Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

controversial r-ala post (edit)

OXANDRIN

New member
Animal calls R-ALA a scam!

It does NOT work in healthy muscle!

Effects of exercise training and antioxidant R-ALA on glucose transport in insulin-sensitive rat skeletal muscle
Vitoon Saengsirisuwan, Felipe R. Perez, Tyson R. Kinnick, and Erik J. Henriksen

Muscle Metabolism Laboratory, Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0093


ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have recently demonstrated (Saengsirisuwan V, Kinnick TR, Schmit MB, and Henriksen EJ, J Appl Physiol 91: 145-153, 2001) that exercise training (ET) and the antioxidant R-(+)--lipoic acid (R-ALA) interact in an additive fashion to improve insulin action in insulin-resistant obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats. The purpose of the present study was to assess the interactions of ET and R-ALA on insulin action and oxidative stress in a model of normal insulin sensitivity, the lean Zucker (fa/) rat. For 6 wk, animals either remained sedentary, received R-ALA (30 mg · kg body wt1 · day1), performed ET (treadmill running), or underwent both R-ALA treatment and ET. ET alone or in combination with R-ALA significantly increased (P < 0.05) peak oxygen consumption (28-31%) and maximum run time (52-63%). During an oral glucose tolerance test, ET alone or in combination with R-ALA resulted in a significant lowering of the glucose response (17-36%) at 15 min relative to R-ALA alone and of the insulin response (19-36%) at 15 min compared with sedentary controls. Insulin-mediated glucose transport activity was increased by ET alone in isolated epitrochlearis (30%) and soleus (50%) muscles, and this was associated with increased GLUT-4 protein levels. Insulin action was not improved by R-ALA alone, and ET-associated improvements in these variables were not further enhanced with combined ET and R-ALA. Although ET and R-ALA caused reductions in soleus protein carbonyls (an index of oxidative stress), these alterations were not significantly correlated with insulin-mediated soleus glucose transport. These results indicate that the beneficial interactive effects of ET and R-ALA on skeletal muscle insulin action observed previously in insulin-resistant obese Zucker rats are not apparent in insulin-sensitive lean Zucker rats.

glucose tolerance; GLUT-4 protein; oxidative stress; protein carbonyls; R-(+)--lipoic acid

INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

IT IS WELL ESTABLISHED that endurance exercise training leads to an enhancement of insulin-mediated glucose metabolism (see reviews in Refs. 11, 15, 16). In normal rodent models, moderate- or high-intensity exercise training can improve glucose tolerance (2, 20), whole body insulin sensitivity (21, 22), and insulin action on skeletal muscle glucose transport activity in rodent models (13, 30, 34). The increased insulin action on skeletal muscle glucose transport after exercise training is associated with increased GLUT-4 protein expression (7, 13, 25, 30, 31, 34) as well as with adaptive responses of enzymes involved in glucose phosphorylation and oxidation (15, 16).

-Lipoic acid (ALA) is a naturally occurring cofactor for several mitochondrial enzyme complexes that catalyze the oxidative decarboxylation of -keto acids, and, when administered exogenously, ALA can act as a potent water-soluble antioxidant (26). It has previously been shown that ALA can modulate glucose metabolism in insulin-sensitive cells and tissues (see Ref. 12 for a recent review). When administered in vitro, ALA increases glucose utilization in the rat diaphragm (10) and enhances glucose uptake by rat myocardium (33, 37), L6 myocytes (6, 24), and locomotor skeletal muscles from both insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant rats (14). In addition, we have demonstrated that parenteral administration of ALA to the obese Zucker ( fa/fa) rat, an animal model of obesity-associated insulin resistance, significantly improves glucose tolerance and insulin action on skeletal muscle glucose transport (19, 27, 31, 36) with a substantially lesser acute effect on insulin-sensitive rats (19).

We have recently demonstrated in the obese Zucker rat a significant interaction between exercise training and chronic ALA administration on maximal run time to exhaustion and on insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity in skeletal muscle (31). However, the potential interactions between these two interventions have not yet been investigated in an animal model of normal insulin sensitivity. In this context, the purpose of the present investigation was to test the hypothesis that exercise training and chronic treatment with the R-(+)-enantiomer of ALA (R-ALA), in combination, could improve insulin-stimulated glucose transport in skeletal muscle of lean Zucker ( fa/) rats to a greater extent than either intervention used individually. Additionally, we wished to further investigate the potential relationship between insulin-stimulated glucose transport and oxidative stress (as reflected in protein carbonyl level) in normal skeletal muscle. Lean Zucker rats underwent 6 wk of exercise training and 6 wk of parenteral administration of R-ALA, individually and in combination. Subsequently, peak aerobic capacity (peak O2 consumption; O2 peak), maximal run time to exhaustion, oral glucose tolerance, insulin-stimulated muscle glucose transport, muscle GLUT-4 protein level, tissue protein carbonyl level (a marker of oxidative stress) (5, 2, and the activities of enzymes involved in glucose phosphorylation (total hexokinase activity) and glucose oxidation (citrate synthase activity) were determined. The investigation of these potential interactions in normal muscle is important in determining whether the beneficial metabolic interactions between these interventions, which we have established in the insulin-resistant obese Zucker rat, are applicable to conditions of normal insulin action.

METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Animals and treatments. Female lean Zucker (fa/) rats (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) were received at 5-6 wk of age and weighed 130-140 g. Animals were housed in a temperature-controlled room (20-22°C) at the Central Animal Facility of the University of Arizona. A reversed 12:12-h light-dark cycle (lights on 1900-0700) was maintained so that training occurred during the dark cycle when the rats are most active. Animals had free access to water and chow (Harlan Teklad Rodent Diet, Madison, WI). This chow does not contain any lipoic acid but does contain 90.2 IU/kg of vitamin E, an antioxidant. However, the amount of vitamin E consumed from the diet would be very small (~1 IU per rat per day), and it is unlikely that this dietary source of antioxidants affected the results of this study. All procedures were approved by the University of Arizona Animal Use and Care Committee.
Lean animals were treated exactly as in our previous study with obese Zucker rats (31). Lean Zucker rats were randomly assigned to one of four groups: 1) a group that remained sedentary and was vehicle treated, 2) an R-ALA-treated group, 3) an exercise-trained group, or 4) a combined R-ALA-treated and exercise-trained group. Animals in the R-ALA-treated groups received 30 mg/kg body wt of purified R-ALA (ASTA Medica, Frankfurt, Germany) dissolved in 120 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) by intraperitoneal injection (a maximally effective dose in obese Zucker rats; Ref. 36) every evening for 6 wk, whereas sedentary control animals received 8.3 ml/kg body wt of 120 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4). Animals in the exercise-trained groups ran in the morning on a 10-lane motor-driven rodent treadmill for 6 wk at 4% grade. During the first 3 wk of training, animals ran 7 days/wk, and the training protocol was quickly increased to 60 min/day, continuously rotating through the following 15-min cycles: 24 m/min for 10 min, 26 m/min for 3 min, and 28 m/min for 2 min. Over the final 3 wk of training, animals ran 75 min/day, 5 days/wk by using these same 15-min cycles. The combined treatment animals performed the treadmill-training protocol exactly as described above, while also receiving daily treatments with R-ALA.

Oral glucose tolerance tests. After 6 wk of treatment, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed on each animal. At 6 PM of the evening before the test, rats were restricted to 4 g of chow. Between 8 and 9 AM on the day of the OGTT, ~15 h after the last R-ALA treatment and/or 24 h after the last exercise bout, rats were administered a 1 g/kg body wt glucose load by gavage. Blood was drawn from a cut at the tip of the tail at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after the glucose feeding, thoroughly mixed with EDTA (18 mM final concentration), and centrifuged at 13,000 g to separate the plasma. Plasma was stored at 80°C and subsequently assayed for glucose (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO), insulin (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO), and free fatty acids (Wako, Richmond, VA). Immediately after completion of the OGTT, each animal was given 2 ml of sterile 0.9% saline subcutaneously to compensate for plasma loss, and animals in the exercise-training groups were run for 30 min.

O2 peak. O2 peak was assessed in each animal during a treadmill test 48 h after the OGTT by using the method of Bedford et al. (1). Sedentary animals were familiarized with treadmill running by running for periods of 5-10 min three times per week in the 2 wk leading to the measurement of O2 peak. No exercise was performed on the day before O2 peak tests. However, R-ALA was given to the R-ALA and the combined exercise-trained and R-ALA -treated groups on this day. Animals ran on a motorized treadmill in an airtight Plexiglas chamber. Grade and speed of the treadmill were increased every 3 min from a basal level of 0% grade and 13.4 m/min through the following stages: 16.1 m/min at 5%, 21.4 m/min at 10%, 26.8 m/min at 10%, 32.2 m/min at 12%, 32.2 m/min at 15%, 32.2 m/min at 18%, and 32.2 m/min at 21%. The test was terminated when the rats were unable to keep pace with the treadmill belt. O2 (Ametek S-3A1, Applied Electrochemistry, Pittsburgh, PA) and CO2 (Ametek CD-3A) were measured in expired gases every 3 min for the determination of O2 uptake (ml O2 · kg body wt1 · min1). Exercise training and R-ALA treatments were resumed the day after O2 peak assessment.

