Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Deadlift rut

TheOak84

Well-known member
ive been deadlifting for 10 weeks and got up to 405. now i cant get any higher than that. whats a good shocker for deads..

this is what i usually do:

warm up - 225x12, 275x8, 315x5

work sets - 365x1, 385x1, 405x1... then i'll rep 315 usually 6-8

and thats it.. should i try 5x5 or 3x12???

what will shock my deads?? anyone got any idead??:confused:
 
Hmmm...the common thought that just deadlifting will bring up the deadlift...:(

Box Squats
Pull Throughs
Speed Deads
Reverse Hypers
Glute Ham Raises

...and a few more...

B True
 
I did't mean it that way. I just thought maybe he would want to try a different deadlifting program. The aux. lifts are a must no matter what.
 
B fold - my deadlift was goin up the whole time, then suddenly jsut stopped.. :( i dunno why, i wsa thinkin about speed deads.
how do you do them 10x3, something like that? or what do u suggest?? also, i woould love to try box squats, but i cant till the summer, cuz we dont have a box in my gym.. but, explain how box squats brings up the deadlift?? i thought you stop just below parallel...

Shades - is BFS bigger faster stronger?? if so, i used that in HS..
but, explain whtat you have in mind...
 
I think that increasing the ROM will help bring it up considerably. I like pulling off a 1/2" mat, 1" or 2" block. If you pull like that for a few weeks and then go back to off the floor, you will just pop weight off the floor.
 
try some rack deads, i like to mix things up and substitute those for regular deads once in a while.
 
In addition to B-Folds suggestions, one thing he has worked with me on that helped me break past my last plateau on deads was varying your deadlift routine. Some of the ones I do are:
- Singles starting at 315 to 405. (10lbs increments. ) Rest only as long as it takes to load the next 10lbs.
- 3x3 or 5x5 or 3x5 or 5x3 at 70-80% of max.
- Singles after 225 at 30lbs increments up to your current 1 rep max. Then attempt to pull your 1 rep max for a max of 6 singles. (Lots of rest between pulls. 3-5 mins)
- 20 rep set. (I haven't tried this one yet, but it's part of my variation plan.)


I also only deadlift every other week. The other week, I do GM's, high-pulls, BB shrugs, other supporting lifts.


Be creative. (That's a direct B-Fold quote, by the way.:)) What I listed above increased my 1 rep max by 30lbs in 5 weeks. I will have to continiye to come up with new ideas if I want to keep that pace, though.

Listen to B-Fold. I know from experience that he can really help you.


.02,
Joker
 
awesome, ill try 3x5, 5x5, 20 reps, 5x3, then the singles..

ill do each one twice for ten weeks.. THEN ill try 425, MAYBE 440.

we'll see:)
 
TheOak84 said:
awesome, ill try 3x5, 5x5, 20 reps, 5x3, then the singles..

ill do each one twice for ten weeks.. THEN ill try 425, MAYBE 440.

we'll see:)

How about sticking to one single program for ten weeks? The reason most trainees never make progress is because they switch up their routine constantly.
 
Debaser said:


How about sticking to one single program for ten weeks? The reason most trainees never make progress is because they switch up their routine constantly.

In his first post, he mentions that he has been doing the same thing for 10 weeks, and has hit a plateau.

He could pick one and stick to it for 10 weeks, then hit another plateau.

Or, he could keep a good variety consistantly and never hit a plateau again.

Either way might get him past his stuck point right now, but why keep hitting plateau's every 10 weeks if you can keep making progress all the time?

Just my .02,
Joker
 
not at all... i dont think 6-9 work sets is over training..

and i dont believe you gain 2 pounds a week and get stronger every week.. if you did, youd be in a magazine promoting a supplement making money.. i think DC is alright.. to get out of a platuea...

and dont say you weigh 205 still, you said that like 4 weeks ago, by now you should weigh arounf 212-215..
 
Haha, actually I did post that I hit 212 like last week, I don't remember which post it was.

I've lost a little weight just because the past week I upped my dance (popping) practice sessions to every day for hours, didn't eat enough and didn't sleep enough. Today I bought a shitload of groceries and tomorrow I'm setting myself back on track.

I like how you say DC is great to "bust a plateau." You've never tried the program. DC has had hundreds of clients, all of whom are making the gains of their life. He's over 300 lbs now, pretty lean. I guess he should try your overtraining volume program, and only use his for plateaus.

I hope one day you'll come around.
 
Debaser said:
Yes. Because he overtrains (heavily).

I don't want to start another "DC Program vs. Everybody" thread again, but according to the DC program, everybody is over-training. And that simply is not the case. Not for everybody.


.02,
Joker
 
Well, that "everybody is over-training" is not true. And this isn't DC training vs. everybody.

This should be everybody vs. volume training.

Here is a routine that oak has posted he does. It is laughable that he expects progress on the deadlift:

*Monday* Chest + tri

Flat - 15, 10, 5,3,1 OR 15, 10, 5x5 OR 3x10
Incline - 10,8, 6, 1-2
Incline DB 3x8-10

Overhead Ext – 12, 10, 8 , 6

Calf – 6x12-20

*Tuesday* Back + bi

Barbell Row – 15,10, 5x5
Dead lift – 10,8, 5x5 OR 5-3-1
Pull-ups 4xfailure OR Cable Row – 4x8-12

Barbell Curl – 12, 10, 8, 6, 6
Hammer curls - 2x15

Wrist Curl – 4x12-20

*Wednesday* Off

*Thursday* Legs

Squat – 15, 10, 8, 6 OR 5x5 OR 5-3-1
Leg Press – 4x8-10
Leg Ext – 4x12
Leg Curl – 5-6x10-12
Calf – 4-12-15

*Friday* Delts

Military Back – 15, 10, 8, 6, 6 OR 15, 10, 8, 5, 3, 1 OR 3x10
Standing OR Seated Military (front) – 3x6-10
Upright Row – 3x8-12

Skull crusher – 15, 10, 5x5
Barbell Curl – 15, 10, 5x5 (cheat)

Reverse curl – 4x8-10

----

Hmm, his labeling is not really accurate, it's more like this:

Monday-Chest, tris, shoulders, calves
Tuesday-back, legs, biceps, rear delts
Thursday-legs, calves
Friday- shoulders, bis, tris
 
Debaser> All I have seen you do in this thread is insult Oak or put down the suggestions offered to him.

I have nothing against DC, so how about you cut the bullshit and post up a solution to Oaks problem based on the DC Program?

We all know you are a big supporter of DC. And it seems to work for you. Oak may try it someday. As well I might. But for the time being, please offer something other than "You overtrain" or "You should follow DC" for solutions to questions people ask.

It's getting really old.

BTW, the question again is "How do I get passed 405 for my deadlift?" People that follow WSB and other types of training have offered solutions. I am curious to see what DC has to offer for a problem like this.


Thank you,
Joker
 
I posted a solution:

Stop overtraining. It doesn't need to be made out any more difficult than it really is. He can NEVER expect to make continuous progress on ANY lift, because he does way too much volume.

DC would say the exact same thing.

I may as well say:

My bench is stuck at 100 lbs. I don't know why, I do 40 sets for it. Should I hit my tris harder? He's looking for the answer in the wrong place. And he needs to get his training (probably diet too) in order if he expects to make gains. And I tried to help him. That DC post was originally for him. Of course, he stuck to his volume training, and instead lots of other people have benefited from the knowledge, and making gains, while he is stuck. So excuse me if I don't have lots of symathy.
 
b fold the truth said:
Don't play 'hit and miss' with your routines...seriously. Study and become a smarter trainee.

B True

Well said...
 
