I just wondered if there was an equivalency point.
As a 45 y/o male, I'd probably see benefits from even 125 mg/week of test. I believe SARMS isn't androgenic, but in terms of anabolics/fat loss I thought there's be an AAS cycle equivalent.
If there isn't, I'll just experiment a little and see if I can build a basis for comparison.
Bro they are very effective and they more than serve their purpose but THEY ARE NOT AAS... I dont know how else to explain it... I explained how to use them... If you want me to compare them in terms of what they would "act as" in comparison then i guess osta would be more like tbol in terms of lean size and strength with little to no water but more size that is very clean... S4 would act like winnie as a hardener and polisher... Gw is completely different as it has multiple uses... It has endurance benefit, weight loss benefit but is also anti catabolic so you can cut with it but retain muscle if you use it in conjunction with others accordingly... I cant explain it any better than this... If you can't get it from this then it may not be for you but they most definitely are very effective... You also feel fucking wonderful on them...