Glucose transport activity in skeletal muscle. Approximately 72 h after the O2 peak test, 24 h after the final exercise bout, and 15 h after the final R-ALA treatment, animals were weighed and deeply anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg body wt). Determination of muscle glucose transport activity was initiated at 8 AM after an overnight food restriction as described in Oral glucose tolerance tests. One soleus and both epitrochlearis muscles were dissected and prepared for in vitro incubation. Whereas the epitrochlearis muscles were incubated intact, the soleus muscle was prepared in two strips (~25 mg) and incubated. Muscles were incubated in the unmounted state. Each muscle was incubated for 1 h at 37°C in 3 ml of oxygenated (95% O2-5% CO2) Krebs-Henseleit buffer (KHB) supplemented with 8 mM glucose, 32 mM mannitol, and 0.1% BSA (radioimmunoassay grade, Sigma Chemical). One epitrochlearis muscle and one soleus strip were incubated in the absence of insulin, and the contralateral epitrochlearis muscle and second soleus strip were incubated in the presence of a maximally effective concentration of insulin (2 mU/ml; Humulin R, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN).
After this initial incubation period, the muscles were rinsed for 10 min at 37°C in 3 ml of oxygenated KHB containing 40 mM mannitol, 0.1% BSA, and insulin, if previously present. Thereafter, the muscles were transferred to 2 ml of KHB, containing 1 mM 2-[1,2-3H]deoxyglucose (2-DG; 300 mCi/mmol; Sigma Chemical), 39 mM [U-14C]mannitol (0.8 mCi/mmol; ICN Radiochemicals, Irvine, CA), 0.1% BSA, and insulin, if previously present. At the end of this final 20-min incubation period at 37°C, the muscles were removed, trimmed of excess fat and connective tissue, quickly frozen, and weighed. Epitrochlearis muscles were divided into two pieces, which were individually reweighed. One piece from each epitrochlearis muscle and the entire soleus strip were dissolved in 0.5 ml of 0.5 N NaOH. After the muscles were completely solubilized, 5 ml of scintillation cocktail were added, and the specific intracellular accumulation of 2-DG was determined as described previously (13) by using mannitol to correct for the extracellular accumulation of 2-DG. Glucose transport activity was measured as the intracellular accumulation of 2-DG (in pmol · mg muscle wet wt1 · 20 min1).

Biochemical assays. The remaining two pieces of epitrochlearis were pooled, reweighed, and homogenized in 40 volumes of ice-cold 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) containing 1 mM EDTA and 250 mM sucrose. These homogenates were used for determination of total protein content by using the bicinchoninic acid method (Sigma Chemical), GLUT-4 protein level (31), total hexokinase activity (3, and citrate synthase activity (35). In addition, the contralateral soleus and plantaris muscles, liver, and heart were removed, trimmed of fat and connective tissue, quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and used for subsequent determination of these same variables as well as for the measurement of protein carbonyl levels by using the method of Reznick and Packer (2. Briefly, pieces of frozen tissue (50-90 mg) were gently homogenized in 1.5 ml of a 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1% digitonin, 1 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitors (40 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 7 µg/ml pepstatin, and 5 µg/ml aprotinin). If needed, nucleic acids were removed with 1% streptomycin sulfate, and extracted soluble proteins were then reacted with 10 mM 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) in 2.5 M HCl for 1 h at room temperature. Proteins were precipitated with 10% TCA, and protein pellets were washed with ethanol/ethyl acetate (1:1) (vol/vol) to remove free DNPH and lipid contaminants. Final precipitates were dissolved in 6 M guanidine HCl and incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The carbonyl contents of these samples were then assessed by using a spectrophotometric assay at 370 nm and an absorption coefficient of 22,000 M1 · cm1 (2. Protein content of the final samples was quantified by reading the absorbance at 280 nm with the use of a BSA standard curve. These protein contents were typically in the range of 0.3-0.5 mg. In our hands, this assay had a coefficient of variance of 11%.

Statistical analysis. All values are expressed as means ± SE. The significance of differences among the four experimental groups was assessed by a factorial ANOVA with a post hoc Fisher's protected least-significant difference test, and relationships between two variables were assessed by linear regression analysis (StatView version 5.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). A level of P < 0.05 was set for statistical significance.

RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Body weights, muscle weights, and O2 peak. The R-ALA-treated and the combined treatment groups had slightly lower (8-9%, P < 0.05) final body weights compared with either the sedentary or the exercise-trained groups due to significantly lower average rates of body weight gain over the experimental period (18-23%, Table 1). Wet weights of the whole soleus, plantaris, heart, and heart wet weight-to-body weight ratio were not different among the various groups (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Effects of exercise training and chronic R-ALA treatment on body weight, O2peak, maximum run time to fatigue, and plasma glucose, insulin, and free fatty acids

Animals in both the exercise-training and the combination groups had significantly higher peak aerobic capacities compared with the sedentary control (31 and 29%, respectively) or the R-ALA-treated group (27 and 24%, respectively) (Table 1). In addition, exercise training alone or in combination with R-ALA treatment caused significantly longer maximum run times than those of the sedentary control (52 and 63%, respectively) or the R-ALA-treated group (54 and 65%, respectively) (Table 1).

Plasma glucose, insulin, and free fatty acids. There were no differences in plasma glucose among the various groups after the overnight food restriction (Table 1). R-ALA treatment had no effect on plasma levels of insulin, whereas exercise training induced significant decreases in plasma insulin (23-33%) and free fatty acids (62-136%) compared with all other groups. In contrast, R-ALA treatment resulted in the highest level of circulating free fatty acids, an effect that was prevented by exercise training of R-ALA-treated animals.

OGTT responses. Glucose and insulin responses during the OGTT in the experimental groups are displayed in Fig. 1. Compared with the sedentary control group, R-ALA treatment alone had no effect on plasma glucose or insulin at any time point during the test. At the 15-min time point, exercise training alone or in combination with R-ALA treatment significantly lowered the glucose response (17 and 36%, respectively) compared with the R-ALA treatment and induced significant reduction of the insulin response (36 and 19%, respectively) relative to the sedentary control.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 1. Responses of glucose (top) and insulin (bottom) during an oral glucose tolerance test in lean Zucker rats that remained sedentary (), received chronic treatment with R-(+)--lipoic acid (R-ALA; ), underwent exercise training (), or received chronic treatment with R-ALA combined with exercise training (). Values are means ± SE for 6-9 animals/group. aP < 0.05 vs. sedentary group. bP < 0.05 vs. R-ALA-treated group.

Whereas there were no significant differences among groups for the glucose area under the curve (AUC), exercise training alone was associated with a significantly lower insulin AUC compared with the sedentary group (Fig. 2). The glucose-insulin index, defined as the product of the glucose and insulin AUCs, is an indirect index of in vivo peripheral insulin action (4). R-ALA treatment in the lean animals led to a trend toward a higher glucose-insulin index compared with sedentary control (Fig. 2). This response toward a worsening of whole body insulin sensitivity was prevented by exercise training of the R-ALA-treated animals.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 2. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for glucose (mg · dl1 · min1; A) and insulin (µU · ml1 · min1; B) during an oral glucose tolerance test and the glucose-insulin index (mg · dl1 · min1 × µU · ml1 · min1 × 106; C) in lean Zucker rats after the 6-wk interventions. Data for AUCs were taken from Fig. 1. Values are means ± SE of 6-9 animals/group. Sed, sedentary control group; ALA, R-ALA-treated group; Exer, exercise-trained group; Combo, combined treatment group. aP < 0.05 vs. R-ALA-treated group.

Muscle glucose transport. To examine whether the interventions altered the skeletal muscle glucose transport system, basal and insulin-stimulated 2-DG uptake in isolated epitrochlearis and soleus muscles was determined (Fig. 2). Basal 2-DG uptake in either muscle was not different among experimental groups. In the epitrochlearis, the rate of insulin-stimulated 2-DG uptake (Fig. 3A) was enhanced by exercise training alone (16%) and by exercise training in combination with R-ALA treatment (17%) compared with the sedentary control group. In the soleus muscle (Fig. 3B), exercise training alone significantly increased the insulin-stimulated rate of 2-DG uptake (28% vs. sedentary and 29% vs. R-ALA). These significant increases relative to the sedentary and R-ALA groups were maintained in the combined treatment group.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 3. In vitro rates of 2-deoxyglucose uptake in the epitrochlearis (A) and soleus (B) muscles in the absence (black bars) or presence (open bars) of insulin (2 mU/ml) in lean Zucker rats after the treatments. Values are means ± SE of 6-9 animals/group. aP < 0.05 vs. Sed group. bP < 0.05 vs. R-ALA-treated group.

GLUT-4 protein and enzyme responses. Total protein concentrations for a given muscle type did not differ significantly among the various groups (data not shown). Total GLUT-4 protein level (Fig. 4) and the activities of total hexokinase (Fig. 5) and citrate synthase (Fig. 6) enzymes were determined in the epitrochlearis, soleus, plantaris, and heart. No increases in GLUT-4 protein level were observed in either muscle type after chronic treatment with R-ALA. Exercise training, alone or in combination with R-ALA treatment, caused significant increases in the GLUT-4 protein level in the epitrochlearis (21 and 18%, respectively, vs. sedentary control and 15 and 12%, respectively, vs. R-ALA-treated animals), soleus (21 and 31%, respectively, vs. sedentary control and 15 and 25%, respectively, vs. R-ALA-treated animals), plantaris (14 and 16%, respectively, vs. sedentary control and 16 and 18%, respectively vs. R-ALA-treated animals), and heart (22 and 19%, respectively, vs. sedentary control).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 4. Effects of chronic treatment with R-ALA, Exer, or Combo on whole muscle level of GLUT-4 protein in the epitrochlearis, soleus, plantaris, and heart. Values are means ± SE of 6-9 animals/group. aP < 0.05 vs. Sed. bP < 0.05 vs. R-ALA-treated group.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 5. Effects of chronic treatment with R-ALA, Exer, or Combo on total hexokinase activities of the epitochlearis (Epi), soleus, plantaris, and heart. Values are means ± SE of 6-9 animals/group. aP < 0.05 vs. Sed. bP < 0.05 vs. R-ALA-treated group.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 6. Effects of chronic treatment with R-ALA, Exer, or Combo on citrate synthase activities of the epitochlearis, soleus, plantaris, and heart. Values are means ± SE of 6-9 animals/group. aP < 0.05 vs. Sed. bP < 0.05 vs. R-ALA-treated group.

