Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
RESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsRESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic

EQ vs. Primo which is best?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Counterstrike
  • Start date Start date
C

Counterstrike

Guest
which would work better for female and lets not talk about fakes etc... which would have less sides buyt better to assist in tonining the body i think eq is more ebenefit you?
 
Counterstrike -- I have to say NOTHING will tone the body. And just for the record, my primos SCHERING 100 mg amps that were gotten OUT OF THE BACK DOOR OF A HOSPITAL were fake.

The real primo I had made me harder -- very hard. But I had not increase in strength nor did I gain mass nor did it decrease bodyfat on a fairly clean diet and rigerous training program.

I cannot speak for EQ yet -- however, from the women I talk with, it gave them nice gains but they needed to run it for 10 weeks to really benefit. None of them lost bodyfat.

Not sure what you mean by tone. But aas in a woman builds muscle and can make them appear harder -- but it has nothing to do with leanness unless of course one is dieting down and then the aas can act as a anti-catabolic.
 
Counterstrike said:
which would work better for female and lets not talk about fakes etc... which would have less sides buyt better to assist in tonining the body i think eq is more ebenefit you?

I can't really see how Primo would tone the body. Primo works at low calorie diet allowing a diet without the catabolic problems. So the tonning itself wont be achieved thourgh rpimo but rather through your diet, training, fat burners...

And I dont think I would put my girl on vet stuff yet, so EQ is a big no.
 
Top Bottom