Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

IF HGH can make you insulin resistance , WHY ....

VictorBR

New member
is that it makes you LOSE FAT ?

From what I understand , insulin RESISTANCE MAKES YOU FAT . Right ?

When your body can't use the insulin that you produce , and sends a signal for you to RELEASE more insulin to make it up , thus ALL this insulin making you FAT .

Can anyone elaborate please ?

can someone explain me how HGH effects insulin , and how HGH can make you lose fat ?


Victor
 
because it converts to IGF-1.

IGF-1 does not allow your cells to absorb suger. It forces your cells to use its own suger supply to burn for energy....Thats why you loose fat. And why you are resistant to insulin
 
LftHndPwrHouse said:
because it converts to IGF-1.

IGF-1 does not allow your cells to absorb suger. It forces your cells to use its own suger supply to burn for energy....Thats why you loose fat. And why you are resistant to insulin


>>> bro , I didn't understand your explanation . IF you are RESISTANT to insulin , you WILL RELEASE MORE insulin , thus making you FATTER .

You are saying to me that the extra insulin that we are going to release (because now we are insulin resistan ) is gonna be converted to IGF-1 ?!?!?!

IS that it ?


Victor
 
the analogy I like to think of is, it makes muscle cells more anabolic/anti-catabolic, and fat cells just the opposite, more catabolic/anti-anabolic. so during any kind of calorie deficit it is more likely your fat stores will be utilized vs. muscle catabolism. similarly, during calorie surplus more excess nutrients are driven into muscle vs. fat cells. given enough time this make a big difference in appearance for us guys 35 and up. now I am talking about HRT style (2iu/day) dosages not the large bulking dosages (which I do not think are advisable - diminishing marginal returns and increased sides)
 
VictorBR said:
>>> bro , I didn't understand your explanation . IF you are RESISTANT to insulin , you WILL RELEASE MORE insulin , thus making you FATTER .

You are saying to me that the extra insulin that we are going to release (because now we are insulin resistan ) is gonna be converted to IGF-1 ?!?!?!

IS that it ?


Victor

HGH is the precursor to IGF-1, not insulin, yes you can release more insulin in that state but you are 1. burning the fat for energy vs. muscle, and 2. eating clean to not help supply the fat. More insulin will almost always make you gain fat, you are correct in your thinking, but taking the proper steps will minimize the fat addition and maximize on the muscle uptake of the glycogen instead.
 
indy69camaro said:
HGH is the precursor to IGF-1, not insulin, yes you can release more insulin in that state but you are 1. burning the fat for energy vs. muscle, and 2. eating clean to not help supply the fat. More insulin will almost always make you gain fat, you are correct in your thinking, but taking the proper steps will minimize the fat addition and maximize on the muscle uptake of the glycogen instead.


>>> what do you mean by the proper steps bro ? I am just scared of using HGH and becoming insulin resistant , AKA - releasing more insulin and thus the HGH would make me GAIN fat ( due to larger levels on insulin circulating in my body ) instead of losing FAT .


See I plan on using HGH with this cycle :

week 1-12 - HGH
week 1-12 - EQ
week 1-6- win
week 1-6 - turanabol
week 6-12 - var
week 6-12 - masteron

So , I am only interest in HGH for its FAT LOSS and skin thightening properties , I am not using HGH to gain mass , since I would have to go too high on the dose for that like 8 IU ED and probably have to use slim at the same time so hell no , this is a cutting cycle , so the HGH would be just for FAT loss and skin tightening . I am thinking a low dose like 2 IU ED just for those purposes .