Total hexokinase activity was increased by R-ALA treatment alone or exercise training alone (69 and 75%, respectively) in the epitrochlearis with no further significant increase when these two interventions were combined. This parameter was markedly enhanced by 186% in the soleus muscle from the combination treatment group. In the plantaris, exercise training alone brought about significant increases in hexokinase activity compared with the sedentary or the R-ALA-treated groups (53 and 85%, respectively), whereas no significant alterations between groups were observed in the heart. Citrate synthase activity in epitrochlearis was increased (31-48%) after either R-ALA treatment alone, exercise training alone, or in the combination treatment group. Exercise training, alone or in combination with R-ALA treatment, resulted in significant increases (59%) in this variable in the soleus muscle. The combination treatment enhanced citrate synthase activity in the plantaris by 37% compared with the sedentary or the R-ALA-treated groups, whereas only exercise training alone increased citrate synthase activity in the heart (29%) relative to the sedentary control group.

Protein carbonyls. The effect of the antioxidant R-ALA and exercise training interventions on tissue protein carbonyls, a marker of oxidative stress (5, 2, was examined. R-ALA treatment, alone or in combination with exercise training, resulted in significant decreases (91-108%) in protein carbonyl levels in the liver. Protein carbonyl levels in the soleus after exercise training alone or in combination with R-ALA treatment were significantly lower (49-59%) compared with the sedentary group. In the plantaris muscle, exercise training alone or R-ALA treatment alone lowered protein carbonyl levels by 47% and 74%, respectively, relative to the sedentary group. No changes in this parameter were observed in the heart muscle after either intervention. The correlation between protein carbonyl level and insulin-mediated 2-DG uptake in the soleus muscle from the various experimental groups was assessed. No significant correlation was observed (P = 0.1025). In addition, no significant correlation was observed in the soleus between protein carbonyl level and citrate synthase activity (P = 0.9212) (data not shown).

DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Our laboratory has recently reported (31) that, in the markedly insulin-resistant, hyperinsulinemic, and dyslipidemic obese Zucker rat, endurance exercise training and the antioxidant R-ALA interact in an additive fashion to improve skeletal muscle glucose transport. In contrast to these findings, we have demonstrated in the present investigation that the combination of endurance exercise training and R-ALA treatment in the insulin-sensitive lean Zucker rat does not result in a further improvement of insulin-stimulated glucose transport in skeletal muscle compared with the effects of exercise training alone (Fig. 3). Moreover, we have shown that chronic treatment of normal rats with R-ALA alone does not improve insulin action on whole body glucose disposal (Figs. 1 and 2) and skeletal muscle glucose transport (Fig. 3), unlike the beneficial modulation of glucose metabolism in insulin-resistant rodents (19, 27, 31, 36) and humans (17, 18, 23) associated with chronic administration of ALA. It appears, therefore, that the ability of ALA to enhance insulin action on glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle is restricted to conditions of insulin resistance.

The level of carbonyl formation in proteins is an indicator of oxidative damage in tissues (5) and reflects the degree of long-term oxidative stress (2. We have demonstrated in the present investigation that the levels of protein carbonyls in the soleus, plantaris, myocardium, and liver of the insulin-sensitive lean Zucker rats (Fig. 7) were 31-60% less (P < 0.05) than those levels measured in the same tissues of insulin-resistant obese Zucker rats (31). In this previous investigation (31), our laboratory showed that reductions in soleus muscle protein carbonyl levels after endurance exercise training or chronic administration of R-ALA were significantly correlated with improvements in insulin-mediated glucose transport activity, supporting a role of oxidative stress in the etiology of muscle insulin resistance. However, this relationship between oxidative stress and insulin action is obviously not a simple one, as reductions in the level of protein carbonyls in the soleus muscle of the exercise-trained or R-ALA-treated lean Zucker rats were not significantly correlated with any significant enhancement of insulin-mediated glucose transport activity (Fig. . Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that reductions of already elevated protein carbonyl levels (such as those in tissues of the obese Zucker rat), elicited by either exercise training or R-ALA interventions, can be associated with enhancements of insulin action on skeletal muscle glucose transport. However, further decreases in these protein carbonyl levels below a given threshold value (e.g., the levels in muscle from the lean Zucker rat) do not result in an enhancement of insulin action.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 7. Effects of chronic treatment with R-ALA, Exer, or Combo on protein carbonyl levels in the liver, soleus, plantaris, and heart. Values are means ± SE of 6-9 animals/group. aP < 0.05 vs. Sed. bP < 0.05 vs. Exer.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 8. Simple linear regression analysis of the relationship between insulin-mediated glucose transport activity and protein carbonyl level in the soleus muscle of lean Zucker rats subjected to the various interventions. Insulin-mediated glucose transport is defined as the net increase in 2-deoxyglucose uptake above basal due to insulin (using data from Fig. 3). Regression equation: y = 0.004x + 2.302, r = 0.321, P = 0.1025.

An important observation in the present study is that chronic treatment of lean animals with R-ALA was associated with a significantly reduced rate of body weight gain (Table 1). As lean mass was apparently not affected (muscle wet weights were not different between sedentary and R-ALA-treated animals), the difference in body mass was likely due to a difference in fat mass. It has previously been noted that, in older rats, chronic treatment with R-ALA leads to increases in ambulatory activity and hepatocellular oxygen consumption (, and we have also found increases in metabolic enzyme activities (hexokinase and citrate synthase; Figs. 5 and 6) in skeletal muscle of the R-ALA-treated animals. The possibility exists that chronic R-ALA treatment can increase the expression of specific genes involved in metabolism, allowing for an increase in metabolic and ambulatory activity and ultimately leading to a reduced body weight gain.

The alterations in plasma FFAs that resulted from the interventions in the lean animals are noteworthy (Table 1), as FFAs are known to negatively modify whole body and skeletal muscle glucose disposal (3). Whereas chronic R-ALA treatment of dyslipidemic, obese Zucker rats elicits decreases in plasma FFAs (31, 36), chronic treatment of lean animals with R-ALA brought about an unexpected and significant increase in plasma FFAs (Table 1), an effect that was significantly reduced by concomitant exercise training. This elevation in plasma FFAs after ALA treatment has previously been reported in normal chickens (9) and may result from the ability of ALA to bind to albumin and displace fatty acids (32). Moreover, the elevated FFAs may help to explain the slight worsening of whole body insulin sensitivity after R-ALA treatment (Fig. 2). In support of this concept, in the group of lean animals receiving R-ALA treatment and exercise training in combination, the reduction in plasma FFAs relative to the R-ALA-treated group was accompanied by a relative enhancement of whole body insulin sensitivity.

We have again confirmed numerous previous investigations demonstrating that endurance exercise training enhances insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity in skeletal muscle (reviewed in Refs. 15, 16). These improvements in insulin action were associated with increased total GLUT-4 protein level (Fig. 4) and with increased activities of enzymes involved in glucose phosphorylation (hexokinase; Fig. 5) and glucose oxidation (citrate synthase; Fig. 6), in agreement with previous studies (15, 16).

In summary, we have provided new evidence that, in contrast to the insulin-resistant obese Zucker rat (31), chronic administration of the water-soluble antioxidant R-ALA to the insulin-sensitive lean Zucker rat does not enhance insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity in skeletal muscle. Moreover, again in contrast to our findings with the obese Zucker rat (31), we could find no evidence that the combination treatment of lean Zucker rats with exercise training and R-ALA could beneficially modify either maximal running performance or skeletal muscle glucose transport activity relative to endurance exercise training alone. Taken together, these results indicate that the positive interaction between endurance exercise training and antioxidant treatment with R-ALA for skeletal muscle insulin action is restricted to conditions of insulin resistance and is not seen in insulin-sensitive muscle.
 
I guess he forgot the thounsands of happy customers and "Dr. Lipoic" ( I forgot his name...).
 
Reports don't mean shit to me!

I've seen 5 pagers where testosterone is not effective in healthy males!

RADAR
 
I read that today @ his little board. Interesting to say the least. He had a big fallout today @ ology it sounnds like. I think he was flaming Ulter and Macro.
 
Honestly, the products from AF really dont do that much--ive ordered two seperate times from them and both times i have been pretty disappointed. One product that seems to work pretty good with me from the AF store is Yohimburn DF--ive tried their R-ALA, thermorexin and other types but i never saw the results that i was hearing from the boards..the only product i will probably continue to buy from them is the Yohimburn DF..dont wanna be a jerk but that stuff is way too expensive for the results
 
Ganryu said:
I read that today @ his little board. Interesting to say the least. He had a big fallout today @ ology it sounnds like. I think he was flaming Ulter and Macro.

That was exactly it. We don't allow flaming in the anabolic section, and he continued to flame even after all parties agreed not to. He continued and was called on it. I am thankful that the other parties involved stopped (I have to add that they only started flaming in self defense).

He seemed upset. :)
 
Bran987 said:
I haven't seen anyone come up with a valid rebuttal yet

There are some serious answers that have yet to be answered. I don't know if they even can be answered at this time. I am waiting for macro to post about his upcoming meeting with Dr. Packer. Maybe that will clear up some of these questions.
 
thelegacy again said:
Honestly, the products from AF really dont do that much--ive ordered two seperate times from them and both times i have been pretty disappointed. One product that seems to work pretty good with me from the AF store is Yohimburn DF--ive tried their R-ALA, thermorexin and other types but i never saw the results that i was hearing from the boards..the only product i will probably continue to buy from them is the Yohimburn DF..dont wanna be a jerk but that stuff is way too expensive for the results

well, I have lost 3-4 lbs. in the past 2 weeks and 1/2 inch off my waist.. which I'm happy about, basically I started my diet when my Thermorexin and Glucorell-R arrived in the mail.

