i respect you bro, but @ two wks i didnt see sh!t from peptides....nothing. and i dont think peptides or gh increases strength at all. they increase recovery, protein synthesis, igf serum numbers, etc etc. in the end they increase growth which goes hand in hand with strength.
Tes or even better, tren alone can just sky rocket my strength and it happens very very quickly.
i thik you were seeing better recovery, growing faster and thats what your calling strength. but still in 2wks..... idk
GHRP, Ipam, whatever...within two weeks (without aas) I notice a difference in endurance, and strength. The majority of people expect way too much from peptides so they think it does nothing. Its not like the feeling of being a few weeks in on a prop cycle at the gym. But its very very noticable. Peptides work faster than HGH. They arent stronger. They just give some of the benefits sooner. But then after a few months you notice other HGH type effects that take time to notice. Like effects on diet.
Not to mention most people that get legit peptides and dont think they work are trying them for the first time while on cycle. This is precisely why I tried them without AAS. So I could feel anything and everything or nothing at all happening.
Yes...between workout recovery was significantly increased. I forgot to include that initially. But when I suddenly feel like I can start a brutal workout all over again after an hour and the only thing thats changed is a week or two of Ipam then its pretty obvious. As for strength, I'm not talking a tren like sudden increase in strength. I'm talking a noticable enough increase to know something is happening other than just a natty increase.
Adding 50mgc of T4 for two months towards the end based on the "HGH without running T4 is a waste" theory improved the overall experience even more. Yes only 50mcg with peptides because its not HGH. If it were 4iu or so of HGH a day I would have tapered up to 100mcg.