Hey Debaser since your solution for his stuck deadlift is that he is overtraining, what do DC'ers do when they hit a plateau, and please dont even attempt to say you dont hit a plateau or DC'ers worldwide would be benching fire trucks by now. Obviously when you hit a plateau you cant lower your volume much more, or else you wouldnt even really be doing a set. So what I want to know is, what do the low volume DC people do when they hit that inevitable plateau? If I remember correctly, DC says switch the exercise and become "brutally strong on that one". If that is the case, then why not just say "Hey Oak try some rack pulls or some good mornings" instead of your generic "You're overtraining" comment you throw at everyone.
 
Yes, he has you switch to a new exercise. I do it slightly differently, because I have fractional plates and certain training cycle beliefs, but to address your "If that is the case, then why not just say "Hey Oak try some rack pulls or some good mornings" instead of your generic "You're overtraining" comment you throw at everyone."

Because he asked about increasing his deadlift. He's not doing the DC program. The DC program is not centered around specific lifts, it's about getting stronger and stronger. When you hit a wall on one chest exercise, do a different chest exercise and get stronger on that. I'm not going to tell him that because it won't fucking matter, he'll still overtrain. If it were within the context of the DC program, I would tell him that or have some other ideas, but since he doesn't have a grasp on proper training that is pointless.
 
Debaser said:
I posted a solution:

Stop overtraining. It doesn't need to be made out any more difficult than it really is. He can NEVER expect to make continuous progress on ANY lift, because he does way too much volume.

Closer. Still, you just state "Stop overtraining". So, from that, the ony solution you can offer, DC Program wise, is to follow DC. There is no other option.

My take on that, is that DC is not very versatile. WSB and others offer multiple solutions based on the trainees current problem.

Does that coincide with what you are saying? If so, I think I see part of the reason many people are against DC. As well as why many people swear by it.

Personally, and I do mean personally, I would prefer a program that offers many different options and solutions to correct or solve training problems and plateau's I have or develop. Not one that has no options when I hit a plateau.

Just my take on this conversation thus far,
Joker
 
I will give several answers.... In DC style I would say : do 2-3 warm up sets...go to (at your strength level) around 315LBS ...do your max # of reps...I am thinking you will get 10-12..thats it..no Rest Pause...no negatives ...just do 1 all out set and stop....your next back workout ...don't deadlift! Do something else for back thickness...cable rows, dumbell rows, bent over rows, t bar ..... choose 1 exercise..and do one all out set...8-12 reps ..pr is for 2-3 more sets...and stop!

In a more normal routine I would still say you are massively overtraining! Drop your set volume to 2-3 working sets of 6-10 reps...and then do 1 more back exercise, for 2-3 sets ...and then stop working back....move on..Most world class deadlifters only deadlift every 10-14 days...not twice a week
 
Deepsquat said:
I will give several answers.... In DC style I would say : do 2-3 warm up sets...go to (at your strength level) around 315LBS ...do your max # of reps...I am thinking you will get 10-12..thats it..no Rest Pause...no negatives ...just do 1 all out set and stop....your next back workout ...don't deadlift! Do something else for back thickness...cable rows, dumbell rows, bent over rows, t bar ..... choose 1 exercise..and do one all out set...8-12 reps ..pr is for 2-3 more sets...and stop!

In a more normal routine I would still say you are massively overtraining! Drop your set volume to 2-3 working sets of 6-10 reps...and then do 1 more back exercise, for 2-3 sets ...and then stop working back....move on..Most world class deadlifters only deadlift every 10-14 days...not twice a week

That sounds similiar to what I suggested with the exception being how you decsribed your worksets vs how I described mine.

I agree with this for the most part. The only difference I do is I tend to do a more singles when deadlifting than sets of any number. (The exception being my light warmups.) The sets of 3 or 5 are variations I use from time to time.

I definately agree with you on not deadlifting every week. I said the exact same thing up above in a previous post. ( I had to learn this the hard way...:))

Interesting post. Good info. Thanks.:)


Joker
 
hahaha

Debaser, that is my OLD routine.. and ur exapmple of my training are funny.. im stuck at 100 pounds and i do 40 sets.. HAHAHA

you seem like a moron to me, if you read correctly, i do SIX TO NINE work sets.. which is fine for building muscle, its proven by scientists..

and everyone one else is right, all you do is put me down.

it doesnt really bother me, since i already know i look good and and strong for my age, size and weight..

so, lets get back to the subject.. my deadlifting.. not lifting in general, you already ahve your own sticky.. why dont you cause chaos there..

Deepsquat - i dont deadlift twice a week, who said that???:confused:

thanx for everyone who gave me ideas and DIDNT put me down..
 
I hope one day you'll come around.

i hope you'll understand that i like to pump iron.. nice heavy sets.. not 1 set.. i like to be that guy in the gym who people stare at saying "man how old is that kid, hes strong as hell"

then they say, "oh my god, hes using 100's on incline DB, but, but, he JUST went heavy on flat and incline...i dont understand.."

ya know one of those guys.. not just a guy who 'claims' to be big, but.. you never see him lift. and hes there for 30 minutes..
 
I concur - sometimes you just do it because its fun!

1 set won't cut it for that :)

1 set of power cleans? no way!
 
Train for your ego then. I myself train for mass and strength.

oak you don't understand, your strength is good but not phenominal. It could be a lot better if you learned how to train. Aren't you 5'2"? You are genetically dispositioned for strength from the get-go.

And you hit a wall. I don't care if you don't think 6-9 work sets is overtraining, but IT IS. The sooner you realize that you need to train to get stronger and not for reasons like:

A. I want a good pump
B. I want the people in the gym to see what I lift

How about "oh my god, hes using 100s on incline...but he used those last month, and the month before. Look at that guy over there, I could have sworn he was using 140s last time I saw. What the fuck are those, 180s? Gee I wonder why that guy keeps getting bigger and stronger and the other guy always looks the same."

BTW this is my quote of the year:
"6-9 work sets is fine for building muscle, IT'S PROVEN BY SCIENTISTS" hahahaha
 
Debaser, why is it that just about every thread I see you post on it ends up like this one, a flame fest where you mostly just put down the style of training that is being discussed?

From what i've seen, the DC method is effective, but at the same time, you cant just state that it would work best for every one. You say that 6-9 working sets is over training, but that is a gross generalization. Look at what the 5x5 has done for me, and all the others that I train. I saw you post once that not everyone has my genetics, so it'll only work for a few, you have no idea how funny that is. I was 140lbs when i started training, and was a major hardgainer. I have a tiny bone structure, 7" wrists and a waist around 28" when I diet down, and I had to fight for very lb every gained. But when I tried this version of the 5x5, I blew up faster than most do on gear. And look at my strength gains, I can deadlift 550+ for easy sets of 5, no belt, straps or anything, I know NPC and pro level guys that cant do that.

Bottom line is that if you're not a part of the solution, then you are a part of the problem. Instead of just making blanket statements, offer specific solutions. I've gained pretty much 100lbs since I started training, and around 8" on my arms, but I still dont preach that the systems I advocate are the only ones that work
 
Okay this is starting to get annoying. I'm not saying DC is the only way.

I am saying:

He is overtraining.

I am not saying if you do not do DC you will only overtrain.

Needsize I am not doubting your efforts. But I believe 5x5 is too much work for many people, though it is much better than how oak trains. You doubt your genetics, but really 7" wrists are not bad at all. 2-3 work sets per bodypart is all you need, deepsquat is right. Any more than that and ALL you are doing is hampering you ability to recover from your workouts.

Too all those that think they are hardgainers, or that you need more than 2-3 sets, read this: http://www.hardgainer.com/articles/21-38.html and tell me. BTW he is using traditional 5x5, which 2-3 sets are warmups and the rest are worksets. Someone who is 6'3", with extra-long arms and legs, displaced hips, scoliosis, less than SIX INCH WRIST, and rounded shoulders. And he put on 72 lbs. who knows what now this is a 7-9 year old article.

And furthermore, look at what DC training has done for DC: He started at 130 or so lbs and is now up to 300 and a superheavyweight. He got up to 240 naturally. 110 lbs, all natural, is quite an accomplishment. He has had hundreds of clients, who have all had the gains of their life, and most of them are clean. It is not uncommon for his trainees to gain over 2 lbs a week of almost all muscle (I am gaining 2-3 lbs/week).

