Hitler said:well if there is war, S. Korea won't have much time to think about it. Correct me if im wrong but the capitol of SK is well within NK artilery and missle range. Plus we have a shitload of troops over there and there would be HELL to pay if NK made a preemptive strike against SK and US forces.
The Nature Boy said:what harm has north korea done to anyone? someone please enlighten me.
manny78 said:
they didn't the US the permission to have Nuke plants/weapons. Nukes in the world are basically like a car, in order to use one you need a license........lol
Testosterone boy said:If I was a foreign country, I may very well really dislike America. Our foreign policy comes across like we have apppointed ourselves as everybodies boss. Frankly, other countries have a right to defend themselves.
manny78 said:
and they have China on their side. That's the difference between NK and Iraq. Go ask R.I.P. Gen. MacArthur, things were going perfectly till China joined the war.
The Nature Boy said:
well then we need to go after everyone else with nuclear weapons then too. north korea is a soverign nation, they should be allowed to go about their business.
TxArmyGuy said:NK makes brash decesions that affect not just the U.S. but everyone else in the world. China is not doing anything to help feed the NK people and doing nothing else other then to give moral support. Give NK a Nuke and see how long it takes them to invade the south
TxArmyGuy said:NK makes brash decesions that affect not just the U.S. but everyone else in the world. China is not doing anything to help feed the NK people and doing nothing else other then to give moral support. Give NK a Nuke and see how long it takes them to invade the south
JohnyJuice said:
I can't remember who was over there during the korean war (Patton or MacArthur), but he wanted to keep rolling right through china and russia. He had a window of opportunity to conquer almost all of the Asain continent (the parts that matter anyway), but the president at the time wouldnt allow it. The general actually lobbied for it so much, and was so gun hoe, that he was taken out of control of the region and we never bothered. Makes you wonder what the world would have looked like had we conquered Russia and China.
But as far as N. Korea removing the video survelience.... Whoever thinks that isnt a problem is delusional. If you are using a reactor for what it is supposed to be used for (creating energy) , then there should be no problem with a camera watching people go about there normal business. Its not like they are gonna get in trouble for smoking on the job, or the employees donrt want them cause they feel a lack of privacy. It isnt a business office thatthese cameras are in. So why would they remove the cameras? Hmmm... Could it be so no one sees them enriching plutonium to weapon grade material, or removing material from the site to bring to another location to build a bomb? Duh.
The Nature Boy said:
you're right. people get upset about the UN trying to dictate to the US, yet the US is allowed to dictate to everone else in the world what happens.
JohnyJuice said:
I like that philosophy taken by th rest of the world... Do nothing, let America bend over backwards by bailing out countries, forgiving debts, helping some to defensd themselves, eliminating threats to world piece, getting the rerst of the world out of jams (WWII), etc.. and then bitch because everthing isnt perfect, and blame it on us intruding.
The Nature Boy said:
ok einstein. fill me in on the forgiving debts issue, when the US is one of the in debt countries in the world. Please list our acts of debt benovolence, besides forgiving WWII debts.
As for WWII, we had to do it for our own interest... not because we felt like helping everone else out, not only that the japanese bomed pearl harbor and that's what brought us in.
Now fill me in on who we've helped defend themselves.
Enlighten me.
danielson said:i think i remember a BBC report about the US and chinese meeting fairly recently to discuss amongst other things, N.korea....i dont think china likes em too much and see;s them as a mutual enemy
pakistan is a DAMN unstable givernment....its still ruled by a military dictator who overthrew the elected government, who in the past supported the taliban, who's borders still harbour taliban, who;s government probably has the odd nutjob in there and is currently in a stalemate with india, who can;t seem to decide what to do about kashmir, only that it should put 1milloon men on its border.
why are we not going after them?
why are we cancelling there debt? its just gonna go on military spending...
MattTheSkywalker said:
North Korea is a country ruled by a dictator who cares little for the people of the country, has isolated them from just about everything. The world is a better place if he is removed, period. it matters not who does it.
Pakistan - we forgave their debt to enlist their support of our operations in Afghanistan. The US, for better or worse, uses its welath and economic leverage like a blunt instrument to get things done on the world stage. You know that.
MattTheSkywalker said:
To whom is the US in debt? Are you talking about our "National Debt"?
Anyway, here's one for you:
At the commencement of Desert Storm, we forgave all debts of Arab or Muslim nations in the Middle East. Recently we forgave approx $300 million in debt to Pakistan.
