More and more subbing GW for HGH

[Jbranken]

Sorry, I wasn't implying that! I just meant that the dangers of GW make trenbolone's side effects appear pretty laughable.

I disagree. Like the study stated, 100-1000 times the typical dose showed signs of cancer. So, don't do that. What do you think 100-1000 times the typical dose of anything would do? OTC supps? Milk? Oranges? Tren? Prob not a good thing. Most of everything can be safe in moderation

 

[RolinRandy]

May I ask what is GW...I know what HGH is.

 

[psizzle_8]

GW is a research chemical a lot of us are enjoying giving our rats since it has become popular around here...it isn't a sarm but it's often used with the popular Sarms (S4 and Osta). GW aids in muscular and cardiovascular endurance, helping you in the gym and with cardio. Its amazing stuff.

My rats feel great when they're on their SarmsSearch GW...they can run on their little wheels for hours on end and not feel a thing. As I said it also aids in the gym with muscular endurance. They also have told me they have a feeling of breathing easier when on GW

 

[notjake11]

As PSizzle said, GW is the bomb (paraphrasing). Sarmssearch is certainly a great company. I've used Uniquemicals with fantastic success and stand by their products - just finished a killer cycle running the triple stack of GW, S4 and Osta and it was amazing.

 

[psizzle_8]

As PSizzle said, GW is the bomb (paraphrasing). Sarmssearch is certainly a great company. I've used Uniquemicals with fantastic success and stand by their products - just finished a killer cycle running the triple stack of GW, S4 and Osta and it was amazing.

Both companies are sponsors, they're both good places...I've just made a home at SS while you've done the same with Unique.

 

[notjake11]

Both companies are sponsors, they're both good places...I've just made a home at SS while you've done the same with Unique.

Exactly - both are solid companies and can't go wrong with either. Haven't got a bad thing to say about them.

Now Psizzle on the other hand . . . lots to say about her.







j/k obv - She's the bomb too.

 

[RolinRandy]

Thanks yall...I've found the sites. I'll do a little more research on it now.
RR

 

[psizzle_8]

Watch it now NJ...lol

Let us know if you have any questions. Good luck!

 

[plazmic]

I disagree. Like the study stated, 100-1000 times the typical dose showed signs of cancer. So, don't do that. What do you think 100-1000 times the typical dose of anything would do? OTC supps? Milk? Oranges? Tren? Prob not a good thing. Most of everything can be safe in moderation

I would agree, except that the studies show a 100-1000x increase in rapid onset, whole-body cancer with doses as low as 5mg/kg.

Understandably, that's still quite a bit higher than most guys are dosing. But with guys at 70kg taking 50mg or more a day, the difference in dosage (from the lower end studied) is now a factor of 7x. There is no direct "conversion" of risk, so you're right, it could be negligible at low doses. However, GSK didn't provide any data at doses similar to athletes, they simply terminated all further developments.

I don't mean to knock on the drug -- it's one of the most fascinating peptides in existence to me... it's literally exercise in a fucking pill! I just want to point out that the difference between athletic dosing and highly carcinogenic dosing is less than virtually every other compound commonly abused in sports. Anyone considering the benefits of GW should give due diligence.

 

[goin on 4T]

This is the same problem I have, statistically speaking what are the odds?
Did they stop the study when people started getting cancer?
Why were they dosing so high?