I am not sure how else to convince you guys that you DO NOT NEED MORE THAN 2-3 sets. It wouldn't matter how many examples I showed, or the logic behind it, or anything else. Thank yourselves (some of you) for your genetics, as there are people that have trained 10+ years the way you do, and (one example) got up to the pinnacle of 6'1" 180 lbs. AFTER SWITCHING TO ABBREVIATED TRAINING, HE PUT ON 55 MORE LBS NATURALLY. I could list EXAMPLE AFTER EXAMPLE, GOING ON FOR PAGES. IT WOULDN'T MATTER. I'd say I would just give up, but people are slowly coming around, I'd say a few people per week are being turned on by the DC sticky. And they're making the smartest decision in their training career they will EVER make.
 
2-3 lbs huh? Clean? I don't think so. It is physiologically impossible to put on 2 lbs of muscle a week. Beginners see the most gain, and don't even put on this much muscle. Generally it is water retention (by the muscles) and subsequent carbohydrate bloating.
For the advanced bodybuilder, natural, the best results can still be impressive, but 2-3 lbs is a week is impossible. Sorry to say but you are exagerating. The most conservative estimate by researches say adding a lb of muscle a week(for the beginner, 1 lb of muscle a month for the advanced) is generally seen as awesome, and I have seen that 2-3 lbs a month of muscle can be achieved by those with higher than normal hormone levels.

Either you are jucing or lying. Not saying using steroids is bad, but using your example to get newbies that aren't juicing to do your method expecting your kinds of gains is extremely dishonest.
 
Last edited:
Here is an article by a guy who has a bit more optimistic ceiling for muscle growth- 1lb a week.

http://www.wannabebig.com/article.php?articleid=68

One frequently asked question which always seems to plague gym instructors, Internet message boards, various magazines and books has to do with muscle gain. Many of us have heard or have overheard the local gym guru or the community fitness expert boasting about how much he/she has gained, or how one of their clients has gained 10 pounds in a month. When someone hears this, a light goes on inside their head and it kicks off a series of thoughts that quickly translate into a set of unrealistic goals. I will say this: that from whichever mouth it comes, whether a highly regarded coach, trainer or a bodybuilder, the fact of the matter is that it’s physiologically impossible to achieve this muscle status! Later on, I’ll explain why.

Often, people making this claim have a faulty perception of how the body either works or are just super-optimistic. Of course, it’s not only the gym (freaks) that espouses this myth; it can be traced to numerous ads in a variety of muscle magazines lining the bookstore shelves. The bodybuilding industry, nowadays, thrives on people who are hungry for a quick change. They are ready to buy into the notion that a change can be accomplished because a certain ad lays claims by way of an incredible cut and paste transformation. Frequently, it’s a beginner who testifies to the astounding feat of gaining 30 pounds over a period of several months. This is, no doubt, a great achievement but most have been fooled into believing that a large percentage is muscle when most of it is due to an increase in glycogen stores, body fat and water.
Now it’s not my intention to dash your hopes or crush your dreams. I’d merely like you to know that the body simply cannot adapt at the speed claimed by many. For example, Chris Thibaudeau of Iron magazine online states: “making physical changes takes time;” this couldn’t be closer to the truth. So be forewarned that in your quest to change or morph yourself into the next Ronnie Coleman; the transformation is going to take more than a few months. Our bodies are equipped with systems that need to adapt together over a period. This is what you should bear in mind while working towards the goal of a more muscular physique.

So How Much Muscle Can You Gain.

Sometimes we are our own worst enemy when it comes to gaining muscle. Nine times out of ten, most of us fail in the dedication department. What starts out as a carefully planned and calculated program, ends up hitting some bumps along the way. However, even if we are dedicated (some may call it obsessed) and diligent about our nutrition, with proper training and recuperation practices, we still would not be able to add more than 1 pound of muscle in a week. That’s right, only one pound a week--and this is assuming you’ve had a darn good week both inside and outside the gym!
Often, people believe that if they take in 3500 more calories during a week that they will be successful at packing on slabs of muscle. However, the old adage that one pound equates to 3500 calories is right for fat but NOT muscle. If you want to gain one pound of fat, then you should be taking in an extra 3500 calories a week. Now there’s one way of putting on some weight!

As I mentioned earlier, the body’s multiple systems are all intricately interconnected: if one system has not undergone the proper adaptation, then the results will show in the form of a failure to produce optimal hypertrophy of the muscle complex. For example, if we were to look at some of the soft tissues involved in the hypertrophy process of the muscle complex, we’d see that muscle would generally adapt to a load within several days. Unlike the tendons and ligaments, studies have shown that muscle responds by adapting after a period of several weeks or even months of progressive loading (McDough & Davies, 1984). It also should be noted that the protein turnover rate in collagen occurs approximately every 1000 days. This clearly shows that even if one were to gain in bodyweight, the body would only be able to accommodate a certain amount in the form of muscle; otherwise, the muscles would fall prey to injury due to the time-span in adaptation rates for various other tissues. Those who scoff at this and continue to believe they’ve gained super size over such a short period forget, as suggested earlier, that much of the increased bodyweight is largely due to increased body fat stores, glycogen and water.
Hypertrophy of the muscle complex has, so far, been shown to be controlled by what is known as protein turnover (the breakdown of damaged muscle proteins and creation of new and stronger ones). This process takes time. Just as the many living organisms around us in nature require time to grow, so do our muscles. In our enzymes the protein turnover rate occurs approximately every 7-10 minutes. In the liver and plasma, it’s every 10 days. And in the hemoglobin it’s every 120days.In the muscles, protein turnover rate occurs approximately every 180 days (6 months). This lends even more support to the observation that the turnover rate limits the natural body (of the non drug-using athlete, bodybuilder) in building muscle quickly.
The Colgan Institute of Nutritional Sciences (located in San Diego, CA) run by Dr Michael Colgan PHD, a leading sport nutritionist explains that in his extensive experience, the most muscle gain he or any of his colleagues have recorded over a year was 181/4 lbs. Dr Colgan goes on to state that “because of the limiting rate of turnover in the muscle cells it is impossible to grow more than an ounce of new muscle each day.” In non-complicated, mathematical terms, this would equate to roughly 23 pounds in a year! Keep in mind that high-level athletes are the subjects of these studies.

Putting It All Together

Now that I’ve put a damper on your expectations you can step back and take a closer look at your training, nutritional practices and recuperation tactics. There’s no need to beat yourself up because you’ve only been able to gain a pound a week for the last 6 weeks. If anything, assuming your body fat levels have been kept at bay, you’re probably on the right track.

When it comes to muscle gain there is no dramatic technique or quick fix that will allow you to pack on more muscle naturally. It’s better to stay focused and realistic by training hard, eating meticulously and spending time to recuperate properly; this will result in your achieving a more muscular physique. Keep in mind that it’s physiologically impossible to gain more than one pound of lean muscle per week. For most weight-gainers, .5 pounds per week would be an even more realistic goal as they reach their genetic limit. Remember that gaining muscle is a long-term project and not something that can be simply turned on. If you’re dedicated and diligent in your efforts, you’ll not be disappointed!


Written by, Maki Riddington

And here- a bit more conservative- heads up though, its a PDF file.

http://www.studenthealth.ucla.edu/snac/pages/Resources/Handouts/HOBulkingup.pdf

How much weight can I expect to
gain over time?
In theory, you will gain 1 pound per week by eating 3500 extra
calories per week (or 500 extra calories per day). of course not all of this will be muscle

In practice, weight gain is not that simple.
 At the start of your weight training program, you’ll have
greater gains (up to 3 lb. of muscle per month).
 After 3 months, the gains will be smaller.
 If you keep up with a high intensity weight training program
and a high calorie diet, you may produce gains of 20 pounds in
a year.
Keep in mind, once you reach your genetic size potential, you
cannot get any bigger.
 There is an upper limit to how much pure muscle your body
can acquire (naturally) without further gains in fat mass too.

