CELL TECH v.s. TRAK.. (creatine)??

[Jamesquadz]

I have been taking cell tech for precisely 45 days now .. and it is actually good for a non roid product .. THere is a new product by GNC called TRAK .. it is supposed to be better than CELL TECH .. I may switch over .. ANyone take trak yet ?? Help me out here fellaz .. lata

 

[jstrong20]

I prefer regular creatine washed down with some grape fruit juice. I don't think it's worth the money to pay for sugar which is basically in cell-tech.

 

[Mike P.T.]

I prefer regular creatine washed down with some grape fruit juice. I don't think it's worth the money to pay for sugar which is basically in cell-tech.

i see your point bro if money is an issue but to get the most out of your creatine, they say grapefruit juice isnt the best. im sure u still get good results but the best results are when creatine is taken with a high glycemic carb. such as the 75gram dextrose thats in the cell tech serving. taken first thing in the morning or immediately after a workout it will induce the highest insulin spike. the insulin helping to shuttle the creatine and the carbs in the desired area, muscle tissue.

 

[Rémy!]

Anything is better than cell tech.

Micronized creatine w/ a 50:50g MRP will potentiate a insulin spike eqiv of 96 g of dextrose.

 

[HighIntensity]

CEll Tech works period, you can hate on it but resultes don't lie

 

[augastes_stiranko]

Cell-tech is the only creatine that has worked for me. The other ones only give me water retention and a mild pump with little strength gains. But with cell-tech the pump and strength gains were amazing. It might have wokred for me because I have a very fast metabolism because it does not work that well for most people I know. I think cell-tech works best if you have a fast metabolism.

 

[s-mac]

I have used cell tech and got great results. I haven't tries trac, but ive talked to people who have, and they say it works just as good as cell tech, but it doesn't give you the 75g of sugar.