Victorian guy said:I've lived in South Korea for more than a few years...South Koreans, despite owing their freedom to the USA (North korea has a much bigger army and lots more equipment), whose soldiers died for them in the Korean War and liberated them from the Japs in WW2, are thankless...they wont admit to owing the usa one damn bit of thanks. instead...because of an ACCIDENT where a US armoured vehicle ran over two teenage girls (what are amoured vehicles and pedestrians doing using the same road anyway? whose fault is that?), are crying foul and in some cases attacking anyone who is white as long as there are 10 of them and one white guy. These are people who think it is ok to slaughter dogs for food in the following manner: they take a stick and beat the dog to death, as they think it makes the meat more tender. I am not kidding. And I have fournd that they find that acceptable. Cruel bastards, I have no respect for them or their backward, racist culture. Wanna beat up your girlfriend in public- mgo to korea. No one there will care. Seen it happen. I intervened, and nobody else would. Just walked on by. Why does America and Canada let them immigrate? They wont allow a foreigner to become korean. South Korea has accepted ONE refugee- despite the thousands that arrive there.
SOBs. Why die for them? fuck south korea. they wont hire blacks to teach there...they want to learn english but are xenophobic...they suffer from a "helpless victim syndrome" and are always complaining about being treated poorly by other countries when they more or less have a slave market in chinese, phillipino and pakistanis whom they treat like SHIT.
Fuck them. The US ought to pull out of korea, period. so what if north attacks south One thing about Koreans..North Korea is bluffing. Call them on it, really threaten them, and watch them tremble.
North korea has sent hit squads to the south, blown up a passenger plane, blown up a handful of south korean govt ministers at a meeting in thailand, sells missle technology to unstable regimes, and is the most sickening dictatorship in a long time. The people are outright lied to- I am talking history is not so much portrayed differently, as a completely different version is taught to the north's people. I'd make it clear to the north: build nukes, and The US vaporizes Pyongyang with a hydrogen bomb (a nice 15 megatonner would obliterate everything within city limits and beyond) and a handful of other cities.
Because those weapons WILL be sold abroad and used against the US.
The Nature Boy said:
ok einstein. fill me in on the forgiving debts issue, when the US is one of the in debt countries in the world. Please list our acts of debt benovolence, besides forgiving WWII debts.
As for WWII, we had to do it for our own interest... not because we felt like helping everone else out, not only that the japanese bomed pearl harbor and that's what brought us in.
Now fill me in on who we've helped defend themselves.
Enlighten me.
JohnyJuice said:
Manny78.... The UN put the cameras in, not us. Those countries dont need cameras in their nuke facilities becasue we know they have nukes. N. Korea isnt allowed to have them (cause they are fucked up), and the camera is there to make sure they dont make nuke material. Get it? They disabled the cameras, so what does that tell you? Oh yeah, they are also building and testing long range ballistic missles. COincedence?
prophet said:there is no reason for a country like North Korea to have nukes! who threatons them?
manny78 said:
there's a reason: Japan. They still have the WWII fresh in memory...
manny78 said:
As usual, the UN as nothing better to do. Useless organization IMO. Pakis have nukes, nothing really care anymore. They're unstable as hell but anyway. Let's assume North Korea has nukes. What would they do ? What'S the worse that can happen ? They blow up Seoul or Tokyo. No more Hyundays or Hondas.
prophet said:
japan is more concerned with their economy right now...i don't think a war with N korea will solve their current economic conditions such as liquidity shortage and deflation
WizKid25 said:Why can't we just nuke them both already?
TxArmyGuy said:NK makes brash decesions that affect not just the U.S. but everyone else in the world. China is not doing anything to help feed the NK people and doing nothing else other then to give moral support. Give NK a Nuke and see how long it takes them to invade the south
WizKid25 said:Why can't we just nuke them both already?
danielson said:yes....but have we stirred the pot? before they were named an 'axis' member, they were gonna send diplomats over to saouth korea and things between the nationed had calmed down. i didnt hear much after that, only that the sent a bunch of US ambassadors back over. were they named an axis memebr because they were doing this stuff covertly or did they only start after....its something i wondered
Rogue Warrior said:I applaud the fact that this country is finally attempting to quiet the problem children of the world.
Americans have been too nice and bleeding heart for too long. We must install enough fear in the world through force because that is the only language these backward nations understand.
We could have avoided the whole Cold War, Korean, Vietnam, if we just listen to the practical minds of Patton and McAuther.
Now, after all these lost American lives we can thank the policy of the Truman era and those who followed after him.