I have used 2 IU EOD in the past and it did help with my fat loss , but now since I am planning on using 2 times that dose , I am worried about the insulin resitance thing


Victor
 
By proper steps I mean eating right, not eating carbs right after a GH injection. GH is also catabolic BIGTIME to adipose tissue to sight injections will keep fat from accumulating in that area. I have used GH on 6mo cycles and never had an insulin issue. As stated above you need insulin for GH to add serious muscle, so that should tell you, GH is not that great at adding mass, the anabolic activities are very low especially the younger you are.
 
indy69camaro said:
By proper steps I mean eating right, not eating carbs right after a GH injection. GH is also catabolic BIGTIME to adipose tissue to sight injections will keep fat from accumulating in that area. I have used GH on 6mo cycles and never had an insulin issue. As stated above you need insulin for GH to add serious muscle, so that should tell you, GH is not that great at adding mass, the anabolic activities are very low especially the younger you are.



>>>> exactly I am 25 bro , but I have gained and lost 40 pounds of fat on and over for the past 3 years , sometimes I would be 240 and sometimes I would lean out to 200 and then again and again ...

As a result I have some loose skin over my abs and stretch marks also , so the HGH would be just to help with skin tightening and also help with the fat loss , now I am 209 lbs but I still want to drop more 20 pounds to be 5 % bodyfat ....

BY no means I am using HGH to help build muscle for that I will use 1 g AAS per week during my cycle , like I said HGH to build mass gotta be taken at high doses and with insulin ! So I am not looking for anabolic properties only fat loss and skin thightening/improve .


For my goals , do you think 2 IU ED would work ? Or I would have to go higher than that ?


Victor
 
Beachbum1546 said:
i always thought that HGH made you more insulin sensitive?!?

>>> You mean it makes you release EVEN LESS insulin because your body is using the insulin that you already release so well .

Is that it ?

Damn , this is getting confusing ...

let's call the pros - uuuuuuulter , maaaaaacro , huuuuuuck , heeeeeeeelp :)


Victor
 
VictorBR said:
>>>> exactly I am 25 bro , but I have gained and lost 40 pounds of fat on and over for the past 3 years , sometimes I would be 240 and sometimes I would lean out to 200 and then again and again ...

As a result I have some loose skin over my abs and stretch marks also , so the HGH would be just to help with skin tightening and also help with the fat loss , now I am 209 lbs but I still want to drop more 20 pounds to be 5 % bodyfat ....

BY no means I am using HGH to help build muscle for that I will use 1 g AAS per week during my cycle , like I said HGH to build mass gotta be taken at high doses and with insulin ! So I am not looking for anabolic properties only fat loss and skin thightening/improve .


For my goals , do you think 2 IU ED would work ? Or I would have to go higher than that ?


Victor
2IU is fine for that effect
 
indy69camaro said:
2IU is fine for that effect

>> yeah that is what I am thinking .


about the insulin resitance , I was thinking if HGH can make you DIABETIC , what does that means ?

DIABETIC persons are insulin resitance RIGHT , it means the insulin they produce is no longer good enough , so they gotta TAKE insulin shots all the time to make it up , is that it ?

SO , if this is right , it is pretty much easy to say that HGH can make you insulin resitant . ( if it can make you a diabetic , it has to make you insulin resistant )

NOW , I STILL don't understand HOW THE HELL it can HELP you burn FAT if it is GONNA make you RELEASE more INSULIN ( insulin resistant ) .

:rolleyes:

I am lost :(


Victor
 
VictorBR said:
>> yeah that is what I am thinking .


about the insulin resitance , I was thinking if HGH can make you DIABETIC , what does that means ?

DIABETIC persons are insulin resitance RIGHT , it means the insulin they produce is no longer good enough , so they gotta TAKE insulin shots all the time to make it up , is that it ?

SO , if this is right , it is pretty much easy to say that HGH can make you insulin resitant . ( if it can make you a diabetic , it has to make you insulin resistant )

NOW , I STILL don't understand HOW THE HELL it can HELP you burn FAT if it is GONNA make you RELEASE more INSULIN ( insulin resistant ) .

