posted October 30, 2000 08:12 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged

------------------
Call me Tyrannosaurus Pecs

posted October 30, 2000 10:32 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged

------------------
Redemption.

posted October 30, 2000 10:39 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged

Very indepth answer there Frack.
Justin, Frackal is right in a sense. I think its cause girls like the "cool" kids who also happen to be the "bad boys". Then one day they realize the cool kids go nowhere in life and go looking for the good guys. (most the time) JohnnyO presents a good point in the theory that the bad guys can protect a family better, but of course there is an exception to every rule.

------------------
-Hesitation is the mother of regret.
-God forgives...Italians don't.
-Wuuuuuuuu.

posted October 30, 2000 10:47 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged

Actually I think you mean teenagers and girls in their early 20's like bad guys, heres why. These girls respond to the emotional highs they get off of being with a bad guy because there brains respond to intensity, whether the intensity is good or bad. Think of it like this, when you do something dangerous that might hurt you but is fun, like skydiving or riding superfast on a motorcycle, afterwards you feel a huge rush. Its the same with girls and the "bad boys" they get with. They know thats its potentially dangerous, but yet it is fun also, therefore they get the same "high" that you would from skydiving or some shit. Thats why "nice guys" dont get any action because nice guys are too boring and dont have any intensity, be it good or bad. They just want to sit around and hold hands or walk in the park and get some ice cream. But bad boys on the other hand can be involved high intensity activities that draw girls to them, like riding a motorcycle, going bungee jumping, camping in the middle of nowhere not knowing whether or not a bear is gonna eat you alive, and....doing gear even. Hope this book I wrote here clears it all up for ya

------------------
Redemption.

posted October 30, 2000 10:52 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged

------------------
The bigest risk in life is not taking one at all.

posted October 30, 2000 11:05 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged

I figure, concentrate on BBing now, get huge, fuck all thru college and such.

posted October 31, 2000 01:31 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged

------------------
-Hesitation is the mother of regret.
-God forgives...Italians don't.
-Wuuuuuuuu.

posted October 31, 2000 01:39 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged

Somehow, most women seem to go after all the wrong
> guys for all the wrongs reasons.
>
> To completely end the mystery that perhaps many of
> you men in the group may have been wondering about
> for a while, most women absolutely DO go after jerks.
>
> But to say "jerk" is not a truly accurate description
> of the type of men these women go after. You might just
> say that they go after men who are incredibly self-confident
> with women. But that would not be completely accurate either.
> You could say that they go after the man who is not afraid
> of their pussy (please forgive the blunt language), but that
> too, would not be totally accurate.
>
> Well the truth is this. Women, more times than not, don't
> even know THEMSELVES what it is they are after. Very
> seldom do the ever stop to sit down and think of what kind
> of guy they would really like to have in their life.
> Their idea is ambiguous at best.
>
> So it comes down to this. Women just plainly and purely end
> up going after the guy who can make them feel the best.
> Period. The WAYS in which they are made to feel good by
> the guy(s) they ultimately select are irrelevant.
> That's where, and why, they get into trouble.
>
> In an instant gratification society, they just go after
> what turns them on the most, first. This is where the so-called
> "nice-guy" loses out (which is not an accurate description also).
>
> The so-called nice guy is generally not a smooth-talker. He does
> not come-on like he has loads and loads of great feelings and
> highs to spare, and generally not extrememly outspoken. From
> women's viewpoint, this is taken in all sorts of erroneous ways
> that it probably shouldn't be taken. But that's life, and the
> legacy of the poor "nice-guy."
>
> In passing, it should be noted for the record, that not ALL
> women go after the so-called "jerk" types. Do you want to know
> which women do? Only the women you want. So in that light, you
> may as well say "all" of them, right?
>
> So how does what I have said relate to the subject of this
> post.
>
> When women continue to fuck-over the guys they really should
> perhaps AT LEAST consider giving more of a chance to, these guys
> eventually, and usually quite quickly, begin to realize what
> kind of men the women they would like to have are going after.
> The result is that one day something just snaps inside of them,
> and they begin to emulate and become like the "jerks" that "most"
> women seem to love so much. In order to become that kind of man
> effectively, it usually has to be taken all the way to the end,
> for the "jerk" mindset would not be truly established if it were
> not. What that amounts to is becoming the "jerk" that smooth
> talks women and turns them on in many ways by showing that they
> have loads and loads of great feelings and highs to spare all for
> the woman. And in the end, after they have been promptly fucked,
> the guy dumps them. Why? Because that is the jerk's, and the women
> who go after jerks, legacy.
>
> So when women inadvertently, or purposely, create so-called
> "jerks" out of so-called "nice guys", they are just inadvertently
> fucking over other women, their own kind.
>
>

posted October 31, 2000 03:10 PM

Staff Use Only: IP: Logged

------------------
Call me Tyrannosaurus Pecs

All times are ET (US)