accurate for many americans (as is usual for stereotypes). However, Jonnyjuice (a tough guys name if ever I heard one) seems to fit most of the stereotypes. Go figure.........

JohnyJuice said:


GayMan5000, thank you for your input. i have now seen the light. I like how you threw in the "cowardly attack them from the air" comment. Shut your mouth. What would be manly, if we give out troops handguns and march thousands upon thousands of them in to fight hand to hand, because that would only be "fair" since the opposition doesnt have our technology, manpower, etc? You are a joke. Listen to your horseshit about us not being able to take on Korea and Iraq. I am sure if i go dig up some of your posts on the war in Afghanistan (before we went in), you were one of those assholes saying "Look what happened to the soviets when they went in there. They got themselves into a war which lasted years, cost countless lives, and then lost". But what happened?? We mopped the floor with them.
Keep hating on America, because i know it burns you up that not only are we a stronger nation, we arent a bunch of socialist dildoes like the rest of the world, i know it also pains you that we have bigger dicks.
I would even wager to say that we could also probably hand "your majesty's military" their ass while we simultaneously dealt with Iraq and Korea. We will just arm out troops with Tooth brushes, and tell them to engage in oral hygene warfare; something that is completely unknown to the English.
 
Well I'm no pacifist.......I believe that in todays world violence must play a part. However, I object to all of the posts saying we should just go to war.......especially the ones concerning using nukes. Nukes are a last resort......you let one off and people are likely to get trigger happy. Even if the nuke is not aimed at a particular country they are likely to get a little twitchy when they feel the repercussions of the bomb.

Thanks for the link, I'll check it out.

minion said:
Those that say do nothing I only wish that would be enough. I find it ironic that the pacificist are appallingly misinformed or simply apathetic. If it is one of the two I suggest you get involved and research your opinions. Its my belief if you do you will find your stand illfounded.

This is one of "MY" personal favorites.
http://www.globalsecurity.org
 
Imnotdutch said:
You can already tell my mentality?? LMAO. Had a great time laughing at your post.......full of paranoia, macho images, loadsa choldish comments........funny as hell.

You must know everything huh. This wouldn't be out of character for you.........the minute somebody crosses you, you get all upset and get involved with pathetic name calling. Did you know that you exemplify the stereotypical american (as veiwed by the rest of the world)? Fortunately I know enough americans to know they aren't all like you. Bottom line is you like throwing your weight around and you can't handle it when people oppose you and your views. Most people get past that attitude once puberty hits.........mebbe you still have time??


Actually, i believe you sarted the name calling and talking shit about my mom. I merely said to stop acting like a pussy. And yeah, i am really paranoid. whatever. Macho images? Telling things like they are, as opposed to the beating around the bush and talking while doing nothing like you Europeans? Guilty as charged. Macho? I cant help it if i have more free, unbound testosterone than you have I.Q. points.
 
In the first two lines you managed to contradict yourself........outstanding.

Ok you wanna compare degrees........I got a BSc (hons) and a Ph.D. Now that ain't incredibly impressive but can you match it? As for your free test........what comes out of a needle doesn't count little boy.

JohnyJuice said:


Actually, i believe you sarted the name calling and talking shit about my mom. I merely said to stop acting like a pussy. And yeah, i am really paranoid. whatever. Macho images? Telling things like they are, as opposed to the beating around the bush and talking while doing nothing like you Europeans? Guilty as charged. Macho? I cant help it if i have more free, unbound testosterone than you have I.Q. points.
 
Imnotdutch said:
This post proved one thing to me.........you are just a jackass.

I hope the other americans on the board wil ignore my next comments below because I feel the need to tell this fuckwitt what the rest of the world considers to be a stereotypical american:

1) Big mouth (you got that covered)
2) Inability to think prior to acting (you got this well and truly covered too)
3) Big headed (guess what- looks like you do this spectacularly well too)
4) Power crazy (hhmmmm what do you reckon)
5) Huge ego (yip)
6) Mental ability of a chimp (mebbe this is exaggerating a little- you are more like an amoeba)
7) Obese (dunno....)
8) Small penis- ok I made this one up just for you. But I'm guessing that you are less than well endowed hence you try to compensate with a shitty attitude.

Disclaimer: These views are STEREOTYPICAL views. They are unlikely to be accurate for many americans (as is usual for stereotypes). However, Jonnyjuice (a tough guys name if ever I heard one) seems to fit most of the stereotypes. Go figure.........


