Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Newspaper Publishes List of All Concealed-Carry Holders' Names and Addresses

p0ink

New member
Newspaper site publishes concealed-carry holders' names, addresses
The Roanoke Times ^ | 03/11/07 | Christian Trejbal

Today is the start of Sunshine Week, the annual week in which we reflect on the importance of open government and public records. To mark the occasion, I want to take you on an excursion into freedom of information land. We're going to find out who in the New River Valley has a concealed handgun permit.

I can hear the shocked indignation of gun-toters already: It's nobody's business but mine if I want to pack heat.

Au contraire. Because the government handles the permitting, it is everyone's business.

There are good reasons the records are open to public scrutiny. People might like to know if their neighbors carry. Parents might like to know if a member of the car pool has a pistol in the glove box. Employers might like to know if employees are bringing weapons to the office.

And all Virginians have a stake in checking that their government is not making mistakes, for example, by issuing permits to convicted felons. Open records allow the media or any private citizen to check.

This is not about being for or against guns. There are plenty of reasons people choose to carry weapons: fear of a violent ex-lover, concern about criminals or worry that the king of England might try to get into your house. There are plenty of reasons to question the wisdom of widespread gun ownership, too.

But that's a debate for another time.

To illustrate the open government process, I set out to acquire permit lists for the New River Valley.

I first called the local circuit court clerks charged with overseeing permitting. They were helpful, as far as they could be.

Only Radford and Floyd County said they could produce a list. Giles County maintains an unofficial list but could not produce an official one. Montgomery and Pulaski counties had squat. The best they could do is determine if a specific individual had a permit.

None of that conflicts with the law. The records must be available but not necessarily in the format citizens want.

Fortunately, one of the clerks tipped me off to another avenue. The state police, she thought, maintained a master list.

I called Richmond and found out that yes, they did have a statewide list. Bingo!

Then another lesson of open government hit. A copy would cost more than $100.

Any Virginian can show up at a government office and request a public document. If it is something simple such as a council agenda, officials usually gladly duplicate it, maybe charging a few cents for the photocopy.

If it is something more complicated, government agencies may charge for the time and effort to prepare the records. In the case of concealed handgun permits, state police need to weed through them to cut out some personal data, which takes staff time.

A state that eagerly puts sex offender data online complete with an interactive map could easily do the same with gun permits, but it does not.

I bit the bullet and placed my order, saving the paper a few bucks by taking a Jan. 18 list officials had recently prepared for someone else.

The compact disc arrived last week. Names, addresses, issue and expiration dates.

About 2 percent of Virginians, 135,789 of us, have concealed handgun permits. In the New River Valley, 3,826 people have them, a slightly higher rate than in the rest of the state.

I immediately started checking some names. Virginia Tech football coach Frank Beamer, no permit. Pulaski County Supervisor Dean Pratt, packing. Radford University President Penelope Kyle, no permit. Giles County Supervisor Paul "Chappy" Baker, packing.

Some of the names proved tricky. Dana Dwayne Munsey of Pembroke has a permit. Is that Mayor Munsey? Standoffish town officials wouldn't provide a middle name or address for confirmation, and the listed phone number is disconnected.

The list sports a dismayingly large number of typos for an official registry -- four different spellings of "Christiansburg," for example.

Local celebrities generally don't carry, but at least a half dozen elected officials do. I'll leave it to readers to figure out which ones so you can avoid annoying them at meetings.

As a Sunshine Week gift, The Roanoke Times has placed the entire database, mistakes and all, online at www.roanoke.com/gunpermits. You can search to find out if neighbors, carpool partners, elected officials or anyone else has permission to carry a gun.

Open government laws arose from distrust of government. They guarantee citizens can watch what government does in their names, including issuing gun permits.

Christian Trejbal is an editorial writer for The Roanoke Times based in the New River Valley bureau in Christiansburg.
 
lets post the names and addresses of everyone on welfare, everyone on medicaid, ev ery family who receives a free school lunch, etc.

better yet, lets do the criminal element a big favor - post the names and addresses of everyone who DOES NOT own a gun.
 
what is the fucking point of that?

what an asshole....these gun control advocates need to drop dead
 
I'd love to carry a concealed weapon and if it was legal here where I live, it would already be done. You can own a firearms liscense which I have however your guns have to be kept in the bank. Lmao.
 
InquisitivePsyche said:
I'd love to carry a concealed weapon and if it was legal here where I live, it would already be done. You can own a firearms liscense which I have however your guns have to be kept in the bank. Lmao.

where the hell do you live?
 
p0ink said:
where the hell do you live?

Half the time I live in Chicago and the other half of the time I live in a suburb outside of Chicago. The only allowed gun in your home is a shot gun. Pfft. Not my kind of gun.
 
