Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Have you seen the new Windows Vista in action? VID inside

patsfan1379 said:
lmfao @ geeks who know what the fuck an activesync and dirextx are

Oh yeah, you mean the Windows features that don't work when you run XP in OSX Parallels on Apple hardware?
 
so basically vista sucks?
 
redguru said:
Oh, and increase the refresh rate on your monitor.

bitch, that is 1600x1200 @ 85 Hz (can't do better)

The other thing, my graphic card was top of the line 2 years ago, it's directx9 compliant (Radeon 9700 Pro).

Compared to today's card, it's already mid-level, saved only by the fact that it Supports DirectX 9.

The basics specs are:

128Mb DDR SDRAM
* Eight parallel rendering pipelines
* Four parallel geometry engines
* 256-bit DDR memory interface
* AGP 8X support
MPEG2 HW encoding/decoding

This works perfect... according to the so called Windows Experience Index, my card is a 5... my processor is the bottle neck, with 3.2

This index is actually a good idea, since it lets you know what exactly you need to upgrade to get the most bang for the buck
 
I'm using vista on one of my computers - both computers are dual core :nerd:

I'm using onboard video and its kind of a drag - you really need a solid video card for vista to run super smoothly. It's a resource hog. 64-bit wireless card drivers do not exist UGH. IT has a nice gooey interface though

there's a screen shot for you:

desktopzb9.jpg
 
Top Bottom