Yep. It was my first cycle (ahh, memories

).
It's a solid cycle, albeit rather expensive... or at least it used to be. If you're running 1.3g of gear at the time... hmm, well, with the EQ it's not that heavily androgenic... seems like something I would run for a few months. I wouldn't expect it to cause explosive gains or heavy water retention, so if you're looking put on some quality mass, it looks good. I wouldn't hope for results not dissimilar to a heavy test cycle laden with orals, though. If you don't end up running the EQ or another concurrent, the cycle might leave you wanting, depending on your goals. I don't know your history, but a primo-based cycle would seem comparably weak with respect to many other commonly used cycles.
What's with the prop labeled "as needed"? Are you looking at it to kickstart the cycle, to add something androgenic, to have as a variable based on strength/weight/lift gains throughout, et cetera?
A month's worth of shorter-acting drugs with the purpose of letting the EQ clear... depending on whether or not you're looking for the individual effects from those drugs, I don't see why you'd want shorter esters. The longer ester steroids will self-taper based on their halflife. EQ doesn't really take that much longer to clear, as with deca, but rather it's the lingering metabolites and effects on the endocrine system while using that give both their reputation.
Lots of steroids can lead to hair thinning -- it really depends on your genetic predisposition. I believe the mechanism is pretty straight foward if it's any kind of worry.