Imnotdutch said:
Just give em a nuke huh????!!!!!!!!
People like you shouldn't even be allowed near sharp objects without supervision let alone a gun. Ever wonder about the knock on effectsthat just one nuke might have??
JohnyJuice said:I believe you missinterpretted what he said. I believe he meant when they get their nukes developed, watch how quickly they invade south Korea. And as far as your Statement to The Rogue Warrior.... stop being a pussy and think for a second. If we just up and decided one day to start handing out beat downs on nations that were peaceful and benevolent, then yes we would be a fucked up country with a fucked up leader. The fact of the matter is, we have ignored so many problems, and solved others so hlaf assed, that we now have literally a whole world of shit to deal with.
JohnyJuice said:
I believe you missinterpretted what he said. I believe he meant when they get their nukes developed, watch how quickly they invade south Korea. And as far as your Statement to The Rogue Warrior.... stop being a pussy and think for a second. If we just up and decided one day to start handing out beat downs on nations that were peaceful and benevolent, then yes we would be a fucked up country with a fucked up leader. The fact of the matter is, we have ignored so many problems, and solved others so hlaf assed, that we now have literally a whole world of shit to deal with.
JohnyJuice said:
If we just up and decided one day to start handing out beat downs on nations that were peaceful and benevolent
Imnotdutch said:
BTW concerning the pussy comment........go fuck yourself. Bet you feel real tough bandying words like that around huh.......and just last night your mom was telling me that she was so proud of you.
JohnyJuice said:
I believe he meant when they get their nukes developed, watch how quickly they invade south Korea.
Strong_Man20 said:
For your information, they already got nukes.
They can not reach the USA however they can attack US military bases in South Korea and Japan if the Americans decide to cowardly attack them from the air.
War with North Korea wont happen. Putting it bluntly, the Americans will get their asses kicked badly if they decide to embark on an un-winnable war like North Korea. North Korea would be harder than Vietnam even without China's support. They are more than capable of defending them selves and rightly so, the US has no right to act righteous and decide who can have nukes or not.
Rumsflieds speech, that he can take on NK and Iraq at the same time was complete bullshit. A war with North Korea would destroy the US economy, Rumsfield and bush are the most cockiest fags I have ever seen.
Strong_Man20 said:
For your information, they already got nukes.
They can not reach the USA however they can attack US military bases in South Korea and Japan if the Americans decide to cowardly attack them from the air.
War with North Korea wont happen. Putting it bluntly, the Americans will get their asses kicked badly if they decide to embark on an un-winnable war like North Korea. North Korea would be harder than Vietnam even without China's support. They are more than capable of defending them selves and rightly so, the US has no right to act righteous and decide who can have nukes or not.
Rumsflieds speech, that he can take on NK and Iraq at the same time was complete bullshit. A war with North Korea would destroy the US economy, Rumsfield and bush are the most cockiest fags I have ever seen.
JohnyJuice said:
Fuck you, you little bitch. I was implying that you were taking a pussy's stance in this whole thing, not that you were a pussy (which you probably are).
And as far as your "world's policeman" bullshit arguement, i can already tell your mentality. You would rather the U.N. handle the world's problems, and make everyone hug and play nice. The world doesnt work like that, you idealistic shithead. When America does nothing, we get bitched and moaned at. When we act, we get bitched and moaned at. Maybe we should just sit around and let things develop at the rate they are going, without intercededing. We could play "Lets pretend we are like the pussy whipped bitch Europeans, who like to sit back and do nothing as they get demolished and cry for help". Lets see, here are some quick predictions....
1. N. Korea gets nukes. Invades south Korea. Depending on how China reacts to this, they could have a little nuke fest of their own. If N. korea and china get along, well then Korea can just sit back and sell misles and nukes to fund their economy.
2. Huge war in the middle east. It will go nuclear as well. It will also most likely roll over into India/Pakistan nuke fest.
3. Korea sells nukes to islamic extremists, and they detonate one somewhere, leading to a big war.
I really dont see a need to go on, because any of the above mentioned events would probably bring around another dark ages.
So while you are sitting there in your pathetic smugness combing your studly ponytail, why dont you think about the way things work back in a little place called reality. For all you know about international events and blah blah, you obviously have a problem realising that talking to people doesnt work most of the time.
So be content sitting around, sucking cock, wearing a skirt, and being an idealistic fag. Leave keeping the world in a somewhat ordered fashion up to America.