:rolleyes:

I am lost :(


Victor


Let me give you run down of diabetes

two types:
type 1
type 2

type 1 (insulin dependent diabetes) the kind where the person (pancreas) does not make any insulin at ALL. None, nada. Insulin sensitivity has nothing to do with this type. The person takes shots of insulin to regulate their blood sugar (i'm this).

type 2 (fat people diabetes :)) this kind is when someone does not produce enough themselves to equal out their blood sugar. So, they still produce insulin just not enough. This happens because has become too insulin resistent, meaning their body isn't efficent enough with the insulin it produced. This happens usually from being too fat or being old.

Sensitivity and its role:
Higher your insulin sensitivity is the better. Having HGH raising you insulin sensitivity is good.
Imagine you eat a piece of pie and you need 5 units of insulin to equal it out. Now if you were on HGH, which would raise your sensitivity, you might only need 3 units of equal your blood sugar (and transport nutrients to cells).
That's why you lose fat, less insulin in your body more energy from fat and whatnot. (from 5 units of insulin in your system to 3 units).
That is why insulin/HGH is such a powerful stack, they compliment each other.
Working out raises your sensitivity levels too.
 
makes sense now bro

So , it is safe to say that HGH WILL Not make you insulin resitant , BUT in FACT it will make you raise your insulin sensitivity which is basically the OPOSITE of insulin resitance .

Right ?

Victor
 
GH's primary function is that of a diabetogenic hormone that opposes the actions of insulin and IGF's on carbohydrates and lipid hemeostasis. GH is directly lipolytic and largely indirectly promotes protein synthisis. Gh is additionally a physiologic regulator of muscle mass and adiposity.

Simply put GH and insulin oppose each other. GH works directly on adipocites abd causes lipolosis where as Insulin stimulates glucose uptake by muslce and adipocites.
 
thx zyg :)

So for my goals with HGH which are just fat loss and skin tightening , how much would you recommend ?

2iu ED enough ? or should I bump it to 3-4 iu ED ?


Victor
 
VictorBR said:
thx zyg :)

So for my goals with HGH which are just fat loss and skin tightening , how much would you recommend ?

2iu ED enough ? or should I bump it to 3-4 iu ED ?


Victor
Its really hard to say. The effects of GH are not as pronounced as those of AAS but they are there. The sides from GH can also sneak up on you. With that in mind your just going to have to experiment and see how you do. At 2IU dialy you shouldnt have much in the way of sides and honestly by opinion is that doubling the dose to 4IU doesnt necessarily double the benefits but it can surely cause the sides to set in.
 
Just read what zyg wrote and don't kill yourself trying to figure out what causes insulin resistance. If you did figure out what causes insulin resistance you could write a paper and win the Nobel Prize because no one knows, and lots of people want to know.
You should use 4iu/day if you're shooting daily.
 
Here's what Nandi had to say about this subject:

In 1963 PJ Randle introduced the idea of the glucose-fatty acid cycle, later fittingly called the Randle cycle. In Randle's model, an increase in fat oxidation leads to a decrease in glucose oxidation. Later, researchers identified a pathway whereby the opposite occurs: increased glucose oxidation prevents fat burning. This is appropriately enough called the reverse Randle cycle.

In Randle's model, acetyl-CoA derived from the beta oxidation of fatty acids builds up in the mitochondria faster than it is oxidized for energy. This buildup of acetyl-CoA blocks the enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase, a rate limiting enzyme for glucose oxidation. The buildup of glucose-6-phosphate in turn inhibits the enzyme hexokinase, which phosphorylates glucose once it enters the cell under the influence of insulin. Finally, this buildup of glucose limits further glucose entry into the cell, inducing insulin resistance.

