Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Ozcanium Analytics - Aus local HPLC LC-MS/MS Purity Assay and Identification

O

Ozcanium Analytics

Member
Hello All,

Its Ibrahim from Ozcanium Analytics here.

We’re an Australian analytical lab which specialise in testing for oils, tablets/caps, peptides and blends based in Sydney. I thought it was worth making a quick intro here because a lot of the Aussie community already gets products tested, but most of it still gets sent overseas, and people seem to have lots of logistics problems.

Nothing against Janoshik, they’ve clearly done a lot for this space and people trust their reports. The main issue for Australians is the obvious one: sending samples overseas is slow, annoying, and sometimes the samples simply don’t make it. We’re trying to give the local market a proper Australian option.

We routinely analyse things like:

Oils: testosterone, trenbolone, masteron(drostanolone), primobolan, nandrolone, blends, etc.
Orals: Anavar/oxandrolone, Aromasin/exemestane, Winstrol, Anadrol, Cialis-type products and similar.
Peptides: Retatrutide, GHK-Cu, BPC-157, TB-500, KPV, melanotan-type peptides, HGH and others depending on the exact sample.
Stacks/blends: KLOW, GLOW, mixed peptide blends and multi-compound samples.

Routine samples are usually $350 AUD.
Stacks/blends are usually $550 AUD because they take more work to separate and confirm properly.

Turnaround is usually 3–7 days from when we receive the sample, assuming it’s a normal sample and not something that needs custom method development.

We run HPLC/UPLC with LC-MS/MS confirmation. So for a normal report we’re looking at the chromatogram, peak area/purity where suitable, and mass spec confirmation so we can say whether the claimed compound is actually there. For some compounds we use SIM or MRM/MS-MS transitions as well, especially when identity needs to be nailed down properly.
We’ve already done testing for a few people/vendors connected to this space, and we’re happy for people to judge us by the quality of the reports and the consistency of the work.

We’re not a source, we don’t sell anything being tested, and we don’t advise or condone anyone on use. We just test the sample and report what we find in a transparent and analytical fashion.

If anyone wants to ask about a sample, pricing, turnaround, or whether something is testable, message me here or contact us directly:

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 0407 260 481
Website: ozcaniumanalytics.com.au

Happy to answer questions.
 
Ozcanium Analytics said:
Hello All,

Its Ibrahim from Ozcanium Analytics here.

We’re an Australian analytical lab which specialise in testing for oils, tablets/caps, peptides and blends based in Sydney. I thought it was worth making a quick intro here because a lot of the Aussie community already gets products tested, but most of it still gets sent overseas, and people seem to have lots of logistics problems.

Nothing against Janoshik, they’ve clearly done a lot for this space and people trust their reports. The main issue for Australians is the obvious one: sending samples overseas is slow, annoying, and sometimes the samples simply don’t make it. We’re trying to give the local market a proper Australian option.

We routinely analyse things like:

Oils: testosterone, trenbolone, masteron(drostanolone), primobolan, nandrolone, blends, etc.
Orals: Anavar/oxandrolone, Aromasin/exemestane, Winstrol, Anadrol, Cialis-type products and similar.
Peptides: Retatrutide, GHK-Cu, BPC-157, TB-500, KPV, melanotan-type peptides, HGH and others depending on the exact sample.
Stacks/blends: KLOW, GLOW, mixed peptide blends and multi-compound samples.

Routine samples are usually $350 AUD.
Stacks/blends are usually $550 AUD because they take more work to separate and confirm properly.

Turnaround is usually 3–7 days from when we receive the sample, assuming it’s a normal sample and not something that needs custom method development.

We run HPLC/UPLC with LC-MS/MS confirmation. So for a normal report we’re looking at the chromatogram, peak area/purity where suitable, and mass spec confirmation so we can say whether the claimed compound is actually there. For some compounds we use SIM or MRM/MS-MS transitions as well, especially when identity needs to be nailed down properly.
We’ve already done testing for a few people/vendors connected to this space, and we’re happy for people to judge us by the quality of the reports and the consistency of the work.