JohnyJuice said:
GayMan5000, thank you for your input. i have now seen the light. I like how you threw in the "cowardly attack them from the air" comment. Shut your mouth. What would be manly, if we give out troops handguns and march thousands upon thousands of them in to fight hand to hand, because that would only be "fair" since the opposition doesnt have our technology, manpower, etc? You are a joke. Listen to your horseshit about us not being able to take on Korea and Iraq. I am sure if i go dig up some of your posts on the war in Afghanistan (before we went in), you were one of those assholes saying "Look what happened to the soviets when they went in there. They got themselves into a war which lasted years, cost countless lives, and then lost". But what happened?? We mopped the floor with them.
Keep hating on America, because i know it burns you up that not only are we a stronger nation, we arent a bunch of socialist dildoes like the rest of the world, i know it also pains you that we have bigger dicks.
I would even wager to say that we could also probably hand "your majesty's military" their ass while we simultaneously dealt with Iraq and Korea. We will just arm out troops with Tooth brushes, and tell them to engage in oral hygene warfare; something that is completely unknown to the English.
minion said:Those that say do nothing I only wish that would be enough. I find it ironic that the pacificist are appallingly misinformed or simply apathetic. If it is one of the two I suggest you get involved and research your opinions. Its my belief if you do you will find your stand illfounded.
This is one of "MY" personal favorites.
http://www.globalsecurity.org
Imnotdutch said:You can already tell my mentality?? LMAO. Had a great time laughing at your post.......full of paranoia, macho images, loadsa choldish comments........funny as hell.
You must know everything huh. This wouldn't be out of character for you.........the minute somebody crosses you, you get all upset and get involved with pathetic name calling. Did you know that you exemplify the stereotypical american (as veiwed by the rest of the world)? Fortunately I know enough americans to know they aren't all like you. Bottom line is you like throwing your weight around and you can't handle it when people oppose you and your views. Most people get past that attitude once puberty hits.........mebbe you still have time??
JohnyJuice said:
Actually, i believe you sarted the name calling and talking shit about my mom. I merely said to stop acting like a pussy. And yeah, i am really paranoid. whatever. Macho images? Telling things like they are, as opposed to the beating around the bush and talking while doing nothing like you Europeans? Guilty as charged. Macho? I cant help it if i have more free, unbound testosterone than you have I.Q. points.
Imnotdutch said:This post proved one thing to me.........you are just a jackass.
I hope the other americans on the board wil ignore my next comments below because I feel the need to tell this fuckwitt what the rest of the world considers to be a stereotypical american:
1) Big mouth (you got that covered)
2) Inability to think prior to acting (you got this well and truly covered too)
3) Big headed (guess what- looks like you do this spectacularly well too)
4) Power crazy (hhmmmm what do you reckon)
5) Huge ego (yip)
6) Mental ability of a chimp (mebbe this is exaggerating a little- you are more like an amoeba)
7) Obese (dunno....)
8) Small penis- ok I made this one up just for you. But I'm guessing that you are less than well endowed hence you try to compensate with a shitty attitude.
Disclaimer: These views are STEREOTYPICAL views. They are unlikely to be accurate for many americans (as is usual for stereotypes). However, Jonnyjuice (a tough guys name if ever I heard one) seems to fit most of the stereotypes. Go figure.........
JohnyJuice said:
I really dont give a shit what you think about me, or anything else for that matter. But since you want to blow my dick so bad, i will go back and correct that little survey you put up. I found most of the answers to be a tad bit off.
1) Big mouth= if being honest and not bullshitting is a big mouth, then yup
2) Inability to think prior to acting= sometimes. I think you are a dildo for what it matters.
3) Big headed= in the pants, yes. On top of my shoulders, nope
4) Power crazy (hhmmmm what do you reckon)= i reckon you need a haircut
5) Huge ego (yip)= Not huge. It's called confidence. Dont mistake them.
6) Mental ability= far greater than yours. I am not about to get into an I.Q. debate though, cause it is easier and more fun to tell you that your mother fellates goats. It also accomplished the same thing. nothing.
7) Obese = 6' 232lb 10% Where you at homey?
8) Small penis= nope. But if this is your way of trying to trick me into giving you jerkoff material, forget the details.
And as far as the JohnyJuice nickname goes, amazing. You have made the same stupid observation most others have. I will enlighten you on the origins of it, much as you have enlightened me as to what the offspring of deformed retards who have sex with crack addicted whores. I got that nickname form a dude i worked out with. i didnt make it up.
The Nature Boy said:
well then we need to go after everyone else with nuclear weapons then too. north korea is a soverign nation, they should be allowed to go about their business.
