Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Guys: Think you're confident enough in your masculinity?........

Burning_Inside

Elite Mentor
OK then let's see....

If you are 100% confident in your sexual ways, you should be able to do this no problem.

You should be able to, just for the hell of it, to prove a point, be able to let another guy lick and suck on your genitals, or have anal intercourse with you. If you're honestly 100% sure you'e not gay, then you wouldn't get an erection at all.

Now you may say that just doing these acts would make you gay period, wether or not you'd get turned on by them, but we know that's really not the case. Simply performing an act means you are acting it out, and may or may not feel the way you are acting. If you actually got aroused by it, then that's a different story, that would definately mean you're gay.

So who here in their heart of hearts can muster up the courage and is confident enough that they can actually do something like this without getting turned on?
 
After reading that, I never want to find out WHAT IS "burning inside."

That has to be one of the stupidest fucking things I've ever read, unless of course you're being sarcastic, to make the liberal argument look absurd (reductio ad absurdum - reduce the argument to absurdity) which is usually all too easy to do...

The one thing I can do...

I can prove to you that I'm completely comfortable with my "masculinity" by having sex with my girlfriend tonight!
 
SUCKS.jpg
 
what if a girl is walking past a field and she sees a horse running around with its pig sticker hanging out and she gets turned on

does that mean shes into animal sex?

is this like a lie detection test?

if you walked outside naked and you got aroused because the cold wind was blowing, what does this mean?

i think your argument is floored
 
I'm so 100% sure of my masculinity that if a man approached me in a homosexual way demanding that I let him suck my cock.... I would give him the worst case of black eye he had ever had.

The last time I checked being masculine was the complete opposite of everything you just said.
 
After reading this thread I am 100% sure of who is a cocksucker!!! I am 100% who no matter how hard he tried will never EVER prove to me he is not a cock vaccum.
 
Burning_Inside said:
OK then let's see....

If you are 100% confident in your sexual ways, you should be able to do this no problem.

You should be able to, just for the hell of it, to prove a point, be able to let another guy lick and suck on your genitals, or have anal intercourse with you. If you're honestly 100% sure you'e not gay, then you wouldn't get an erection at all.

Now you may say that just doing these acts would make you gay period, wether or not you'd get turned on by them, but we know that's really not the case. Simply performing an act means you are acting it out, and may or may not feel the way you are acting. If you actually got aroused by it, then that's a different story, that would definately mean you're gay.

So who here in their heart of hearts can muster up the courage and is confident enough that they can actually do something like this without getting turned on?

It is not worth going to jail over... I will just look at the stupid MAMBLA parade with all of the dying queens... that is all I need.... how could anyone think of such a horrible thing???
 
You're all afraid.

It's funny the kind of reaction you get from posting the same question on different boards.

Where'd I think of this? There was a skit on Howard Stern i think it was about a bunch of big tough guy italians doing each other but proclaiming they weren't gay by doing so. Plus I was stoned when I heard it and you know how your mind is cranking when you're like that. So i came up with this little question.

It's just a theoretical question just to make you guys think, which I guess some of you just don't like to do, you'd rather lash out to hide your insecurties.. I mean if you really weren't gay then......

As for the stupid horse dick comment, well...let's see, if you see a horses dick and you get aroused, does that mean you're into bestiality....I'd have to say yeah, why else would you get aroused, unless you were in so much of a daze that you totally forgot that it was a horse dick and it reminded you of a human's.
 
I wouldn't let a girl shit in my mouth, does that mean I'm a prude?

Just because you won't do something in bed, doesn't mean you're not secure in your sexuality. It just means that particualr act doesn't turn you on.

Your argument is flawed sir.
 
I'm curious as to what masculinty has to do with being gay? Just because you're gay doesn't mean you're not masculine, and just because you straight doesn't mean you aren't the most female wimped out piece of wet cloth ever.....

The two aren't opposites....Burning inside, are you homophobic?
 
Last edited:
At the very least put condems in your sick thread! There is no reason to be spreading STD'S.

:sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick:
 
Taps said:
I wouldn't let a girl shit in my mouth, does that mean I'm a prude?

