Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

Most Americans can no longer collect unemployment..

  • Thread starter Thread starter lartinos
  • Start date Start date
L

lartinos

Guest
A Rise in crime or people will have to get off their asses and get a job. Maybe both!

Most of U.S. Unemployed No Longer Receive Benefits

WASHINGTON – The jobs crisis has left so many people out of work for so long that most of America's unemployed are no longer receiving unemployment benefits.
Early last year, 75 percent were receiving checks. The figure is now 48 percent -- a shift that points to a growing crisis of long-term unemployment. Nearly one-third of America's 14 million unemployed have had no job for a year or more.

Congress is expected to decide by year's end whether to continue providing emergency unemployment benefits for up to 99 weeks in the hardest-hit states.
If the emergency benefits expire, the proportion of the unemployed receiving aid would fall further.
The ranks of the poor would also rise. The Census Bureau says unemployment benefits kept 3.2 million people from slipping into poverty last year. It defines poverty as annual income below $22,314 for a family of four.
Yet for a growing share of the unemployed, a vote in Congress to extend the benefits to 99 weeks is irrelevant. They've had no job for more than 99 weeks.
They're no longer eligible for benefits.
Their options include food stamps or other social programs. Nearly 46 million people received food stamps in August, a record total. That figure could grow as more people lose unemployment benefits.
So could the government's disability rolls. Applications for the disability insurance program have jumped about 50 percent since 2007.
"There's going to be increased hardship," said Wayne Vroman, an economist at the Urban Institute.
The number of unemployed has been roughly stable this year. Yet the number receiving benefits has plunged 30 percent.
Government unemployment benefits weren't designed to sustain people for long stretches without work. They usually don't have to. In the recoveries from the previous three recessions, the longest average duration of unemployment was 21 weeks, in July 1983.
By contrast, in the wake of the Great Recession, the figure reached 41 weeks in September. That's the longest on records dating to 1948. The figure is now 39 weeks.
"It was a good safety net for a shorter recession," said Carl Van Horn, an economist at Rutgers University. It assumes "the economy will experience short interruptions and then go back to normal."
Weekly unemployment checks average about $300 nationwide. If the extended benefits aren't renewed, growth could slow by up to a half-percentage point next year, economists say.
The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that each $1 spent on unemployment benefits generates up to $1.90 in economic growth. The CBO has found that the program is the most effective government policy for increasing growth among 11 options it's analyzed.
Jon Polis lives in East Greenwich, Rhode Island, one of the 20 states where 99 weeks of benefits are available. He used them all up after losing his job as a warehouse worker in 2008. His benefits paid for groceries, car maintenance and health insurance.
Now, Polis, 55, receives disability insurance payments, food stamps and lives in government-subsidized housing. He's been unable to find work because employers in his field want computer skills he doesn't have.
"Employers are crying that they can't find qualified help," he said. But the ones he interviewed with "weren't willing to train anybody."
From late 2007, when the recession began, to early 2010, the number of people receiving unemployment benefits rose more than four-fold, to 11.5 million.
But the economy has remained so weak that an analysis of long-term unemployment data suggests that about 2 million people have used up 99 weeks of checks and still can't find work.
Contributing to the smaller share of the unemployed who are receiving benefits: Some of them are college graduates or others seeking jobs for the first time.
They aren't eligible. Only those who have lost a job through no fault of their own qualify.
The proportion of the unemployed receiving benefits usually falls below 50 percent during an economic recovery. Many have either quit jobs or are new to the job market and don't qualify.
Today, the proportion is falling for a very different reason: Jobs remain scarce. So more of the unemployed are exhausting their benefits.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has noted that the long-term unemployed increasingly find it hard to find work as their skills and professional networks erode. In a speech last month, Bernanke called long-term unemployment a "national crisis" that should be a top priority for Congress.
Lawmakers will have to decide whether to continue the extended benefits by the end of this year. If the program ends, nearly 2.2 million people will be cut off by February.
Congress has extended the program nine times. But it might balk at the $45 billion cost. It will be the first time the Republican-led House of Representatives will vote on the issue.


Read more: Most Of U.S. Unemployed No Longer Receive Benefits | Fox News
 
Last edited:
The larger problem are the people who have been out of work for 2+ years, especially fresh-out-of high school/college graduates.

The prolonged Barry recession has created a band of people (probably a few million) who may not ever find real work. They've slipped through the cracks of the system.
 
The larger problem are the people who have been out of work for 2+ years, especially fresh-out-of high school/college graduates.

The prolonged Barry recession has created a band of people (probably a few million) who may not ever find real work. They've slipped through the cracks of the system.


True, it is called cyclical unemployment: caused by business cycle recession. What is the unemployment rate? I think between 8-10%. However, they do not factor in what you call "people who slipped through the cracks" (hidden unemployment) or people, who have given up trying to find a job. I would guess, "the real unemployment rate" is close to 20%.
 
This is not surprising.. If you really want to know a real indication of what the unemployment is than you have to look at the U-6 data... What everyone always talks about Is the U-3.. But even then those numbers are somewhat cooked..
 
Unemployment numbers only count those in the workforce. For the ones that have stopped looking for work, they are not considered part of the unemployment data. Therefore unemployment numbers are artificially deflated because the overall pie has been made smaller.
 
Yes, but more and more people will be going off assistance and I wonder what will happen to them?
 
Yes, but more and more people will be going off assistance and I wonder what will happen to them?

The very employable will get jobs, they might just not be the jobs they want (or at the pay they want).

The unemployable will be more unemployable than ever.

The new problem will the the ones that were employable two years ago that employers don't want to risk since they've been idle for so long. Those are the people who will be trapped. If I had to choose between a 22 year old straight out of college and a 24 year old who graduated two years ago and sat idle, I'd be biased to chose the 22 year old.
 
The very employable will get jobs, they might just not be the jobs they want (or at the pay they want).

The unemployable will be more unemployable than ever.

The new problem will the the ones that were employable two years ago that employers don't want to risk since they've been idle for so long. Those are the people who will be trapped. If I had to choose between a 22 year old straight out of college and a 24 year old who graduated two years ago and sat idle, I'd be biased to chose the 22 year old.

I agree plunk, there should be a company that interviews these people to help determine their value. State funded... IDK
Just an idea at this point.
 
Bad scene indeed. I hate to think how long it's going to take, for the Gov't and the Dems to figure out that until they stop choking out the small & medium businesses with unreasonable taxes, and EPA rules, and lawsuit-promoting employment laws, forced medical coverage, and all, that it's going to continue to get worse.

Charles
 
I agree plunk, there should be a company that interviews these people to help determine their value. State funded... IDK
Just an idea at this point.

The only hope they have now is insane economic growth that sweeps them back into the workforce -- and I wouldn't bet on that. We're nowhere near willing to make the changes it would take to make that happen.
 
Top Bottom