Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Modern Dating Is Legalized Prostitution

The definition of prostitution is the exchange of goods for sex.


If you're a female, and you commonly go out on dates where the male does the paying, you are a prostitute. [size=-999] The vice/versa applies but how often does that happen anyway [/size]


You are being treated to movies, dinner, gifts and other perks.


The man's goal is sex.


If you do not agree, consider if you were to tell the next man you date that you will not be having sex with him.
 
LOL....you and so many other members think alike.

I believe another thread quite similar to this was posted last week.

Too funny.
 
Yea. If women want to really find out if a man likes them for who they are they should say something like this "just so you know upfront we wont be having sex, ok?"
Then see how he reacts. lol
 
I always took turns in paying the bill.... you should do also. This avoids the female thinking: "Mmmm, does he really think that he can get laid by paying my dinner and drinks?"
Works well, and saves money for more important things in life, like gear.
 
That's true of the women who give it up easily... i.e. most women. If they waited a month or something it'd be a completely different ballgame.

The man would have to be quite interested to stick around that long w/out sex. Most women do not realize this simple and obvious fact and are therefore, whores.
 
Interesting, but its the view point of a total amatuer.
#1 flaw in this logic: I only date women that I am interested in as a person. If I don't like being around her, I'm not going to throw away money on dinner and a movie. If she wants to have sex after the date, I'm not going to complain, but it isn't my primary motive.

#2 flaw in this logic: 90% of the women I have slept with, I have never taken on a date. So, they gave it up without me paying anything.

#3 flaw in this logic: Some women will over to split the bill or even to pay. Of course I never let them unless we've had several dates already, but still, they sometimes offer.

Just my 2 cc's.
 
Interesting - perhaps I can extend this justification so that it allows me to stalk and kill any woman and not just the corner whores.

That takes a lot of fun out of it - I mean, would anyone hunt if the woods were just packed full of deer?
I submit not.
 
This is precisely why prostitution should be legalized. I mean almost every woman is involved in it anyway, so let's not have a country full of criminals roaming around doing their dirty work. Might as well just make it legal.

I mean if I have to spend money for sex anyway, I want to be up front about it and skip all the games.
 
Re: Re: Modern Dating Is Legalized Prostitution

DepressiveJuice said:


actually, the definition of prostitution is hiring someone for sex. you are not hiring a girl out by taking them out to eat.

for someone who claims not to be a woman hater- you bad mouth women alot. either someone did you wrong to view women like this or you cant get any because you are either butt ugly or have the personality of a dead ant

DJ, I think you may be on to something here.
 
Frackal said:
The definition of prostitution is the exchange of goods for sex.


If you're a female, and you commonly go out on dates where the male does the paying, you are a prostitute. [size=-999] The vice/versa applies but how often does that happen anyway [/size]


You are being treated to movies, dinner, gifts and other perks.


The man's goal is sex.


If you do not agree, consider if you were to tell the next man you date that you will not be having sex with him.

actually, the definition of prostitution is hiring someone for sex. you are not hiring a girl out by taking them out to eat.

for someone who claims not to be a woman hater- you bad mouth women alot. either someone did you wrong to view women like this or you cant get any because you are either butt ugly or have the personality of a dead ant
 
Originally posted by BodyByFinaplix Interesting, but its the view point of a total amatuer.



Not an amateur, there are always exceptions to ANYTHING, but in the majority of cases, the woman is enjoying the material goods and gifts showered upon her by the guy, and the guy's aim is for sex.

I'm amazed that you actually thought that your individual case study actually nullified the argument, which does not apply to "Bodybyfinaplix" but to the average majority of dating scenarios.

So why do you pay continually after the first date?


Second, both you and depressive juice; I think it would be fun if we could compare the last few chicks we've dated/successfully asked out and will be dating etc...the girls Ive dated, especially lately, are very cream of the crop, including the one that's driving me nuts and probably inspiring the annoyance at women you're whining about.

Your mouth is pretty big depressive juice considering some of your posts, I've posted pics, where are yours bitch?


Here's the reality:

Perhaps it was the home environment which I was raised, but since I was old enough to understand words, I've heard over and over how evil men are, how we are terrible subjugators of women, and all that trickledown from the feminist era.

But look what has happened, after all that screaming for equality, there is a curiously rare silence from women once the check comes. It's pure hypocrisy, and unlike a lot of castrated males, I'm not going to be led by my dick and by popular instruction on this one.

Look how pathetic this is... for the last 40 years we've been crammed with every inequality from a woman's perspective, from golf clubs to glass ceilings... and I point out this glaring hipocrisy and you two jump in like a couple of superheroes in spandex to call me out on my personality, looks and personal experiences...

Simply for having an opinion that stands up for men for a change.


I think it's pathetic personally.
 
Frackal, ok fair enough, the average guy probably has to pay for sex by dating. My personal case study doesn't apply the the average guy with no skillz.

As far as why pay after the first date? Again, any girl I'm dating, I'm interested in keeping around. Its well known that when it comes to picking someone for a long term relationship, MOST women (not all of course) want someone who can finacially take care of them. They'll view you letting them pay as week. After several dates and a relationship has been established, I'll let them pay. In any event, my last girlfriend was always broke, so couldn't afford to pay. She barely covers her rent and tuition. Still, that didn't count as paying for sex, we had already been fuck buddies for some time, when decided I was in love with her, and actually took her out. Had I chose, I could have continued to screw her, without ever taking her out. Still, I guess the average guy doesn't have fuck buddies.
 
sex has always been withheld to accomplish things, be they rewards, tasks or getting others to achieve tasks....the reason girls do it is because guys are too horny and therefore weak

check it out anytime a girl wants something, they INSTANTLY become these submissive sexual cretures with both body language and physical action when they need something. whats worse is it actually works
 
BodyByFinaplix said:
Frackal, ok fair enough, the average guy probably has to pay for sex by dating. My personal case study doesn't apply the the average guy with no skillz.

As far as why pay after the first date? Again, any girl I'm dating, I'm interested in keeping around. Its well known that when it comes to picking someone for a long term relationship, MOST women (not all of course) want someone who can finacially take care of them. They'll view you letting them pay as week. After several dates and a relationship has been established, I'll let them pay. In any event, my last girlfriend was always broke, so couldn't afford to pay. She barely covers her rent and tuition. Still, that didn't count as paying for sex, we had already been fuck buddies for some time, when decided I was in love with her, and actually took her out. Had I chose, I could have continued to screw her, without ever taking her out. Still, I guess the average guy doesn't have fuck buddies.


Good points... and thanks, I'd prefer to chat about this topic in good graces.
 
theres some serious ownage and counter ownage going on in here.
 
Would it make a difference if I demanded she Cook do Laundry and Clean my place instead of Sex in return for dinner/movie etc ?

Seriously, I had several girls back in the day surprise me like this
as a way of saying thanks ontop of the sex..
 
BodyByFinaplix said:
Interesting, but its the view point of a total amatuer.
#1 flaw in this logic: I only date women that I am interested in as a person.

Oh shut the hell up BBF... :)

C-ditty
 
Basically, if you have game... you are going to get laid. Bottom line. You don't have to take girls on fancy dinners to get them to sleep with you... you just have to be a cool, down to Earth person.... believe it or not, there are women out there who like sex just about as much as guys... I'd say, more than we think.

Be Yourself... if you are ment to get in the women's pants, you will. If not, you are just another sucka waiting in line.

C-ditty
 
It's all about the $$$$$$$$$



I asked a 21 year old female if she would date a 32 year old guy and she said no because he would be too old for her. Then I asked if she would date that 32 year old guy if he lived in a 5 million dollar house and drove a $400,000 Bentley and was descent looking. Her response was something like, "Of course I would."
 
Last edited:
Try having a relationship with a woman. There is a huge difference between that and dating girls. If you go into a date or relationship planning on playing a game with the intent of just getting in her pants, don't be surprised if she plays you. Then when it is over, don't cry about being played.
 
Top Bottom