But therein lies the problem. My diet has been squeaky clean the past 2 weeks except for Super Bowl Sunday, so has it been my lifting, cardio, and eating been taking the lbs. off? One thing's for sure, I'm not gonna stop taking the stuff now just for research purposes.

I want to believe in products really bad, but who knows? I'm always weary when I hear people talking about noticing a huge difference in days..

I'd love to hear macro and ulter respond to this research.. who cares whether Animal posted it or not. I was just 'bout to order a bottle for my mom.

I also had a question about Trex and Lrex. One is stimulatory and the other is not, but they are both fat burners. So if you can handle the stimulatory one (Trex), why buy both?? I can't find an answer.

But I am a newbie here, and so I will stay where I belong.. listening and learning without making judgments... I am in awe of the knowledge here.
 
TxLonghorn said:


That was exactly it. We don't allow flaming in the anabolic section, and he continued to flame even after all parties agreed not to. He continued and was called on it. I am thankful that the other parties involved stopped (I have to add that they only started flaming in self defense).

He seemed upset. :)


On a Side Note Tex your an Awsome Admin, and your site is great as well........
 
I agree with the findings of the study. It's not news however we already read it 2 years ago.
OXANDRIN your thread title says very little about you're ability to read and understand what it is you posted.

"It does NOT work in healthy muscle!"

This quote is just as misleading as the crap Animal posted on .


Here's another news flash. If you're already lean and insulin sensitive you don't need to use any fat loss supplement whatsoever. Because you're already there Einstein. It's like saying a study proved that people with 20-20 vision don't need glasses. Duh!

However if you are like 2/3 of the American population OR if you USE ANABOLIC STEROIDS, you know like the people on this board, you are not insulin sensitive. Using AS makes you insulin resistant (the opposite of insulin sensitive) no matter what kind of shape you're in.
And THAT'S why over 4000 people from these boards RE-ORDERED Glucorell R after trying it once.
 
Re: Animal calls R-ALA a scam!

Did macro already refute this on ology? Oh well, I guess he'll do it again if he did. Interesting to say the least.
 
There is nothing to refute with this study. It says that R+ Lipoic Acid doesn't increase glucose uptake if you're already lean and insulin sensitive.

"chronic administration of the water-soluble antioxidant R-ALA to the insulin-sensitive lean Zucker rat does not enhance insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity in skeletal muscle. "

Lean and insulin sensitive people wouldn't be buying a product to help them with carbs that are making them fat. Carbs don't make them fat or they wouldn't be lean and insulin sensitive. It's pretty simple.
 
WTF??? OXANDRIN, westsnoop, etc...
did you actually read the studies? they completely refute his stance, although they do not readily account for AF's position.
 
I like the AF R-ALA i was just posting it so everyone could see what animal was trying to say about it.... thats all
 
I dont know for sure... but I tend to hold fat on my waste and It is nearly impossible for me to get lean when I eat > 50 carbohydrates per non-lifting day...

TheMuscleMonster said:


how do you know you are insulin resistent?
 
R-ALA did not do much for me, and I concluded that it was because I effectively utilize carbs as it is. It is a product for those who can use it, and many have testified that it does work.

If it doesn't work for you, don't buy it. But don't throw silly accusations or make sublime inuendos about the AF store. Those guys research and do their best to bring good stuff to market. I think they do a good job, and no, I don't work for them.

I have not seen any ridiculous claims on any of AFs products, ever. Moreover, Ulter is a fair guy. He does good business. That alone is enough reason to deal with him.

Thermorexin is pretty effective at 6/day. More so than ephedra, and certainly more bearable.

WAY more healthy.

ANd Tyler's Liver Detox, where would we be without that? Normally, doctors charge a pretty good slug for that stuff.

You think you found something about R- ALA, and you did.

You found that it doesn't work for everybody.
 
Fukkenshredded said:
R-ALA did not do much for me, and I concluded that it was because I effectively utilize carbs as it is. It is a product for those who can use it, and many have testified that it does work.

If it doesn't work for you, don't buy it. But don't throw silly accusations or make sublime inuendos about the AF store. Those guys research and do their best to bring good stuff to market. I think they do a good job, and no, I don't work for them.

I have not seen any ridiculous claims on any of AFs products, ever. Moreover, Ulter is a fair guy. He does good business. That alone is enough reason to deal with him.

Thermorexin is pretty effective at 6/day. More so than ephedra, and certainly more bearable.

WAY more healthy.

ANd Tyler's Liver Detox, where would we be without that? Normally, doctors charge a pretty good slug for that stuff.

You think you found something about R- ALA, and you did.

You found that it doesn't work for everybody.

well said, I don't think I've ever seen a product on their site that looked sketchy, and most everthing there is backed by plenty of research.

unlike just about 99.999999999999999% of other supplement stores on the internet, whom sell products that are more than questionable.
 
i follow a moderate carb diet year round and upon adding r-ala i noticed DRASTIC results... say what you will, the stuff is amazing. The potent antioxidant qualities are but a bonus IMO. I would not diet without it.
 
I was very lean over last summer, but I got such awesome pumps from taking 1.5g - 2g R-ALA with my morning meals. My muscles were so full, so hard. It was awesome.

And I know this doens't have anything to do with that long study posted. (Is there a short abstract?)
 
Singleton said:
I was very lean over last summer, but I got such awesome pumps from taking 1.5g - 2g R-ALA with my morning meals. My muscles were so full, so hard. It was awesome.

And I know this doens't have anything to do with that long study posted. (Is there a short abstract?)


I can attest to this. I've also never gotten as lean as I did when I added R-ALA. It was the only thing that changed (ie cardio and diet didnt) and the difference for me was unbelievable.


We arent rats afterall :D
 
Basically it breaks down like this.
If you look like fukkenshredded, and if you say you do I'd have to see it, and you're that lean, then Glucorell R may not be of as much use to you for glucose uptake enhancement as it would be to the average guy. Here's how it works.

To function properly, cells need a steady fuel supply. Blood sugar is the key fuel for most cells in the body, and the body produces the hormone insulin precisely in order to help get energy to the cells that need it. Insulin is like a "key" that turns on the glucose transport "ignition" (insulin receptor) which is located on the surface of the cell.

Fig3_new.jpg
How the cell takes in blood sugar.

When the "key" (insulin) activates the "ignition" (the insulin receptor), it turns on the engines of the "tanker trucks" (GLUcose Transporters, or GLUTs) that do the work of hauling glucose (blood sugar) out of your bloodstream and into your cells. So to get your cells the energy they need - and to keep blood sugar from building up to dangerously high levels - insulin has to tell your cells to take up blood sugar … and the cell also has to listen to the signal, and mobilize the GLUT transporters.

The system is efficient and remarkably adaptable, but it has its limits. The fact is that there's only so much blood sugar that your cells can take in at a time. And as soaring rates of diabetes show, North Americans have been overtaxing those limits for generations. Our fast-paced lifestyles and processed-food diets cause most of us to take in more Calories - and, especially, more carbohydrate - than our bodies can handle. After years of being asked, by insulin, to take in more glucose than they can use, eventually your cells stop responding properly to insulin's signal. (insulin resistance)

Think of an old car starter whose pins have been so worn down by years of friction against the key's teeth that you have to juggle and twist at the key to get the car to start. When the same thing happens to your body's glucose transport system, your body becomes resistant to the action of insulin. Insulin is still being produced, but the cells no longer respond properly, and fail to mobilize GLUTs in response. As a result, cells don't take in glucose, and blood sugar levels climb.

Thus begins a vicious circle. Because high blood sugar is bad for you, the body responds to insulin resistance by producing more insulin. In the short term, this does the trick, forcing your cells to take in more glucose. But if insulin levels are persistently too high, your cells eventually become even less interested in hearing insulin's cries to take in excessive glucose, and respond by producing even less GLUTs … which makes your cells even more insulin resistant.

Something has to give. If the insulin-producing cells of the pancreas just can't produce enough insulin to keep blood sugar levels under control in the face of increasing insulin resistance, then the cycle ends in adult-onset diabetes. On the other hand, if the brute-force strategy of keeping blood sugar levels at manageable levels by cranking insulin levels higher and higher succeeds, a metabolic disorder known as insulin resistance syndrome, or "Syndrome X" ensues. And while full-blown, clinical "Syndrome X" is not diagnosed in most people, almost everyone develops some degree of insulin resistance as part of the "normal" aging. This also occurs with the use of Anabolic Steroids.

Even though the blood sugar of most people with insulin resistance may be within the normal range, their health is still in jeopardy, because insulin resistance itself is a potential killer. The key reason: one of insulin's functions is to control the release of free fatty acids from your tissues into your bloodstream … with the result that, when your body doesn't respond properly to insulin, your plasma levels of free fatty acids rise higher High free fatty acids keep your blood vessels squeezed up tight by interfering with the action of nitric oxide, the molecule that helps your blood vessels to relax as a result, their high free fatty acids cause insulin resistant people to have high blood pressure.


Controlled trials prove that even racemic (R,S)-lipoic acid helps people become more sensitive to insulin - that is, less insulin resistant. But research shows that only the R(+)-Lipoic Acid half of conventional "lipoic acid" supplements makes the body's cells more responsive to insulin. In fact, in some ways the S(-)-form actually makes it harder for your body to healthily process blood sugar!