Bolding mine.
 
epimetheus said:
2-3 lbs huh? Clean? I don't think so. It is physiologically impossible to put on 2 lbs of muscle a week. Beginners see the most gain, and don't even put on this much muscle. Generally it is water retention (by the muscles) and subsequent carbohydrate bloating.
For the advanced bodybuilder, natural, the best results can still be impressive, but 2-3 lbs is a week is impossible. Sorry to say but you are exagerating. The most conservative estimate by researches say adding a lb of muscle a week(for the beginner, 1 lb of muscle a month for the advanced) is generally seen as awesome, and I have seen that 2-3 lbs a month of muscle can be achieved by those with higher than normal hormone levels.

Either you are jucing or lying. Not saying using steroids is bad, but using your example to get newbies that aren't juicing to do your method expecting your kinds of gains is extremely dishonest.

I'm not juicing or lying. Sorry it's so hard for you to believe. Explain to me how it's "physiologically impossible." You're talking out of your ass. Obviously my gains will slow down eventually (I won't be over 100 lbs heavier in a year) but for now they haven't slowed down. I was up to 212, then lost some weight for other reasons. So regaining up to 212 shouldn't be tough, then I'll report my gains as usual after that.
 
epimetheus said:
2-3 lbs huh? Clean? I don't think so. It is physiologically impossible to put on 2 lbs of muscle a week.
Agreed
2-3 lbs of lean muscle gain is the stats of a very successful moderate gear cycle.
 
debaser - can you explain what the 'protein turn over rate' of the muscles, hemoglobin, enzymes etc. means in the article you posted ?
 
Debaser said:


I'm not juicing or lying. Sorry it's so hard for you to believe. Explain to me how it's "physiologically impossible." You're talking out of your ass. Obviously my gains will slow down eventually (I won't be over 100 lbs heavier in a year) but for now they haven't slowed down. I was up to 212, then lost some weight for other reasons. So regaining up to 212 shouldn't be tough, then I'll report my gains as usual after that.

Did you even read that article? It gives the reason, and shows I am not talking out my ass. I am not saying you didn't gain 2-3 lbs a week, I am saying you aren't gaining 2-3lbs of muscle mass- that is simply not possible except on steroids.

Don't take this as an attack on DC method, it isn't. I agree that DC is very effective and that overtraining is a serious problem. However, your claim that you, and thus others, can gain 2-3 lbs of lean muscle mass (not water, not glycogen) every week is misleading.
 
Debaser said:

It is not uncommon for his trainees to gain over 2 lbs a week of almost all muscle (I am gaining 2-3 lbs/week).


Here are 4 clients that DC holds up to the highest level of accomplishment. Please notice that the only natural guy(#3) gained 1 lb per week. He did not say lean, so we have no idea what percentage of that was muscle and what was bodyfat. DC said that all four either maintained the same bf or dropped. However, it is necessary that fat be gained if bf% was maintained. Therefore, the one natural client that he is bragging about gained much less than 1 lb of lean mass a week.

1)188 to 260(2.5 years)

2)172 to 254 (3 years)

3)208 to 261(clean! genetic mesomorph 1 year)

4)218 to 275 (cut his juice in half, doubled his protein, showed him how to train
correctly-2 years)

1) 1.8 pounds per week
2) 1.9 pounds per week
3) 1 pound per week
4) 1.8 pounds per week


NONE of his BEST clients even made it to 2 lbs a week gain of bodyweight on juice(not even lean mass).
 
Wow this is getting interesting (especially Thai's post). Im just so curious why you feel the need to put others down so much and shove your program down everyones throat. Just like Needsize stated, he made awesome gains off the 5x5 yet he doesnt hijack every thread and preach about how all other programs suck and 5x5 is "the way." I too, and EVERYONE else I have had try 5x5 made unbelievable gains (Ruspa's bench went from 295lbs 5x5 to 355lbs 5x5 in I believe 3 months) Yet we dont attack everyone and say "you're training is not good, switch to 5x5." And the funny thing is Debaser you talk so much trash to everyone and put yourself on such a pedestal yet you wont even repond to questions regarding your lifts. You refuse on many occasions to answer how your bench press is going, cause you are ashamed of it, yet you have the audacity to put people down all the time. And Im not trying to take anything away from DC's accomplishments, but when I started training I was 130lbs, and now Im at 240lbs NATURALLY. In all honesty, I dont think that is all that uncommon. And I got to this level, by performing what you would consider "high volume work." Im just suggesting you re-assess how you respond to people on the board. DC came here himself and was very respectful in how he presented his program and how he responded to other programs, and he is the only reason I decided to try DC training. He presented his info very factually, and I respected what he had to say so I gave it a try for a little while. You take the flame approach, and you lose all credibility.
 
That's over a period of years (as if those aren't incredible gains anyway) but I'm still relatively a beginner, keep that in mind...

I'll clarify a few things:

1. The 2-3 lbs a week would generally slow down after I'd say 3-6 months. Most guys that switch to DC, since they don't overtrain anymore (I'm sorry but most of you are) make gains like they're beginners again. Note: slow down still means it works a damn site faster than [every, imo] other training method.

2. When I say little to no fat gain, I did mean %, so yes I am gaining a bit of fat, probably something like 1/2 a lb a week. I do not know exactly. But some guys actually get leaner % wise, which means they actually gain very very little fat weekly. This has to do with his diet practices.

An example DC just posted was of a man who was clean, going from 202 to 237 in 5 months. To boot, he was a marine and had to do the intensive cardio regimen (at least miles of running, I'm not sure what else I could ask my marine friend though) 3 times a week. This is a very typical scenario, imagine the gains without the cardio? Probably 5-10 lbs or even more I'd say (though it's impossible to know). Many of you need to ask yourself, are you REALLY making gains like that? Even juiced? He has had hundreds of guys, most natural, making INCREDIBLE gains.

Sorry about the misconceptions.
 
Isn't it funny how ONE person can come on a message board and because of THEIR personality they can totally ruin all desire to be a part of thier routine?

B True
 
Originally posted by b fold the truth
Isn't it funny how ONE person can come on a message board and because of THEIR personality they can totally ruin all desire to be a part of thier routine?

B True



That was exactly my point B Fold. You and Spatts and other WSB'ers never put people down and really show your progress and only provide positive information on the site and it makes your routine seem so much more appealing. Needsize as well, he provides awesome feedback and does so respectfully and that is why I believe so many people are trying the 5x5 as well. Debaser wants so many to try DC training, yet he takes the absolute worse approach in trying to persuade others. He has posted this type of training before and got little response. DC came here and talked about the training and was very cool about it and now it is a sticky with over 400 replies.
 
Ok Debaser, we get the point... you think DC is the only way to go. Good for you - I hope you do well on it. You're not going to convince everyone, so please stop trying. You WILL get bigger and stronger if you use progressively heavier weights and eat enough food. All systems work.. some better than others. The gains on all systems eventually slow to a crawl and you have to find ways to break the plateau. I've tried the one set to failure deal and I made great gains.. for a while. Now I'm using the 5x5 system and doing well. When the gains stop I might try something else.

I think the Westside style is the most effective for increasing the powerlift totals. They have a whole list of lifters with incredible totals. I don't think there's a lot of 1000 pound squatters out there doing one set to failure routines.
 
with all the shit Debaser eats, i DO believe he gains 2 pounds a week, of FAT, hahaha.. and you are right Blk, i never hear about his routine, or what he lifts.. all i hear is one set this one set that.. or dude, i hear 500g of protien and 1000g of carbs..

but i always hear from everyone else, dude, i reached a new PR, even if its, "i gained 5 pounds on my bench press in a month", something to build off of, and believe.. id rather hear that a 100 pound person gained 5 pounds in 2 months rather than2 pounds a week.. cuz, its real..

thats just me...
 
