Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
Chat & Conversation Okay Wodin, the statement is this: America is communist not a Democracy.
|
Author | Topic: Okay Wodin, the statement is this: America is communist not a Democracy. | ||
Guru Posts: 4277 |
America is a communist country now and Europe is not. | ||
Guru Posts: 2354 |
Okay here goes.
1. Go see the state police to get a license. Then you have basically eliminated the fundamental freedoms of life that our founding fathers invisioned and replaced it with a Socialistic / semi communistic form of government. ------------------ | ||
Guru Posts: 2354 |
| ||
Elite Bodybuilder Posts: 1274 |
WODIN, I agree with what you say, America is becoming MORE SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, etc., etc.) BUT I think that we CAN go back to the way we were, and that's why I 1)follow the Objectivist philosophy started by Ayn Rand, 2)vote Libertarian and suppor the party any way I can, 3)work 2-3 jobs at a time while in my 2nd year of college, 4)plan on attending law school and practicing corporate law, and hopefully representing companies like Microsoft to protect them from government "trust-busting...," 5)bodybuild! Bodybuild you say, what in THE FUCK does that have to do with the discussion at hand??? BODYBUILDING is the most INDIVIDUAL SPORT in the world (along with powerlifting, most track 'n field events, etc.) in that ONLY YOU determine your fate, and if you win or lose!!! ------------------ | ||
Guru Posts: 4277 |
All good points. But what about the fact that we can cross from state to state without border checks, except when looking for fruit that may be banned or quaranteened from a state. Or for illegal aliens. What about the fact that I can say whatever I want without fear of going to jail? Or that I can own a gun? (which is slowly disappearing) What about the fact that if I make it it is because of me, if I fail it is not because of my gov't. We still have alot of freedoms that most do not nor ever had and if we are not dilligent we will lose them without ever knowing it. | ||
Moderator Posts: 2180 |
America is, more than anything else, mismanaged. The Bill of Rights provided the 10th Amendment which left any powers not specified as federal, to the states. However, the Supreme Court has interpreted many laws to fall under the realm of interstate commerce and as such the federal government has ballooned. Where does the Constitution grant powers over education to the federal government? Where does it authorize social security? The list goes on of what the federal governemtn does not have rights to, yet they do. Anyone see the words "inheritance tax" in the constitution? The founding fathers were not stupid or uneducated. They were the most intelligent, welathiest, educated men of the time. If we were beginning anew, would it be wise to consult Alan Greenspan on economic matters? Of course. Well that is akin to what happened then. There was much debate and uproar over the Constitution, not just some barroom arguments. Why the 10th Amendment? Because the founders knew our country would grow. they knew people would move out west. The Louisiana Purchase (1803) provided the room to expand. They also knew population would grow. Remember, these were the "Greenspans" of the 1700's. They knew it would be easier for a state to govern its people and establish program for that state only, than for the federal government to try to apply the same laws to a huge country. The founders intended the federal governemnt to be mainly a foreign policy agent, and leave internal governing to the states. As we have strayed from this, (thanks FDR, predominately) things have progressed to what they are today. Can they be restored? Theoretically, yes, if we eliminate most federal agenices as well as most federal taxes. Sound likely? Didn't think so. States rights = freedom. | ||
Guru Posts: 4277 |
True, the Constitution is a framework upon which to build and thanks to the ambitious power hungry we have lost that framework. Can it be restored, yes, but not with the luke warm patriot, (those not willing to sacrifice everything for honor and freedom.) | ||
Guru Posts: 2354 |
Yes I agree guys, but as those who would have a return to states rights, and the use of the constitution for its true purpose grow further from the "Great Middle", they are deemed radicals and extremist. They are looked upon in the popular press as wackos, nuts and fruit cakes. Is this not the use of the press to purposfully ferment and promont an agenda that is related to a Centralized Federal Government. Isn't this just another name for communism. ------------------ | ||
Guru Posts: 4277 |