I really dont give a shit what you think about me, or anything else for that matter. But since you want to blow my dick so bad, i will go back and correct that little survey you put up. I found most of the answers to be a tad bit off.
1) Big mouth= if being honest and not bullshitting is a big mouth, then yup
2) Inability to think prior to acting= sometimes. I think you are a dildo for what it matters.
3) Big headed= in the pants, yes. On top of my shoulders, nope
4) Power crazy (hhmmmm what do you reckon)= i reckon you need a haircut
5) Huge ego (yip)= Not huge. It's called confidence. Dont mistake them.
6) Mental ability= far greater than yours. I am not about to get into an I.Q. debate though, cause it is easier and more fun to tell you that your mother fellates goats. It also accomplished the same thing. nothing.
7) Obese = 6' 232lb 10% Where you at homey?
8) Small penis= nope. But if this is your way of trying to trick me into giving you jerkoff material, forget the details.

And as far as the JohnyJuice nickname goes, amazing. You have made the same stupid observation most others have. I will enlighten you on the origins of it, much as you have enlightened me as to what the offspring of deformed retards who have sex with crack addicted whores. I got that nickname form a dude i worked out with. i didnt make it up.
 
lol.......I think I shouldn't bother restating what is plain for the world to see. Kinda wondering how you are gonna respond to my first point in the last post I made.........I figure your brain went into overload on that one.

JohnyJuice said:


I really dont give a shit what you think about me, or anything else for that matter. But since you want to blow my dick so bad, i will go back and correct that little survey you put up. I found most of the answers to be a tad bit off.
1) Big mouth= if being honest and not bullshitting is a big mouth, then yup
2) Inability to think prior to acting= sometimes. I think you are a dildo for what it matters.
3) Big headed= in the pants, yes. On top of my shoulders, nope
4) Power crazy (hhmmmm what do you reckon)= i reckon you need a haircut
5) Huge ego (yip)= Not huge. It's called confidence. Dont mistake them.
6) Mental ability= far greater than yours. I am not about to get into an I.Q. debate though, cause it is easier and more fun to tell you that your mother fellates goats. It also accomplished the same thing. nothing.
7) Obese = 6' 232lb 10% Where you at homey?
8) Small penis= nope. But if this is your way of trying to trick me into giving you jerkoff material, forget the details.

And as far as the JohnyJuice nickname goes, amazing. You have made the same stupid observation most others have. I will enlighten you on the origins of it, much as you have enlightened me as to what the offspring of deformed retards who have sex with crack addicted whores. I got that nickname form a dude i worked out with. i didnt make it up.
 
:argue:

I guess Santa couldn't fit down a few chimneys. Thanks guys....you are making me feel better about my life today.

So some guys got to pick their handle huh? I used to be Test boy, that was fine. It got changed to my present name which I don't like too well. Oh well.
 
The Nature Boy said:


well then we need to go after everyone else with nuclear weapons then too. north korea is a soverign nation, they should be allowed to go about their business.

Good point!
 
Testosterone boy said:
:argue:

I guess Santa couldn't fit down a few chimneys. Thanks guys....you are making me feel better about my life today.

So some guys got to pick their handle huh? I used to be Test boy, that was fine. It got changed to my present name which I don't like too well. Oh well.

Yeah Xmas brings out the asshole in me..........BAH humbug :)

Merry Xmas TB.
 
The post that won't die.

North Korea does not have the infrastructure to sustain a campaign against anyone. Nor do they have the force projection to attack anywhere off of the Peninsula. (Well, maybe Japan, China, etc., but maybe not even them.)

Their recent warnings, while frightening, do not constitute a legitimate threat to mainland America, even if they have an atomic weapon or two. I am personally more concerned about an al-Qaeda attack once we being our Iraq invasion. That's another topic. North Korea will be dealt with and probably dimsantled during the Bush Presidency.

Allowing sovereign nations to "go abut their business" is the surest way to hasten the demise of the USA. As much as others dislike it, we need to protect our interests and standard of living, unless you are prepared to give all that up. I am not.

The Vietnam war was a complete success, if you understand that our true objective was to punish the South for rejecting becoming a client state. We destroyed them and they never recovered.
 
im actually worried that saddam sent a whole bunch of sleeper agents over here and as soon as it looks like he;s done for, they start blowing up shit....so maybe not even al-qaeda


but its not realistic that you;d fight a war on 2 separate countries is it? at the same time.....either way it looks like saddam is the first one going down :)
 
Imnotdutch said:


Yeah Xmas brings out the asshole in me..........BAH humbug :)

Merry Xmas TB.