Even when no insulin is available, cells can still open their doors to a small amount of glucose. This ability is called the cell's basal glucose uptake, and it can be tested by isolating a cell from the influence of insulin and other bodily signals in a test tube. Under these artificial conditions, R(+)-Lipoic Acid effectively increases cells' basal uptake of glucose , whereas the S(-)-form has been found to be either totally ineffective, or just half as effective as R(+)-lipoic acid, depending on what kind of cell you look at.

But the ability to increase cells' glucose uptake when there's no insulin around is more of a laboratory curiosity than a medical breakthrough. In a living, breathing organism, insulin is present - and restoring the cell's ability to respond to insulin's signal is the key factor in controlling both blood sugar and the witches' brew of risk factors that come with "Syndrome X." So the key question is not what effects the two enantiomers have on basal glucose uptake, but how they affect the interplay between insulin, sugar, and the cell.

To get answers to this question, scientists compared the response to insulin in the muscle cells of insulin-resistant lab animals injected with either straight S(-)-enantiomer, or pure R(+)-lipoic acid It immediately became obvious that R(+)-Lipoic Acid was superior. Using a special, "traceable" form of glucose to monitor the two enantiomers' effects, the very first treatment with R(+)-Lipoic Acid caused the animals' muscle cells to take up 31% more glucose in response to insulin, which was 64% more glucose than under basal (non-insulin-stimulated) conditions. By contrast, S(-)-lipoic acid caused no significant increase in muscle cell glucose transport.

Next, the scientist looked at the longer-term effects of the two enantiomers. One group of animals was fed a regular diet, while two other groups' chow was supplemented with one of the two enantiomers. The results were essentially the same. Compared to animals which ate an unsupplemented diet, the muscle cells of animals which were given pure R(+)-Lipoic Acid were able to take up 34% more blood sugar in response to insulin, or 65% more than they did under basal conditions. By contrast, feeding animals the same amount of "lipoic acid" in the artificial S(-)-form had no effect on the animals' ability to clear blood sugar.

In fact, even giving the animals two-thirds more S(-)-enantiomer than had been effective when using R(+)-lipoic acid, still led to no clear-cut improvement: while there did appear to be an increase in the animals' muscle cells' glucose uptake under the influence of insulin, the scientists found that the apparent increase was not strong enough, as compared to their basal intake, to rule out a statistical fluke. 21 And the numbers were about the same (145 vs. 150 pmol/mg muscle mass) when they further upped the dose of the S(-)-form to one that was three times more than what was needed to get clear-cut results with R(+)-lipoic acid!

At the same time, insulin levels in animals that were supplemented with R(+)-Lipoic Acid were pushed down by 17%, proving that the vicious circle of insulin resistance was being put into reverse. By contrast, S(-) lipoic acid actually caused insulin levels to soar 15% higher. Another clear sign that the animals were made less insulin resistant was the fact that animals given R(+)-Lipoic Acid experienced reductions of free fatty acids of greater than a third - an extremely important result, granted the role of increased free fatty acids in causing the high blood pressure and killer cholesterol profile seen in "Syndrome X," and their place as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and sudden death. It was a different story in the other group: free fatty acids in animals fed S(-)-lipoic acid showed no significant change.

Looking down at these animals' cells, scientists could see what had happened. The amount of GLUT-4, the muscles' main glucose transporter, was actually reduced by 19% by S(-) lipoic acid supplementation! Granted R(+)-lipoic acid's ability to increase the cell's responsiveness to insulin, you might expect that it would increase GLUT-4 levels. In fact, levels of GLUT-4 were not affected one way or the other by the R(+)-form. Instead, other studies have shown, R(+)-Lipoic Acid helps the cell to mobilize its glucose transporters, without affecting GLUT levels. These studies found that S(-)-lipoic acid either has no effect on, or actually interferes with, the cell's ability to mobilize GLUTs.

Other aspects of the response to insulin were also improved by R(+)-, but not S(-)-, lipoic acid, including a 33% restoration in the ability to burn glucose for fuel and a 26% increase in the formation of glycogen, the long-chain molecules used to store carbohydrates for quick use by the liver and muscles.

In short, when you take a racemic mixture of R(+)- and S(-)-enantiomers found in conventional "lipoic acid" supplements, R(+)-Lipoic Acid improves insulin resistance, while the S(-)-form actually makes it worse. The results that are seen in clinical trials using the racemate, then, are the net effects of combining the powerful benefits of R(+)-lipoic acid, with the sometimes weaker, and sometimes even harmful, effects of the S(-)-form.

R(+)-lipoic acid, in other words, is not just fighting against insulin resistance: it's fighting against the "evil twin" present in most commercial supplements. Getting rid of the "fifth column" in your supplement frees up the full potential of R(+)-lipoic acid, allowing its full strength to be unleashed in the battle to restore healthy sugar metabolism.


References:

Estrada DE, Ewart HS, Tsakiridis T, Volchuk A, Ramlal T, Tritschler H, Klip A. Stimulation of glucose uptake by the natural coenzyme alpha-lipoic acid/thioctic acid: participation of elements of the insulin signaling pathway. Diabetes. 1996 Dec;45(12):1798-804

Yaworsky K, Somwar R, Ramlal T, Tritschler HJ, Klip A. Engagement of the insulin-sensitive pathway in the stimulation of glucose transport by alpha-lipoic acid in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Diabetologia. 2000 Mar;43(3):294-303.

Streeper RS, Henriksen EJ, Jacob S, Hokama JY, Fogt DL, Tritschler HJ. Differential effects of lipoic acid stereoisomers on glucose metabolism in insulin-resistant skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol. 1997 Jul;273(1 Pt 1):E185-91.

Konrad T, Vicini P, Kusterer K, Hoflich A, Assadkhani A, Bohles HJ, Sewell A, Tritschler HJ, Cobelli C, Usadel KH. alpha-Lipoic acid treatment decreases serum lactate and pyruvate concentrations and improves glucose effectiveness in lean and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999 Feb;22(2):280-7.

Jacob S, Ruus P, Hermann R, Tritschler HJ, Maerker E, Renn W, Augustin HJ, Dietze GJ, Rett K. Oral administration of rac-alpha-lipoic acid modulates insulin sensitivity in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus: a placebo-controlled pilot trial. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999 Aug;27(3-4):309-14

Jacob S, Henriksen EJ, Schiemann AL, Simon I, Clancy DE, Tritschler HJ, Jung WI, Augustin HJ, Dietze GJ. Enhancement of glucose disposal in patients with type 2 diabetes by alpha-lipoicacid. Arzneimittelforschung. 1995 Aug;45(8):872-4.

Konrad D, Somwar R, Sweeney G, Yaworsky K, Hayashi M, Ramlal T, Klip A. The antihyperglycemic drug alpha-lipoic acid stimulates glucose uptake via both GLUT4 translocation and GLUT4 activation: potential role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in GLUT4 activation. Diabetes. 2001 Jun;50(6):1464-71

Loeblein K, Rett K, Maerker E, Tritschler HJ, Wessel K, Wicklmayr M, Haring HU. Thioctic acid stimulates translocation of glucose transports in hearts of insulin-resistant Zucker rats. Diabetologia. 1995 Aug; 38(1):A132(Abs512).
 
OMEGA said:



On a Side Note Tex your an Awsome Admin, and your site is great as well........

Thanks, but apparently I am not allowed to even put I am an admin at my site...I have to put xxx's in it or something....steroid-ology but without the '-'. Whatever.
 
I use the AF product. Have not noticed any "transformation" when using r-ala. But I also use it because of the antioxidant properties. Everything else is a plus.
 
Re: Animal calls R-ALA a scam!

OXANDRIN said:
It does NOT work in healthy muscle! this would be an incorrect assumption based on the findings




Effects of exercise training and antioxidant R-ALA on glucose transport in insulin-sensitive rat skeletal muscle
Vitoon Saengsirisuwan, Felipe R. Perez, Tyson R. Kinnick, and Erik J. Henriksen

Muscle Metabolism Laboratory, Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0093


ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have recently demonstrated (Saengsirisuwan V, Kinnick TR, Schmit MB, and Henriksen EJ, J Appl Physiol 91: 145-153, 2001) that exercise training (ET) and the antioxidant R-(+)--lipoic acid (R-ALA) interact in an additive fashion to improve insulin action in insulin-resistant obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats. The purpose of the present study was to assess the interactions of ET and R-ALA on insulin action and oxidative stress in a model of normal insulin sensitivity, the lean Zucker (fa/) rat. For 6 wk, animals either remained sedentary, received R-ALA (30 mg · kg body wt1 · day1), performed ET (treadmill running), or underwent both R-ALA treatment and ET. ET alone or in combination with R-ALA significantly increased (P < 0.05) peak oxygen consumption (28-31%) and maximum run time (52-63%). During an oral glucose tolerance test, ET alone or in combination with R-ALA resulted in a significant lowering of the glucose response (17-36%) at 15 min relative to R-ALA alone and of the insulin response (19-36%) at 15 min compared with sedentary controls. Insulin-mediated glucose transport activity was increased by ET alone in isolated epitrochlearis (30%) and soleus (50%) muscles, and this was associated with increased GLUT-4 protein levels. Insulin action was not improved by R-ALA alone, and ET-associated improvements in these variables were not further enhanced with combined ET and R-ALA. Although ET and R-ALA caused reductions in soleus protein carbonyls (an index of oxidative stress), these alterations were not significantly correlated with insulin-mediated soleus glucose transport. These results indicate that the beneficial interactive effects of ET and R-ALA on skeletal muscle insulin action observed previously in insulin-resistant obese Zucker rats are not apparent in insulin-sensitive lean Zucker rats.

glucose tolerance; GLUT-4 protein; oxidative stress; protein carbonyls; R-(+)--lipoic acid

INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

IT IS WELL ESTABLISHED that endurance exercise training leads to an enhancement of insulin-mediated glucose metabolism (see reviews in Refs. 11, 15, 16). In normal rodent models, moderate- or high-intensity exercise training can improve glucose tolerance (2, 20), whole body insulin sensitivity (21, 22), and insulin action on skeletal muscle glucose transport activity in rodent models (13, 30, 34). The increased insulin action on skeletal muscle glucose transport after exercise training is associated with increased GLUT-4 protein expression (7, 13, 25, 30, 31, 34) as well as with adaptive responses of enzymes involved in glucose phosphorylation and oxidation (15, 16).