BlkWS6 said:
Originally posted by b fold the truth
Isn't it funny how ONE person can come on a message board and because of THEIR personality they can totally ruin all desire to be a part of thier routine?

B True



That was exactly my point B Fold. You and Spatts and other WSB'ers never put people down and really show your progress and only provide positive information on the site and it makes your routine seem so much more appealing. Needsize as well, he provides awesome feedback and does so respectfully and that is why I believe so many people are trying the 5x5 as well. Debaser wants so many to try DC training, yet he takes the absolute worse approach in trying to persuade others. He has posted this type of training before and got little response. DC came here and talked about the training and was very cool about it and now it is a sticky with over 400 replies.

Jesus Christ, man. The only person I even remotely "put down" is theoak, and I guess "putting down" means saying "you're overtraining" Deepsquat said the same thing. I've just had enough of his crap, for reasons I already stated in this thread.

And talk about taking everything to extremes, some of you need to lighten the fuck up. I'm not shoving it down anyone's throats. All I'm saying is that volume routines are bullshit. If you somehow take offense to that, then that's your problem. It's not like I said "you're a fucking asshole." Volume routines have set back bodybuilding DECADES and have allowed the supplement company crooks to prosper.

It looks like just about everyone skipped over the "He is overtraining" post. Deepsquat, and many others would agree, that HE IS. So that's what I told him. He doesn't believe me, that's fine. He'll never make consistant progress. I tried to help him, and nicely too. He even said he would give the DC program an honest shot (never happened). You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.
 
TheOak84 said:
with all the shit Debaser eats, i DO believe he gains 2 pounds a week, of FAT, hahaha.. and you are right Blk, i never hear about his routine, or what he lifts.. all i hear is one set this one set that.. or dude, i hear 500g of protien and 1000g of carbs..

but i always hear from everyone else, dude, i reached a new PR, even if its, "i gained 5 pounds on my bench press in a month", something to build off of, and believe.. id rather hear that a 100 pound person gained 5 pounds in 2 months rather than2 pounds a week.. cuz, its real..

thats just me...

HAHAHHA YOU'RE RIGHT, go ahead and stick to your 2500 calorie diet and check out the gobs of mass that you gain. If you had ANY CLUE about DC dieting protocols you would realize how fucking ignorant you sound. I haven't heard of any of his trainees putting on more than 1% bodyfat over a long period of time. I put on a little bit at one point (1-2%) because I didn't cut the carbs at night and ate a LOT of junk (pint of ice cream every day, even at night) and did no cardio. So I didn't follow his methods to the letter. I have since remedied this. And I don't post my lifts because of idiots like you, who would conclude their training is better simply because you lift more (even though you're a full foot shorter and have trained 6 times as long).
 
i will try it for 4 weeks this summer at my gym in my garage..

if i do it at my local gym.. people will laugh, and so will my training partners.. but, i will let u know THIS summer, come june, maybe even may, or when ever it gets warm.. i have more than enough equipment in my garage to perform all the major lifts.. SO, is 4 weeks enough time to notice results on DC???

i think it should be. so that mean ill gain 6-8 pounds in a month? correct?
 
I would guess you'd gain at least 6 lbs, IF YOU FOLLOWED HIS DIET AS WELL. It won't make you fat.

But that's just my point, you're training for ego if you give a fuck what others think about your lifting.
 
dude, stop crying, want me to hold ur hand???

i said ill try it for 4 weeks, i will TRY to eat that much. but, i will have a job in the summer, a normal person with a job cant eat that much.. if i was a pro BB with nothing to do except eat, train and sleep, then ya.. id do it..

post your exact routine that YOU do at THIS moment, i will copy and save it, study it, prepare.. all that garbage.. then tell me how much protien, carbs, and fat you eat, and ill try to fit that into one day... ok???

so, lay it on me... and, try to stay on the subject.. jsut your routine and your diet.. no other mumbo jumbo
 
I've had 2 jobs + school and could do it, you just have to want it. Anyway, come up with your 3 favorite different exercises per bodypart:
chest
shoulders
triceps
back width
back thickness
biceps
forearms
quads
hams
calves
 
my diet is on that thread called "yay"

and no you don't do all that in 1 day just tell me what your 3 fav exercises for each would be
 
ok lemme see..

chest: bench press, incline bar/DB press, weighted dips

Shoulders: Military back, DB military, upright row

triceps: close grip bench, over head BB ext, skull crushers

Back W: pull ups, pulldown behind neck, deadlifts

Back T: deadlifts, BB rows, hammer st, rows

Bicep: BB curls, cheat curls, any kind of DB curl

Forearm: wrist curls, reverse curls, hammer curls

hams: deadlifts, ham curls, SLDL

calves: standing calf raise, seated raise

-------------------------------------

then what..
 
Oops, double post. But I wanted to say good luck in whatever course you decide on Oak. Arnold is my favorite, too :)
 
Last edited:
That was exactly my point B Fold. You and Spatts and other WSB'ers never put people down and really show your progress and only provide positive information on the site and it makes your routine seem so much more appealing. Needsize as well, he provides awesome feedback and does so respectfully and that is why I believe so many people are trying the 5x5 as well. Debaser wants so many to try DC training, yet he takes the absolute worse approach in trying to persuade others. He has posted this type of training before and got little response. DC came here and talked about the training and was very cool about it and now it is a sticky with over 400 replies.

I don't see how Debaser put anyone down, to be very frank.
He only said that Oak is overtraining, which I think is probably true (I'll get to that in a moment).

If anything, I'd say several people were rude to Debaser by not addressing his argument. Instead of focusing on what he said--his logical advice--we're now attacking his character. That is the fallacy of attacking the person--argumentum ad hominem. (For those unfamiliar with logic, that means disagreeing with him on the grounds that "he's a jerk" means you're making a bogus claim. His argument either holds water or it doesn't; his person has nothing to do with it.)

Next we had several red herrings about DC-style training. Debaser didn't tell Oak he HAD to follow Dogg's training style. DC training, therefore, is a side-issue, a distraction.

Then we had people throwing in straw men arguments, an argument where you distort someone's original position, attack the distortion, then claim to be victorious.

BZZZZZZZZZZZZZT. Sorry, it doesn't work that way.

Would someone be so kind as to point out where Debaser "put someone down"? Is it putting someone down to say they're overtraining? I don't think so.

I agree with his assessment. Deadlifting even once a week usually resulted in overtraining for me. The lower back is quick to fatigue and takes a LONG time to recover. Oak, you'd best be served by cutting down on your no. of work sets AND back off on the deadlift for awhile. I do not think assistance exercises are the answer as you've only been deadlifting hard for 10 weeks, you said?

You must also get beyond this ego-driven "I can do X weight, and people are impressed" business if you want to enjoy pretty steady progress long-term. Chances are good no one cares, though from the sounds of things you're doing well. Concentrate on improving YOU. Focus a little more on what you're doing, not what easily-impressed onlookers think, and try to think outside of the box.

NO ONE is saying DC training is "the only way." Shame on anyone that tossed out that ugly piece of illogic. But would it really kill you to try doing fewer sets of deadlifts, and maybe taking a couple of weeks to back off from the lift itself?

Take a cue from other relatively high-volume lifters, who rarely train a lift VERY hard for more than six weeks or so on end. Most of a 10-12 week cycle for periodization guys are spent working up to very hard sets. You have been doing very hard sets the *entire time*. You've done great to get to 405 that way, but now it's time to regroup. Catch your breath, and start fresh, focusing on putting more work into individual sets. You know that a single set can do a lot for growth, so treat every set as do-or-die. You'll find you won't need many sets total (excluding warm-ups, of course, which everyone needs), and might not be able to do as many as you're used to.

I look forward to hearing what path you choose to take. Good luck.

