Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

How bout them thar Patriots!

patsfan1379

patsfan1379

New member
Brady picked apart the Raiders D and the two freshmans inside linebackers were pretty damn good! Spreading that ball around reminded me of the 2002 season!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

God I love football.

P.S. I feel like shit because I only worked out once this week.
 
I know they won but i didn't think they looked very good in their first outing of the year.I doubt they will repeat again this year but good luck.
 
Deterass said:
I know they won but i didn't think they looked very good in their first outing of the year.I doubt they will repeat again this year but good luck.
Click to expand...
run defance was week at best.but I think the patrits only get better as the season moves on.its not the offence of defance that keeps the patrots winning all the time though.its there abilaty to play as a hole,and make things happen when it conts the most.they are a cluch team.
 
patsfan1379 said:
Brady picked apart the Raiders D and the two freshmans inside linebackers were pretty damn good! Spreading that ball around reminded me of the 2002 season!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

God I love football.

P.S. I feel like shit because I only worked out once this week.
Click to expand...
I was wondering when you were gonna show up!

That was a good game!
 
Tennessee has the worst defense in pro football, followed by Green Bay.

Run defense was at best? WTF? The only reason the Raiders ditched the run is because they were down.

Lamont was busting them off 7 yards at a time, not to mention Crockett's carries.

If anything, the Pat's pass defense looked pretty decent.
 
Gooooo Colts
 
patsfan1379 said:
Brady picked apart the Raiders D and the two freshmans inside linebackers were pretty damn good! Spreading that ball around reminded me of the 2002 season!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

God I love football.

P.S. I feel like shit because I only worked out once this week.
Click to expand...

They got LUCKY!!! The Raiders "D" was handing their ass to 'em for a while there.
 
If Brady threw for over 200 yards in the first half to 8 different receivers... How exactly did the Raiders D hand them anything...
 
patsfan1379 said:
If Brady threw for over 200 yards in the first half to 8 different receivers... How exactly did the Raiders D hand them anything...
Click to expand...

Exactly my point. They had to keep it in the air because the Raider D was kicking their asses on the ground. The Pats have NO running game. It's obvious which teams do and don't have it together on the ground, anytime you see passing numbers over 300 yards/game. :rolleyes:
 
swole said:
Tennessee has the worst defense in pro football, followed by Green Bay.

Run defense was at best? WTF? The only reason the Raiders ditched the run is because they were down.

Lamont was busting them off 7 yards at a time, not to mention Crockett's carries.

If anything, the Pat's pass defense looked pretty decent.
Click to expand...
sorry for my bad spelling and gramer.I ment the run defance was weak.at best.
 
StickFigure said:
Exactly my point. They had to keep it in the air because the Raider D was kicking their asses on the ground. The Pats have NO running game. It's obvious which teams do and don't have it together on the ground, anytime you see passing numbers over 300 yards/game. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
the pats can get it don on the ground and in the air.if you are a 1 demation defance like the riaders are then the pats will just take the essy way and win in the air.lets face it the raiders are going to have a grate run defance this yeare.I mean shit look at the 2 fattes in the middle.ted washington and warren sap.
btw there is no way in hell youre ganna tell me corry dillen ant one of the best in the leage.
 
swole said:
Tennessee has the worst defense in pro football, followed by Green Bay.

Run defense was at best? WTF? The only reason the Raiders ditched the run is because they were down.

Lamont was busting them off 7 yards at a time, not to mention Crockett's carries.

If anything, the Pat's pass defense looked pretty decent.
Click to expand...

Crockett was kickin ass! He'll be a big assett if the coach learns to use him more.

BTW, I HATE the Raiders but I'm taking their side here just for the simple fact that I'm tired of hearing about the Pats and their undefeated streak. :rolleyes:
 
StickFigure said:
Crockett was kickin ass! He'll be a big assett if the coach learns to use him more.

BTW, I HATE the Raiders but I'm taking their side here just for the simple fact that I'm tired of hearing about the Pats and their undefeated streak. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Crockett is a change of pace back. If he started and received 25 carries per game, Oakland would average 3.2 yards per rush. Lamont Jordan is a young and extremely talented running back who can handle the normal workload Norv Turner likes to give his backs.

You don't set game plans for people like Zach Crocket. He's 1 dimensional. He hits the hole hard, that's it. The game plan was set to stop Lamont Jordan. However, Jordan has a beefy frame that can plow him through holes and he can also speed around corners. He's going to be a beast this year. If the Pat's weren't leading by 10 points in the 3rd quarter, Lamont would have had another 30 yards minimum.
 
swole said:
Crockett is a change of pace back. If he started and received 25 carries per game, Oakland would average 3.2 yards per rush. Lamont Jordan is a young and extremely talented running back who can handle the normal workload Norv Turner likes to give his backs.

You don't set game plans for people like Zach Crocket. He's 1 dimensional. He hits the hole hard, that's it. The game plan was set to stop Lamont Jordan. However, Jordan has a beefy frame that can plow him through holes and he can also speed around corners. He's going to be a beast this year. If the Pat's weren't leading by 10 points in the 3rd quarter, Lamont would have had another 30 yards minimum.
Click to expand...
and the morel of the story is.even with a good offance,and a good run deffance.the pats still stomped them.in the end there is only one thing that matters the big w.the pats have it the raiders dont.theres allways next week boys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FishyAnchovy
Approved Log My Orals-Only Pre-Cycle LOG
Replies
21
Views
4K
MUSTANG_18
MUSTANG_18
Macedog24
The best STEROIDS for your arsenal to get MONSTER SIZE + Hardcore bulking article
Replies
8
Views
4K
Tazz
Tazz
D
Back at The Starting Line, wait where's that?
Replies
0
Views
933
Dere.Fried32
D
ceo
NCAAF 10/12 - Iowa St v (20) Texas Tech - NOON ET
Replies
0
Views
878
ceo
ceo
ceo
NCAAF 8/31 Temple v (14)Notre Dame
Replies
0
Views
653
ceo
ceo
Top Bottom