he's actually not inconsistent as the pseudo libertarian that he really is. He claims libertarianism solely because it's more socially acceptable with the younger crowds these days than saying I'm staunch arch conservative that laments the passing of the days when these uppity feministas could be put in a pot of boiling water. Or that these colored boys can make eye contact with a white woman and not find themselves being measured for rope slack. But rest assured when the clutch of socio's have their annual meetings all that repressed tension stampedes right past the pressure valve. Than you'd hear who he is.