P.S.--I mean no offense to you in saying this, but I call it as I see it. I honestly feel you're not thinking things through as best you could. I just read the last few responses in the thread, and you note that you're going to continue on with "high-volume," but will try a DC-style routine in the summertime.

That's fine...but what I don't understand is your inflexibility. You are grasping to something that doesn't work for you right now. You know the saying, if it ain't broke, don't fix it...well, if it IS broken, FIX IT!

You are making a mistake that's common, the false dichotomy. You are treating your training options as a very strict "either this (high volume), or that (extremely low volume)."

Why not strike a compromise, Oak? Try a reduced volume deadlift routine. Just cut out two sets and see what happens at first if you don't believe me. But don't follow this illogic that you must train at either end of the spectrum. Make your training suit YOU; don't suit yourself to the training.
 
Why not strike a compromise, Oak? Try a reduced volume deadlift routine.

i did my friend, i cut back alot.. from about 12-15 work sets to 6-9.. i WILL give DC a try, i said already this summer, may-june.

ill tell you how it goes, ill do it faithfully.. with the way im training now, i am making pregress in strenght, id say about a pound a month in size, and strenght, i cant really pinpoint my gains, but im sure as hell making progress.

if DC gives me better gains, then ill do that for 8-10 weeks, then switch to something else (5x5), or whatever..
 
FWIW, there's a reason that in WSB we almost NEVER do a FULL ROM 1 rep max on any move. Deads, squats, bench...nothing. We'd be...uh, dare I say....overtrained? We cycle things in a 3 week rotation...deads, squat move, good mornings, etc. If you ever go to elitefts.com and look at the mx efforrt exercise lists, you could find enough ideas that you could go months on end without doing the same move twice. There's a good reason for that.

Train smart. One thing that is routinely not taken into consideration around here is conditioning. What overtrains you may not overtrain me, and vice versa. Judge your symptoms and progress for yourself. Be your own critic....and be a thinking one.
 
Wow guldukat Im glad to see you too took a logic course, and I must say I have never seen someone actually break down an argument on the Internet and bring up straw man that is hilarious (did you use a textbook?). So by me continuing this thread, am I contributing to a "slippery slope" scenario or assuming a "slippery slope" might occur is a "hasty generalization"? LOL Anyways, this issue with Debaser has gone on for a while now. I didnt specifically reference this thread. If you use the search button you will find numerous posts in which he refers to routines as shit. Frankly, Im offended slightly if someone will refer to a great program as shit. All that does is further perpetuate misinformation on here. Im glad you took the time to break down all of our fallacies of logic :rolleyes: but please realize that this is an ongoing issue. Im all for people presenting their views (that is what makes this place great), but as you can see me as well as other members get a little annoyed when they are presented in a "holier than thou" approach that Debaser seems to take.
 
It seems a few people on EF are the only ones that take offense to my attitude. I have stated countless reasons why volume training is bullshit. If this offends you, deal with it. You're taking it way too personally. I am entitled to my opinion. Define "great program," too. I don't remember calling any routine shit unless it was a volume routine. Volume does not equate to "great program," I'm sorry to say. If you're referring to 5x5, I said something like:

"Though 5x5 (needsize's method) is still too much volume for the average trainee, it's still better than most split routines."

There aren't that many fucking routines to choose from once you break them down to their core:

Very high volume (16+ sets a bodypart, at least 4 days a week often 5 or even 6 for the deranged) - Ludicrous, "bullshit," whatever you want to call it. If you're even close to average and not on gear than forget about gaining anything. You'll probably lose strength due to overtraining.

High volume (more than 3 sets per bodypart, or generally more than 3 days a week) - Not an overtraining fest like above. However, many trainees will still fail or make slow progress on such a program. Those who are above average or "enhanced" will make gains but not anywhere near as fast as they COULD be.

H.I.T./hardgainer/DC - The way to go for nearly everyone. It JUST MAKES SENSE. You train within your ability to recouperate, and you add reps or weight to the bar every single session (except at the start of a training cycle where you start out with "comfortable" weights). Your body, instead of expending all of its resources to simply RECOVER from a high volume workout, actually builds some muscle. DC is unique in that it's super low volume with higher frequency. You're hitting the bodyparts more often while still recouperating, thus allowing optimum growth and strength gains.

HST - A fine program. Not "optimum" for strength gains but they will still come, and that's obviously not the goal of the protocol.

WSB/some other powerlifting methods - Work well for many but too much frequency for many people (I said volume the first time regarding WSB but I was mistaken)

Olympic Lifting - I know little in this area...
 
You yourself classifed 5x5 as volume training!! And you just stated this: "I don't remember calling any routine shit unless it was a volume routine." Although less volume then most, you still considered 5x5 volume training (that is almost exactly in your words from a post about a week or two ago) and as you just said you call it shit if it is a volume routine. Therefore, you are calling the 5x5 shit and that is the "great program" I was referring to. You remember now? Or am I going to have to go thread hunting?


Here, this will refresh your memory. http://boards.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=215660&highlight=5x5


And what is my whole point to this? I sticking up for the 5x5 which is a routine that has done wonders for so many people. You of all people should respect sticking up for a program that you think works really well. I just dont want people to hear that it is "shit" (especially from someone who hasnt tried it) and then not want to give the program a shot because of this. You see my point?
 
Last edited:
God you're arguing stupid symantics. I would place 5x5 as volume training, i.e. still inefficient and not as productive as possible for trainees. Not in the higher volume category ("shit") but still "too high."

Because people have made gains doesn't mean that it is the most productive way to train. Many trainees would overtrain on that program. If you doubt that maybe you should realize that many people have less than average genetics and recovery. I have decent genetics, so probably I "could" gain on it, but not nearly as fast as DC training, or HST. So why would I do it? The reason people like it is because it's better than routines that are higher volume. They'll do it until they find something better. When they try DC/HST/HIT they'll have found it.
 
Dude dont try and dodge the bullet. I just provided proof that you refer to it as a shitty high volume routine. Providing proof is stupid symantics? :rolleyes: Give me a break. If you cant take responsibility for things you have said then dont say it. I love the gains I make on the 5x5 (or a variation of it) and in fact I have made better gains on it then I did on DC training. I have tried both routines, you have not. Im done beating a dead horse with you Debaser.
 
Really? How long did you try DC training? And how were you eating? This is vital because he has stated that his diet and training go together as a package.
 
I think that this needs to either end...or someone needs to leave. Simple as that.

I am asking you nicely...either change your attitude or move to another board. We are friendly here and we do not want anyone or anything to disrupt that. You have your thoughts and ideas...so present them. If people don't want to take your advice...then let it be. Don't spend your time putting down other people's lifts or routines...unless you don't mind other people putting down yours.

Once again...change your attitude or leave.

B True
 
b fold - he asked what to do. I told him. Somehow people get offended and start talking about 5x5 and crying about how I called it volume training and sometimes I call volume training bullshit, and acting like a detective or something--who gives a fuck, I mean SERIOUSLY, LIGHTEN UP PEOPLE. I never tried to start a flame war, blkws6 did. I wouldn't care, why should you? If you can be nice about how bodybuilding magazine routines have plagued the training world for decades with their volume routines--more power to you. I don't accept it, they've caused countless trainees to fail, and give up frustrated, or get injured, or turn to roids because they can't gain on those routines without them. "Bullshit" is WAY too nice of a term for what they've done. If you disagree, fine, but the internet is a place for sharing ones views, and that is my view.

And I don't mind people putting down my routine. However considering all the people on this board who are doing it "correctly" are loving it, that hasn't been a problem. Just as I expected. What I do think is lame is people not doing the program correctly, doing it half assed, and not following the diet, or stretching, or some other facet when DC has repeatedly stated that they all go together. Then they come on a board and say something like "I was overtrained" or "I didn't make gains." Then you find out that they did more sets, or more rest pause, or didn't allow themselves enough recovery days, or didn't stretch, or didn't eat correctly. That's their problem and they shouldn't represent the program. FEEL FREE to put down the program, if you gave it an honest shot (every part). But you wanna know the funny thing? I've never seen a SINGLE PERSON DO IT. This is out of hundreds and hundreds of people, BTW.