Yes, it is. It is also evident in the One world Gov't that we and others are pushing upon the masses. Yes, the Constitutionalists are labeled as nuts, but that is because there is that 10% factor of bad apples. Yes, it has long been known what the news media is and used for. I contend that the ideas upon which the Nation was founded are within each of us. It is a feeling and a faith that no gov't can take away. I wonder how many people get that choked up feeling in the pit of their stomach when they hear the National Anthem. I believe Maximus from the movie Gladiater epitomized that faith in a country. And when a ruler (illegitamate to be exact) had his family killed and ordered his execution, he still loved his country. He had a beef with the men who betrayed him, not the ideas of Rome and what he believed in. If there were just 100 Americans like him we would have a very different country. The problem is most people focus on the tangeable, taxes, laws, rules and regulations. They have forgotten what loyalty, honor, duty, dillegence, faith mean. Without those ideas and beliefs, we are a country without a soul. It goes beyound capatilism, and success in the business world. For what are those sucessess if you do not have the above? | ||
Moderator Posts: 2180 |
Chesty, Most people focus on the tangible and the day to day because that is all they know. I mean, when you're trying to make a few bucks there isn't time for much else. I know you're making over 100K, and Wodin, so are you. I'm working part time because of school, but if I worked a 40 hour week, I would too. My point is that money is freedom, if you are not overly concerned with it. There is time for us to think because we don't really have to worry all that much about eating or paying the bills. Most people don't have this time - it's a paycheck to paycheck existence chasing the dream.....why do you think lotteries are so popular? So these people don't thin for themselves - the system in place prohibits it implicitly. Where are we going? Not sure. Chesty I think your Roman Empire example is related - another example of a "nation" getting too big for itself. One solution would be to get everyone on the Internet. Information leads to informed decisions...yes there are entities that could use the Net to perpetuate the "lambs led to the slaughter", but still....access to info is beter than no access to info. It's a place to start. Another one would be cameras in the courtrooms. What are judges afraid of? Let's start holding these civil servants to a standard and cut down on bullshit. Another place to start.
| ||
Cool Novice Posts: 38 |
At least Gore didn't win the election. He is one of the biggest pinko,commie bastards to date. Did anyone see the movie 1984? That would have been where we were headed if Gore was elected. | ||
Amateur Bodybuilder Posts: 191 |
an ancient king once said leaders must treat their subjects like crops of barley. when some of the crops grow too tall you must cut them down and keep all the barley at the exact same height. the thing that will be this countrys s00oouurrjjeerrkk | ||
Amateur Bodybuilder Posts: 208 |
quote:
GREAT POINT | ||
Guru Posts: 2354 |
If you really want to make an impact you have to tear down the current money system because everything revolves around that. And those who control the system are the real Rulers of this land. Since 1923 When Woodrow Wilson Sold us all into servitude to the central banking trust all polotics have revolved soley around monied interest. And those who pushed for central banking where spreading out the cash to the politicians long before the got their banking structure legitimized by congress. "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks...will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." -Thomas Jefferson
FYI: THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IS A PRIVATE INSTITUTION. THIS INSTITUTION WHICH IS 20% FEDERALY OWNED AND 80% PRIVATLEY OWNDED DICTATES OUR INTEREST RATES AND THEREFORE OUR ABILITIES TO LEND AND BORROW. LOOK IN YOUR GOV. BLUE PAGES IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME. NO LISTING!!! LOOK IN THE WHITE PAGES...VOILA. Simple proof, because by LAW only federal,state and county institutions can be listed in this section. ------------------ | ||
Moderator Posts: 2180 |
Wodin, What system was in place prior to centralization of banking? | ||
Guru Posts: 2354 |
Regional independent banks that established interest rates based on the local economy. They were not tied to a central structure in determining interest rates and customers could shop around a great deal for the best rates. Today you have about a 1.0 difference in the entire country. Before this you would see rate variations of 4 - 5 % points based on how well or poorley a paticular area of the economy was doing. This is basically the system that fueled the rapid growth of the colonies. ------------------ | ||
Pro Bodybuilder Posts: 517 |
Although there is a social safety net to an extent (more so in Canada) free will and capitalism is still what runs the economy. In a true commumist state, capitalism would be non-existant. Whether you were a lawyer, doctor, musician or street worker you have no more and no less entitlement than your neighbour. There would be no reason to achieve success because there would be none to have. | ||
Moderator Posts: 2180 |
Wodin - Excellent info. Is it even feasible to ponder our government reverting to the older system? I can understand some of the benefits of such a system - chiefly the independence from the Federal Reserve's influence. How would that benefit everyday citizens? | ||