-Lipoic acid (ALA) is a naturally occurring cofactor for several mitochondrial enzyme complexes that catalyze the oxidative decarboxylation of -keto acids, and, when administered exogenously, ALA can act as a potent water-soluble antioxidant (26). It has previously been shown that ALA can modulate glucose metabolism in insulin-sensitive cells and tissues (see Ref. 12 for a recent review). When administered in vitro, ALA increases glucose utilization in the rat diaphragm (10) and enhances glucose uptake by rat myocardium (33, 37), L6 myocytes (6, 24), and locomotor skeletal muscles from both insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant rats (14). In addition, we have demonstrated that parenteral administration of ALA to the obese Zucker ( fa/fa) rat, an animal model of obesity-associated insulin resistance, significantly improves glucose tolerance and insulin action on skeletal muscle glucose transport (19, 27, 31, 36) with a substantially lesser acute effect on insulin-sensitive rats (19).

We have recently demonstrated in the obese Zucker rat a significant interaction between exercise training and chronic ALA administration on maximal run time to exhaustion and on insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity in skeletal muscle (31). However, the potential interactions between these two interventions have not yet been investigated in an animal model of normal insulin sensitivity. In this context, the purpose of the present investigation was to test the hypothesis that exercise training and chronic treatment with the R-(+)-enantiomer of ALA (R-ALA), in combination, could improve insulin-stimulated glucose transport in skeletal muscle of lean Zucker ( fa/) rats to a greater extent than either intervention used individually. Additionally, we wished to further investigate the potential relationship between insulin-stimulated glucose transport and oxidative stress (as reflected in protein carbonyl level) in normal skeletal muscle. Lean Zucker rats underwent 6 wk of exercise training and 6 wk of parenteral administration of R-ALA, individually and in combination. Subsequently, peak aerobic capacity (peak O2 consumption; O2 peak), maximal run time to exhaustion, oral glucose tolerance, insulin-stimulated muscle glucose transport, muscle GLUT-4 protein level, tissue protein carbonyl level (a marker of oxidative stress) (5, 2, and the activities of enzymes involved in glucose phosphorylation (total hexokinase activity) and glucose oxidation (citrate synthase activity) were determined. The investigation of these potential interactions in normal muscle is important in determining whether the beneficial metabolic interactions between these interventions, which we have established in the insulin-resistant obese Zucker rat, are applicable to conditions of normal insulin action.

METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Animals and treatments. Female lean Zucker (fa/) rats (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) were received at 5-6 wk of age and weighed 130-140 g. Animals were housed in a temperature-controlled room (20-22°C) at the Central Animal Facility of the University of Arizona. A reversed 12:12-h light-dark cycle (lights on 1900-0700) was maintained so that training occurred during the dark cycle when the rats are most active. Animals had free access to water and chow (Harlan Teklad Rodent Diet, Madison, WI). This chow does not contain any lipoic acid but does contain 90.2 IU/kg of vitamin E, an antioxidant. However, the amount of vitamin E consumed from the diet would be very small (~1 IU per rat per day), and it is unlikely that this dietary source of antioxidants affected the results of this study. All procedures were approved by the University of Arizona Animal Use and Care Committee.
Lean animals were treated exactly as in our previous study with obese Zucker rats (31). Lean Zucker rats were randomly assigned to one of four groups: 1) a group that remained sedentary and was vehicle treated, 2) an R-ALA-treated group, 3) an exercise-trained group, or 4) a combined R-ALA-treated and exercise-trained group. Animals in the R-ALA-treated groups received 30 mg/kg body wt of purified R-ALA (ASTA Medica, Frankfurt, Germany) dissolved in 120 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) by intraperitoneal injection (a maximally effective dose in obese Zucker rats; Ref. 36) every evening for 6 wk, whereas sedentary control animals received 8.3 ml/kg body wt of 120 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4). Animals in the exercise-trained groups ran in the morning on a 10-lane motor-driven rodent treadmill for 6 wk at 4% grade. During the first 3 wk of training, animals ran 7 days/wk, and the training protocol was quickly increased to 60 min/day, continuously rotating through the following 15-min cycles: 24 m/min for 10 min, 26 m/min for 3 min, and 28 m/min for 2 min. Over the final 3 wk of training, animals ran 75 min/day, 5 days/wk by using these same 15-min cycles. The combined treatment animals performed the treadmill-training protocol exactly as described above, while also receiving daily treatments with R-ALA.

Oral glucose tolerance tests. After 6 wk of treatment, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed on each animal. At 6 PM of the evening before the test, rats were restricted to 4 g of chow. Between 8 and 9 AM on the day of the OGTT, ~15 h after the last R-ALA treatment and/or 24 h after the last exercise bout, rats were administered a 1 g/kg body wt glucose load by gavage. this test does not test the effect of r-ala, but rather its extended effects- (effects where actual stimulus, in this case r-ala, is not present) in a lean animal after 15hrs plasma levels will have dropped to baseline- in an obese animal levels will remain higher due to its lipid solubility which is partly the reason for difference in the findings between lean and obese (though only partly)

Blood was drawn from a cut at the tip of the tail at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after the glucose feeding, thoroughly mixed with EDTA (18 mM final concentration), and centrifuged at 13,000 g to separate the plasma. Plasma was stored at 80°C and subsequently assayed for glucose (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO), insulin (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO), and free fatty acids (Wako, Richmond, VA). Immediately after completion of the OGTT, each animal was given 2 ml of sterile 0.9% saline subcutaneously to compensate for plasma loss, and animals in the exercise-training groups were run for 30 min.

O2 peak. O2 peak was assessed in each animal during a treadmill test 48 h after the OGTT by using the method of Bedford et al. (1). Sedentary animals were familiarized with treadmill running by running for periods of 5-10 min three times per week in the 2 wk leading to the measurement of O2 peak. No exercise was performed on the day before O2 peak tests. However, R-ALA was given to the R-ALA and the combined exercise-trained and R-ALA -treated groups on this day. Once again, r-ala was not given to these animals on the day of the test
Animals ran on a motorized treadmill in an airtight Plexiglas chamber. Grade and speed of the treadmill were increased every 3 min from a basal level of 0% grade and 13.4 m/min through the following stages: 16.1 m/min at 5%, 21.4 m/min at 10%, 26.8 m/min at 10%, 32.2 m/min at 12%, 32.2 m/min at 15%, 32.2 m/min at 18%, and 32.2 m/min at 21%. The test was terminated when the rats were unable to keep pace with the treadmill belt. O2 (Ametek S-3A1, Applied Electrochemistry, Pittsburgh, PA) and CO2 (Ametek CD-3A) were measured in expired gases every 3 min for the determination of O2 uptake (ml O2 · kg body wt1 · min1). Exercise training and R-ALA treatments were resumed the day after O2 peak assessment. what this really tests is whether r-ala, in lean animals initiates after use changes. it does not test the direct effect of r-ala. as above all testing was done in the absence of r-ala



Glucose transport activity in skeletal muscle. Approximately 72 h after the O2 peak test, 24 h after the final exercise bout, and 15 h after the final R-ALA treatment, animals were weighed and deeply anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg body wt). Determination of muscle glucose transport activity was initiated at 8 AM after an overnight food restriction as described in Oral glucose tolerance tests. One soleus and both epitrochlearis muscles were dissected and prepared for in vitro incubation. Whereas the epitrochlearis muscles were incubated intact, the soleus muscle was prepared in two strips (~25 mg) and incubated. Muscles were incubated in the unmounted state. Each muscle was incubated for 1 h at 37°C in 3 ml of oxygenated (95% O2-5% CO2) Krebs-Henseleit buffer (KHB) supplemented with 8 mM glucose, 32 mM mannitol, and 0.1% BSA (radioimmunoassay grade, Sigma Chemical). One epitrochlearis muscle and one soleus strip were incubated in the absence of insulin, and the contralateral epitrochlearis muscle and second soleus strip were incubated in the presence of a maximally effective concentration of insulin (2 mU/ml; Humulin R, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN).
After this initial incubation period, the muscles were rinsed for 10 min at 37°C in 3 ml of oxygenated KHB containing 40 mM mannitol, 0.1% BSA, and insulin, if previously present. Thereafter, the muscles were transferred to 2 ml of KHB, containing 1 mM 2-[1,2-3H]deoxyglucose (2-DG; 300 mCi/mmol; Sigma Chemical), 39 mM [U-14C]mannitol (0.8 mCi/mmol; ICN Radiochemicals, Irvine, CA), 0.1% BSA, and insulin, if previously present. At the end of this final 20-min incubation period at 37°C, the muscles were removed, trimmed of excess fat and connective tissue, quickly frozen, and weighed. Epitrochlearis muscles were divided into two pieces, which were individually reweighed. One piece from each epitrochlearis muscle and the entire soleus strip were dissolved in 0.5 ml of 0.5 N NaOH. After the muscles were completely solubilized, 5 ml of scintillation cocktail were added, and the specific intracellular accumulation of 2-DG was determined as described previously (13) by using mannitol to correct for the extracellular accumulation of 2-DG. Glucose transport activity was measured as the intracellular accumulation of 2-DG (in pmol · mg muscle wet wt1 · 20 min1). once again, no r-ala



