I think that the best we can do is try to make good decisions.
Whether we always succeed or not does not mean we are good or bad people.
For example, while I do not support pot smoking, if people choose to grow their own, then I think that is a better decision than bankrolling the lifestyle/politics of druglords.
It's not a black and white world, and no one is wholly good or wholly bad.
"Nutritional alarmists" are probably just trying to help people, and while they can be holier-than-thou, at least they are trying to do good.
I think I can make my own decisions about what is best for me, and I have to believe that the general populace is similarly capable.
If they are not, and make poor decisions, then it is not for lack of information.
Whether we always succeed or not does not mean we are good or bad people.
For example, while I do not support pot smoking, if people choose to grow their own, then I think that is a better decision than bankrolling the lifestyle/politics of druglords.
It's not a black and white world, and no one is wholly good or wholly bad.
"Nutritional alarmists" are probably just trying to help people, and while they can be holier-than-thou, at least they are trying to do good.
I think I can make my own decisions about what is best for me, and I have to believe that the general populace is similarly capable.
If they are not, and make poor decisions, then it is not for lack of information.