California Senate Votes For Same-Sex Marriage

[Tiervexx]

More statist horseshit.

If a group of individuals choose to get married it is their absolute right to do so.

If a third party (by third party I mean one not involved in the action) decides to get in the way than they are guilty of aggression. Whether that third party is a government agent such as a judge, or legislator, or a crazy hillbilly with a gun is absolutely meaningless.

It amazes me that political "science" takes it for granted that Government must be different than just any gung of thugs that would choose to regulate an control people, because any sense of consistent logic rips that apart in a hurry.

 

[Ish]

Curling, the problem with that is, there is more than one religion. I'm sure you have heard about a couple of them. What if the book you read isn't the one about the real god? Then is it alright to just follow his rules, according to your false book?

I disagree. If God made everything, why shouldn't He get to make the rules? And He did make rules btw because since He is alll knowing He knows what is best for His creation.

 

[curling]

False, what makes someone happy is entirly subjective. Only I can know what is best for me and I don't know anything more about what is best for you than what you could for me.

Whether this god of yours is just a really smart guy, or "all knowing" does not make him any more qualified to say what really is a better way for someone to live their life.

Well, if He is all knowing then He would know what was best for you regardless if it made you happy or not. I am sure herion addicts think they are happy right after they shoot up too.

I'll take it a step further, I'd bet my soul that if god exists that he/she/it is smart enough to understand this.

Don't bet your soul you might not play the fiddle as good as the devil does.

 

[75th]

More statist horseshit.

If a group of individuals choose to get married it is their absolute right to do so.

If a third party (by third party I mean one not involved in the action) decides to get in the way than they are guilty of aggression. Whether that third party is a government agent such as a judge, or llegislator, or a crazy hillbilly with a gun is absolutly meaningless.

Sorry, you misunderstood my point. Im glad since the very idea of homosexual unions did not have to be dragged through the Supreme Court mud.

 

[stilleto]

I disagree. If God made everything, why shouldn't He get to make the rules? And He did make rules btw because since He is alll knowing He knows what is best for His creation.

but "he" doesn't make the rules. people do. you can be judged by him at the END of your life, but right now, the court system judges it and the government makes the rules.
unfortunately for you, you shouldn't be the one to decide who can marry whom.

 

[75th]

As of 7 pages, the only one who even attempted to make some sort of valid argument is Curling, which is pretty sad, considering he is forgetting the 1 cardinal rule of this thread: discounting wacko religious beliefs, why should two men or two females not be allowed to form a legal union?

 

[curling]

but "he" doesn't make the rules. people do. you can be judged by him at the END of your life, but right now, the court system judges it and the government makes the rules.
unfortunately for you, you shouldn't be the one to decide who can marry whom.

But you see it what rules we make does effect me and my family and everybody for that matter. Because God will get upset with people that go against his rules and after seeing what happen to New Orleans I don't want God angry at this nation do you?

75ish thanks and I did break the rules of the thread because they were silly rules to begin with. You can't take God out of the equation because He is in it like it or not.

 

[75th]

75ish thanks and I did break the rules of the thread because they were silly rules to begin with. You can't take God out of the equation because He is in it like it or not.

Says you. God should have no say on what decisions we make regarding laws of the land.

 

[curling]

Says you. God should have no say on what decisions we make regarding laws of the land.

Really? And why is that?

 

[75th]

Really? And why is that?

Because he doesnt exist. And even if he did, not everybody wants to follow some rules written in a book by a bunch of homeless guys about 2,000 years ago,