It is well known that numerous studies have shown that GH use can promote both fat burning and insulin resistance. This recently published paper proposes that the GH induced insulin resistance is due to the stimulation of the Randle cycle by GH. (1)

One would think that the higher levels of insulin in the insulin resistant state would slow down lipolysis, bringing glucose and fat oxidation back to normal, but evidently not. It also makes one wonder if it is wise to try to improve insulin sensitivity while on GH, potentially increasing glucose oxidation at the expense of fat burning. Some people on anabolic boards have suggested using metformin or other insulin sensitizing agents like ALA during GH use. But interestingly, one proposed mechanism for metformin's effect on glucose uptake is to inhibit the Randle cycle (2). This would seem like a bad approach if one were taking GH for fat loss.

The research presented in (1) is supported by earlier work showing that inhibiting lipolysis during GH treatment improves insulin sensitivity:

http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/co...full/86/12/5813


(1) J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003 Apr;88(4):1455-63

Growth hormone replacement therapy induces insulin resistance by activating the glucose-fatty acid cycle.

Bramnert M, Segerlantz M, Laurila E, Daugaard JR, Manhem P, Groop L.


(2) Diabet Med 2001 Jul;18(7):578-83

Metabolic effects of metformin in patients with impaired glucose tolerance.

Lehtovirta M, Forsen B, Gullstrom M, Haggblom M, Eriksson JG, Taskinen MR, Groop L.
 
thx guys ,

Zyg - I will probably stay on 2 iu and that is it , 4iu ED might make me tired and I dont want that ..

ulter - that is right bro , I will stop worring about it and just use it , but I will probably stay on 2 iu ....

kbrkbr - very nice read bro , thx


Victor
 
vic, if this is your first time out with gh, even 2iu will likely make you lethargic at first. Don't let it bother you: Your body will quickly acclimate.
 
it would be the second time bro,

first time I used 2 iu EOD ( that is like 1 IU ED , right ? ) and I got ZERO SIDES , I wasn't feeling lethargic or tired at all ...

I think at 2 IU I will be ok ...


Victor
 
btw- should I go with 2 iu , 5 days on - 2 days OFF , or just stay on all the time , I mean 7 days a week


Victor
 
I recently read a study that found the eod approach to GH administration was the best as it did not affect the body's own GH secretion.
It takes longer to get the benefits from this approach, but it is safer for long term use. When I begin GH, I will be starting off at 2iu eod then move it up by 1iu every 6 weeks until I get to 4iu eod, which is the dose I'll stick with.
 
DAMN !

EOD ulter , this is totally new to me .

How come people come with this decision ? any specific reason at all ?

I mean he said that it wouldn't interfere with your own production which is a pretty good reason by itself ..but still ...anytihng else ?

And if I was planning on doing 2iu ED , to get the same benefits I would have to go with 4 iu EOD , right ?


Victor
 
holy crap , when you think you know everything , you know nothing . LOL

That is why I gotta come here everyday , everyday you learn something , and it is actually true that : " the more you know , the more you grow " ;)

You know this is interesting , last time I used it , I used it EOD , I was shooting 2 iu EOD and althought I was dieting and using AAS , I completely changed my body , I don't know if the HGH helped or NOT , but I guess it played its role .

But like I said , I was planning in going 2 iu ED this time , do you think that for me to have the SAME results I would have to go with 4 iu EOD ?



Victor
 
Ulter said:
That's what I told you to use two days ago.

Oh and bro, you can't know "it all" because "it all" keeps changing


>>> that is true , you can never know it all , lol , it keeps changing all the time ..

So , at 2 IU EOD , I had ZERO sides , now I am gonna bump it to 4 iu EOD , like you said.... do you think sides are gonna settle in ? like numbness , swollen hands/feet , lethargy and feeling tired 24/7 ?



Victor
 
This is the first time I've heard people going EOD on GH. Anyone have some reading material on the subject???... how long is "long term" GH use, over 6 months? So if I was going for 4-5 months then 4IU/ED would be ok?
 
lrg&inCHARGE said:
This is the first time I've heard people going EOD on GH. Anyone have some reading material on the subject???... ?


Here you go. This is from a sticky on ulter's board.


