|
|
 |
 |
|
 Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
 Chat & Conversation
 Polaroid vs Niko negative/slide scanners
|
| Author | Topic: Polaroid vs Niko negative/slide scanners | ||
|
Cyborg    
Posts: 4741 |
I am looking at the Polaroid sprintscan 4000 (4000 dpi x 4000dpi) with an optical density of 3.4 and 12 bits per color channel, price 1458. The two nikons I am comparing to are the coolscan III ls-30, 2700 dpi x 2700dpi, optical density of 3.2 and 8 bits per color channel price is 548 (remanufactured by nikon) and the LS-2000 super coolscan at 2700dpi x 2700dpi, optical density of 3.6, and 8 or 12 bits per color channel, price is 1368 new from nikon. Now with the exceptin of resolution the Nikon seems a better deal (the ls-2000) My question is this: How much of a difference is there between a picture scanned at 4000dpi x 4000dpi and one at 2700dpi x 2700dpi? With the exception of zooming in do you think there is going to be much overall difference? ------------------     | ||
|
Cyborg
Posts: 4741 |
No one know's anything? Huh, find that hard to believe on this know it all board. ------------------ | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder 
Posts: 896 |
quote: What kind of heli is this and where can I get one, if I had the money for it? ------------------ wise men do not need to prove their point; | ||
|
Cyborg
Posts: 4741 |
It is a huey and you ain't got enough! ------------------ | ||
|
Freak
Posts: 2069 |
quote: Ill put my helo up against your helo anytime... http://www.army-technology.com/projects/apache/apache1.html [This message has been edited by Gilbyag (edited February 27, 2001).] [This message has been edited by Gilbyag (edited February 27, 2001).] |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c
posted February 25, 2001 07:41 PM