Merry Xmas to you Imnotdutch.

I keep forgetting to just leave the country for a week or so around Xmas, I really can't stand it.

:fro:
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


The Vietnam war was a complete success, if you understand that our true objective was to punish the South for rejecting becoming a client state. We destroyed them and they never recovered.

once again, it would have been a lot easier to just carpet bomb South Vietnam for a year non-stop rather than sending young americans to the butchery.
 
manny78 said:


once again, it would have been a lot easier to just carpet bomb South Vietnam for a year non-stop rather than sending young americans to the butchery.


I really hate this fact but the truth is that we need some miliatry exercises from time to time. How can we protect our interests without any experienced military leaders? I'm not condoning the way Vietnam was run however.
 
?You know what. i am going to appologize right now for insulting you earlier (I'mNotDutch). I shouldnt be mocking you for having a diffwerent take then i do on how America is seen. Some people on here piss me off cause they are just blatantly Un-American, they just go against every thing we do. You didnt comeoff like that, but i kinda went off on you, so my bad.

I am still cooler than you, because i am an american. I also have a larger penis than you, but you arent a bad guy. Dont want you to think i dislike you or something. You always seemed cool on your other posts. Again. peace.
 
TxArmyGuy said:
Strong Man I'm just wondering from what experience do you speak about us not being able to handle NK?

being worst then vietnam? doubtfull...the modern day battle field has shown no one has been able to keep up with us.

History is my experience....

History teaches us that empires who bite off more than they can chew will eventually be flushed down the toilet.. That is exactly what will happen if the US decides to get nasty with NK.. NK have the means of defending them selves not like Afghanistan or Iraq. They will attack the US and its allies and have the technology to do so. I heard that the Iraq war will cost 200 billion dollars, how much do you think it will cost to invade NK?
It will have a huge negative impact on the US economy to no return.

We are talking about a country that has the means of launching nukes against US bases in Japan and SK. No one is questioning America’s military superiority over NK, but its not enough to beat NK.
 
An Open Letter to the People and Government of North Korea,

Since my military has been severely down-sized, I am unforntunately only able to service one customer at a time with conventional warfare tactics. Seeing as we are busy with Iraq at this time, I will only be able to respond to a threat from your country with nuclear warfare.

Please don't be surprised if this happens, so continue acting the fool like you are at your own risk.

Signed,
George W. Bush
 
ttlpkg said:
An Open Letter to the People and Government of North Korea,

Since my military has been severely down-sized, I am unforntunately only able to service one customer at a time with conventional warfare tactics. Seeing as we are busy with Iraq at this time, I will only be able to respond to a threat from your country with nuclear warfare.

Please don't be surprised if this happens, so continue acting the fool like you are at your own risk.

Signed,
George W. Bush

Its the end of America if the Bush administration continue to go this path......Bush Jr obviously does not have his fathers tack.

BTW could you show me the source you got this from? I doubt the US are this foolish to commit themselves against the likes of NK. Maybe Syria and Libia are more realistic however.
 
Strong_Man20 said:


Its the end of America if the Bush administration continue to go this path......Bush Jr obviously does not have his fathers tack.

BTW could you show me the source you got this from? I doubt the US are this foolish to commit themselves against the likes of NK. Maybe Syria and Libia are more realistic however.

You're kidding right? I just made this up as a joke but I do believe we should be prepared to use nukes if warranted, and NK or any would-be-threat should know this.

It is not the end of America by showing a willingness to use force. It would be the end to not have the armed forces to back it up.
 
JohnyJuice said:


GayMan5000, thank you for your input. i have now seen the light. I like how you threw in the "cowardly attack them from the air" comment. Shut your mouth. What would be manly, if we give out troops handguns and march thousands upon thousands of them in to fight hand to hand, because that would only be "fair" since the opposition doesnt have our technology, manpower, etc? You are a joke. Listen to your horseshit about us not being able to take on Korea and Iraq. I am sure if i go dig up some of your posts on the war in Afghanistan (before we went in), you were one of those assholes saying "Look what happened to the soviets when they went in there. They got themselves into a war which lasted years, cost countless lives, and then lost". But what happened?? We mopped the floor with them.
Keep hating on America, because i know it burns you up that not only are we a stronger nation, we arent a bunch of socialist dildoes like the rest of the world, i know it also pains you that we have bigger dicks.
I would even wager to say that we could also probably hand "your majesty's military" their ass while we simultaneously dealt with Iraq and Korea. We will just arm out troops with Tooth brushes, and tell them to engage in oral hygene warfare; something that is completely unknown to the English.