Guru Posts: 2354 |
Matt the central bank has been broken Three times in this nations history and we are still here today. You just have to get the legislation through. The last president to break the bank was Andrew Jackson. As to helping out the everyday joe, some of your tax burden would be relieved since the Federal Debt is paid to the Federal Reserve Bank. The Federal Government would have real options as to who it borrows from rather than just the Federal Reserve Bank. The rates at which we borrow and lend to one and other would be based totally on supply and demand rather than on the constraints of the federal reserve bank and it's board of governors. ------------------ | ||
Moderator Posts: 2180 |
Thanks wodin. | ||
Elite Bodybuilder Posts: 721 |
Wodin, I think you are cool bro, but some of what you are saying is totally wrong. For example: "The Federal Government would have real options as to who it borrows from rather than just the Federal Reserve Bank." MOST of the federal debt is in the form of bonds owned by private institutions and individuals. A small portion is in foreign notes. "As to helping out the everyday joe, some of your tax burden would be relieved since the Federal Debt is paid to the Federal Reserve Bank." Wrong again. First of all debt cannot be a form of payment. You can pay a debt, but you cannot pay with debt, hence "Federal Debt is paid to..." is a flawed statement. Secondly, the payments on federal debt are to the bond holders who redeem their bonds or sell them in an open market. The Federal Reserve actually carries out these transactions, but they do not profit from them. You also mention something about the Federal Reserve being a private organization. Wrong again bro. It is NOT a private organization. It is run like a private institution because it finances its own operations by using the interest on bonds that they own. They aren't even in the fiscal budget. The reason? Because the Federal Reserve wishes to remain free from influence from Congress' tight grip. Think about this for just second. If Greenspan didn't agree with Congress regarding some policy, then Congress could just reduce the amount of funding the Bank could get. It doesn't have to worry about this. However, it is entirely a government organization. What makes me qualified to say this? I did an internship for the Federal Reserve in Richmond, Virginia while I was working on a Masters Degree in Economics from the University of Virginia. As far as the Federal Reserve and it contributing to the downfall of the country? That is a bit extreme. I wish I had more time to write about this because I am a very big believer in our Federal Reserve System. But, to each his own most certainly. TG | ||
Pro Bodybuilder Posts: 509 |
america is like a bag of shit in a wind storm!. i have no idea what that means, but thats the best i could come up with right now. give me a couple minutes and i'll think of something better. ------------------ | ||
Elite Bodybuilder Posts: 966 |
If my ass was a country, it would be the USA!!! el ass-o wipe-o for president!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Puc ------------------ | ||
Pro Bodybuilder Posts: 509 |
PUC FOR VICE PRESIDENT. HE CAN GIVE ME BLOW JOBS UNDER MY DESK. WHAT A TEAM WE'LL BE. ------------------ | ||
Guru Posts: 2354 |
Ghost 80% of the Fed is owned by private share holders. Much like the Bank of England which is the central system of banking in that country. I agree with you that varioius lending institutions and the bond issuance, and their long term rates are set based on FRB projections. So If I control the basis upon which you charge interest for you bond in essence I control your market.
Hell even Henry Ford one of the greatest industrialist of this century was against having a centralized banking system. | ||
Elite Bodybuilder Posts: 1274 |
Even though I agree and disagree with several points made on this thread, it's GOOD TO SEE people who actually still care about this country...WODIN, chesty, etc., etc., it's people like y'all (and I like to think myself included) that give me hope (hell I'm only 19) for America's future, and my children's...I'm not trying to sound like a damn pansy either, it's just that it's debates like these that prove why America's the greatest nation on earth!! We can openly discuss, hell even insult and argue, almost every decision, program, and law that our government creates, and hopefully, together, find some common thread of success and make changes for the better... To all (except Asswipe who I have no respect for, and don't believe will ever make a difference in his country or ours) I say...1)READ ANY AYN RAND BOOKS YOU CAN GET YOUR HANDS ON, 2)LOOK INTO THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY, and 3)KRRP LEARNIN', KEEP CRITICIZING, AND STAY PROUD AND HONORABLE... OK, I'm off my red, white, and blue soap-box for now...be back later!! ------------------ |
All times are ET (US) | |
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c