Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

did hitler help break down racial, sexual taboos?

Yarg!

Platinum Membership gift from THE BOMB SQUAD!
yeah i know it sounds weird, but its raining outside so i started reading a bunch of books. as i was pondering and reading i came up with this:

did hitler actually break down racial and sexual taboos? cuz lets reiterate. now we have gay pride parades, the jews are more accepted, etc etc. but a long time ago, basically before israel was created jews were prosecuted, maybe not holocaust prosecuted, but people generally didnt like them. also it was the same with handicapped ppl and gay ppl. this was because everyone was soo damn ethnocentric and conservative, that being gay was ofcourse frowned upon. now hitler, was one of these conservatives, but he was an extremist psycho conservative and took matters too far. everyone frowned upon differences, but hitler outright prosecuted them and started murdering them in the thousands. this ofcourse shocked the world, and after ww2 people become more accepting. was it because hitler went soo far that it hit such a huge nerve and ppl went "jesus.. thats too much." and started to become more accepting of differences? so hitlers master race plan basically backfired, and instead indirectly created this huge satire of ethnocentricism gone overboard? i dont know i could be wrong. btw ofcourse im not praising hitler or supporting him in anyway- he was an evil maniacle bastard, i am just playing devil's advocate.
 
Similar discussions have been made about Hitler advancing civilization and technology by a generation or more b/c of the huge leap in technology focus forced by the second world war including splitting the atom and ushering the nuclear age. Things like development of radar etc.... hundreds of examples of new technologies that continued after the war.
The unintended positive consequences of a World War. So the question arises was it a good thing or a bad thing in terms of civilization progressing at the expense of 55million lives? Its a question meant to provoke thoughts and discussion.
 
His actions have educated future generations however this education may or may not be practiced to improve relations between or towards our human counterparts.
 
Napoleon - marched into Russia during the winter


Hitler - marched into Russia during the winter




..proving my theory that those truly obsessed with power will always be sabotaged by their own ego
 
although Hitler had to speed up his plans as he was suffering from Parkinsons they say
 
^ it was syphilis they suspected b/c he had aortic regurgitation murmur in his heart which causes aortic dialation and also his mental and physical symptoms.
And he invaded Russia well before winter but like you said his ego betrayed him b/c he was sure theyd have taken Moscow before winter and he did not issue winter clothing to the soldiers. They might have well won Eurasia if it wasnt for Hitler.
 
Eringobraugh said:
Similar discussions have been made about Hitler advancing civilization and technology by a generation or more b/c of the huge leap in technology focus forced by the second world war including splitting the atom and ushering the nuclear age. Things like development of radar etc.... hundreds of examples of new technologies that continued after the war.
The German people did. Hitler was a boob. Often, advance projects like the assault rifle had to be shuffled around him.
I got no respect for that man. Not for the horror, but cuz he coulda pulled it off.
 
they attributed the extreme shaking and loss of the use of his hand to the Park....
 
Eringobraugh said:
^ it was syphilis they suspected b/c he had aortic regurgitation murmur in his heart which causes aortic dialation and also his mental and physical symptoms.
And he invaded Russia well before winter but like you said his ego betrayed him b/c he was sure theyd have taken Moscow before winter and he did not issue winter clothing to the soldiers. They might have well won Eurasia if it wasnt for Hitler.

yep...after the non-agression pact

LOL
 
Eringobraugh said:
And he invaded Russia well before winter but like you said his ego betrayed him b/c he was sure theyd have taken Moscow before winter and he did not issue winter clothing to the soldiers. They might have well won Eurasia if it wasnt for Hitler.
The timing of the Russian invasion by Germany is not that relevant. He opened a second front in the E theater.
Any person knows that's a no-no (remember WW1). Too much risk.
This was a time issue. Ivansion of Russia, would stall the E-theater and run out Japan's game clock in the P theater. Japan knew they could hold off the US for only so long. They knew it before the war began. They never got reinforcements.
Japan's fleet was put on the defensive , Germany was spread to thin in East Europe, Allied push in. Italy buckels (as usaual). Russia pushed from the West. It was lost when Hitler was stalled at the Volga river.
 
I wish I knew more about history because the details of ww2 really sound interesting. Maybe I'll go to the library and check out some history books.
 
Yarg! said:
yeah i know it sounds weird, but its raining outside so i started reading a bunch of books. as i was pondering and reading i came up with this:

did hitler actually break down racial and sexual taboos? cuz lets reiterate. now we have gay pride parades, the jews are more accepted, etc etc. but a long time ago, basically before israel was created jews were prosecuted, maybe not holocaust prosecuted, but people generally didnt like them. also it was the same with handicapped ppl and gay ppl. this was because everyone was soo damn ethnocentric and conservative, that being gay was ofcourse frowned upon. now hitler, was one of these conservatives, but he was an extremist psycho conservative and took matters too far. everyone frowned upon differences, but hitler outright prosecuted them and started murdering them in the thousands. this ofcourse shocked the world, and after ww2 people become more accepting. was it because hitler went soo far that it hit such a huge nerve and ppl went "jesus.. thats too much." and started to become more accepting of differences? so hitlers master race plan basically backfired, and instead indirectly created this huge satire of ethnocentricism gone overboard? i dont know i could be wrong. btw ofcourse im not praising hitler or supporting him in anyway- he was an evil maniacle bastard, i am just playing devil's advocate.
50's , after the war here, were ultra conservative...
Maybe we should diss the church for starting this shit in the first place?
There where no sexual or racial taboos in Rome, Greek men fuck each other, then you go the middle ages; Crusades, Inquisition, witch trails, prosecution of all non-norms.
 
Top Bottom