Testosterone boy said:![]()
I guess Santa couldn't fit down a few chimneys. Thanks guys....you are making me feel better about my life today.
So some guys got to pick their handle huh? I used to be Test boy, that was fine. It got changed to my present name which I don't like too well. Oh well.
Imnotdutch said:
Yeah Xmas brings out the asshole in me..........BAH humbug![]()
Merry Xmas TB.

MattTheSkywalker said:
The Vietnam war was a complete success, if you understand that our true objective was to punish the South for rejecting becoming a client state. We destroyed them and they never recovered.
manny78 said:
once again, it would have been a lot easier to just carpet bomb South Vietnam for a year non-stop rather than sending young americans to the butchery.
Testosterone boy said:
Don't quit your day job. Your debating skills are among the worst I have seen.
TxArmyGuy said:Strong Man I'm just wondering from what experience do you speak about us not being able to handle NK?
being worst then vietnam? doubtfull...the modern day battle field has shown no one has been able to keep up with us.
ttlpkg said:An Open Letter to the People and Government of North Korea,
Since my military has been severely down-sized, I am unforntunately only able to service one customer at a time with conventional warfare tactics. Seeing as we are busy with Iraq at this time, I will only be able to respond to a threat from your country with nuclear warfare.
Please don't be surprised if this happens, so continue acting the fool like you are at your own risk.
Signed,
George W. Bush
Strong_Man20 said:
Its the end of America if the Bush administration continue to go this path......Bush Jr obviously does not have his fathers tack.
BTW could you show me the source you got this from? I doubt the US are this foolish to commit themselves against the likes of NK. Maybe Syria and Libia are more realistic however.
JohnyJuice said:
GayMan5000, thank you for your input. i have now seen the light. I like how you threw in the "cowardly attack them from the air" comment. Shut your mouth. What would be manly, if we give out troops handguns and march thousands upon thousands of them in to fight hand to hand, because that would only be "fair" since the opposition doesnt have our technology, manpower, etc? You are a joke. Listen to your horseshit about us not being able to take on Korea and Iraq. I am sure if i go dig up some of your posts on the war in Afghanistan (before we went in), you were one of those assholes saying "Look what happened to the soviets when they went in there. They got themselves into a war which lasted years, cost countless lives, and then lost". But what happened?? We mopped the floor with them.
Keep hating on America, because i know it burns you up that not only are we a stronger nation, we arent a bunch of socialist dildoes like the rest of the world, i know it also pains you that we have bigger dicks.
I would even wager to say that we could also probably hand "your majesty's military" their ass while we simultaneously dealt with Iraq and Korea. We will just arm out troops with Tooth brushes, and tell them to engage in oral hygene warfare; something that is completely unknown to the English.
Strong_Man20 said:
North Korea are not little bitches you can push around, they have the capabilities to hurt the US badly if you decide to go that route.
JohnyJuice said:Go down and read what i said about Ashcanistan.
Strong_Man20 said:
BTW NK threw out the UN weapons inspectors from their nuclear plant. They couldn’t give two shits about the US......
Strong_Man20 said:
LOL.....Comparing Afghanistan with NK, is like comparing Ghandi's size with Ronnie Coleman
Remember what happened to Hitler when he created too many enemies??
BTW NK threw out the UN weapons inspectors from their nuclear plant. They couldn’t give two shits about the US......
jerkbox said:
comparing the US to the likes of Hitler's empire is ridculous....
1. we don't practice genocide
2. we aren't on a conquest to conquer the world
3. we are eliminating the terrorist organizations that threaten our, and YOUR safety, and the countries that support them
4. considering yourself lucky we are your closest allies, being that we prevented the UK from becoming part of the Nazi Republic of Germany in WWII.
thank you
jerkbox said:
comparing the US to the likes of Hitler's empire is ridculous....
1. we don't practice genocide
2. we aren't on a conquest to conquer the world
3. we are eliminating the terrorist organizations that threaten our, and YOUR safety, and the countries that support them
4. considering yourself lucky we are your closest allies, being that we prevented the UK from becoming part of the Nazi Republic of Germany in WWII.
thank you
jerkbox said:i suppose that we didn't supply the the majority of the western allied forces with arms during WWII, and that the decimated British army defeated Germany
and I realize that the UK is involved...
anyway, going to war with NK would not be a good thing for anyone involved....besides that, my guess would be the UK would be right there with us anyway...
cheers!
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 