EOD GH injections are better!..... study says

A very thorough well controlled 4 year study published on
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 87, No.8 3573-3577
clearly shows every other day (EOD) hGH injections to be much more beneficial in
the long run to everyday injections. Everyday injections seems to drastically lower
your body's sensitivity to it's own GH secretion. The study included children with idiopathic
short stature, but can be ever casting on us, normal non-deficient hGH individuals who
may use hGH periodically for bodybuilding, sports and health purposes.

The 38 children were divided into 2 groups:
Group I received daily hGH injections.
Group II received alternate day hGH injections.

It is important to note that the total weekly dosage of hGH
was the same for both groups.

Both groups received the hGH therapy contiguously for 2 years.
Their natural growth was followed for an additional 2 years after hGH therapy ended.
They were all measured at 3-month intervals during the 4 years period (2 years
with hGH therapy and 2 years after). Their Serum GH was measured by double antibody RIA kit.

During hGH therapy, both groups accelerated their growth substantially.
Group I receiving the daily hGH injections first & second year velocity was 3.4 and 2.3 SD
Group II receiving the alternate hGH inj. had 3.0 and 2.0 SD for first and second year respectively.

Over the initial 6 months after withdrawal of therapy, growth velocity decelerated to a low nadir -3.9 SD score
for the daily therapy group, whereas it decelerated in the alternate day group to only -0.2 SD score.

During the 2 years off therapy, the later group (taking EOD injections)
maintained growth rates of -0.2 to -1.2 SD score, which is similar to their SD score prior to the hGH treatment.
The daily group also recovered but very slowly, on the fourth semiannual evaluation off therapy.
The cumulative 4-year growth velocity (2yrs on and 2 yrs off therapy) of the alternate day group was greater
than that of the daily therapy group (mean, 0.9 vs. 0.3 SD score).

At the end of the 4-yr therapy period, the adult height prediction of the alternate day group was greater
than that of the daily group by a mea of 6.5cm (that's over 2.5" in height, quite a lot of difference)

In even simpler English, to translate what it may mean to us is that using hGH everyday will only
negligibly give better short-term results. Yet using alternate day hGH will give radically better long-term
results and much better recovery. As the body may get back to homeostasis much faster.

Remember the two groups got the same weekly total hGH dosage,
so your every other day hGH injections would be twice as if you used
it every day.

The researchers said, the dose was of less impotency than the schedule of the injections.
Daily hGH therapy for 3 years caused subnormal growth persisting for 1.5 years (very bad)

It may be that the problem is not enough hGH or IGF-1 secretion but rather
the body's decreased sensitivity to it. The interesting part is that the serum GH levels
and serum IGF-I and IGF-binding protein remained unaffected or relatively mutely affected.
Even your body's endogenous pulsatile secretion of GH resumes within just days
even after long-term hGH therapy.

The researchers hypothesis is that the tolerance may be in the "GH signal transduction in
selective target organs in response to the disappearance of the unique pulsatile
pattern of serum GH during GH therapy". You see, hGH taken via sc injections
do not imitate the your body's own GH secretion.
"Indeed, daily sc administration of GH results in an unphysiological serum GH profile, with peak
levels at 4 h and a slow decline over the course of the following 12–24 h. This pattern can be
regarded as continuous administration, rather than the physiological GH pulses,
with a frequency of about eight per day."
"Assuming that the withdrawal syndrome is related to tolerance that might have developed toward
hGH or IGF-I, we tried to prevent it by alternate day treatment. Moreover, hGH doses used in
therapy often stimulate IGF-I to supraphysiological serum levels, suggesting that target
tissues IGF-I may also be higher than normal. The mechanism seems, therefore, to rest
with hGH and IGF-I action at their target tissues. We now show that alternate day therapy
with hGH in children with an intact GH-IGF-I axis prevents the withdrawal syndrome"