Biochemical assays. The remaining two pieces of epitrochlearis were pooled, reweighed, and homogenized in 40 volumes of ice-cold 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) containing 1 mM EDTA and 250 mM sucrose. These homogenates were used for determination of total protein content by using the bicinchoninic acid method (Sigma Chemical), GLUT-4 protein level (31), total hexokinase activity (3, and citrate synthase activity (35). In addition, the contralateral soleus and plantaris muscles, liver, and heart were removed, trimmed of fat and connective tissue, quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and used for subsequent determination of these same variables as well as for the measurement of protein carbonyl levels by using the method of Reznick and Packer (2. Briefly, pieces of frozen tissue (50-90 mg) were gently homogenized in 1.5 ml of a 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1% digitonin, 1 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitors (40 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 7 µg/ml pepstatin, and 5 µg/ml aprotinin). If needed, nucleic acids were removed with 1% streptomycin sulfate, and extracted soluble proteins were then reacted with 10 mM 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) in 2.5 M HCl for 1 h at room temperature. Proteins were precipitated with 10% TCA, and protein pellets were washed with ethanol/ethyl acetate (1:1) (vol/vol) to remove free DNPH and lipid contaminants. Final precipitates were dissolved in 6 M guanidine HCl and incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The carbonyl contents of these samples were then assessed by using a spectrophotometric assay at 370 nm and an absorption coefficient of 22,000 M1 · cm1 (2. Protein content of the final samples was quantified by reading the absorbance at 280 nm with the use of a BSA standard curve. These protein contents were typically in the range of 0.3-0.5 mg. In our hands, this assay had a coefficient of variance of 11%.

Statistical analysis. All values are expressed as means ± SE. The significance of differences among the four experimental groups was assessed by a factorial ANOVA with a post hoc Fisher's protected least-significant difference test, and relationships between two variables were assessed by linear regression analysis (StatView version 5.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). A level of P < 0.05 was set for statistical significance.

RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Body weights, muscle weights, and O2 peak. The R-ALA-treated and the combined treatment groups had slightly lower (8-9%, P < 0.05) final body weights compared with either the sedentary or the exercise-trained groups due to significantly lower average rates of body weight gain over the experimental period (18-23%, Table 1). Wet weights of the whole soleus, plantaris, heart, and heart wet weight-to-body weight ratio were not different among the various groups (data not shown).

what this says is that the r-ala and the exercise + r-ala groups were LEANER by 8-9%




View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Effects of exercise training and chronic R-ALA treatment on body weight, O2peak, maximum run time to fatigue, and plasma glucose, insulin, and free fatty acids

Animals in both the exercise-training and the combination groups had significantly higher peak aerobic capacities compared with the sedentary control (31 and 29%, respectively) or the R-ALA-treated group (27 and 24%, respectively) (Table 1). In addition, exercise training alone or in combination with R-ALA treatment caused significantly longer maximum run times than those of the sedentary control (52 and 63%, respectively) or the R-ALA-treated group (54 and 65%, respectively) (Table 1).

what this say is that r-ala treatment alone may increase aerobic capacity, though r-ala without exercise may slightly decrease maximum run times

on the other hand r-ala plus exercise (as compared to just exercise may mean slightly less aerobic capacity 2% and slightly longer run times (10%)

this data is inclusive

hard to say and as above the testing occured in the absence of r-ala




Plasma glucose, insulin, and free fatty acids. There were no differences in plasma glucose among the various groups after the overnight food restriction (Table 1). R-ALA treatment had no effect on plasma levels of insulin once again testing done not in the presence of r-ala , whereas exercise training induced significant decreases in plasma insulin (23-33%) and free fatty acids (62-136%) compared with all other groups.what this means is that exericise gives you longer insulin sensitizing effects- at least 24hrs after exercise- it really does not evaulate the direct effects of r-lipoic on these values In contrast, R-ALA treatment resulted in the highest level of circulating free fatty acids, an effect that was prevented by exercise training of R-ALA-treated animals.

OGTT responses. Glucose and insulin responses during the OGTT in the experimental groups are displayed in Fig. 1. Compared with the sedentary control group, R-ALA treatment alone had no effect on plasma glucose or insulin at any time point during the test. At the 15-min time point, exercise training alone or in combination with R-ALA treatment significantly lowered the glucose response (17 and 36%, respectively) compared with the R-ALA treatment and induced significant reduction of the insulin response (36 and 19%, respectively) relative to the sedentary control.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 1. Responses of glucose (top) and insulin (bottom) during an oral glucose tolerance test in lean Zucker rats that remained sedentary (), received chronic treatment with R-(+)--lipoic acid (R-ALA; ), underwent exercise training (), or received chronic treatment with R-ALA combined with exercise training (). Values are means ± SE for 6-9 animals/group. aP < 0.05 vs. sedentary group. bP < 0.05 vs. R-ALA-treated group.

Whereas there were no significant differences among groups for the glucose area under the curve (AUC), exercise training alone was associated with a significantly lower insulin AUC compared with the sedentary group (Fig. 2). The glucose-insulin index, defined as the product of the glucose and insulin AUCs, is an indirect index of in vivo peripheral insulin action (4). R-ALA treatment in the lean animals led to a trend toward a higher glucose-insulin index compared with sedentary control (Fig. 2). This response toward a worsening of whole body insulin sensitivity was prevented by exercise training of the R-ALA-treated animals.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 2. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for glucose (mg · dl1 · min1; A) and insulin (µU · ml1 · min1; B) during an oral glucose tolerance test and the glucose-insulin index (mg · dl1 · min1 × µU · ml1 · min1 × 106; C) in lean Zucker rats after the 6-wk interventions. Data for AUCs were taken from Fig. 1. Values are means ± SE of 6-9 animals/group. Sed, sedentary control group; ALA, R-ALA-treated group; Exer, exercise-trained group; Combo, combined treatment group. aP < 0.05 vs. R-ALA-treated group.

Muscle glucose transport. To examine whether the interventions altered the skeletal muscle glucose transport system, basal and insulin-stimulated 2-DG uptake in isolated epitrochlearis and soleus muscles was determined (Fig. 2). Basal 2-DG uptake in either muscle was not different among experimental groups. In the epitrochlearis, the rate of insulin-stimulated 2-DG uptake (Fig. 3A) was enhanced by exercise training alone (16%) and by exercise training in combination with R-ALA treatment (17%) compared with the sedentary control group. In the soleus muscle (Fig. 3B), exercise training alone significantly increased the insulin-stimulated rate of 2-DG uptake (28% vs. sedentary and 29% vs. R-ALA). These significant increases relative to the sedentary and R-ALA groups were maintained in the combined treatment group.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 3. In vitro rates of 2-deoxyglucose uptake in the epitrochlearis (A) and soleus (B) muscles in the absence (black bars) or presence (open bars) of insulin (2 mU/ml) in lean Zucker rats after the treatments. Values are means ± SE of 6-9 animals/group. aP < 0.05 vs. Sed group. bP < 0.05 vs. R-ALA-treated group.

GLUT-4 protein and enzyme responses. Total protein concentrations for a given muscle type did not differ significantly among the various groups (data not shown). Total GLUT-4 protein level (Fig. 4) and the activities of total hexokinase (Fig. 5) and citrate synthase (Fig. 6) enzymes were determined in the epitrochlearis, soleus, plantaris, and heart. No increases in GLUT-4 protein level were observed in either muscle type after chronic treatment with R-ALA. Exercise training, alone or in combination with R-ALA treatment, caused significant increases in the GLUT-4 protein level in the epitrochlearis (21 and 18%, respectively, vs. sedentary control and 15 and 12%, respectively, vs. R-ALA-treated animals), soleus (21 and 31%, respectively, vs. sedentary control and 15 and 25%, respectively, vs. R-ALA-treated animals), plantaris (14 and 16%, respectively, vs. sedentary control and 16 and 18%, respectively vs. R-ALA-treated animals), and heart (22 and 19%, respectively, vs. sedentary control).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 4. Effects of chronic treatment with R-ALA, Exer, or Combo on whole muscle level of GLUT-4 protein in the epitrochlearis, soleus, plantaris, and heart. Values are means ± SE of 6-9 animals/group. aP < 0.05 vs. Sed. bP < 0.05 vs. R-ALA-treated group.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 5. Effects of chronic treatment with R-ALA, Exer, or Combo on total hexokinase activities of the epitochlearis (Epi), soleus, plantaris, and heart. Values are means ± SE of 6-9 animals/group. aP < 0.05 vs. Sed. bP < 0.05 vs. R-ALA-treated group.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 6. Effects of chronic treatment with R-ALA, Exer, or Combo on citrate synthase activities of the epitochlearis, soleus, plantaris, and heart. Values are means ± SE of 6-9 animals/group. aP < 0.05 vs. Sed. bP < 0.05 vs. R-ALA-treated group.

Total hexokinase activity was increased by R-ALA treatment alone or exercise training alone (69 and 75%, respectively) in the epitrochlearis with no further significant increase when these two interventions were combined. This parameter was markedly enhanced by 186% in the soleus muscle from the combination treatment group. In the plantaris, exercise training alone brought about significant increases in hexokinase activity compared with the sedentary or the R-ALA-treated groups (53 and 85%, respectively), whereas no significant alterations between groups were observed in the heart. Citrate synthase activity in epitrochlearis was increased (31-48%) after either R-ALA treatment alone, exercise training alone, or in the combination treatment group. Exercise training, alone or in combination with R-ALA treatment, resulted in significant increases (59%) in this variable in the soleus muscle. The combination treatment enhanced citrate synthase activity in the plantaris by 37% compared with the sedentary or the R-ALA-treated groups, whereas only exercise training alone increased citrate synthase activity in the heart (29%) relative to the sedentary control group.