InquisitivePsyche said:
I'd love to carry a concealed weapon and if it was legal here where I live, it would already be done. You can own a firearms liscense which I have however your guns have to be kept in the bank. Lmao.
I believe they have CCW permits available in 48 states (I'm using my memory as a reference so I might be off a couple of states - lol).
The one area of gun ownership that has improved greatly over the last decade is that more people than ever have the legal right to carry a concealed handgun.
It is total bullshit to publish permit holders names, but if that's the game the liberals are going to play, I'm still going to exercise my rights.
 
Powerbuilder333 said:
I believe they have CCW permits available in 48 states (I'm using my memory as a reference so I might be off a couple of states - lol).
The one area of gun ownership that has improved greatly over the last decade is that more people than ever have the legal right to carry a concealed handgun.
It is total bullshit to publish permit holders names, but if that's the game the liberals are going to play, I'm still going to exercise my rights.

I'm definitely going to research that. I'd love to carry a concealed weapon. In the fall I will be attending graduate school downtown, most likely having to take the "L" which is public transportation (Chicago) that I am not fond of (known for having weirdos on it), and I wouldn't hesitate one bit to use it. Save the world from one less asshole. How pernicious. I know.
:evil:
 
InquisitivePsyche said:
Half the time I live in Chicago and the other half of the time I live in a suburb outside of Chicago. The only allowed gun in your home is a shot gun. Pfft. Not my kind of gun.
Yes I believe Illinois is one of the sucky states for gun laws.
I think you'd look great with a nice 20g Mossberg 500 pump shotgun. Not to much of a kick, but still good for home defense :)
 
I'd love for them to get it in IL. I'll probably never see it. Especially with Obama here. Very against guns. Has always voted against them in any and every bill.

I don't know what weapons are and aren't allowed, but could you imagine walking around with a 12 gauge tucked under your coat? Willickers!!

Whiskey
 
I hope all anti-gun people are faced with a life or death situation at some point.
I bet they will rethink their philosphy in that brief period prior to facing death.
 
what do you think of dan wesson 1911s? 1911s in general seem to have a maaajor following, and like everyone and his pa has a version or six.

anyway, as for this thread, i see a fundamental difference between such information being freely accessible to anyone who wants to look it up, versus some 3rd party (i.e., the author) doing the work and publishing it for the sake of others to access. leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

"There are good reasons the records are open to public scrutiny. People might like to know if their neighbors carry. Parents might like to know if a member of the car pool has a pistol in the glove box. Employers might like to know if employees are bringing weapons to the office."

^ This excerpt, if it's not a joke (and I guess not) seems a wee bit asinine to me.

People might like free blowjobs on Sunday, but too fucking bad.
 
As much as I would like to carry a concealed weapon, I see the points on both sides. There are a shitload of crazy people out there who have no control over their anger, so could you imagine what they would do if they got angry and just so happened to have a gun on them? There are so many factors that need to be weighed but as I said, I do see both sides. Grrr.. I'd still love to carry one though.
 
jackangel said:
what do you think of dan wesson 1911s? 1911s in general seem to have a maaajor following, and like everyone and his pa has a version or six.

anyway, as for this thread, i see a fundamental difference between such information being freely accessible to anyone who wants to look it up, versus some 3rd party (i.e., the author) doing the work and publishing it for the sake of others to access. leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

"There are good reasons the records are open to public scrutiny. People might like to know if their neighbors carry. Parents might like to know if a member of the car pool has a pistol in the glove box. Employers might like to know if employees are bringing weapons to the office."

^ This excerpt, if it's not a joke (and I guess not) seems a wee bit asinine to me.

People might like free blowjobs on Sunday, but too fucking bad.

I have never fired a Dan wesson 1911. They have some top quality parts in them though.
 
i primarily disagree with the publishing of any such list. as for having access to the information by going one's self to the police or some hall of records...i'd have to think more carefully on that. one's right to and desire for privacy makes me instinctively balk at the notion, and there's probably no end to the kinds of information that one might find a use for (even if just for peace of mind), if given access. but unless there's some practical, solid rationale which makes 'big picture' sense for knowing that your neighbor has a gun permit (i.e. is it likely to matter one fucking bit, except in an easily-contrived set of circumstances), i'd err on the side of privacy.

as in other areas of gun-related policy, i'd tend to think that the ones you have to worry about are those that won't have permits or abide by the law in general.

i don't know...i have to go take a leak. hopefully i won't get shot on my way back from the men's room.
 