Oak, it's all in the sticky, and in your words "stop crying do you want me to hold your hand?" I posted that sticky FOR YOU remember? Use it.
 
Here are ways to get your deadlift to go up.

First, identify your weaknesses.

If you are having problems with the lower portion, focus in working on hamstring flexibility and lower back strength. Here are some options:

STIFF LEG DEADS - this is a compound movement that will strengthen the hamstrings, buttocks, and lower back. Make sure to keep the back flat.

HYPEREXTENSIONS - Another great exercise that will help keep the back strengthen and will protect you from injury.

To strengthen the weakness of the mid-point.

LATS - make sure that your lats are strong, supported T-Bar rows and barbell rows should work. They are perfect for adding additional strength.

Upper portion of the deadlift:

PARTIAL DEADLIFTS - set the bars at knee level. When executing the movement make sure your butt is out and your back is flat. Focus on putting your shoulders back as if you were completing in a powerlifting competition.

SHRUGS - If you cannot finish the movement, it is typically a sign of weak traps. I recommend heavy barbell or dumbbell shurgs using reps between 5 and 8.

These are a few suggestions. Be sure to work on the weak points.
 
Debaser said:
b fold - he asked what to do. I told him. Somehow people get offended and start talking about 5x5 and crying about how I called it volume training and sometimes I call volume training bullshit, and acting like a detective or something--who gives a fuck, I mean SERIOUSLY, LIGHTEN UP PEOPLE. I never tried to start a flame war, blkws6 did. I wouldn't care, why should you? If you can be nice about how bodybuilding magazine routines have plagued the training world for decades with their volume routines--more power to you. I don't accept it, they've caused countless trainees to fail, and give up frustrated, or get injured, or turn to roids because they can't gain on those routines without them. "Bullshit" is WAY too nice of a term for what they've done. If you disagree, fine, but the internet is a place for sharing ones views, and that is my view.

I'm going to say this ONE more time...then I am going to suggest that you no longer be here on this board. I, for one, don't appreciate your attitude towards myself or towards others...at all.

I think that this needs to either end...or someone needs to leave. Simple as that.

I am asking you nicely...either change your attitude or move to another board. We are friendly here and we do not want anyone or anything to disrupt that. You have your thoughts and ideas...so present them. If people don't want to take your advice...then let it be. Don't spend your time putting down other people's lifts or routines...unless you don't mind other people putting down yours.

Once again...change your attitude or leave.

B True
 
BlkWS6 said:
Wow guldukat Im glad to see you too took a logic course, and I must say I have never seen someone actually break down an argument on the Internet and bring up straw man that is hilarious (did you use a textbook?).
:D I was like that after I took a critical thinking class when I started college. Always looking for an excuse to use the big funny words:D
 
Originally posted by Thaibox

:D I was like that after I took a critical thinking class when I started college. Always looking for an excuse to use the big funny words:D


Hahahah yeah at first I didnt think he was serious. I was having flashbacks of my sophomore year in college as I read that! ahhhh. (btw. Thai hows that Camaro running bro?)
 
I had to swap my cam and tweak the hell out of it to get it to smog, but it passed. I've gotta sell it now. If I get what I'm asking for it, I'll lose about $13k on the damn thing.:(
How is pontiac world treating you?
 
b fold the truth said:


I'm going to say this ONE more time...then I am going to suggest that you no longer be here on this board. I, for one, don't appreciate your attitude towards myself or towards others...at all.

I think that this needs to either end...or someone needs to leave. Simple as that.

I am asking you nicely...either change your attitude or move to another board. We are friendly here and we do not want anyone or anything to disrupt that. You have your thoughts and ideas...so present them. If people don't want to take your advice...then let it be. Don't spend your time putting down other people's lifts or routines...unless you don't mind other people putting down yours.

Once again...change your attitude or leave.

B True

b fold the truth said:


I'm going to say this ONE more time...then I am going to suggest that you no longer be here on this board. I, for one, don't appreciate your attitude towards myself or towards others...at all.

I think that this needs to either end...or someone needs to leave. Simple as that.

I am asking you nicely...either change your attitude or move to another board. We are friendly here and we do not want anyone or anything to disrupt that. You have your thoughts and ideas...so present them. If people don't want to take your advice...then let it be. Don't spend your time putting down other people's lifts or routines...unless you don't mind other people putting down yours.

Once again...change your attitude or leave.

B True

B Fold...I thinkl you are wrong! This board is mainly comprised of MEN...and when men get together and dicuss a topic...sometime they argue....almost every thread in here is some sort of arguement or another...one post will generate 15 different answers to the same question...if I contradict your answer...is that not an argument???

Though my post count doesn't show it (lost around 1000 posts in the hacker attack) I have been with this sight for more the 4 years...sometime i drift off..but I return from time to time ..to see how the board has changed ( usually the same stupid question 5 times on one page)...but occasionally a thread like this sparks my intrests...and many others as well...there are 75 posts on this thread..and as of me writing this 587 views...sounds to me as though people are not intrested in you moderating this thread with your politically correct views.

Political correctness was fostered by women trying to modify the actions and thoughts of men, by infuluencing there husbands and sons..we don't need it here...give us someplace to go where we don't have to cow-tow to everyones feelings..let men be men ..and if the women want to join in ...more power to them!

You say that we are nice people here and we don't flame people , to insight there emotions..( I paraphrased) ...if that is so ...then why do we have all of the following similies :mad: :mix: and more???? ( it wouldn't let me post them all)

It used to be yopu could flame the snot out of someone for being stupid, and half the time the moderators would join in!
 
Agreed, you guys should come to fucking animal's board if you think I am "flaming." hahah
 
Flaming for a reason is one thing. Having a poor attitude and being annoyingly disrespectful for the sake of arrogant preaching is another. b-fold is simply recognizing that debasser has a poor attitude and close mind. A combination no one likes to deal with.
 
debaser - you seem to know a lot about DC and are a good advocate, you got me very interested in it. I think you would get a lot more people to realy listen to you and a lot more respect for your views and for DC training if you just took the chip off your shoulder, and if people have their views and are devoted to a style of training, just let them be and move on with those who do want your assistance
 
I guess you're right, I should ignore these 1-2 PMs a day I get from different people wanting help with the DC program. I guess "no one likes to deal with me."

And, you keep ignoring the point. I gave a reason why I was flaming in case you missed it, it's in MULTIPLE posts on this thread. And I wouldn't even call it flaming. "Annoyingly disrespectful," is your opinion, haha. How did you even contribute to this thread? Oh that's right. By saying that I was lying about my weight gain. Great contribution, I see *I* must be the one with the closed mind.
 
Deepsquat said:

B Fold...I thinkl you are wrong! This board is mainly comprised of MEN...and when men get together and dicuss a topic...sometime they argue....almost every thread in here is some sort of arguement or another...one post will generate 15 different answers to the same question...if I contradict your answer...is that not an argument???

Though my post count doesn't show it (lost around 1000 posts in the hacker attack) I have been with this sight for more the 4 years...sometime i drift off..but I return from time to time ..to see how the board has changed ( usually the same stupid question 5 times on one page)...but occasionally a thread like this sparks my intrests...and many others as well...there are 75 posts on this thread..and as of me writing this 587 views...sounds to me as though people are not intrested in you moderating this thread with your politically correct views.

Political correctness was fostered by women trying to modify the actions and thoughts of men, by infuluencing there husbands and sons..we don't need it here...give us someplace to go where we don't have to cow-tow to everyones feelings..let men be men ..and if the women want to join in ...more power to them!