Just because you won't do something in bed, doesn't mean you're not secure in your sexuality. It just means that particualr act doesn't turn you on.

Your argument is flawed sir.
Duh man, how it's so easy to totally go off the boat and try to sound smart. I love these people that try to be champion flawed arguementalists to,, you know the kind that try and pick apart any little nuance of a post and twist and band and go all philosphical and sometmies even political just to make that "you're arguement is flawed sir" comment, god those people are good entertainment.

No taps, see if you don't like a girl to shit in your mouth, it means you don't like to eat shit, doesn't mean that you're prude. That was the most poor pathetic example of trying to twist words around or create alternate scenarios (and one that has nothing at all to do with the original anyway in any sense) to try and make my "arguement flawed". When you come out of 8th grade you'll learn about subjective reasoning, and maybe learn how to keep on target if you're trying to argue a point and not seem like a jackass.

If the act didn't turn you on, then you're not gay. That's all this is about. It's a cut and dry scenario. You'd actually have to perform the action first to see if you were turned on or not though. Stop trying to be mental superman everyone by tossing in other scenarios to try and make this whole thing seem flawed. By doing this you make yourselves seem more insecure.

Bottom line is, if there was a test of sorts you had to undergo to prove if you were gay or not, and this was the way, I bet a lot of you would fail haha. Especially those of you totally avoiding the question or trying to find some kind of allmighty FLAW.
 
Burning_Inside said:

Duh man, how it's so easy to totally go off the boat and try to sound smart. I love these people that try to be champion flawed arguementalists to,, you know the kind that try and pick apart any little nuance of a post and twist and band and go all philosphical and sometmies even political just to make that "you're arguement is flawed sir" comment, god those people are good entertainment.

No taps, see if you don't like a girl to shit in your mouth, it means you don't like to eat shit, doesn't mean that you're prude. That was the most poor pathetic example of trying to twist words around or create alternate scenarios (and one that has nothing at all to do with the original anyway in any sense) to try and make my "arguement flawed". When you come out of 8th grade you'll learn about subjective reasoning, and maybe learn how to keep on target if you're trying to argue a point and not seem like a jackass.

If the act didn't turn you on, then you're not gay. That's all this is about. It's a cut and dry scenario. You'd actually have to perform the action first to see if you were turned on or not though. Stop trying to be mental superman everyone by tossing in other scenarios to try and make this whole thing seem flawed. By doing this you make yourselves seem more insecure.

Bottom line is, if there was a test of sorts you had to undergo to prove if you were gay or not, and this was the way, I bet a lot of you would fail haha. Especially those of you totally avoiding the question or trying to find some kind of allmighty FLAW.

Well, I'd be lying if I said that I'd expended a great deal of mental energy on answering your original post. I suppose from a purely logical point of view, what you said makes sense. Human sexuality is far from logical, however.

And how many people are truly objective anyway?
 
Badkins21 said:

The one thing I can do...

I can prove to you that I'm completely comfortable with my "masculinity" by having sex with my girlfriend tonight!

i plan on proving my masculinity by having sex with badkins girlfriend, too.

who's got next?

:)
 
The question isn't if we'd let a guy suck our cocks, or pound us in the ass. It's if you would.

Would you?
No wait thats a stupid question.

And everything you have said has made absolutely no sense. I am strongly opposed to homosexuality in men. So when the idea is suggested, I do not get this insecure feeling of, wow am i really gay? I get the feeling, What if he's gay? And i quickly move, tell him to move, or do something very offensive towards gays and see if he looks hurt or takes up for them.

Masculinity, however, is an Idea, and any idea is an opinion. While some are more common than others, i don't think letting a guy pork you in the hole is one of those wide spread, "That guys a male role model" type deals.
 
Burning_Inside said:
OK then let's see....

If you are 100% confident in your sexual ways, you should be able to do this no problem.

You should be able to, just for the hell of it, to prove a point, be able to let another guy lick and suck on your genitals, or have anal intercourse with you. If you're honestly 100% sure you'e not gay, then you wouldn't get an erection at all.

