Biden "Fully Undersands" China's One Child Policy

[mrplunkey]

Barry really shouldn't let him off the estate. But he is good for entertainment value.

"What we ended up doing is setting up a system whereby we did cut by $1.2 trillion upfront, the deficit over the next 10 years. And we set up a group of senators that have to come up with another $1.2 to $1.7 trillion in savings or automatically there will be cuts that go into effect in January to get those savings. So the savings will be accomplished. But as I was talking to some of your leaders, you share a similar concern here in China. You have no safety net. Your policy has been one which I fully understand -- I'm not second-guessing -- of one child per family. The result being that you're in a position where one wage earner will be taking care of four retired people. Not sustainable."

 

[-SD-]

*understands

 

[cindylou]

lol @ understanding something that is thoroughly immoral

 

[mrplunkey]

lol @ understanding something that is thoroughly immoral

I wonder if it's too late to get it added to BarryCare???

 

[nimbus]

lol it's actually super sustainable after a couple generations get screwed after retirement and then die off

 

[PICK3]

there is no mechanism for getting rid of a vice president who can’t function

Cheney: My book will have ?heads exploding? in D.C. - books - TODAY.com

 

[ledhead]

lol @ understanding something that is thoroughly immoral

How do figure it's immoral? It might quite be possibly moral considering they can barely feed all their people now.

 

[cindylou]

How do figure it's immoral? It might quite be possibly moral considering they can barely feed all their people now.

IMO any govt attempt to control how many children you may or may not have is immoral. It is worse than govt trying to control your ability to not have children. You can't exactly hide children from the state.

 

[DaBangEm]

IMO any govt attempt to control how many children you may or may not have is immoral. It is worse than govt trying to control your ability to not have children. You can't exactly hide children from the state.

Me an Cindy agree! That and it looks like TruBlood as well.

It's ridiculous in the whole frame. If you have one child and it sustains one person. Then having another sustains another and so on. The whole preponderance is absurd. Unless it's a nation full of rehtards.

 

[ledhead]

IMO any govt attempt to control how many children you may or may not have is immoral. It is worse than govt trying to control your ability to not have children. You can't exactly hide children from the state.

Does that create dissidence? I don't understand how it's immoral to prevent people from living a lifetime of misery??? People in the US don't want to hide children from the state because they get a free ride.Ya know?