Synpax said:As sick as it may seem, I think the principal purpotraters of this aren't medal-hungry women from the West but statist regimes - historically and maybe today.
These regimes don't think twice about killing millions. Witness the 2 million people the N. Korean regime starved to death in 1998.
You know how medal hungry these sicko dictators are. In western states, achieving a medal is cool for a nation but the respect goes to the individual athlete. In the dictatorships, the medal is a prestige device for the reigning thugs and helps them preserve power.
So you think these guys would think twice about doing this to their athletes if they thought it would help?
I imagine the effect would be similar to EPO - an easy way to find out would be to determine if pregnant women's hemocrit range is higher than the normal range. Or if post-abortive women's hemocrit level got a boost.
A hormone difference? MAybe the sex of the unborn child would be relevant - more test if it's a boy?
So basically the "athletic" benefit acheived is an increase in RBC count (and sheer bllod volume)?
Seems like an AWFULLY high price for an athlete to pay, but as you pointed out the dictator is the one pulling the strings...That is just a REALLY sad thing if that is true