InquisitivePsyche said:
...There are a shitload of crazy people out there who have no control over their anger, so could you imagine what they would do if they got angry and just so happened to have a gun on them? There are so many factors that need to be weighed but as I said, I do see both sides. ...

In that case let's do away with vehicles since people drink and drive in them.

You do not strip law-abiding citizens of their rights simply because a few dumbass people abuse them. That is why there are laws to punish the ones who do commit crimes, not the ones who don't.
 
jackangel said:
i primarily disagree with the publishing of any such list. as for having access to the information by going one's self to the police or some hall of records...i'd have to think more carefully on that. one's right to and desire for privacy makes me instinctively balk at the notion, and there's probably no end to the kinds of information that one might find a use for (even if just for peace of mind), if given access. but unless there's some practical, solid rationale which makes 'big picture' sense for knowing that your neighbor has a gun permit (i.e. is it likely to matter one fucking bit, except in an easily-contrived set of circumstances), i'd err on the side of privacy.

as in other areas of gun-related policy, i'd tend to think that the ones you have to worry about are those that won't have permits or abide by the law in general.

i don't know...i have to go take a leak. hopefully i won't get shot on my way back from the men's room.


I think I agree. I wonder how the 4th amendment would play a role in this (specifically talking about "secure in their papers"). Right to privacy? Who knows.. there's always ways around the Constitution. Lmao.
 
alien amp pharm said:
In that case let's do away with vehicles since people drink and drive in them.

You do not strip law-abiding citizens of their rights simply because a few dumbass people abuse them. That is why there are laws to punish the ones who do commit crimes, not the ones who don't.

Totally see your point however I think you would have more problems with people using guns improperly (since it is so easy to get one legally and illegally) than drunk driving incidents. I'd have to research that to see the numbers, though. The government constantly strips law abiding citizens of their rights in order to protect others. I'm not saying I agree with it, but there's so much that can be argued in that area. Law is definitely a controversial topic, no doubt.
 
InquisitivePsyche said:
Totally see your point however I think you would have more problems with people using guns improperly (since it is so easy to get one legally and illegally) than drunk driving incidents. I'd have to research that to see the numbers, though. The government constantly strips law abiding citizens of their rights in order to protect others. I'm not saying I agree with it, but there's so much that can be argued in that area. Law is definitely a controversial topic, no doubt.

Take a look at the types of weapons included in this newest rendition of the AWB (h.r. 1022) and you will see how absolutely rediculous it is, especially when you actually see the numbers that are involved in crimes.
 
InquisitivePsyche said:
Totally see your point however I think you would have more problems with people using guns improperly (since it is so easy to get one legally and illegally) than drunk driving incidents. I'd have to research that to see the numbers, though. The government constantly strips law abiding citizens of their rights in order to protect others. I'm not saying I agree with it, but there's so much that can be argued in that area. Law is definitely a controversial topic, no doubt.

Alcohol can be purchased much easier than a firearm so I don't understand why that nor the specific number of problems is revelant at all. People use both to kill and often.

Trust me I agree that striping of our rights occurs. Personally I think we are about 85% of the way from having a police state in the USA. Goodbye freedom, hello big brother.
 
alien amp pharm said:
Alcohol can be purchased much easier than a firearm so I don't understand why that nor the specific number of problems is revelant at all. People use both to kill and often.

Trust me I agree that striping of our rights occurs. Personally I think we are about 85% of the way from having a police state in the USA. Goodbye freedom, hello big brother.

Agreed. Our society has definitely reached what is termed, "Culture of Control." The government/police have more power now then they ever have. Interestingly, this was an area that we covered in a law class I took and I found it so true. It's sad - I am not a huge fan of the police (at least here in Chicago) because there is so much corruption going on. I'm not saying all police but you get my point...
 
InquisitivePsyche said:
Agreed. Our society has definitely reached what is termed, "Culture of Control." The government/police have more power now then they ever have. Interestingly, this was an area that we covered in a law class I took and I found it so true. It's sad - I am not a huge fan of the police (at least here in Chicago) because there is so much corruption going on. I'm not saying all police but you get my point...


You seem pretty intelligent.

Are you sure you're a female?


teeheehee :)
 
Post the name of everyone on Food Stamps in the Commonwealth, Mr. Trejbal, just to be fair. Then compare that list to the owners' lists of Escalades and Navigators.
 
alien amp pharm said:
You seem pretty intelligent.

Are you sure you're a female?


teeheehee :)

Lmao. Indeed I am. I am big on learning - always have loved school and all that. AND I would have to agree... sadly, so many girls these days idolize dipshits like Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie. God please help us all.
 
Nice work.

Clearly this belongs in the outdoorsman forum. It would be a shame to have any thread of substance, which really is political in nature, on C&C.
 
Top Bottom