We’re not a source, we don’t sell anything being tested, and we don’t advise or condone anyone on use. We just test the sample and report what we find in a transparent and analytical fashion.

If anyone wants to ask about a sample, pricing, turnaround, or whether something is testable, message me here or contact us directly:

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 0407 260 481
Website: ozcaniumanalytics.com.au

Happy to answer questions.
Click to expand...
Welcome to the forum brother, good to know we have local Aussies doing HPLC testing. Can you share a few results with us all.

How are you different to janoshi?
I like the 3-7day turn around is a huge game changer!
 
Last edited:
Ozcanium Analytics said:
Hello All,

Its Ibrahim from Ozcanium Analytics here.

We’re an Australian analytical lab which specialise in testing for oils, tablets/caps, peptides and blends based in Sydney. I thought it was worth making a quick intro here because a lot of the Aussie community already gets products tested, but most of it still gets sent overseas, and people seem to have lots of logistics problems.

Nothing against Janoshik, they’ve clearly done a lot for this space and people trust their reports. The main issue for Australians is the obvious one: sending samples overseas is slow, annoying, and sometimes the samples simply don’t make it. We’re trying to give the local market a proper Australian option.

We routinely analyse things like:

Oils: testosterone, trenbolone, masteron(drostanolone), primobolan, nandrolone, blends, etc.
Orals: Anavar/oxandrolone, Aromasin/exemestane, Winstrol, Anadrol, Cialis-type products and similar.
Peptides: Retatrutide, GHK-Cu, BPC-157, TB-500, KPV, melanotan-type peptides, HGH and others depending on the exact sample.
Stacks/blends: KLOW, GLOW, mixed peptide blends and multi-compound samples.

Routine samples are usually $350 AUD.
Stacks/blends are usually $550 AUD because they take more work to separate and confirm properly.

Turnaround is usually 3–7 days from when we receive the sample, assuming it’s a normal sample and not something that needs custom method development.

We run HPLC/UPLC with LC-MS/MS confirmation. So for a normal report we’re looking at the chromatogram, peak area/purity where suitable, and mass spec confirmation so we can say whether the claimed compound is actually there. For some compounds we use SIM or MRM/MS-MS transitions as well, especially when identity needs to be nailed down properly.
We’ve already done testing for a few people/vendors connected to this space, and we’re happy for people to judge us by the quality of the reports and the consistency of the work.

We’re not a source, we don’t sell anything being tested, and we don’t advise or condone anyone on use. We just test the sample and report what we find in a transparent and analytical fashion.

If anyone wants to ask about a sample, pricing, turnaround, or whether something is testable, message me here or contact us directly:

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 0407 260 481
Website: ozcaniumanalytics.com.au

Happy to answer questions.
Click to expand...
Welcome to EF brother @Ozcanium Analytics. Great that we have a local AU contact to support the community with any testing requirements.
 
Ozcanium Analytics said:
Hello All,

Its Ibrahim from Ozcanium Analytics here.

We’re an Australian analytical lab which specialise in testing for oils, tablets/caps, peptides and blends based in Sydney. I thought it was worth making a quick intro here because a lot of the Aussie community already gets products tested, but most of it still gets sent overseas, and people seem to have lots of logistics problems.

Nothing against Janoshik, they’ve clearly done a lot for this space and people trust their reports. The main issue for Australians is the obvious one: sending samples overseas is slow, annoying, and sometimes the samples simply don’t make it. We’re trying to give the local market a proper Australian option.

We routinely analyse things like:

Oils: testosterone, trenbolone, masteron(drostanolone), primobolan, nandrolone, blends, etc.
Orals: Anavar/oxandrolone, Aromasin/exemestane, Winstrol, Anadrol, Cialis-type products and similar.
Peptides: Retatrutide, GHK-Cu, BPC-157, TB-500, KPV, melanotan-type peptides, HGH and others depending on the exact sample.
Stacks/blends: KLOW, GLOW, mixed peptide blends and multi-compound samples.

Routine samples are usually $350 AUD.
Stacks/blends are usually $550 AUD because they take more work to separate and confirm properly.

Turnaround is usually 3–7 days from when we receive the sample, assuming it’s a normal sample and not something that needs custom method development.

We run HPLC/UPLC with LC-MS/MS confirmation. So for a normal report we’re looking at the chromatogram, peak area/purity where suitable, and mass spec confirmation so we can say whether the claimed compound is actually there. For some compounds we use SIM or MRM/MS-MS transitions as well, especially when identity needs to be nailed down properly.
We’ve already done testing for a few people/vendors connected to this space, and we’re happy for people to judge us by the quality of the reports and the consistency of the work.

We’re not a source, we don’t sell anything being tested, and we don’t advise or condone anyone on use. We just test the sample and report what we find in a transparent and analytical fashion.

If anyone wants to ask about a sample, pricing, turnaround, or whether something is testable, message me here or contact us directly:

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 0407 260 481
Website: ozcaniumanalytics.com.au

Happy to answer questions.
Click to expand...
welcome to EF you have testing examples?
 
Ozcanium Analytics said:
Hello All,

Its Ibrahim from Ozcanium Analytics here.

We’re an Australian analytical lab which specialise in testing for oils, tablets/caps, peptides and blends based in Sydney. I thought it was worth making a quick intro here because a lot of the Aussie community already gets products tested, but most of it still gets sent overseas, and people seem to have lots of logistics problems.

Nothing against Janoshik, they’ve clearly done a lot for this space and people trust their reports. The main issue for Australians is the obvious one: sending samples overseas is slow, annoying, and sometimes the samples simply don’t make it. We’re trying to give the local market a proper Australian option.

We routinely analyse things like:

Oils: testosterone, trenbolone, masteron(drostanolone), primobolan, nandrolone, blends, etc.
Orals: Anavar/oxandrolone, Aromasin/exemestane, Winstrol, Anadrol, Cialis-type products and similar.
Peptides: Retatrutide, GHK-Cu, BPC-157, TB-500, KPV, melanotan-type peptides, HGH and others depending on the exact sample.
Stacks/blends: KLOW, GLOW, mixed peptide blends and multi-compound samples.

Routine samples are usually $350 AUD.
Stacks/blends are usually $550 AUD because they take more work to separate and confirm properly.

Turnaround is usually 3–7 days from when we receive the sample, assuming it’s a normal sample and not something that needs custom method development.

We run HPLC/UPLC with LC-MS/MS confirmation. So for a normal report we’re looking at the chromatogram, peak area/purity where suitable, and mass spec confirmation so we can say whether the claimed compound is actually there. For some compounds we use SIM or MRM/MS-MS transitions as well, especially when identity needs to be nailed down properly.
We’ve already done testing for a few people/vendors connected to this space, and we’re happy for people to judge us by the quality of the reports and the consistency of the work.

We’re not a source, we don’t sell anything being tested, and we don’t advise or condone anyone on use. We just test the sample and report what we find in a transparent and analytical fashion.

If anyone wants to ask about a sample, pricing, turnaround, or whether something is testable, message me here or contact us directly:

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 0407 260 481
Website: ozcaniumanalytics.com.au

Happy to answer questions.
Click to expand...
Welcome to the EF Community, @Ozcanium Analytics!

It’s great to see a local source for testing! I feel like a local option with a faster turn around, will be more encouraging for members and vendors in our community. Which in turn helps keep our community safe!
 
Yes, we can report content, not just purity and identity.
The specifics depend a little more on the form of material (oil peptide or capsule/tab).

One caveat though: a mg/vial result is for the exact vial we test. It does not scientifically prove every vial in the batch has the exact same amount. With lyophilised peptide vials especially, there is always up to 10+% variation from vial to vial. These vials are usually filled by machines, and then proceed to be lyophilised. So if one vial tests at 10.3 mg, that means the vial tested was 10.3 mg. It does not automatically mean every vial in the batch is 10.3 mg.

With regards to example reports, ill put up a redacted example.
 

Attachments

Ozcanium Analytics said:
Yes, we can report content, not just purity and identity.
The specifics depend a little more on the form of material (oil peptide or capsule/tab).

One caveat though: a mg/vial result is for the exact vial we test. It does not scientifically prove every vial in the batch has the exact same amount. With lyophilised peptide vials especially, there is always up to 10+% variation from vial to vial. These vials are usually filled by machines, and then proceed to be lyophilised. So if one vial tests at 10.3 mg, that means the vial tested was 10.3 mg. It does not automatically mean every vial in the batch is 10.3 mg.

With regards to example reports, ill put up a redacted example.
Click to expand...
This is great news!
I have been doing some research on your company, before giving your services my vote of approval, for the safety of our EF community.
May I ask why I can't find any reviews as yet on the Internet for your company?
 
Last edited:
Fair Question,
The main reason is that we have not traditionally been a retail/customer review type business. Most analytical labs work with businesses, manufacturers, private clients, research projects, fragrance/flavour/cosmetic samples, essential oils, and similar work where the results are confidential. Those clients usually do not publicly review the lab or post what they had tested.

This community-facing testing service is newer, so the public review trail is still being built. I understand that means people will want proof over claims.

That’s why I’m happy to provide redacted example reports, answer technical questions openly, and have mods/trusted members verify with us directly or submit independent samples if needed. Trust in this space has to be earned through repeated, consistent results, and that’s exactly how we’re trying to approaching it.

Hope that answers your question?
 
Hello All,
Thought i would provide an update with regards to a new feature we will be adding to our website.
In the near future, everyone will directly be able to verify reports on our website (similar to how Janoshik has been running their verification feature).
Keep in mind, we still do not endorse the usage of ANY substance regardless of what it is, but have developed a system like this after a lot of interest was expressed via our emails.
Will post another update once its live.
 
Can you tell us more about your requirements to provide concentration rather than just identification and purity? I’ve heard Ozcan expects a whole sealed vial to provide this, whereas with Jano they’re happy to test a small aliquot.

I understand the potential limitations re homogeneity of sample etc if only getting an aliquot but this is a huge limitation of using your service if true. Many in the space just want a rough approximation of oil concentration. Also the chances a brewed oil would vary ml to ml is very minimal. We also don’t need total content given volumes will naturally vary +\- a small % in filling.
 
Just to clarify, it’s not that we physically can’t test a small aliquot. If someone sends a small amount of oil, we can analyse what was submitted.

The issue is what that result is allowed to represent.
For our verified reports, especially concentration reports, we prefer a sealed original vial because it removes a lot of ambiguity, including whether the sample was actually from that vial, whether it was mixed properly before transfer, whether anything crashed out or settled, whether there was transfer loss, contamination, dilution, or just a bad aliquot taken from a larger product.

With oils, I agree that a properly made homogeneous oil should not vary wildly mL to mL. But once we receive a tiny transferred sample, we have to trust that the aliquot was taken properly and represents the original vial. Sometimes that’s probably fine. Sometimes it creates arguments later.

So the policy is basically:
Sealed vial = We can stand behind the result as a proper submitted vial report.
Small aliquot = Indefensible in some areas, will avoid as much as possible. Not because were lazy but because we do not know what happened to the sample.

Its for this reason we tell customers to leave it to us to do the sampling.

Also this is being made into a much bigger limitation than it actually is.
The overwhelming majority of customers already send full sealed vials. That is the normal way people submit samples to us (and to any other lab frankly), especially when they want a verified report that other people are going to rely on and trust.

For a private rough check, an aliquot can be discussed. But for a public/vendor-style concentration report, we aren't going to provide numerical data we cannot stand behind. In an field where there are way too many counterfeits and fakes, its important we provide reliable and dependable reports for all.

Hope that explains it.
 
Never seen a testing lab with so many errors on their reports. I’ve seen dating errors (eg signed off for later this year), listed compound errors (eg we saw one in Hexal’s report).

Also hearing of people generally not having a great experience dealing with OzCan. From what I’ve heard, he doesn’t understand the UGL space.

It’s a shame as a local option would’ve been very welcome.

Stick to Jano.
 
I’ll address this once, because vague statements like “people generally haven’t had a great experience” are not something we can respond to properly, and I do not believe that is a fair or accurate representation of the truth.

If someone has a specific report concern, send the report number and details directly by email. We can check the sample record, raw data, report file and verification entry. If an error is found, it will be corrected through the proper channel.

What we cannot meaningfully respond to is second-hand forum talk, screenshots without context, or broad claims.

On the local testing point, we came here because we thought an Australian option would be useful. Samples going overseas can be slow, expensive and unreliable, and a local testing option should be a good thing for the community.

That should have been a good thing.

Unfortunately, the oil side of this has shown us exactly why serious services avoid this crowd in Australia as a whole.
What should have been straightforward technical testing has, in some cases, been drowned out by harassment, doxxing, threats, personal attacks, and coordinated pile-ons. That is not evidence-based scrutiny, and it is not accountability. Genuine concerns are raised with facts, report numbers, and data. What we have seen from a small number of individuals goes far beyond that and has crossed into behaviour that undermines any productive discussion. That is not accountability. That is mob behaviour.

Most people here have been respectful. But a few bad actors have made public oil testing through this channel unsafe and unworkable.

So we are pausing public oil submissions until further notice.

This is not because oil testing cannot be done. It is not because the methodology does not work (far from it). It is because a small number of individuals have turned what should have been a straightforward technical service into an environment dominated by threats, doxxing, harassment, misinformation, bad-faith attacks, and sustained attempts to damage both the service and the people behind it. No legitimate testing operation should be expected to function under those conditions, and we will not continue exposing ourselves or our staff to this childish behaviour.

Genuine concerns are raised with facts, report numbers and data. They are not handled through vague claims, pressure campaigns, or people trying to turn rumours into facts.

We will continue with peptides, HGH, tablets/capsules and blends, where the demand is strong and the communication has been much more professional.

If anyone has a specific report issue, send it properly, and it will be addressed properly.
If the only thing being offered is vague commentary, anonymous screenshots, or forum pile-ons, there is nothing useful for us to respond to.

Any threats, doxxing, or harassment have been evidenced and preserved and will be dealt with through the appropriate channels.
 
Aussies are a tough crowd
Most guys expect high standards like Jano tbh

I also don’t think ppl are happy to send you a full sealed vial tbh,Jano only needs 1 ml

Only only reason Jano is more expensive is becasue of freight charges,some of his testing is cheaper

So maybe honestly you need to bring your testing costs down
 
Ozcanium Analytics said:
Unfortunately, the oil side of this has shown us exactly why serious services avoid this crowd in Australia as a whole.
Click to expand...

Only a little company called Jano.

Not asking you to address my statements. You have your opinions and I have mine. No “bad-faith” attack. I have nothing to benefit from saying this ..

Based on reports I’ve seen and experiences I’ve heard, I would not recommend OzCan. A “serious” service wouldn’t make the errors I’ve seen.

I have no idea about the abuse etc. and don’t agree with that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Real or Fake HCG? Don't be a sucker..
Replies
2
Views
3K
Macedog24
M
M
N2-BULK!! Exclusive to MRSUPPS!!
Replies
39
Views
9K
MrSupps.com
M
N
  • Locked
Natural post cycle therapy. Holistic cycle support . The drug and steroid user Bible
Replies
70
Views
412K
Fitstitch
Fitstitch
N
good read on aas drug testing and athletes
Replies
21
Views
7K
needtogetaas
N
PINTOBEAN
East German Doping in the 70's
Replies
2
Views
7K
PINTOBEAN
PINTOBEAN
Top Bottom