Easy now son,

I bet every anti-US country, would love nothing less than to see the likes of you gain power in the US....So that you could drill your country into the ground, and turn the US into a shitpile like Russia. The arrogance by the likes of you astonishes me.

Let me get this through to you clearly, you yanks cannot invade NK without destroying your economy and sacrificing many US lives. North Korea are not little bitches you can push around, they have the capabilities to hurt the US badly if you decide to go that route.
 
Strong_Man20 said:

North Korea are not little bitches you can push around, they have the capabilities to hurt the US badly if you decide to go that route.

All the more reason to nuke first, ask questions later.
 
Who said anything about invading N. Korea? I dont think that possibility has even been brought up. We arent that far along in the process. But if you think N. Korea would give us that much trouble, read above were you wuoted me. Go down and read what i said about Ashcanistan.
 
JohnyJuice said:
Go down and read what i said about Ashcanistan.

LOL.....Comparing Afghanistan with NK, is like comparing Ghandi's size with Ronnie Coleman
Remember what happened to Hitler when he created too many enemies??

BTW NK threw out the UN weapons inspectors from their nuclear plant. They couldn’t give two shits about the US......
 
Strong_Man20 said:


BTW NK threw out the UN weapons inspectors from their nuclear plant. They couldn’t give two shits about the US......

And that is cool of them to you, but we should care about therm? Whatever man. They are a bunch of gooks who are gonna get lit up like a christmas tree if they keep this shit up. But dont take my word for it, sit back and watch as we keep the world safe for bed wetters like yourself.
 
Strong_Man20 said:


LOL.....Comparing Afghanistan with NK, is like comparing Ghandi's size with Ronnie Coleman
Remember what happened to Hitler when he created too many enemies??

BTW NK threw out the UN weapons inspectors from their nuclear plant. They couldn’t give two shits about the US......


comparing the US to the likes of Hitler's empire is ridculous....


1. we don't practice genocide

2. we aren't on a conquest to conquer the world

3. we are eliminating the terrorist organizations that threaten our, and YOUR safety, and the countries that support them

4. considering yourself lucky we are your closest allies, being that we prevented the UK from becoming part of the Nazi Republic of Germany in WWII.

thank you
 
Number 4 leads me to think that you watch too many John Wayne movies.........

Number 3 leads me tot hink that you aren't up on current events........the Uk is also involved in that particular activity.

Number 2 is debatable.........

jerkbox said:



comparing the US to the likes of Hitler's empire is ridculous....


1. we don't practice genocide

2. we aren't on a conquest to conquer the world

3. we are eliminating the terrorist organizations that threaten our, and YOUR safety, and the countries that support them

4. considering yourself lucky we are your closest allies, being that we prevented the UK from becoming part of the Nazi Republic of Germany in WWII.

thank you
 
i suppose that we didn't supply the the majority of the western allied forces with arms during WWII, and that the decimated British army defeated Germany

and I realize that the UK is involved...


anyway, going to war with NK would not be a good thing for anyone involved....besides that, my guess would be the UK would be right there with us anyway...

cheers!
 
jerkbox said:



comparing the US to the likes of Hitler's empire is ridculous....


1. we don't practice genocide

2. we aren't on a conquest to conquer the world

3. we are eliminating the terrorist organizations that threaten our, and YOUR safety, and the countries that support them

4. considering yourself lucky we are your closest allies, being that we prevented the UK from becoming part of the Nazi Republic of Germany in WWII.

thank you

1- You have others doing it for you

2- really ? Cause you sadly failed .......

3- WHere is ossama ? Did Bush forgot about that ?

4- That's true.........but I dont give a fuck about British......
 
jerkbox said:
i suppose that we didn't supply the the majority of the western allied forces with arms during WWII, and that the decimated British army defeated Germany

and I realize that the UK is involved...


anyway, going to war with NK would not be a good thing for anyone involved....besides that, my guess would be the UK would be right there with us anyway...

cheers!

Ah yeah thats right.......before you lot got involved we were fighting with spears and flint axes. Saying our army was decimated means shit. That is only one man in the original ten of the armed forces was dead. Oh and we had some help from other countries in helping defeat Germany.

If you think that the British public will stand going to war without very good reason then you misjudge us. Blair is struggling to get public support for his own support of the US attack on Iraq.....and thats an enemy the public know about.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom