Is Kerry going to be indicted.....?

[HumorMe]

Before you answer, please read the whole article then respond. Long read but an interesting one.


Article

Excerpt from article....

Indeed, John Kerry has a well-documented record of anti-American activities, especially aiding Communist regimes. But the "aid and comfort" he gave to North Vietnamese Communists in 1971 (while still a U.S. naval officer, and while Americans were still fighting, dying, and being held captive by that regime) is the most grievous of these transgressions.

His treasonous actions in 1970-1971 are the subject of an indictment that will be delivered to Senate President Dick Cheney, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and Attorney General John Ashcroft on 12 October. The indictment [http://www.PatriotPetitions.US/Kerry] notes both Kerry's UCMJ and U.S. Code (18 USC 2381) violations, and it calls for his disqualification for public office in accordance with the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3, which states: "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President...having previously taken an oath...to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."

Why issue this indictment now? Because John Kerry chose to make his Vietnam war record the centerpiece of his presidential campaign (see "Kerry's Quagmire..." http://FederalistPatriot.US/alexander/). In response, more than 160,000 signatories of the aforementioned indictment have made it the centerpiece of their campaign to disqualify him from public office.

Clearly, there will be no determination on these charges until after 2 November, but Kerry will be held to account for his treasonous actions -- for there is no statute of limitations on treason.

For those who would argue that Kerry's anti-American activities in 1971, which clearly cost American lives in Vietnam, do not reflect the nature of the man today, we refer you to this statement from Kerry from the first debate. On the subject of our troops engaged in Iraq, Kerry remarked, "It is vital for us not to confuse the war -- ever -- with the warriors. That happened before."

 

[Mr. dB]

No, he's going to be innaugurated.

 

[HumorMe]

Thanks for reading the whole article and the indepth response.

 

[WODIN]

I did not know that exercising free speach and protesting were unamerican.

 

[p0ink]

No, he's going to be innaugurated.

someone is in for a big let-down come nov 2nd.

 

[WODIN]

someone is in for a big let-down come nov 2nd.

Get a new line already.

 

[hooch]

Thanks for reading the whole article and the indepth response.

The Federalist Patriot...."The Conservative Journal of Record"


Thats about as in-depth as you need.....

 

[p0ink]

Get a new line already.

someone sure doesn't like confidence and optimism...typical liberal.

 

[HumorMe]

I did not know that exercising free speach and protesting were unamerican.

Did you even read the first paragraph of the excerpt?

I'll make it easier for you, read what is in the parenthesis. It's these things()

 

[HumorMe]

The Federalist Patriot...."The Conservative Journal of Record"


Thats about as in-depth as you need.....

Have anything else to add?

 

[chewyxrage]

that's funny because it's never going to happen.

 

[chesty]

While you are still subject to the UCMJ and still in the military you are forbidden from the kind of speaking that he did. From wearing the uniform in an indignant manner as he did, from collaboration with the enemy (which you can't do as a civilian either)

He might not be formally charged, but then again he may. What if the Dems are hoping that he does get elected, then let the charges fly since they really want Edwards as president. They new he was too young and too new to get elected on his own merits. So they help Kerry get elected, then impeach him for treason and convict him of same. Then edwards becomes president.

 

[pitbullstl]

He might not be formally charged, but then again he may. What if the Dems are hoping that he does get elected, then let the charges fly since they really want Edwards as president. They new he was too young and too new to get elected on his own merits. So they help Kerry get elected, then impeach him for treason and convict him of same. Then edwards becomes president.

Interesting thought...............but a little bit too Tom Clancy for me.

 

[EnderJE]

Whoa. I like it.

 

[Mr. dB]

someone is in for a big let-down come nov 2nd.

I'll try not to gloat too much.

 

[Muntch]

While you are still subject to the UCMJ and still in the military you are forbidden from the kind of speaking that he did. From wearing the uniform in an indignant manner as he did, from collaboration with the enemy (which you can't do as a civilian either)

He might not be formally charged, but then again he may. What if the Dems are hoping that he does get elected, then let the charges fly since they really want Edwards as president. They new he was too young and too new to get elected on his own merits. So they help Kerry get elected, then impeach him for treason and convict him of same. Then edwards becomes president.

That's a pretty big streatch. I know that liberals a scandalous but I couldn'd resonably belive that the entire democratic party is conspiring to get Edwards' retarded ass to become president.

 

[chesty]

I wouldn't think so, but then again I wouldn't be surprised. Hell, everyone believes that it will be Hillary running in 2008. Wouldn't it be novel if Bush wins (as he will) the repubs can't muster someone with even half of what Bush has and Hillary is on the ticket? She scares me more than Kerry. She is past menopause and probably hates all the young pretty women. And she will have her finger on the button! Yippee! Can't wait.

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

I did not know that exercising free speach and protesting were unamerican.

They're not, brobot, but perhaps you overlooked the part about while still a U.S. naval officer

Strictly speaking, was it a time of war? There was no war declared...

Edwards as President? Would he be a class-warrior or elitist? Class warriors change when they get power and become elitist.

 

[WODIN]

someone sure doesn't like confidence and optimism...typical liberal.

OH, I like confidence and optimism, hell I even engage in "Hard work" but I don't run around parroting.

Here's your sign.

 

[WODIN]

Did you even read the first paragraph of the excerpt?

I'll make it easier for you, read what is in the parenthesis. It's these things()

I've read it and just how is engaging in talks to stop what was termed a Police Action providing "aid and comfort" to the enemy?

 

[WODIN]

They're not, brobot, but perhaps you overlooked the part about while still a U.S. naval officer

Strictly speaking, was it a time of war? There was no war declared...

Edwards as President? Would he be a class-warrior or elitist? Class warriors change when they get power and become elitist.

There really is no basis for these charges. Strictly speaking we never declared war on North Vietnam.

Class warfare is on no matter which group you support. The rich getting tax breaks that are forced down on the middle class is class war fare. The Middle class supporting progressive taxes is tax war fare.

To decry class warfare should produce a resound DUH from anyone who is somewhat informed. Those expressing shock and dismay are well...idiots.

 

[coverguy]

While you are still subject to the UCMJ and still in the military you are forbidden from the kind of speaking that he did. From wearing the uniform in an indignant manner as he did, from collaboration with the enemy (which you can't do as a civilian either)

100% correct, and very important to note!!! unfortunately Chesty, more than 60% of today's society (if not more) has no idea about military culture and military laws. anyone who has served knows that Kerry was wrong in his actions, and should have at the very least waited until after his commission was served, or should have been brought up on Conduct Unbecoming of an Officer and perhaps several other articles of the UCMJ!

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

There really is no basis for these charges. Strictly speaking we never declared war on North Vietnam.

Right. Agreed.

Class warfare is on no matter which group you support. The rich getting tax breaks that are forced down on the middle class is class war fare. The Middle class supporting progressive taxes is tax war fare.

Wrongo bongo Broseph. Consider:

The "rich" pay a disproportionate share of the taxes (top 1% pay 47% already, top 400 "super rich" pay 1.3% of taxes even though they are only .0075% of the population. The top 10% (hardly rich anymore, but still the top 10%) pays 89% of taxes

Today's tax code and its many deductions is a handout to the middle class. The government will subsidize owning a home through tax deductions, as long as the home is not too big, or you don't want more than two.

It is laughable when people say the middle class will have to "make up for" tax cuts for the rich. By comparison, the middle class pays nothing in taxes.

To decry class warfare should produce a resound DUH from anyone who is somewhat informed. Those expressing shock and dismay are well...idiots.

It's the heart of the flaw with democracy. I'm not shocked, just dismayed.

 

[BoS*FLANKER]

I'm for the rebels too-wheres my indictment-just because i said that, it 'comforts the enemy' , Kerry earned the right to be for the rebels, unlike those pussys bush and cheney who got their rich daddys to get them preferential treatment and now they're war mongers-they expect poor people to do their dirty work.