Researchers mark the analogy to another endocrine tolerance and withdrawal syndrome:
"alternate day therapy with glucocoricoids prevents tolerance to that hormone to a substantial degree,
"Interestingly, glucocoricoids withdrawal syndrome can also occur while the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is intact (, indicating that tolerance to glucocoricoids has developed
at the target organ level (9). "

An example of a good safe protocol to follow in my opinion could be

hGH taken for 4 months (16 weeks) or more at 8IU every other day,
split to 4IU three hours after waking up (say 11:00am)
and another 4IU taken 4 hours later (say 3:00pm).
This approach is quite conservative and may be optimal.

Obviously, you may extend past 4months, and take more IUs per day.
This approach goes with 8IU EOD, so it is equivalent to folks that would
otherwise go with 4IU ED, which is what most do.

There is some controversy as to how many of these IUs the body
can utilize at once

Obviously, there are lot of studies, some better conducted, some less.
Lots of opinions and doctrines in endocrinology, bodybuilding etc..
So you should make your own decision, I guess old individuals on
hGH for life would not mind, as no rebound would affect them. Professional
bodybuilders probably wouldn't mind as well.

I would rather follow a protocol like this. For most part due to the
nasty rebound that I could get after withdrawing from long-term ED hGH treatment.
Nothing worse then look awesome, stop hGH then after several months having:
Low body sensitivity to your own body's GH.
Slow recovery
Decline in resting cardiac output
Increase fat mass
Decrease in metabolic rate
Negative nitrogen balance, phosphorus, sodium and potassium.

Again, I said "could" not "would", because this study cannot absolutely manifest
our use of hGH. Moreso, we are not children, we are not idiopathic hGH deficient
and not aGHD. But since the weekly dosages do remain the same as well as the
duration of the hGH usage. Just changing to the EOD protocol from the well
hyped everyday inj protocol is worth in my honest opinion. It seems statistically
a better bet, with more chance to win, than loose as opposed to the ED protocol.

I just tried to summarize the findings of the study, which was by the way,
a pleasure to read as the study is well written and was prepared by
Dr Hochberg, MD, a renowned well respected figure in endocrinology.

You can read the full article with all the graphs and details here:
http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/87/8/3573
With references to 23 studies.

Here are some interesting graphs:

http://jcem.endojournals.org/conten...g0828721002.gif
This graph shows the difference growth velocity difference pre GH treatment, and at the
end of the trial, 4 years after (2 years after withdrawal from GH treatment)
The dark bar marks the alternate day injections. The light bar marks the every day injections,
note that the every day injections group saw worse long-term (4 yrs) results as opposed
to the alternate day group.

http://jcem.endojournals.org/conten...g0828721003.gif
This graph shows the annual bone age advancement in children treated with
alternate GH injections and daily injections.
The light bar marks the every day injections, the dark bar the alternate day injections.
In first two years (the years they were taking hGH), take a look at the relatively
small advantage ED injections gave over the EOD inj, as opposed to the 2 years
after withdrawal of the treatment. The EOD group shows
 
nice post kbrkbr. I am planning to go 4 months at 3IU's/ED. Would I benifit from going EOD or is 4 months short enough that I wouldn't see much of a crash? I'm 2 months in, would I benifit from changing my intake to 4IU/EOD from now?
 
lrg&inCHARGE said:
nice post kbrkbr. I am planning to go 4 months at 3IU's/ED. Would I benifit from going EOD or is 4 months short enough that I wouldn't see much of a crash? I'm 2 months in, would I benifit from changing my intake to 4IU/EOD from now?


There used to be a gh guru here on elite named Ironmaster and he always said the the efficacy of gh is not a function of quantity as much as duration. In other words, it would be better to use a smaller amount for a longer period than a large amount for a smaller period.

I have come around and now agree with ulter -- yes, I admit I was wrong before -- and now go with 4-6iu eod.
 
OK..In case anyone still reads this thread...I gotta chime in.