You say that we are nice people here and we don't flame people , to insight there emotions..( I paraphrased) ...if that is so ...then why do we have all of the following similies :mad: :mix: and more???? ( it wouldn't let me post them all)

It used to be yopu could flame the snot out of someone for being stupid, and half the time the moderators would join in!

You're right, we are men. Not children. And as such, we should act like men. (No offence to the women on this board.)

Men and women both argue when they get together and discuss something such as this. However, there is a difference between a healthy argument between people dicussing their different points of view of any particular subject, and a fight where nothing gets accomplished.

This board is here for the healthy arguments where all views are heard, discussed, and debated. Noone benefits from the bitching and narrow-minded whining of anyone that refuses to hear any other view other than their own. That goes for all the boards here.

The comment of "Flaming the snot out of someone and the MOD's would join in" does happen. But happens on the C&C board. Where that is what the board is there for. This board, the Anabolic Board, Supplement Board, PL Board, etc...are for learning. Flames and fighting are a waste of everyones time that comes here witrh questions and help regardiing their training.

DC is obviously a very effective training method. Notice the sticky at the top of the page. Notice also the sticky on WSB. Another proven effective way of training.

This thread has become a total waste of time for everyone here. I only hope that Oak got enough of an answer to his question for him to pursue his problem.

My vote at this time, due to what this thread has digressed into, is to lock it.

Oak, if you still have questions regarding getting past your sticking piint in your deadlift, please feel free to PM or mail me, and I will help you in anyway that i can.

I am done.

Joker
 
Debaser,
Don't turn this my direction little man. I proved your weight gain claims false at the beginning of this thread(using direct quotes from DC), then I explained why some people dislike your approach to the board. That's all. Unwad your panties. :o
 
Then you totally ignored the response to your post. I thought you were going to "discuss", but like gul dukat said you guys are basically dismissing my arguments on the grounds that "he's a jerk." I'll go ahead and post it again:

That's over a period of years (as if those aren't incredible gains anyway) but I'm still relatively a beginner, keep that in mind...

I'll clarify a few things:

1. The 2-3 lbs a week would generally slow down after I'd say 3-6 months. Most guys that switch to DC, since they don't overtrain anymore (I'm sorry but most of you are) make gains like they're beginners again. Note: slow down still means it works a damn site faster than [every, imo] other training method.

2. When I say little to no fat gain, I did mean %, so yes I am gaining a bit of fat, probably something like 1/2 a lb a week. I do not know exactly. But some guys actually get leaner % wise, which means they actually gain very very little fat weekly. This has to do with his diet practices.

An example DC just posted was of a man who was clean, going from 202 to 237 in 5 months. To boot, he was a marine and had to do the intensive cardio regimen (at least miles of running, I'm not sure what else I could ask my marine friend though) 3 times a week. This is a very typical scenario, imagine the gains without the cardio? Probably 5-10 lbs or even more I'd say (though it's impossible to know). Many of you need to ask yourself, are you REALLY making gains like that? Even juiced? He has had hundreds of guys, most natural, making INCREDIBLE gains.

Sorry about the misconceptions.
 
I know Debaser has totally changed himself physically with alot of my ideas and has a very strong opinion about my methods and I greatly appreciate his fervor. I notice alot of other guys on some other boards feel very strongly also. What I dont want to do is to forcefeed my methods down someones throat. I dont want everyone doing my methods because it works best with people who have exhausted all other means and are frustrated and decide--"ok screw this crap im going to give this guy a shot 100%".
I originally put my theories down on the net after haveing large success with local people down here in San Diego and I thought I could help a couple guys by showing them a different way to get to the pie especially if they were at a standstill. My advice/comments to the people on this thread are to please keep doing what your doing and if you feel you just cant get there and its not happening for you --and you have exhausted all avenues and they just arent doing the trick---please look into my way of doing things because I feel I can really help you. Debaser I love your passion for this but I learned something long ago---you have to let someone make that BIG decision for themselves. You can throw hints. You can suggest but the final decision lies with them. With the guys I train online, I email them a huge questionairre because I want to know everything and I use that questionairre to decide whether we will work well together or not. Their words to me tell me whether they are going to go at this 100% or if they are going to read about the newest pro training in Flex magazine 2 weeks down the road and wonder if they should follow that. A huge huge mistake I see people make is jumping from program to program every 3 weeks and never getting something down steady and progressive. It comes from that question in everyones head "am i doing the right thing"? I urge everyone to use your deductive reasoning to decide what is best for you--trust in it--believe in it--devour it and pound it. Casual BB and I have some arguments on here but I have an admiration for both him and Debaser because they read either HST or my methods, thought "that sounds right to me" and then BLASTED AWAY AT IT. Both those guys will be successfull. I kind of laugh because alot of my trainees online email me and tell me that people in their gyms comment on how they train, asking questions etc. The larger guys i train online have a great deal of 'status' in the gym and the questions are nonstop for them because my methods are very different. The lighter guys I train get some crap from their freinds at first and then 30lbs later, they are now doling out advice. It strikes me odd how much the visual of all this effects people instead of deductive reasoning. Anyway I digress....what I ask of people is if they do try my methods is its not only the training part but I need them to do, but to eat a certain way, stretch a certain way, log training weights a certain way etc etc etc. --as Im starting to see people skip other aspects of my recommendations that I feel are important to the mix. You can have the greatest most productive training routine ever but if your eating candy corn and pepsi all day long Im sorry but your not going to gain any appreciable muscle any time soon. With that said I wish you all well with your training endeavors and I hope you keep track of some of the people who train with my methods just for information sake--take care
 
Thanks for the intelligent and well thought out response, thats the way we prefer debates in this forum
 
I want to take a moment to throw some respect to TheOak. I was reading the thread from page 1, and what I realized is that, despite being badgered by Debaser and having his routine insulted and reposted for mockery, TheOak, instead of getting petty, has actually agreed to try the DC routine. It takes balls to change one's view, especially based on the opposition of someone who is similarly UNwilling to compromise.

-casualbb
 
Good post DC.

casualbb: well I'm not sure why I'm saying it again because I don't even know how many times I've repeated it, but:

theoak was the reason I typed up the whole DC sticky in the first place. He was telling me he wanted to try it (for a whole 2 weeks) and I said you need to do a program for at least 6-8 weeks. He said fine. So I wrote all of it up and he never did it. I'm glad it's helped so many other people, but his immaturity shined through. I'm hoping he gets his act together.

And you don't think he got petty? Our definitions must vary, for I seem to recall him saying:"with all the shit Debaser eats, i DO believe he gains 2 pounds a week, of FAT, hahaha.. and you are right Blk, i never hear about his routine, or what he lifts.. all i hear is one set this one set that.. or dude, i hear 500g of protien and 1000g of carbs.. " and "dude, stop crying, want me to hold ur hand???"
 
I thought it was interesting that in the beginning B suggested some moves, and someone came back and said "the accessory work is a given." That's not accessory work...it's possible to increase your full ROM dead without ever deadlifting...powerlifters do it all the time.

Also, someone mentioned increasing ROM to increase strength. This is the exact opposite of what we do to gain strength.

We break it into parts, find the weak part, and bitch slap it.

The only times I have ever done a full ROM/1RM on anything was in a competition, yet my numbers go up every meet.
 
spatts said:
I thought it was interesting that in the beginning B suggested some moves, and someone came back and said "the accessory work is a given." That's not accessory work...it's possible to increase your full ROM dead without ever deadlifting...powerlifters do it all the time.

Also, someone mentioned increasing ROM to increase strength. This is the exact opposite of what we do to gain strength.

We break it into parts, find the weak part, and bitch slap it.

The only times I have ever done a full ROM/1RM on anything was in a competition, yet my numbers go up every meet.

Hmmm...interesting...aint it?

;)

B True
 
I just posted a deadlift specific program for anyone who is interested...I'll be trying it out in a few months probably since deads are my fav exercise. I'll only make a few slight modifications, a set less there, a few more reps there, what have you...
 
Top Bottom