Bretmj1 said:What ya think? They seem to me like they are in for the same ultimate goal, but are there any big difference? Does one support a more definitive conclusion in results then the other?
BiggT said:Getting good on big lifts induces hypertrophy......training for soreness or a pump flushes blood into a muscle and you feel swollen for a few hours, but it doen't contribute to long-term gains.
fallingeggs said:i am with mm107... i love the 5x5. i do not do any iso work anymore and my lifts are moving up faster then ever.
Bretmj1 said:Alright, another question then. Will this contribute to lean muscle mass in all places that isolation work would? If you could explain that would be wonderful!
Bret
BiggT said:Getting good on big lifts induces hypertrophy......training for soreness or a pump flushes blood into a muscle and you feel swollen for a few hours, but it doen't contribute to long-term gains.
I'll hit everything you asked:Bretmj1 said:I was chatting with a friend the other day about Starr 5x5 and I guess it made me question a bit on how exactly those core workouts work all the necessary muscles to make you one sexy beast. What about lower back, and calves, and traps, delts? Dont those need to be worked separately?
^^^ Did you miss this??BiggT said:I isolate biceps, maybe curls or hammer curls for 3-5 sets once a week IF that, I will post a biceps shot, I am not Ronnie Coleman or anything, but I have never had anybody accuse me of needing more direct arm work.......
http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f...ent=Summer06005.jpg&refPage=&imgAnch=imgAnch1
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










