Both appear to make d1734 look as if he were made of rubber. This is a terrible pc camera. The color scheme is completely off. On first inspection the new pics look fabricated as well, until one inverts the colors.

When the colors are inverted and measurements are made I will come out and say, the pics are real. In edit four, the arms measure close to equally. Oddly though, his large arm still has the discoloration as before. In these new pics though we see the reason, for that is just a poor quality net camera. I could make my penis look 17 inches in diameter with such a poor quality picture.

The pc camera also hedges the color palette, as I noted in the first post about the smudging of skin color over areas that are not skin. Take time to notice in edit four the back and unflexed arm blend together. The camera cannot see the difference between a back and an arm at rest. They just seemingly blend together.

So what am I saying? I am saying nice fucking pics. I am as proud of you as everyone else. This was an interesting story on elite at least for twelve hours.

One more thing, stop putting that fake door in the background to cover up the Britney Spears poster.

This one is kina cute.

btw, the webcam is a Creative, got it for $35. it is made for cheap video, not a digital camera. max res is 640x480 and that is about as sharp as i can make a picture.

oh ya, i never wear sleeveless shirts. i dress very conventionally unlike most teens, let alone teens with decent physiques. when i gain another 1-2" on the guns who knows, maybe at that point i will think i have earned the right to wear a sleeveless shirt.

This is to Havoc: I have the integrity to say the pics are real if proof were provided, as I did above. Clearly Havoc, I am not the dumb asshole shit you claim I am.