Now you may say that just doing these acts would make you gay period, wether or not you'd get turned on by them, but we know that's really not the case. Simply performing an act means you are acting it out, and may or may not feel the way you are acting. If you actually got aroused by it, then that's a different story, that would definately mean you're gay.

So who here in their heart of hearts can muster up the courage and is confident enough that they can actually do something like this without getting turned on?

do you like to have your partner shoot his load on your face or let it run out of your bunhole?
 
Liberator said:
what if a girl is walking past a field and she sees a horse running around with its pig sticker hanging out and she gets turned on

does that mean shes into animal sex?

is this like a lie detection test?

if you walked outside naked and you got aroused because the cold wind was blowing, what does this mean?

i think your argument is floored

BAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAA
 
What if you were blindfolded and getting your dick sucked by a man, however someone told you that Rebecca Romjin-Stamos was sucking your dick and you were aroused. Would this make you gay?
 
This doesn't make sense. The only person I would have lick me is someone I WANT to be with. I only want to be with a woman. If a man tried to lick me, I would defend myself with extreme force.
Why would you have sex with someone you didn't care about, anyways?
 
I think the intention of having sex with a girl is reason enough to be hetero. Being tricked into banging a guy (like if he looked like a girl) doesn't mean your gay.

If your banging a guy to prove your straight...you took the wrong test and your gay. Congrats, burning...
 
LMAO!!!!! That's funny stuff. The old gay trick. "How do you know if you never tried?" Never had my air on fire either.

It is an idiotic ploy that only a fool would even consider. Or someone very insecure.
 
Argh, guys listen, all i'm trying to do is test people and see how secure they really are. I personally think the homphobic are the ones with the hidden gay tendencies because they have fear that if they are around gays, they will bring them out of the closet and everyone will laugh at them and think differently of them and their egoes will be shattered. Never again could they walk with their chests puffed out and act all manly. I know no one would ever do this test just to see if theyr eally are gay, but it makes you think...What would happen? And this also has nothing to do with being blindfolded or whatnot, see, everyone tries adding in their own 2 cents and tries to turn everything around on me here or make the "arguement is logically flawed captain" comment. This test would be done knowing who is sucking you off, or getting you up the ass, no blindfolds. I think if you weren't gay and had no gay tendencies, then you'd just stick it out and bear with it for let's say 5 minutes would be the time you had to endure, and not get hard. I mean if you were that secure, and that manly, you'd take it like a man and bear the trauma and not get hard right? I mean just think if there was a mandatory test you had to go through in this manner. I think many people would fail horribly.
 
My masculinity has never been questioned. I like the way women look but I usually have no use for their mental processes. I do not like the way men look and I usually have no use for their mental processes. Perhaps I should look into becoming a eunich.:(
 
Someone has Issues

OK....let me get this straight.....you want us to prove that we are heterosexual by performing gay sexual acts?....I'm also wondering if you are offering your services in this department...I think I'll stick to chicks and if that means that I'm not secure in my sexuality so be it...one last question though.......does it count if you have slept with a bi girl? :D


:teleport:
 
Why in the hell do you queers always think gay bashers are closet fags? Is it because you saw it in American Beauty?
 
This is the same pickup line every fag has used:

to try to get a straight guy to let them fuck'em. It's creative....I'll give'em that...... But you still gotta be a rump ranger to want to do it..

Don't fall for it guys.........It's a trap........LOL
 
Burning_Inside said:
I think if you weren't gay and had no gay tendencies, then you'd just stick it out and bear with it for let's say 5 minutes would be the time you had to endure, and not get hard. I mean if you were that secure, and that manly, you'd take it like a man and bear the trauma and not get hard right? I mean just think if there was a mandatory test you had to go through in this manner. I think many people would fail horribly.

you are assuming that its all physical, just because you get a hardon doesn't mean your gay either. i get one when the wind blows.
 
Damn, I didn't check this thread for a while...

Hey runner/supersizeme...sorry, that boat won't sail, LOL!

To whoever called whoever "homophobic," get with the times...

Those of us that do not agree with the homosexual lifestyle prefer the term "heterosexist."

