Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below superman40229
New member
Hamill beat em down
Hamill was f#ck#n ROBBED
- Thread starter superman40229
- Start date
cipherking
New member
na he lost bro. after the first round bisbing boxed the hell out of him. he chased him for 2 rounds. i cant understand for the life of me why hamill didnt grab him and keep him down all 3 rounds. stupid
I thought it could have gone either way.
canadianhitman
Well-known member
Bisping didn't win a single round...he MIGHT have earned a draw for round 3, tops. Fixed that one good, they did...I guess growth in the european market means more than integrity.
cipherking
New member
i thought he lost. its not just the judges. im in philadelphia and u cant get more america then here. to me he lost. u cant chase people around and get jabbed for 5 mins and expect to win.
redsamurai
Banned
It was close........but Bisping won. Hamill didn't do what he does best. I like that his standup has improved, obviously. But it didn't improve enough to make a real statement. He should have shot on Bisping more........and when he did get him down..........one, Bisping got up on him twice, that doesn't look good to the judges......and two, he didn't do any real damage. Bisping was actually more active on his back than he was standing up. But Hamill showed his class after the fight..........where Bisping didn't. I lost a bit of respect for the count after that. I mean, even in the standup.......Hamill was getting to Bisping..........so for Bisping to act like he dominated the fight and Hamill had no business in the octagon with him.........well.........not really classy.
But how about crocop fighting like a man who's terrified of getting KO'ed?? He might be done.........I've never seen him that trepid.
But how about crocop fighting like a man who's terrified of getting KO'ed?? He might be done.........I've never seen him that trepid.
Kongo broke one of Crocop's ribs in the first round.
split endz
New member
Agree that Hamill was robbed. He inflicted more damage, he had several take-downs (Bisping had none), & he pushed the action. Points should be given for all. Bisping did nothing but land some virtually harmless jabs. The first judge had it right : 30 - 27 Hamill.
split endz said:
I thought Hamill was ripe to be KOd near the end of the third. Hamill never got anything going with the takedowns after the first; he just layed and prayed. Bisping started countering effectively starting in the second round, but really got lit up by Hamill in the first round. You can push the action, but it must be effective agression. Hamill was hitting gloves and missing frequently. Frankly they both started gassing early in the second which makes it tough to determine actual damage.
cipherking
New member
totally agree with thisJacob Creutzfeldt said:
buttbeater
New member
hamill was robbed brutally, and i don't even like the guy!
abs of steel
New member
hamill was robbed. but what can we do. do you all think there will be another rematch?
abs of steel said:
There's already a rematch planned. I think it is UFC 80, but don't quote that as fact.
bonejamesbone
New member
Hamill was robbed, he dominated most of the fight. Bisping was flustered by Matt's improved stand-up game, only in the third round did Bisping start to get some confidence back. Matt won, and a rematch will prove it!
Similar threads