Protein carbonyls. The effect of the antioxidant R-ALA and exercise training interventions on tissue protein carbonyls, a marker of oxidative stress (5, 2, was examined. R-ALA treatment, alone or in combination with exercise training, resulted in significant decreases (91-108%) in protein carbonyl levels in the liver. Protein carbonyl levels in the soleus after exercise training alone or in combination with R-ALA treatment were significantly lower (49-59%) compared with the sedentary group. In the plantaris muscle, exercise training alone or R-ALA treatment alone lowered protein carbonyl levels by 47% and 74%, respectively, relative to the sedentary group. No changes in this parameter were observed in the heart muscle after either intervention. The correlation between protein carbonyl level and insulin-mediated 2-DG uptake in the soleus muscle from the various experimental groups was assessed. No significant correlation was observed (P = 0.1025). In addition, no significant correlation was observed in the soleus between protein carbonyl level and citrate synthase activity (P = 0.9212) (data not shown).

DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Our laboratory has recently reported (31) that, in the markedly insulin-resistant, hyperinsulinemic, and dyslipidemic obese Zucker rat, endurance exercise training and the antioxidant R-ALA interact in an additive fashion to improve skeletal muscle glucose transport.this would be a correct finding, these animals would have both elevated and extended r-ala levels due to higher adipose uptake (r-ala is lipid soluble)- with the fast more would be released. Also these animals would see a greater extended benefit due to the impact of having a "r-ala restored system" prior to testing- basically the time of treatment restored them to a more normal state, because it was extended the time for regression would be longer. likely in the groups more direct testing would show even greater improvements (with high plasma r-ala) than they found- which is quite significant

In contrast to these findings, we have demonstrated in the present investigation that the combination of endurance exercise training and R-ALA treatment in the insulin-sensitive lean Zucker rat does not result in a further improvement of insulin-stimulated glucose transport in skeletal muscle compared with the effects of exercise training alone (Fig. 3). Moreover, we have shown that chronic treatment of normal rats with R-ALA alone does not improve insulin action on whole body glucose disposal (Figs. 1 and 2) and skeletal muscle glucose transport (Fig. 3), unlike the beneficial modulation of glucose metabolism in insulin-resistant rodents (19, 27, 31, 36) and humans (17, 18, 23) associated with chronic administration of ALA. It appears, therefore, that the ability of ALA to enhance insulin action on glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle is restricted to conditions of insulin resistance. see above, for the flaw(s) in this logic. More accurate would have been to indicate that the impact of exercise has extended effects in the lean insulin sensitive model, whereas r-ala does not. though with cessation of exercise as has been seen in human models, there is regression as well

The level of carbonyl formation in proteins is an indicator of oxidative damage in tissues (5) and reflects the degree of long-term oxidative stress (2. We have demonstrated in the present investigation that the levels of protein carbonyls in the soleus, plantaris, myocardium, and liver of the insulin-sensitive lean Zucker rats (Fig. 7) were 31-60% less (P < 0.05) than those levels measured in the same tissues of insulin-resistant obese Zucker rats (31). In this previous investigation (31), our laboratory showed that reductions in soleus muscle protein carbonyl levels after endurance exercise training or chronic administration of R-ALA were significantly correlated with improvements in insulin-mediated glucose transport activity, supporting a role of oxidative stress in the etiology of muscle insulin resistance. However, this relationship between oxidative stress and insulin action is obviously not a simple one, as reductions in the level of protein carbonyls in the soleus muscle of the exercise-trained or R-ALA-treated lean Zucker rats were not significantly correlated with any significant enhancement of insulin-mediated glucose transport activity (Fig. . Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that reductions of already elevated protein carbonyl levels (such as those in tissues of the obese Zucker rat), elicited by either exercise training or R-ALA interventions, can be associated with enhancements of insulin action on skeletal muscle glucose transport. However, further decreases in these protein carbonyl levels below a given threshold value (e.g., the levels in muscle from the lean Zucker rat) do not result in an enhancement of insulin action.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 7. Effects of chronic treatment with R-ALA, Exer, or Combo on protein carbonyl levels in the liver, soleus, plantaris, and heart. Values are means ± SE of 6-9 animals/group. aP < 0.05 vs. Sed. bP < 0.05 vs. Exer.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Fig. 8. Simple linear regression analysis of the relationship between insulin-mediated glucose transport activity and protein carbonyl level in the soleus muscle of lean Zucker rats subjected to the various interventions. Insulin-mediated glucose transport is defined as the net increase in 2-deoxyglucose uptake above basal due to insulin (using data from Fig. 3). Regression equation: y = 0.004x + 2.302, r = 0.321, P = 0.1025.

An important observation in the present study is that chronic treatment of lean animals with R-ALA was associated with a significantly reduced rate of body weight gain (Table 1). As lean mass was apparently not affected (muscle wet weights were not different between sedentary and R-ALA-treated animals), the difference in body mass was likely due to a difference in fat mass. right findings, though the reasoning below is likely just part, the insulin issue needs to be evaluated in lean insulin sensitive animals in the PRESENCE of r-ala
It has previously been noted that, in older rats, chronic treatment with R-ALA leads to increases in ambulatory activity and hepatocellular oxygen consumption (, and we have also found increases in metabolic enzyme activities (hexokinase and citrate synthase; Figs. 5 and 6) in skeletal muscle of the R-ALA-treated animals. The possibility exists that chronic R-ALA treatment can increase the expression of specific genes involved in metabolism, allowing for an increase in metabolic and ambulatory activity and ultimately leading to a reduced body weight gain.

The alterations in plasma FFAs that resulted from the interventions in the lean animals are noteworthy (Table 1), as FFAs are known to negatively modify whole body and skeletal muscle glucose disposal (3). Whereas chronic R-ALA treatment of dyslipidemic, obese Zucker rats elicits decreases in plasma FFAs (31, 36), chronic treatment of lean animals with R-ALA brought about an unexpected and significant increase in plasma FFAs (Table 1), an effect that was significantly reduced by concomitant exercise training. This elevation in plasma FFAs after ALA treatment has previously been reported in normal chickens (9) and may result from the ability of ALA to bind to albumin and displace fatty acids (32). Moreover, the elevated FFAs may help to explain the slight worsening of whole body insulin sensitivity after R-ALA treatment (Fig. 2). In support of this concept, in the group of lean animals receiving R-ALA treatment and exercise training in combination, the reduction in plasma FFAs relative to the R-ALA-treated group was accompanied by a relative enhancement of whole body insulin sensitivity.

We have again confirmed numerous previous investigations demonstrating that endurance exercise training enhances insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity in skeletal muscle (reviewed in Refs. 15, 16). These improvements in insulin action were associated with increased total GLUT-4 protein level (Fig. 4) and with increased activities of enzymes involved in glucose phosphorylation (hexokinase; Fig. 5) and glucose oxidation (citrate synthase; Fig. 6), in agreement with previous studies (15, 16).

In summary, we have provided new evidence that, in contrast to the insulin-resistant obese Zucker rat (31), chronic administration of the water-soluble antioxidant R-ALA to the insulin-sensitive lean Zucker rat does not enhance insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity in skeletal muscle.what this should read is that there is no extended enhancement- testing was done 15hrs from last dose Moreover, again in contrast to our findings with the obese Zucker rat (31), we could find no evidence that the combination treatment of lean Zucker rats with exercise training and R-ALA could beneficially modify either maximal running performance or skeletal muscle glucose transport activity relative to endurance exercise training alone. methodology was wrong for this, as above, basically r-ala treatment the day before exercise does not have these impacts
Taken together, these results indicate that the positive interaction between endurance exercise training and antioxidant treatment with R-ALA for skeletal muscle insulin action is restricted to conditions of insulin resistance and is not seen in insulin-sensitive muscle.

basically this study FULLY supports r-ala for FAT LOSS.
with respect to muscle insulin sensitivity and performance the findings are somewhat inconclusive with respect to the manner in which its used. what it does indicate is that r-ala effects are not as extended in lean insulin sensitive animals. This is for 2 reasons:
1. they are leaner, so they have less lipid stores for r-ala
2. their system is already good, so the systemic impact is not marked like it is in obese insulin insensitive models.


what this study does indicates is that cardio exercise is good for your insulin sensitivity- so while r-ala is part of the picture- using r-ala with cardio and lifting are essential for making more permanent changes.
 
ProtienFiend said:
I am somewhat lean, but I am insulin resistant... Where does that put me in terms of R-ala's effectiveness?

effective-


lean insulin resistant individuals and animals get the same benefits as obese insulin resistant individuals and animals.

impact of fat loss may be different, its hard to say, without more specific parameters of condition, source, current diet (ie if thats why your lean), etc.
 
Bran987 said:


I'd love to hear macro and ulter respond to this research.. who cares whether Animal posted it or not. I was just 'bout to order a bottle for my mom.

I also had a question about Trex and Lrex. One is stimulatory and the other is not, but they are both fat burners. So if you can handle the stimulatory one (Trex), why buy both?? I can't find an answer.


see above

your mom will probably see better results than you, age is a big factor in the decrease in insulin sensitivity. one that get EVERYONE.

why buy both... because the effects are additive, some would say synergystic.... and mechanistically they are quite different.
 
You mentioned R-ALA could possibly actually burn carbs when too many were eaten, what's the mechanism behind this? (Assuming incresed activity of mitochondria but I'm a nerd and this is interesting).
 
One supp that I NEVER run out of is r-ALA. I buy boxes of the stuff because YES, it REALLY DOES WORK. I'm older now (in my 30's) and my metabolism is just not what it was in my teens and 20's - I think my insulin resistance changed with age (but who the hell knows, I'm no doc :) ) and r-ALA helps me to get my metabolism back to my teens and 20's. For all the doubters - just try it. I take 2~3 caps before EVERY meal and notice results in a week or so.
 
Top Bottom