:D
 
Burning_Inside,


OK tell me this why do you think the above...?

Ok now do you get turned on when a girl gives you head YES
Now a mouth is a mouth be it male of female, and if your eye's where closed you would never know..!

Ok secondly 99% of guys will get turned on by stimulation of there g-spot which happens to be up there arse.

So according to you all of the men on this board will be gay if we get turned on by any of the above...

It would be hard not to be turned on slightly i think you have a fucked up view here and you have issues you need to address..!

And how does letting some guy fuck you up the arse prove your ok with your sexuality..? Being ok with your sexuality is knowing your limits and what you like.

Explain and enlighten me I believe your fighting a loseing battle..!
 
WOW!I can't believe this thread, Burning you must have far to much time on your hands,and who knows what else.Can I suggest some ideas for your next thread? Perhaps we could debate the meaning of life,or is there a God.Un fuckin believable!!:alien:
 
IS this some sort of gay trick to let fags fuck straight guys that is some sick shit you are for sure gay BURNING INSIDE, You have to be gay to think up a thread like this. HOMO
 
It has nothing to do with how secure you are in your sexuallity. It simply comes down to what sex you are sexually attracted to.

If you like women then you ain't gonna be thinking happy thoughts about some guy sucking your slongster!

:beer:
 
last time at the doctor's office.....

it was time for the annual digital prostate check.

the doctor found something he was concerned about, spent a LONG time with the ol' greased and gloved finger messaging and checking my prostate. i popped a blue steel boner.

if i follow the logic(?) fo your argument,

does this mean i am gay?
 
Re: last time at the doctor's office.....

rnch said:
it was time for the annual digital prostate check.

the doctor found something he was concerned about, spent a LONG time with the ol' greased and gloved finger messaging and checking my prostate. i popped a blue steel boner.

if i follow the logic(?) fo your argument,

does this mean i am gay?
rnch, I hate the old prostate check up....do they have to ream us so damn hard?? I've never had them keep the finger in for as long as what you went through...damn i feel for ya man. They check me every so often, not becuase of my age (I'm only 26), but because of a hernia I had a couple years ago and they check to make sure everything is in working order. This reminds me of my grandpa one time when he got his prostate checked...he told the doctor, "I hope that's your finger you're using!!"
 
see - the deal is that "Im so secure in my masculinity" that stupid arguments like this never enter my mind. My recommendation to you BI is that you seek some help bro, sounds like youve got "issues" with your own self worth. Check out a Counselor.
 
CYCLEON said:
see - the deal is that "Im so secure in my masculinity" that stupid arguments like this never enter my mind. My recommendation to you BI is that you seek some help bro, sounds like youve got "issues" with your own self worth. Check out a Counselor.

I second that 100% cycleon!



To me it sounds like you (Burning inside) are the only one with sexual security problems that your debating in your own head.

why do gays think that everyone has to be gay. not everyone likes guys sucking on their cocks , and not every guy wants a dick up their ass, if you do Burning inside thats fine, but your argument is a VERY weak one and hopefully was just a dumb mistake on your behalf to post that lame fucking thread.


seek counseling if you cant accept your homosexuality. you can be gay or you can be straight, just be REAL.

me...im STRAIGHT!!!!!!!! I like pussy and I like women ONLY!!!!
never tried anything else, never will
sorry if thats not manly enough for you.

my question to you is, have you ever been with a goat? NO? o, then maybe your not fully facing your masculinity unless you can conquer animals.

lol..get a life bro'
 
Superbabe said:
I'm curious as to what masculinty has to do with being gay? Just because you're gay doesn't mean you're not masculine, and just because you straight doesn't mean you aren't the most female wimped out piece of wet cloth ever.....

The two aren't opposites....Burning inside, are you homophobic?

I like you Superbabe...this post shows you are not afraid to think rationally instead of merely reacting to life...as most of the people on this board do.
 
obviously this guy is a pillow biter! just a mental note dude: most people who sit down and smoke a joint hang out and laugh, munch out , fart and scratch their balls......maybe you should look into laying off the weed, cause i , i just cant relate to what you saying!:fro:
 
Top Bottom