UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
  George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
  Chat & Conversation
  Comparison Yates vs Coleman in muscle mag

Post New Topic  
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

Author Topic:   Comparison Yates vs Coleman in muscle mag
young1
Pro Bodybuilder
(Total posts: 271)
posted April 20, 2000 12:35 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for young1   Click Here to Email young1     Edit/Delete Message
Personnaly I think Ronnie looks better. Like he's got more volume with the same deep stiations as Yates if not better. You guys?

IP: Logged

bad brains
Pro Bodybuilder
(Total posts: 417)
posted April 20, 2000 12:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for bad brains   Click Here to Email bad brains     Edit/Delete Message UIN: 68109812
I like Ronnies symmetry, he's got the guns, no doubt about it.....but Yate's back is a fucking work of art...no one comes close to those lats....off the subject I think Cormier is the best out today..just my opinion.....

IP: Logged

TheBadGuy
Amateur Bodybuilder
(Total posts: 39)
posted April 20, 2000 01:57 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for TheBadGuy     Edit/Delete Message
Personally, i think Ronnie right now would kill Yates at his best. Why? He's got it all, size, cuts, symmetry. Yates had the best back of all time but Ronnies isnt that far behind if u compare. Yates also had the biggest waist of all pro's, its damn disgusting if you ask me. Yates was good but not as complete as Coleman is right now.

IP: Logged

Komo
Amateur Bodybuilder
(Total posts: 56)
posted April 20, 2000 04:53 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Komo   Click Here to Email Komo     Edit/Delete Message
I`d have to go with Yates on this one. I don`t like Colemans abs. Yates had it all, including calves.

/Komo

IP: Logged

bigsexy
Amateur Bodybuilder
(Total posts: 52)
posted April 20, 2000 10:47 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for bigsexy     Edit/Delete Message
coleman all the way, hate to be critical of either of them, but dorians midsection looked like shit from about 94 on, and ronnie's abs dont look great--but that is more from genetics than growth hormone
colemans arms are better, his quads hams and glutes are better, yates back is a little better, his calves are better, and when he was on he looked like granite

IP: Logged

TheBadGuy
Amateur Bodybuilder
(Total posts: 39)
posted April 20, 2000 11:46 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for TheBadGuy     Edit/Delete Message
Ill give u that Ronnies ab SUCK but i guess it is due to genetics. Anyway i think as bad as Ronnies abs look, at least he waist isnt as big as Yates. Yates does have better calves too but it seems like calves are overlooked by the judges nowadays.

IP: Logged

mossberg
Pro Bodybuilder
(Total posts: 102)
posted April 20, 2000 12:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mossberg   Click Here to Email mossberg     Edit/Delete Message
I think Ronnies abs look kinda cool, in a wicked sort of way!

IP: Logged

blackhaus1
Pro Bodybuilder
(Total posts: 227)
posted April 20, 2000 01:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for blackhaus1   Click Here to Email blackhaus1     Edit/Delete Message
Definetly Ronnie...I was looking at him in Muscle and fitness last night and thinking how freaking huge he is...so its really weird that young1posted this today!

IP: Logged

masster_blasster
Amateur Bodybuilder
(Total posts: 35)
posted April 21, 2000 06:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for masster_blasster   Click Here to Email masster_blasster     Edit/Delete Message
i think Yates wins from the back and Ronnie wins from the front..

masster blasster

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | Back to Elite Fitness

Elite Fitness Discussion Board

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board (UltimateBB), Version 5.42a
� Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998-1999.