First off I would NOT recommend using insulin if you aren’t diabetic! I advise against it! The stuff can kill YOU quickly!!!!!

My creds: I'm Type 1 Diabetic (over 40yrs ..since I was 1yr old) ..and I have a Bachelor's in Exercise Physiology (even though I do something different now for work). ...So take it for what you will...

Insulin resistance seems to be misunderstood. What it is: the body's ability to use the insulin that it has (currently floating in the blood, etc). Insulin needs to 'bind' to insulin receptors on the cells. When those receptors change (due to other chemicals in the body), the insulin can’t bind to the receptors. Think of it like 2 pieces in a jigsaw puzzle …the shape makes them fit (and kind’a stick) together. (The actual receptors and insulin are chemicals, so it’s actually chemical attraction, but easier to visualize a shapes).

So, if you change the shape of 1 of the pieces of the jigsaw (receptor), but a robot keeps making more of the other piece to fit with it (Insulin), it doesn’t matter how many insulin pices you have …none will fit with the receptor piece.

Now you have a ton of insulin floating in your bloodstream, but say only 50% of your receptors are ‘shaped correctly’, it doesn’t matter…the cells can’t use the insulin. It’s right there, but it doesn’t matter…it won’t bind.

More real info (think of the low-carb diets):

Insulin does 2 primary things:
1. Gets GLUCOSE across the cell membrane ((gets ‘sugar from the blood into the cells) so the cell can use that glucose molecule for energy.

2. If that cell DOES NOT NEED THE ENERGY from the glucose molecule right then, INSULIN CONVERTS THE CLUCOSE TO FAT. (caps for importance, not yelling).

So, when hgh increases insulin resistance, and your body starts producing more insulin to keep blood glucose levels (blood sugar) in check, it keeps making more to overcome the resistance, but your body isn’t actually ‘using’ any more insulin.

Don’t think of how much insulin is in the bloodstream/produced. Think of how it effects your carb intake: For the same amount of carbs, your blood sugar will rise by so many points (mmol/dl). Us diabetics typically use what’s called a sliding scale (like for every 10g sugar, I take 1 unit (IU) (NOT ml!!! that’s typical 100 units) of insulin. Ex: A coke (37g sugar) I’d take 3.5-4 IU insulin to ‘balance’ it. And to bring my blood sugar down, I (different for everyone) take 1 unit per 30mmol/dl (the glucometer numbers in the US)). AGAIN VERY IMPORTANT: ..THESE ARE MY NUMBERS FOR MY BODY and I AM DIABETIC
….Don’t mess with insulin unless you wanna die! By the time the paramedics figure out that your seizure and coma is from hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), it will be post mortem (after you’re dead).

So…real life:

I’ve been on kig for a few weeks ..5IU split 3 night 2 early am 5on 2 off. Since working up to 5, my resistance has gone CRAZY. I am taking roughly 3-5 times the amount of insulin to keep my blood sugars in check It happened all of the sudden too! Woke up 1 morning with my blood sugar at 420 (100 is ‘normal…good range). I don’t like that …to the point that I’ll probably drop back to 2-3IU 5on 2 off or 5 EOD to see if things go back to normal-ish…and I’m doing it mainly for joints (mine are destroyed after 20yrs heavy lifting if it ends in it is, I got it in my shoulders, hips and knees …booo) …and fat loss.

And stay away from the slin…way too dangerous (the stuff I take could kill YOU in less than 1 hour!!!!!!)

I hope that helps explain...
 
This thread ahs been inactive for almost 7 years ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
 
I know it has been, but it's still info that comes up in a search ...regarding gh and insulin resistance ....so in case people find it and read it...I wanted to update with some of the chem/science info (and correction : US glucometers typically use mg/dl ..not mmol ...I never look at that on the glucometer..just the number).

...It's just info that might be of use to someone (maybe new to gh like me)
 
Top Bottom